TY - JOUR T1 - How psychology and psychologists can and can’t contribute to peace processes? A prolegomenon for a critical peace psychology AU - Gezgin, Ulaş Başar PY - 2018 DA - December JF - Eurasian Journal of Anthropology JO - Euras J Anthropol PB - ÖREN-ADRAMYTTEİON ANTİK KENTİ KÜLTÜR TURİZM VE DOĞA DERNEĞİ WT - DergiPark SN - 2166-7411 SP - 29 EP - 40 VL - 9 IS - 1 LA - en AB - There may be at least three ways through which psychology andpsychologists can contribute to peace processes: 1. Psychologicalresearch findings can be usual for peace processes. 2.Psychologists as a professional group can involve in negotiationsor other peace-related processes. 3. Applied psychologicalcounseling skills such as active listening, basic empathy,multicultural competency, acceptance, rapport-building etc. canbe utilized to train both sides of the conflict for a smoothtransition to peace processes. Unfortunately, these three optionsare rarely taken into consideration. The article discusses variousways through which psychology and psychologists can and can’tcontribute to peace processes, errors, biases and fallaciestypically observed in the relevant research and the applied fields,and the distinction between medical and social models of peace.The introduction of new terms to the field of peace studies ingeneral, and peace psychology in particular is another keystrength of this article. KW - Peace psychology KW - critical peace psychology KW - critical psychology KW - organic peace psychologist KW - medical model of peace KW - and analogical inference error CR - Adams D. (2000) Toward a global movement for a culture of peace. Peace and Conflict 6(3):259-266. CR - Ardila R. (2001) Qué es la psicología de la paz? Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología 33(1):39-43. CR - Arrigo JM. (2004) A utilitarian argument against torture interrogation of terrorists. Science and Engineering Ethics 10(3):543-572. UR - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eja/issue//619298 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/806598 ER -