Evaluating entrepreneurship through the lens of institutional quality and social capital theory

This paper investigates how the structural domain of social capital and institutional quality explains the current and expected entrepreneurial behavior. Based on the literature of social capital and institutional theory this article aims to examine the strength of the relationship between the degree of trust, norms, networks, and associations within a society with governance quality. By using a quantitative methodology, the data collected through the Global Competitiveness Index for 72 businesses in Albania are processed by conducting descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. The study intention is to explain the impact of perceived assessment for country institutions at entrepreneurial action in order to create a social relationship in society based on trust, norms, and networks. The results showed the significance of perceived trust and quality at public and private institutions as important predictors of entrepreneurship behaviors toward market or network orientations.


Introduction
This paper emphasizes the important role of positive social capital as described by the literature in solving and reducing both market and government failures. By explaining the effect of a positive social capital build by governments we can understand then better the ways by which institutions perform to support entrepreneurship. The contribution of this empiric study is the attempt to describe and analyze the relationship between perceived institutional quality and the social capital forms in Albania.
The study begins first through the introduction of institutional theory by emphasizing the importance of institutional quality in promoting and supplying entrepreneurship in an economy and also the introduction of social capital theory by emphasizing the forms of entrepreneurial networks and interconnections to facilitate entrepreneurial activity. In the next section, we discuss the literature which describes the kind of relationships between social capital and institutions, the discussion aims to understand the context of this interaction in Albanian businesses studied in this paper.
Regarding social capital theory, this study will focus mainly on those dimensions of social capital which target the entrepreneurial behavior if it is network-oriented or market-oriented. exchange of information, also help to search for information with lower costs. Trust can be explained as confidence in the reliability of others. The trust that people have in other people, in general, can be referred to as generalized or general trust. Knack and Keefer (1997) explain that in the case of high trust, people tend to follow the civic norms in their actions because the expectations that others will reciprocate are high. Fukuyama (1995) emphasizes that mutual trust at social networks provides the reduction of transaction costs. In the same logic Putnam (2000) explains that the difference between generalized reciprocity and trust absence at social networks is similar to the difference between money and barter. Kim and Aldrich (2005) explain the importance of social capital based on the advantages of wider social relations in which the majority of individuals have embedded their ties. The basic logic is that when people are connected with the others, as they share the same values, this will make them able to benefit and profit more than when they acted alone.
Social capital represents a multidimensional concept. Researchers have described three forms of social capital bonding, bridging, and linking. Bonding and bridging are described by Gitell and Vidal (1998) and Putnam (2000), the third dimension linking was described by Woolcock (1998Woolcock ( , 2001. Bonding social capital refers to internal ties of a social group and is stronger and common in denser networks, bridging social capital refers to external ties and are weaker and common in larger networks, while linking social capital links citizens to formal institutions enabling them to access institutional resources. According to Granovetter (2005), the consequences of too much bonding are related to restraining innovation and adaption, creates monopolies, collusion, and cartels. While bridging which leads to larger networks is better than bonding for sharing information in denser networks with a high degree of overlapping information. Lumpkin and Dess (1996) argue that entrepreneurial oriented companies try to realize independently their organizational visions and objectives, but they can't succeed because without all the necessary resources their strategies will tend to fail. Under these conditions is evidenced the positive effect of social capital by supplying the network with different and considerable resources. While the process is reciprocal, for the reason that entrepreneurial oriented companies can also have a valuable influence on social capital. Rothstein and Stolle (2008) in their study approach the role of the state as a source of social capital, arguing that the mechanism of the relationship between institutions and social capital in the creation of the generalized trust. Authors explain that when the administrative system is characterized by bias (favoritism), unfairness and corruption all this causes low levels of social capital, this referring to social capital as generalized trust. Institutions and social capital as represented by norms and values interact to treat the necessary trade-offs and balances between freedom and competition on the one hand and regulation and predictability on the other.
Based on the logic that institutions replace and complement social capital Aoki (2007) argues that institutions affect the current social capital and co-evolve with it in positive and negative ways. Trust and good institutions reinforce each other. North (2003) explains that the main components of institutions that contribute to the definition of economic performance are a set of formal rules, informal rules (like norms), also conformity and implementation mechanisms. Referring to the definition of institutions as a set of informal rules (norms), we can say that social capital is usually linked with institutions thorough the concept of informal institutions. Ahlerup et al. (2009) in their study have reviewed the impact of institutions and social capital (represented by the interpersonal trust) on economic growth, they describe that strong institutions cause a

