TY  - JOUR
T1  - THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENT IMPLEMENTATIONS OF URBAN TRANSFORMATION TO SPATIAL SET-UP: EXAMPLE MAMAK IN ANKARA PROVINCE
AU  - Özen Yavuz, Arzu
AU  - Özdemir, Berna
PY  - 2019
DA  - June
JF  - Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning
JO  - GUJSPB
PB  - Gazi University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2147-9534
SP  - 269
EP  - 281
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
LA  - en
AB  - In ourcountry, it became mandatory for local administrations and central governmentto implement Urban Transformation due to unqualified living circumstances viaconurbanization, unplanned growth and over-migration, and earthquakes. In thisstudy, spatial evaluation of transformation implementations, which has been realizedin different processes, is aimed. In this context, Mamak district in Ankara, inwhich a dense formation of “shanty settlement” and various kinds of urbantransformation are witnessed, is chosen as a study area. Two different kinds ofsamples which are the subject of urban transformation are chosen as far asimplementation is concerned and it was aimed to analyze the differences inurban transformation in terms of space in Mamak area. Urban transformation isimplemented via methods of interference such as preservation, rehabilitation, revitalization,gentrification, improvement and regeneration; and while New Mamak UrbanTransformation and Development Project is an example of rehabilitation –one ofthe methods of urban transformation, Royal Residence Project is an example ofrevitalization. The main construct of the study was determined via the designaspect of urban transformation which is a multi-dimentional implementationincluding physical, economic, social and administrational aspects. It isdetermined that implementation of urban transformation with keeping all thecriteria, which will raise the standards as far as space, social, and economicsare concerned, in mind is the main factor for a successful transformation.
KW  - Urban Transformation
KW  - 
KW  - Housing
KW  - Spatial organization
KW  - Spatial Transformation
CR  - Ilıca Erzene, Ş. (2013). Kentsel dönüşüm ve uygulanabilirliği ile ilgili bir yöntem yaklaşımı. Phd Doctoral Thesis, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 21.Kaş, M. (2014). Konut sorununun çözümünde kentsel dönüşüme kullanıcı katılımının sağlanması üzerine bir yöntem araştırması: Konya örneği. Phd Doctoral Thesis,Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya, 32.Ataöv, A., Osmay, S. (2007). Türkiye’de kentsel dönüşüme yöntemsel bir yaklaşım. METU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 58.Güzel, D. (2010). Kentsel yenileme bağlamında endüstri alanlarının dönüşümü ve tarihi Seka fabrikası örneği. Master Thesis, Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kocaeli, 18-20.URL  (http://www.kentseldonusumplatformu.com.tr/kentsel-donusum.php). Şisman A,  Kibaroğlu  D, (2009)  Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Kentsel Dönüşüm Uygulamaları, TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası  12. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, Ankara.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gujsb/issue//561203
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/745716
ER  -