TY  - JOUR
T1  - Menstrüel Kanın Toplanmasında Alternatif Bir Yöntem: Menstrüel Kap
AU  - Değirmenci, Filiz
AU  - Vefikuluçay Yılmaz, Duygu
PY  - 2019
DA  - October
DO  - 10.31125/hunhemsire.630820
JF  - Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi
JO  - JOHUFON
PB  - Hacettepe University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2148-3590
SP  - 186
EP  - 194
VL  - 6
IS  - 3
LA  - tr
AB  - Üreme çağındaki kadınlar her ayperiyodik olarak, vajinal kanamanın görüldüğü ve 3-5 günlük zaman diliminikapsayan menstrüel dönemi yaşamaktadırlar. Kadın sağlığı açısından her ayyaşanılan bu dönemlerde gerekli hijyenin sağlanması son derece önemlidir.Menstrüel hijyen yönetiminin yeterince sağlanamaması kadınların fiziksel olduğukadar ruhsal ve sosyal sağlıklarını da olumsuz etkilemektedir. Bu nedenlemenstrüel hijyen yönetiminde kanın toplanması için kullanılan yöntemler,kadınlara sağladığı hijyen ve konfor gibi özellikler açısındandeğerlendirilmelidir. Menstrüel hijyen yönetiminin sürdürülmesinde etkin birrole sahip bu yöntemlerden bazıları, evde kullanılan kumaşlardan hazırlananbezler, tek kullanımlık pedler ve tamponlardır. Bunların dışında günümüzdedünyanın birçok yerinde yaygın olarak kullanılan ve uzun bir geçmişe sahip olanancak Türkiye’de çok az bilinen ve nadir uygulanan diğer bir yöntem isemenstrüel kaptır. Bu doğrultuda derlemede Türkiye’de oldukça az bilinen veuygulanan menstrüel kabın yapısı, nasıl kullanıldığı, dünden bugüne kullanımdurumu ve bu konuyla ilgili yapılan çalışmalar ile menstrüel kabın avantaj vedezavantajları ele alınmıştır. 
KW  - Hemşirelik
KW  - menstrüel hijyen ürünleri
KW  - menstrüel kap
KW  - menstrüel siklus
CR  - 1.	Taşkın L. Üreme Sisteminin Fizyolojisi. Taşkın L, editor. Doğum ve Kadın Sağlığı Hemşireliği. Ankara: Akademisyen Tıp Kitabevi; 2016. s. 64-67. 
2.	Geethu C, Paul EP, Thomas JE, Pullan CS, Hemalatha, S. & Sivakumar T. Appraisal of menstrual hygiene management among women in a rural setting: a prospective study. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health. 2017; 3(8): 2191-296. doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20162569 
3.	Santra S. Assessment of knowledge regarding menstruation and practices related to maintenance of menstrual hygiene among the women of reproductive age group in a slum of Kolkata, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2017; 4(3): 708-12. doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20170744 
4.	Lahme AM, Stern R, & Cooper D. Factors impacting on menstrual hygiene and their implications for health promotion. Global health promotion. 2016; 1–9. doi: 10.1177/1757975916648301
5.	Das P, Baker KK, Dutta A, Swain T, et al. Menstrual hygiene practices, WASH access and the risk of urogenital infection in women from Odisha, India. PloS one.  2015; 10(6), 1-16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130777
6.	Chandra-Mouli V, Patel SV. Mapping the knowledge and understanding of menarche, menstrual hygiene and menstrual health among adolescent girls in low-and middle-income countries. Reproductive health. 2017; 14(30), 1-16. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0293-6
7.	Hennegan J, Montgomery P. Do menstrual hygiene management interventions improve education and psychosocial outcomes for women and girls in low and middle-income countries? A systematic review. PloS one. 2016; 11(2), 1-21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146985
8.	Maniar A, Mehta S. Menstrual hygiene practices: myths and taboo. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences. 2017; 7(12), 93-101.
9.	Sommer M, Hirsch JS, Nathanson C, Parker RG. Comfortably, safely, and without shame: defining menstrual hygiene management as a public health issue. American journal of public health. 2015; 105(7), 1302-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302525
10.	Baker KK, Padhi B, Torondel B, Das P, Dutta A, Sahoo KC, et al. From menarche to menopause: A population-based assessment of water, sanitation, and hygiene risk factors for reproductive tract infection symptoms over life stages in rural girls and women in India. PloS one. 2017; 12(12), 1-20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188234 
11.	United Nations Desa / Population Division. World Population Prospects 2017. URL: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/dataquery/ March 31, 2018.
12.	TÜİK Haber Bülteni. İstatistiklerle Kadın 2016. URL: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24643 March 31, 2018.
13.	UNICEF and World Health Organization. Progress on Sanitation and Drinking Water – 2015 update and MDG assessment. URL: https://www.unicef.org/publications/index_82419.html March 31, 2018.