Methodology
This study has a quantitative methodology, by following a deductive logic. The deductive logic begins with existing theories and concepts and formulates hypotheses that are testable later. To answer the research question this study is based on quantitative methods of data collection and processing. As an empirical study, the paper collects numeric data which then are converted into statistically interpretable data. The research focus is to explore the relationship between the com-pany´s behavior concerning perceived institutional quality. In the role of independent variable is the perceived institutional quality while the dependent variable is the strategy (company behavior) which can be relationship (network) based or marked based.
The method used to collect data for this study is a survey questionnaire, which is composed of two sections. The first section uses questions from Executive Opinion Survey (WEF, 2016(WEF, -2017 referring only to the part that includes the first dimension of Global Competitiveness Index developed by WEF since 2004, the second part it refers to dimensions of social capital bonding and bridging to identify the entrepreneur's strategy related with institutions according to their perceptions for institutional quality. The last part of the study survey refers to demographics for the study sample: participant's gender, education, and business location. The total study sample is 70 participants.
The reason why we rely on the GCI index is the fact that it one of the most distinguished indicators that evaluates the countries competition at national levels, is an index that encompasses a wide range of dimensions, and is published every year by WEF. Institutions the first dimension of this general index, which is the first part of our questionnaire construction, it refers to the legal and administrative framework within agents of society interact between each other and the quality of this framework has a very important influence on competitiveness, growth and sustainable development of an economy. The following table shows the detailed data related to sample composition and its demographic characteristics.
The dependent variable of the study is social capital which is represented by two components studied in this paper bonding and bridging. The determinant variables are a set of 7 composed dimensions each of them detailed in components. All the composed variables are categorized into two groups: the first developed to evaluate the quality of public institutions, and the second developed for the assessment of the quality of private institutions. The methodological model used in this study is configured like the figure below:  There are 28 questions in total and all the collected data are in the form of attitudes that are held to the respective proposition, and each participant in the study chooses his/her attitude in a range of seven Likert scales. Likert scale is a 5-or 7-point ordinal scale used by respondents to rate the degree to which they agree or disagree with a statement. Based on the fact that an attitude can be described in preferential ways of behaving and reacting in specific circumstances around an object, a subject or a concept acquired through social interactions, Likert scales are created to quantify the subjective preferential thinking, feeling and action in a validated and reliable manner (Schwarz et.al.,2001).
The statistical procedure used to analyze the collected data it refers to correlations statistics between the independent and dependent variables. The statistical results are provided by SPSS. The rule in evaluating the total institutional quality perceived is that every dimension is equally important and affects the performance of the other dimensions. In an attempt to answer our research question: Which are the entrepreneurial strategies toward institutions related to their perceptions for institutional quality, the study hypothesis to be investigated are: H0: Entrepreneurs by perceiving a positive institutional quality are market-oriented. H1: Entrepreneurs by perceiving a negative institutional quality are network-oriented.
Based on the literature we will expect entrepreneurs to be network oriented (create bonding sc-contact with people like oneself) when they do not trust in institutions that will be similar to having negative perceptions related to the country institution's quality. On the other side, we will expect entrepreneurs to be market-oriented when they trust in institutions that will be similar to having positive perceptions related to the country institution's quality. The following sections will be presented the reliability analysis and correlation statistics in order to control the study hypothesis. Detailed information related to the study questionnaire, reliability analysis, and Nonparametric Correlations are in the last section (appendix).

Results
Before examining the percentages of descriptive to control the study hypothesis, the reliability analysis will be performed to evaluate the internal validity and to see if all variables will need to be included in the subsequent analysis. Cronbach's alpha is the most common measure of internal consistency ("reliability"). It is most commonly used when we have multiple Likert questions in a survey that form a scale and we need to determine if the scale is reliable.

