TY  - JOUR
T1  - Investigation of the Learning Opportunities Provided by a Classroom Teacher to Her Students
TT  - Bir Sınıf Öğretmeninin Öğrencilerine Sunduğu Öğrenme Fırsatlarının İncelenmesi*
AU  - Hiğde, Aylin
AU  - Acar, Esin
JF  - HAYEF Journal of Education
PB  - İstanbul University-Cerrahpasa
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2602-4829
SP  - 246
EP  - 266
VL  - 16
IS  - 2
LA  - en
AB  - DOI: 10.5152/hayef.2019.19019This study aims to determineof learning opportunities provided by a classroom teacher to her students, anduses the example of a 4th-grade teacher to do so. The types of learningopportunities and how they were presented by the teacher were observed indetail in the classroom environment, within the framework of the classroomculture. Qualitative research methods were used in this ethnographic casestudy. The data were collected by way of classroom observations andsemi-structured interviews and analyzed by descriptive and content-basedanalyses. It was observed that the classroom teacher did not adequately presentthe learning opportunities that encouraged students to think conceptually andpractically. Although in-class discussions were conducted sometimes, they wereinsufficient in creating appropriate learning opportunities.Cite this article as: Hiğde, A., Acar, E.(2019). Investigation of the Learning Opportunities Provided by a ClassroomTeacher to Her Students. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 16(2); 246-266. 
KW  - İlkokul matematik sınıfı
KW  - öğrenme fırsatı
KW  - sınıf etnografisi
N2  - DOI: 10.5152/hayef.2019.19019Sınıf öğretmeninin sunduğu öğrenmefırsatlarının ve bu sunumun nasıl gerçekleştirildiğinin belirlenmesinin amaçlandığıçalışmada bir 4. sınıf öğretmeni ile çalışılmıştır. Öğrenme fırsatlarının nelerolduğunun yanı sıra nasıl sunulduğu ya da sunulmadığı da ayrıntılı bir şekildesınıf ortamında sınıf kültürü çerçevesinde gözlemlenmiştir. Bu çalışma nitelaraştırma yöntemlerinden etnografik durum çalışması olarak uygulanmıştır. Sınıfgözlemleri ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme ile toplanan veriler betimsel analizve içerik analizi ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada, sınıf öğretmenininöğrencilerini düşünmeye sevk eden öğrenme fırsatlarını kavramsal olarak veuygulamada yeterli düzeyde sunmadığı, bazen sınıf içi tartışmaları kullansa da,bu tartışmaların öğrenme fırsatları oluşturmaları bakımından yetersizkaldıkları gözlemlenmiştir.    Cite this article as: Hiğde, A., Acar, E.(2019). Investigation of the Learning Opportunities Provided by a ClassroomTeacher to Her Students. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 16(2); 246-266. 
CR  - Anthony, G., Hunter, J., & Hunter, R. (2015). Supporting prospective teachers to notice students’ mathematical thinking through rehearsal activities. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(2), 7-24.
Bloor, M. A., & Wood, F. A. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. Sage Publications, London.
Copes, L., & Shager, N. K. (2003). Phasing problem-based teaching into a traditional educational environment. In H. L. Schoen (Ed.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Grades 6-12 (pp. 1985-205). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 
Doğan, O. ve Kılıç, H. (2019). Matematik öğrenme fırsatları: fark etme ve harekete geçme. Eğitim ve Bilim, 44(199), 1-19.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403-434.
Fredenberg, M. D. (2015). Factors considered by elementary teachers when developing and modifying mathematical tasks to support children’s mathematical thinking. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, University of California, San Diego.
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Practices and Principles. Second Edition. New York: Routledge.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202.
Kahan, J. A., & Wyberg, T. R. (2003). Problem solving can generate new approaches to mathematics: The case of probability. The Mathematics Teacher, 96(5), 328.
Kılıç, H. (2016). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ noticing skills and scaffolding practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 377-400.
Leatham, K. R., Peterson, B. E., Merrill, L. M., Van Zoest, L. R., & Stockero, S. L. (2016). Imprecision in classroom mathematics discourse. In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,pp. 1236-1243. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
Leatham, K. R., Peterson, B. E., Stockero, S. L., & Van Zoest, L. R. (2015). Conceptualizing mathematically significant pedagogical opportunities to build on student thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 88-124.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author. 
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283.
Peterson, B. E., & Leatham, K. R. (2009). Learning to use students’ mathematical thinking to orchestrate a class discussions. In L. Knott (Ed.), The role of mathematics discourse in producing leaders of discourse (pp. 99-128), Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. 
Schoen, H. L., & Hirsch, C. R. (2003). The Core-Plus mathematics project: Perspectives and student achievement. In S. L. Senk and D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards oriented school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? (p.311-343). Manwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313-340.
Stockero, S. L., Peterson, B. E., Leatham, K. R., & Van Zoest, L. R. (2014). The “MOST” productive student mathematical thinking. Mathematics Teacher, 108(4), 308-312.
Stockero, S. L., & Van Zoest, L. R. (2013). Characterizing pivotal teaching moments in beginning mathematics teachers’ practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(2), 125-147.
Wilson, P. H., Mojica, G. F., & Confrey, J. (2013). Learning trajectories in teacher education: Supporting teachers’ understandings of students’ mathematical thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 103-121.
Tunç-Pekkan, Z., & Kılıç, H. (2015). Mathematical opportunities: Noticing and acting. In CERME 9-Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Education, Czech Republic. (pp. 2923-2929). hal-01289652
Tyminski, A. M., Land, T. J., Drake, C., Zambak, V. S., & Simpson, A. (2014). Preservice elementary mathematics teachers’ emerging ability to write problems to build on children’s mathematics. In J. Lo, K. R. Leatham, & L. R. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research Trends in Mathematics Teacher Education. New York, NY: Springer.
Zwahlen, E. K. (2014). An ınvestigation of how preservice teachers design mathematical tasks. Unpublished Master Thesis, Brigham Young University.Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovation (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iuhayefd/issue//640506
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/844345
ER  -