TY  - JOUR
T1  - EVALUATING THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM OF COMPUTER SCIENCE GRADE 6 TO 8 BY USING BLOOM’S TAXONOMY
AU  - Sahito, Nasreen
PY  - 2020
DA  - January
DO  - 10.18768/ijaedu.593884
JF  - IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education
JO  - IJAEDU
PB  - OCERINT International Organization Center of Academic Research
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2411-1821
SP  - 361
EP  - 369
VL  - 5
IS  - 15
LA  - en
AB  - Criticalthinking, problem solving and logical reasoning are considered as the 21stcentury learning skills. These higher order thinking skills (HOTS) can only bedeveloped through curriculum and teaching and learning strategies, becauseit include critical, logical,reflective, metacognitive, and creative thinking.Thepurpose of this study is to analyze National Curriculum 2006 (Pakistan) ofComputer Education in order to observe that how much it is helpful for thedevelopment of higher order thinking skills among the students and whether ithas focused on merging 21st century interdisciplinary themes with core contentsof the subject.TheNational Curriculum2006 (Pakistan) of Computer Education from grade VI to VIIIwas analyzed using the revised blooms taxonomy. Out of six levels, upper threelevels Analyzing, Evaluating and Creating were considered as HOTS. Frequencyand Proportions were calculated for Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) meetingHOTS criteria. P21 framework was used for checking the contents and SLOs whichmerging the 21st century interdisciplinary themes in curriculum.Overallonly 9% of the SLOs in curriculum met the requirement of HOTS. There was aslightly increasing trend was observed from grade 6 to 8. Grade 6 had 6%, grade7 had 9% and grade 8 had 11% of HOTS.Howeveroverall proportion of SLOs meeting HOTS was low but an increasing trend wasobserved from grade VI to grade VIII. In order to develop HOTS among thestudents, there is a need to redesign the curriculum, teachers should betrained accordingly and assessment standards should also be meeting withcurriculum needs.Itwill help in the re-designing of National Curriculum for Computer EducationGrade VI-VIII. This study can be expended to analyze the National Curriculumfor other subjects.
KW  - Higher Order Thinking Skills
KW  - Curriculum
KW  - SLOs
KW  - 21st century skills
KW  - Critical Thinking
CR  - Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P. et al (2001).  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
Assaly, I. R., & Smadi, O. M. (2015, April 23). Using Bloom's Taxonomy to Evaluate the Cognitive Levels of Master Class Textbook's Questions. Retrieved April 30, 2017, from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/
Barahal, S. (2008), Thinking about Thinking: Pre- Service Teachers Strengthen their Thinking Artfully, Phi Delta Kappan 90 (4).
Britishcouncilorg. (2017). Britishcouncilorg. Retrieved3 June, 2017, from http://courses.britishcouncil.org/teachertraining/mod/glossary/print.php?id=4561 
Elliott Seif. (2013). Edge, A professional networking community for educators. Retrieved 26 April, 2017, from http://edge.ascd.org/blogpost/strengthening-curriculum-and-instruction-in-a-21st-century-world.
Imtliuse. (2017). Imtliuse. Retrieved 21 May, 2017, from https://www.imt.liu.se/edu/Bologna/LO/slo.pdf
Ibrahim, F. (1998). Curricula foundations, organizations, and Evaluation. Cairo: Egypt Library.
Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview [Electronic Version]. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Liberty concepts. (2013). The Glossary of Education Reform. Retrieved 4 May, 2017, from http://edglossary.org/blooms-taxonomy/ 
Nazri Hassan et al... (2017). Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills Module in Science Primary School: Needs Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 624-628.
Nitko, A. & Brookhart, S. (2007), Educational Assessment of Students, Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Norris, S. & Ennis, R. (1989), Evaluating Critical Thinking, Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.
Partnership for 21st century learning, p21. (2002). P21org. Retrieved 24 April, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/component/content/article/140-history.
Partnership for 21st century learning, p21. (2002). P21org. Retrieved 24 April, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/about-us/our-history. 
Partnership for 21st century learning, p21. (2002). P21org. Retrieved 23 April, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_Framework_Definitions_New_Logo_2015.pdf .
Partnership for 21st century learning, (2002). P21org. Retrieved 24, April 2017, from http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework.
Riazi, A., & Mosalanejad, N. (2010). Evaluation of learning objectives in Iranian High-School and pre-university English Textbooks using Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, vol. 13(4), 1-16. 
Sproutfundorg. (2016). the Sprout Fund. Retrieved 21 April, 2017, from http://www.sproutfund.org/2016/04/29/demystifying-learning-frameworks-the-p21 framework/. 
Textbookequityorg, M. (2017). Textbookequityorg. Retrieved 7 May, 2017, from https://textbookequity.org/Textbooks/Orey_Emergin_Perspectives_Learning.pdf 
Vanderbiltedu, P. (2017). Vanderbilt University. Retrieved 4 May, 2017, from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/
UR  - https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.593884
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/914613
ER  -