Reliability
The first table we need to look at in our output is the Reliability Statistics table. This gives us our Cronbach's alpha coefficient. We are looking for a score of over .7 for high internal consistency. In this case, α = .836, which shows the questionnaire is reliable. The next step of analysis is considering the correlations between the dependent and independent variables of the study. For each one of the dimensions of institutional quality we will consider the correlation with firm's choice strategy which can be market oriented or network oriented. But firstly, we will see the perceptions of entrepreneurs regarding institutional quality in the country. Then according the positive or negative perceptions we will consider then how this perceptions influence the firm's choice strategy in order to control the study hypothesis and answer the research question.
By analyzing frequency as descriptive statistics for each of the items which are components of institutional quality and based on the rule that the total institutional quality perceived is that every dimension is equally important and affects the performance of the other dimensions we can distinguish that the overall perception of entrepreneurs for the institutional quality in public institutions is negative, while regarding to the private institutions, the entrepreneurs seem to have a neutral perception and uncertainty. The following tables show the reported evaluations of study participants for country institutional quality, specifically their reported evaluations related with property rights, ethical standards of politicians, and undocumented extra payments or bribes connected with public utilities. All the tables which include all the dimensions are in the appendix section but below are presented just 4 of them to help understand the overall idea just for a brief illustration. It is noticed according to the cumulative percent than 62.5 percent of respondents perceive that their property rights including financial assets are not at all, or to a small extent, or some extent protected. Regarding the ethical standards of politicians, it is noticed according to the cumulative percent than 88.9 percent of respondents perceive that they are extremely low, somewhat low, and low. While only 1.4% of participants evaluate according to their perceptions that ethical standards of politicians are somewhat high and another 1.4% of them perceive those standards as high. Alarming negative perceptions are noticed for firm's engagements in making undocumented extra payments or bribes connected with public utilities, cumulative percent show that 77.8 percent of respondents perceive that such behavior very commonly occurs, usually occurs and occurs. Also distressing negative perceptions are noticed for firm's engagements in making undocumented extra payments or bribes connected with imports and exports, cumulative percents show that 70.8 percent of respondents perceive that such behavior very commonly occurs, usually occurs and occurs.
Regarding private institutional quality also all the tables which include the items measuring the entire dimension are in the appendix section but below are presented just 2 tables of the description statistics to help understand the overall idea just for a brief illustration. The results are shown as following: The corporate ethics of companies it is mainly ranked fair, good or very good respectively 23.6%, 25% and 5.6%, while 15.5% of the study participants had considered it extremely poor or poor. Also, a significant part of respondents (29.6%) show neutral evaluations. The most part of respondents (38.9%) perceive that financial auditing and reporting standards are extremely weak, weak ore somewhat weak, while almost 32% of them are neutral compared to 29.2% of them who believe that those standards are somewhat strong or strong.
Considering the descriptive data from the statistical program related with entrepreneurial strategy orientation toward institutions we can distinguish in general mainly neutral attitudes and with a little percent of the results related with network-oriented strategy. We can notice than most of the participants 77.5% show attitudes mainly neutral to a small extent, to some extent or not at all related to relationship-oriented strategy. Most of the participants 59,7% in cumulative percent of the participants show attitudes that approve market-oriented strategies to a moderate extent, to a great extent and a very great extent. But our study focus is to consider the kind of relationship between each one of the strategies and the perceived institutional quality. In this framework, we will analyze the values of correlations between each one dimension of institutional quality and the alternative strategy.
According to the results we have distinguished not positive perceptions related to country institutional quality we can now expect to be proven the second study hypothesis H2: Entrepreneurs by perceiving a negative institutional quality are network-oriented. The statistical approach to explore this link between strategy and institutions are the correlations. When the study data are collected in Likert items it is more appropriate to analyze thorough non-parametric correlations. The detailed results of nonparametric correlations will be in the appendix section and the following table will be presented only the significant correlations marked by the statistical program. .329 ** Significant but week correlation Q20 .345 ** Significant but week correlation Q24 -.284 * Significant but week correlation The correlations results show that no one of the hypotheses can be verified statistically for the sample included in this study. In the following issue, we will give some explanation regarding these results and their implications.

Conclusions and implications
The purpose of this study was to provide an assessment of the perceived efficiency of both public and private institutions of the country in the light of the social dimension as an important economic force. Based on the fact that the legal and administrative interaction between individuals, firms, and governments impacts growth and competitiveness, and also based on the fact that great and favorable private institutions have a considerable influence in the sustainable development of a country economy this topic's results represent significant importance for policymakers.
Institutions, the first dimension of GCI it refers to the legal and administrative framework within agents of society interact with each other and the quality of this framework has a very important influence on competitiveness, growth, and sustainable development of an economy. This dimension of the GCI index aims to assess the ability of national economies to ensure and guarantee high levels of prosperity to offer sustainable economic development. As described and analyzed in the previous section, it results in a low level of perceived institutional quality for the public institutions and also a low level of perceived institutional quality for private institutions, although for public institutions the comparative assessment is lower. Those attitudes and perceptions describe not a very favorable framework to be promotional for competitiveness and entrepreneurial incentives.
One of our study limitations is the number of participants included in the research, a larger number of participants would enable a more accurate overall outcome of the study population. Also, we think that the study model would be more completed and comprehensive if it could be incorporated more elements of country competitiveness (other components of GCI) and some variables to measure the trust (as another important component of social capital) to explain in a wider and more convincing form strategy that entrepreneurs choose to react in their relationship with institutions. This study offered a specific view of only one of the GCI components and a more completed model for the main both study variables remains a starting point for another more extensive study.
The reported attitudes and perceptions related to institutional quality in general talk about an environment in which is needed more attempt to guarantee an environment that encourages entrepreneurship. One of the reasons why a business has this kind of perception related to the institutional quality of the country is explained by the levels of trust they have for the country institutions. This low level of trust may be a result of previous experiences related to the relationship between them and institutions and also may be a result of the very slow improvement of the work of these institutions in guaranteeing the competitive environment and the promotion of entrepreneurship. Also, we can that the overall absence of trust makes possible that they do not create bonding or bridging relationships.
Finally, in another more extensive study, it is necessary to include as the independent variable the trust level of people in institutions to better explain the relationship between the forms of social capital and their strategy toward country institutions.
The new methodological framework would be as the following scheme: