TY  - JOUR
T1  - Conceptual Metaphor for Teaching and Learning of Prime and Composite Numbers at Primary Grades
AU  - Pradhan, Jaya Bishnu
PY  - 2019
DA  - September
JF  - The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences
JO  - EPESS
PB  - ISRES Publishing
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2587-1730
SP  - 78
EP  - 88
VL  - 14
LA  - en
AB  - Metaphoris a conceptual mapping from one domain to another. It helps student tounderstand abstract and unfamiliar mathematical content knowledge through theireveryday experiences, familiar and concrete objects. The subject of prime andcomposite number is a very important part of school mathematics curriculum atbasic level. Different teachers use several metaphors to assist students’learning and encourage them to understand abstract ideas and concepts ofnumbers. The main objective of this paper is to provide a glimpse of teachingabstract mathematical content of prime and composite numbers through differentconceptual metaphor based on constructivist approaches for teaching andlearning. Action research was adopted with three level of interventions, followedand corrected depending on observations and reflections. Differentinterventions regarding the student experiences and everyday activities wereused to communicate the concepts of prime and composite numbers. The colormetaphor was applied as the first intervention. Then the area metaphor wasapplied as the second intervention and finally the teacher used colorfulrainbow factore metaphor to analyze the change and improvement in classroompractice of teachers. The pre-class and post class interview with teachers andstudents were taken. From the classroom observation and interview, it was foundthat conceptual metaphors used by the teachers in the classroom contributed forthe improvement of students’ understanding of the concepts.
KW  - Action research
KW  - Composite numbers
KW  - Conceptual metaphor
KW  - Prime numbers
KW  - ZPD
CR  - Barton, B. (2005). Mathematics and language: Divergence or convergence? In C. Bergsten & B. Grevholm (Eds.), Conceptions of mathematics. Proceedings of NORMA 01. The 3rd Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education, (pp. 96–104). Linköping: SMDF.
Bonotto, C. (2007). How to replace word problems with activities of realistic mathematical modelling. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modeling and Applications in Mathematics Education: The 14th ICMI Study (185-192). New York, NY: Springer.
	Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev and S. M. Miller (Eds), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.  
Chiu, M. M. (2000). Metaphorical reasoning: Origins, uses, development and interactions in mathematics. Educational Journal, 28 (1), 13-46.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
English, L. D. (1997). Children's reasoning processes in classifying and solving computational word problems. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 117-147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research teaching (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
Fyhn, A. B. (2007). Sami culture as basis for mathematics teaching. In C. Bergsten, B. Grevholm, H. S. Masøval, & F. Rønning (Eds.), Relating Practice and Research in Mathematics Education. Proceedings of NORMA 05, Fourth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 245–256). Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press. 
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Lakoff, G. & Nunez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Orey, D. C. & Rosa, M. (2006). Ethnomathematics: Cultural assertions and challenges towards pedagogical actions. The Journal of Mathematics and Culture, VI (1), 57-78.
Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor and thought (2 nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 
Parzysz, B., Pesci, A. & Bergsten, C. (2005). The role of metaphors and images in the learning and understanding of mathematics. CERME, 4, 67-71.
Pradhan, J. B. (2018).  Conceptual metaphor for teaching and learning of integers: A collaborative action research. Education and Development. Tribhuvan University, Research Center for Educational Innovation and Development (CERID), Kathmandu, Nepal, 28, 1-22.
	Pritchard, A. & Woollard, J. (2010). Psychology for the classroom: Constructivism and social learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Stringer, Ernest T., Christensen, Lois McFadyen & Baldwin, Shelia C. (2010). Integrating teaching, learning, and action research: Enhancing instruction in the K-12 classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Somekh, B. (2006). Action research: A methodology for change and development. New York, NY: Open University Press.
	van Harmelen, M. (2008). Design trajectories: Four experiments in PLE implementation. Interactive Learning Environments, 16 (1), 35-46. 
	Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/epess/article/624112
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/814918
ER  -