14.	Devashish D, Badloe C, Lee H. and House S. Supporting the Rights of Girls and Women Through Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) in the East Asia and Pacific Region: Realities, progress and opportunities, UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office (EAPRO), Bangkok, Thailand. URL: https://www.unicef.org/eapro/MHM_Realities_Progress_and_OpportunitiesSupporting_opti.pdf March 31, 2018.
15.	Kaur R, Kaur K, Kaur R. Menstrual Hygiene, Management, and Waste Disposal: Practices and Challenges Faced by Girls/Women of Developing Countries. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2018; 1-9. doi: 10.1155/2018/1730964
16.	North BB., & Oldham MJ. Preclinical, clinical, and over-the-counter postmarketing experience with a new vaginal cup: menstrual collection. Journal of Women's Health. 2011; 20(2), 303-11. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1929
17.	Vostral S. Toxic Shock Syndrome, Tampon Absorbency, and Feminist Science. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience. 2017; 3(1), 1-30.
18.	Oster E, Thornton R. Determinants of technology adoption: Private value and peer effects in menstrual cup take-up. Journal of the European Economic Association. 2012; 10(6):1263-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01090.x
19.	Mason L, Laserson K, Oruko K, Nyothach E, Alexander K, Odhiambo F, at. al. Adolescent schoolgirls' experiences of menstrual cups and pads in rural western Kenya: a qualitative study. Waterlines. 2015; 34(1), 15-30. doi: 10.3362/1756-3488.2015.003
20.	Hyttel M, Thomsen C F, Luff B, Storrusten H, Nyakato VN, Tellier M. Drivers and challenges to use of menstrual cups among schoolgirls in rural Uganda: a qualitative study. Waterlines. 2017; 36(2), 109-124. doi: 10.3362/1756-3488.16-00013
21.	Lunette Adet Kabı Türkiye. Lunette Adet Kabı Türkiye satış oranları. Gönderen: lunetteturkiye@gmail.com. Alıcı: filizdegirmenci@mersin.edu.tr, April 03, 2018.
22.	Kakani CR, Bhatt JK. Study of adaptability and efficacy of menstrual cup in managing menstrual health and hygiene. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; 6(7), 3045-3053. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172932
23.	Juma J, Nyothach E, Laserson KF, Oduor C, Arita L, Ouma C, et al. Examining the safety of menstrual cups among rural primary school girls in western Kenya: observational studies nested in a randomised controlled feasibility study. BMJ open. 2017; 7(4), 1-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015429
24.	Mooncup. Mooncup Ltd. URL: https://www.mooncup.co.uk/ March 31, 2018.
25.	Lunette Adet Kabı Türkiye. Lunette Ltd. URL: https://www.lunetteadetkabi.com/ March 31, 2018.
26.	Stewart K, Greer R, Powell M. Women's experience of using the Mooncup. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010; 30(3), 285-287. doi: 10.3109/01443610903572117
27.	Google Patents Arama Motoru. “menstrual cup” URL: https://patents.google.com/?q=%22Menstrual+cup%22&oq=%22Menstrual+cup%22  April 01,2018.
28.	Grose RG, Grabe S. Sociocultural attitudes surrounding menstruation and alternative menstrual products: The explanatory role of self-objectification. Health care for women international. 2014; 35(6), 677-694. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2014.888721
29.	Beksinska ME, Smit J, Greener R, Todd CS, Lee MLT, Maphumulo V, Hoffmann V. Acceptability and performance of the menstrual cup in South Africa: a randomized crossover trial comparing the menstrual cup to tampons or sanitary pads. Journal of Women's Health. 2015; 24(2), 151-158. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5021
30.	Howard C, Rose CL, Trouton K, Stamm H, Marentette D, Kirkpatrick N, et al. FLOW (finding lasting options for women): multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing tampons with menstrual cups. Canadian Family Physician. 2011; 57(6), e208-e215.
31.	Cheng M, Kung R, Hannah M, Wilansky D, Shime J. Menses Cup* evaluation study. Fertility and sterility. 1995; 64(3), 661-663. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57812-1
32.	Stewart K, Powell M, Greer R. An alternative to conventional sanitary protection: would women use a menstrual cup? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2009; 29(1), 49-52. doi: 10.1080/01443610802628841
33.	Phillips-Howard PA, Nyothach E, O ter Kuile F, Omoto J, Wang D, Zeh C, et al.  Menstrual cups and sanitary pads to reduce school attrition, and sexually transmitted and reproductive tract infections: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility study in rural western Kenya. BMJ open. 2016; 6(11), 1-11. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013229
34.	Marton M. (2016). Staphylococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome Caused By An Intravaginal Product. A Case Report. The Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2016; 2(1), 51-55. doi: 10.1515/jccm-2016-0003
35.	Mitchell MA, Bisch S, Arntfield S, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM. A confirmed case of toxic shock syndrome associated with the use of a menstrual cup. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology. 2015; 26(4), 218-220. doi: 10.1155/2015/560959
36.	Day S. A retained menstrual cup. International journal of STD & AIDS. 2012; 23(5), 367-368. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2011.011277
UR  - https://doi.org/10.31125/hunhemsire.630820
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/826241
ER  -