@article{article_97213, title={POLLUTION AND ALGAE OF ANKARA STREAM}, journal={Gazi University Journal of Science}, volume={18}, pages={51–59}, year={2010}, author={Atıcı, Tahir and Ahıska, Syhan}, keywords={Key Words Ankara River Algae, Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, Cyanophyta, Euglenophyta, Pollution}, abstract={<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"> <strong> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;"> <span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">ABSTRACT </span> </span> </strong> </p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"> <span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;">In order to determine algal species adapted to pollution, species collected from four different habitats (Epipelic, Epiphytic, Epilitic and Plankton) in areas in where branches of Ankara stream connect to Ankara stream were examined. A total of 151 taxa belong to four divisions ( </span> <em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;">Bacillariophyta </span> </em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;">, </span> <em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;">Chlorophyta, </span> </em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"> </span> <em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;">Cyanophyta </span> </em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;">and </span> <em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;">Euglenophyta </span> </em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;">) were identified. 86 of 151 taxa were recorded from </span> <em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;">Bacillariophyta </span> </em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;">, 31 from </span> <em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;">Chlorophyta </span> </em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;">, 25 from </span> <em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;">Cyanophyta </span> </em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;">and 9 from </span> <em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;">Euglenophyta </span> </em> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;">. Physical and chemical parameters during the working period were analyzed, and relation of these parameters with relative abundance level and presence of species in Ankara Stream were investigated </span> <span style="font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"> <span style="font-size: small;">. </span> </span> </span> <span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"> </span> </p>}, number={1}, publisher={Gazi University}