TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of Equivalent Static Analysis and Mode Combination Method for Concrete Buildings According to Turkish Standard AU - Naımı, Sepanta AU - Hanoun, Mohammad Omar Mustafa A. PY - 2018 DA - October JF - International Journal of Electronics Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering JO - IJEMME PB - Istanbul Aydin University WT - DergiPark SN - 2146-0604 SP - 1609 EP - 1616 VL - 8 IS - 4 LA - en AB - This study aims to define the impact of analysis methods that are used to design buildings and offers their analysis. Asa matter of fact, there are several methods for fundamental analysis of buildings and other civil engineering structures under seismicsituations. Both can be differentiated in the shape of the seismic involvement and in the structure idealization. There are twomeasures to identify seismic design forces: one is the equivalent static force, and the other is dynamic analysis which can be inmany forms. One of these forms is the superposition mode. This research aims to study the impact of these methods in the analysisof a six story concrete building; both results, obtained from the static and dynamic, will be ultimately compared. The results showthat in a MDOF system, such as with six floors or more, the dynamic analysis will lead to displacements and smaller forcescompared with the static process. KW - Equivalent earthquake loads KW - KW - mod combination method KW - KW - Turkish standard KW - SAP2000 CR - [1]https://www.engineeringexamples.net/structural-analysis-procedures-calculate-equivalent-static-force-actingstructure- due-earthquake-loading/ (last visit, 23.04.2019) CR - [2] S. H. Helou and Ibrahim Muhammad, Equivalent Lateral Load Method vs. Response Spectrum Analysis Which Way is Forward, Asian Journal of Engineering and Technology,02(05), 2014 CR - [3] A. Gottala, K. Kishore, s. Yajdhani, Comparative Study of Static and Dynamic Seismic Analysis of a Multistoried Building, IJSTE - International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering, 2(01)2015. CR - [4] https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/deprem-tehlike-haritasi (last visit, 23.04.2019) CR - [5] N. s. Armouti. Earthquake engineering theory and implementation. Amman. Jordan first edition CR - [6] Turkish building code (TBDY), Ankara, Turkey, 2018, CR - [7] American Society of Civil Engineers, "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7- 10", Reston, VA, 2010 CR - [8] American Concrete Institute, " Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI 318-08 and Commentary", Farmington Hills, Mi, 2008 CR - [9] International Code Council, "International Building Code, IBC 2009 ", Washington, D.C. 2009 CR - [10] James K. Wight and James G. McGregor, “Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design”, Fifth edition, Pearson International Edition, 2009. CR - [11] A. A. Kasimzade, S. Tuhta, G. Atmaca, I. Alameri, O. Abrar, Novel Approach on Performance-Based Aseismic Design Based on FEMA Requirements, International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD), 3(1), 2018. CR - [12] S. Tuhta, I. Alameri, F. Gunday, Numerical algorithms n4sid for system identification of buildings, International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering Technology & Science, 6(1), 2019. UR - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijemme/issue//769330 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1201483 ER -