TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics
TT  - Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics
AU  - Kılıç, Osman
AU  - Boz, İsmet
AU  - Başer, Uğur
PY  - 2020
DA  - February
DO  - 10.19159/tutad.676527
JF  - Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi
JO  - TÜTAD
PB  - Siirt University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2148-2306
SP  - 105
EP  - 110
VL  - 7
IS  - 1
LA  - en
AB  - The primary purpose of this study was to determine the Kurt Lewin’s leadership styles of college students and alsoto determine whether their leadership styles differ with their demographic characteristics or not. The participants were 384students sampled from the total student population of Ondokuz Mayıs University in Turkey, based on Cochran’s sample sizedetermination formula for categorical data collection instruments. Overall, 49.2% of the respondents were democratic leaders34.9% were autocratic, and 15.9% were laissez-faire style leaders. The Chi-square test, conducted on the variables ofleadership style and demographic characteristics of students, revealed significant effects of gender and parents' place ofresidence but was independent of other factors. Female respondents and respondents coming mostly from rural and suburbanareas tended to be more democratic leaders in comparison with male respondents and respondents coming from more denselypopulated or metropolitan areas. The study suggests that similar researches should be conducted to determine the influence ofleadership style on the performance of workers employed in different businesses in Turkey.
KW  - Leadership
KW  - leader
KW  - leadership styles
KW  - higher education
KW  - student
N2  - The primary purpose of this study was to determine the Kurt Lewin’s leadership styles of college students and alsoto determine whether their leadership styles differ with their demographic characteristics or not. The participants were 384students sampled from the total student population of Ondokuz Mayıs University in Turkey, based on Cochran’s sample sizedetermination formula for categorical data collection instruments. Overall, 49.2% of the respondents were democratic leaders34.9% were autocratic, and 15.9% were laissez-faire style leaders. The Chi-square test, conducted on the variables ofleadership style and demographic characteristics of students, revealed significant effects of gender and parents' place ofresidence but was independent of other factors. Female respondents and respondents coming mostly from rural and suburbanareas tended to be more democratic leaders in comparison with male respondents and respondents coming from more denselypopulated or metropolitan areas. The study suggests that similar researches should be conducted to determine the influence ofleadership style on the performance of workers employed in different businesses in Turkey.
CR  - Barlett, J.E., Kotrlik, J.W., Higgins, C.C., 2001. Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1): 43-50.
CR  - Beebe, S.A., Masterson, J.T., 1994. Communicating in small groups: Principles and practices. Fourth Edition, Harper Collins College Publishers, New York.
CR  - Cochran, W.G., 1977. Sampling Techniques. Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
CR  - Eagly, A.H., Carli, L.L., 2003. The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6): 807-834.
CR  - Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., 2001. The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4): 781-797.
CR  - Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., Van Engen, M.L., 2003. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4): 569-591.
CR  - Eagly, A.H., Johnson, B., 1990. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2): 233-256.
CR  - Eagly, A.H., Karau, S.J., Johnson, B.T., 1992b. Gender and leadership style among school principals: A meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1): 76-102.
CR  - Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., Klonsky, B.G., 1992a. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1): 3-22.
CR  - Erçetin, S., 1998. Lider Sarmalında Vizyon. Önder Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti., Ankara, Türkiye.
CR  - Gilley, A., 2005. The Manager as Change Leader. Westport, CT: Praeger.
CR  - Gilley, A., Dixon, P., Gilley, J.W., 2008. Characteristics of leadership effectiveness: Implementing change and driving innovation in organizations. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19(2): 153-169.
CR  - Gökulu, G., 2010. City Safety and relationship between urbanization and crime. Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 24(1): 209-226. (in Turkish).
CR  - Karasu, M.A., 2008. The effect of Turkey’s urbanization dynamics on crime. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 57(4): 255-281. (in Turkish).
CR  - Kartal, S.K., 1978. Kentleşme ve İnsan: Kentleşme Sürecinde İnsan Tutum ve Davranışlarında Meydana Gelen Değişmeler: Çankırı Köylerinden Ankara'ya Göç Edenler Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Türkiye ve Orta Doğu İdaresi Enstitüsü Yayınları, No. 175.
CR  - Kellerman, B., 2007. What every leader needs to know about followers. Harvard Business Review, 85(12): 84-91.
CR  - Kotter, J.P., 1996. Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
CR  - Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. White, R.K., 1939. Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. Journal of Social Psychology, 10: 271-299.
CR  - Nadler, D.A., 1997. Champions of Change: How Ceos and Their Companies Are Mastering The Skills of Radical Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
CR  - Nworgu, B.G., 1991. Educational Research: Basic Issues and Methodology. Ibadan, Wisdom Publishers.
CR  - Prawl, W., Medlin, R., Gross, J., 1984. Adult and Continuing Education Through The Cooperative Extension Service. Extension Division, University of Missouri, Columbia.
CR  - Sykes, W., 2012. Visions of Hope: Leadership. Open Writings, (http://www.openwriting.com/archives/visions_of_hope/), (Accessed: 29.12.2018).
CR  - Tatlıdil, E., 2009. Identity of cities and citizens; the case of Izmir. Ege Akademic Review, 9(1): 319-336. (in Turkish).
CR  - Tead, O., 1935. The Art of Leadership. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
CR  - Tosun, K., 1992. İşletme Yönetimi: Genel Esaslar. Savaş Yayınları, Ankara.
CR  - Turan, M.T., Beşirli, A., 2008. Impacts of urbanization process on mental health. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 9(4): 238-243. (in Turkish).
CR  - Ulu, A., Karakoç, İ., 2004. The influence of urbanization on city identity. Journal of Planning, 29(3): 59-66. (in Turkish).
CR  - Winston, B.E., Patterson, K., 2006. An integrative definition of leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(2): 6-66.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.676527
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/985289
ER  -