Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

TÜRKİYE’NİN ORTA VE DOĞU AVRUPA’DAKİ KARARSIZ MÜTTEFİKLERİ: TÜRKİYE’NİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ SÜRECİNE YÖNELİK DESTEĞİN DİNAMİKLERİ

Year 2018, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 153 - 179, 06.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.457841

Abstract

Bu makale Orta ve Doğu Avrupa’da (ODA) yer alan ve Avrupa Birliği’ne (AB) görece yeni üye olmuş ülkelerin siyasi elitlerinin Türkiye’nin AB sürecine yönelik desteklerindeki farklılaşmayı açıklamayı amaçlamaktadır. Makale Türkiye’nin AB’ye tam üye yapılması, müzakere sürecinin ilerletilmesi, durdurulması veya Türkiye ile ilişkilerin mevcut çerçevesinin yeniden tanzimi konularındaki elitlerin görüşlerini inceleyecektir. Bu farklılaşmayı açıklarken, bu ülkelerin stratejik çıkarları, AB’nin genişlemesine yönelik kamuoyları, Türkiye ile siyasi ve ticari ilişkilerinin seyri gibi faktörlerin etkisinden söz edilebilir. Makale özellikle Türkiye’nin ODA ülkeleriyle ikili ilişkilerinin Türkiye’nin AB’deki geleceğine yönelik görüşler üzerinde belirleyici bir etkisi olacağını öngörmektedir.

References

  • Bagdonas, Azuolas. “The Geopolitics of Support for Turkey’s EU Accession: A View from Lithuania.” Insight Turkey 14, no 3 (2012): 177-192.
  • Börzel, Tanja A. et. al. “European Union Enlargement and Integration Capacity: Concepts, Findings, and Policy Implications.” Journal of European Public Policy 24, no 2 (2017): 157-176.
  • Braghiroli, Stefano ve Maili Vilson. “FEUTURE EU 28 Country Report: Estonia.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 25, 2018. http://www.feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/pdf/Estonia_28_Country_Report.pdf.
  • Bruģe, Ilvija. “FEUTURE EU 28 Country Report: Latvia.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 25, 2018. http://www.feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/pdf/Latvia_28_Country_Report.pdf.
  • Damian, Alexandru ve Raluca Dinu. “FEUTURE EU 28 Country Report: Romania.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 25, 2018. http://www.feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/pdf/Romania_28_Country_Report.pdf.
  • Dimitrova, Antoaneta et. al. “Comparing Discourses about Past and Future EU Enlargements–Core Arguments and Cleavages.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 26, 2018. http://www.sps.unimi.it/extfiles/unimidire/28401/attachment/comparing-discourses-about-eu-enlargement-30-april-final.pdf.
  • Dimitrova, Antoaneta ve Aron Buzogány. “Post‐Accession Policy‐Making in Bulgaria and Romania: Can Non‐state Actors Use EU Rules to Promote Better Governance?” Journal of Common Market Studies 52, no 1 (2014): 139-156.
  • Dimitrova, Antoaneta ve Elitsa Kortenska. “What Do Citizens Want? And Why Does It Matter? Discourses among Citizens as Opportunities and Constraints for EU Enlargement.” Journal of European Public Policy 24, no 2 (2017): 259-277.
  • Epstein, Rachel A. ve Wade Jacoby. “Eastern Enlargement Ten Years On: Transcending the East–West Divide?” Journal of Common Market Studies 52, no 1 (2014): 1-16.
  • Hobolt, Sara. B. “Ever Closer or Ever Wider? Public Attitudes towards Further Enlargement and Integration in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 21, no 5 (2014): 664-680.
  • Hürsoy, Siret. “On the Edge of the EU: Turkey’s Choice between ‘Privileged Partnership’and Non-Accession.” Asia Europe Journal (2017): 1-21.
  • İçener, Erhan ve David Phinnemore. “Enlargement and the European Union's Absorption Capacity: 'Oft-forgotten' Condition or Additional Obstacle to Membership?” Insight Turkey 8, no 3 (2006): 37-43.
  • Jahn, Egbert. “Limits on the Future Expansion of the European Union. On the Disputed Membership of Turkey, Ukraine and Other States.” International Politics (2015): 27-42.
  • Karakaş, Cemal. “EU–Turkey: Integration without Full Membership or Membership without Full Integration? A Conceptual Framework for Accession Alternatives.” Journal of Common Market Studies 51, no 6 (2013): 1057-1073.
  • Mandacı, Nazif. “Avrupa’daki Radikal Sağ Partiler ve Balkanlı Kuzenleri: Çanlar Türkiye İçin Çalıyor.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 33, no 9 (2012): 41-71.
  • Müftüler-Baç, Meltem. “Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: The Impact of the EU’s Internal Dynamics.” International Studies Perspectives 9, no 2 (2008): 201-219.
  • Müftüler-Baç, Meltem ve Aylin Ece Çiçek. “A Comparison of the European Union’s Accession Negotiations with Bulgaria and Turkey: The Role of Bilateral Issues.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 25, no 2 (2017): 180-196.
  • Sedelmeier, Ulrich. “Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania after Accession.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52, no 1 (2014): 105-121.
  • Şatır, Bilgesu. “FEUTURE EU 28 Country Report: Slovakia.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 25, 2018. http://www.feuture.uni-koeln.de/eu-28-country-reports/slovakia/.
  • Taydaş, Zeynep ve Cigdem Kentmen-Cin. “Who Is Afraid of EU Enlargement? A Multilevel Comparative Analysis.” Political Research Quarterly (2017).
  • Turhan, Ebru. “Turkey’s EU Accession Process: Do Member States Matter?” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 24, no 4 (2016): 463-477.
  • Uğur, Mehmet. “Open‐Ended Membership Prospect and Commitment Credibility: Explaining the Deadlock in EU–Turkey Accession Negotiations." Journal of Common Market Studies 48, no 4 (2010): 972.
  • Usul, Ali Resul. “Is There Any Hope on the Revival of EU–Turkey Relations in the ‘New Era’?” Turkish Studies 15, no 2 (2014): 283-302.
  • Verveckiene, Liucija, ve Justinas Lingevicius. “FEUTURE EU 28 Country Report: Lithuania.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 25, 2018. http://www.feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/pdf/Lithuania_28_Country_Report.pdf.

Turkey’s Ambivalent Allies in Central and Eastern Europe: Dynamics of Support for Turkey’s European Union Process

Year 2018, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 153 - 179, 06.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.457841

Abstract

This article seeks to explain the differentiation among the political elites of the new European Union (EU) members from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) in terms of their support to Turkey’s EU process. The article investigates elite opinions about Turkey’s full membership, continuation or suspension of Turkey’s EU accession negotiations, as well as, the adjustment of the existing framework of
Turkey-EU relations. In explaining such differentiation, one may discuss the impact of the strategic interests of these countries, their public opinion about the EU enlargement, as well as, the progression of their political and trade relations with Turkey. The article expects that especially Turkey’s bilateral relations with the CEE countries should have significant impact over the views concerning Turkey’s future
in the EU.

References

  • Bagdonas, Azuolas. “The Geopolitics of Support for Turkey’s EU Accession: A View from Lithuania.” Insight Turkey 14, no 3 (2012): 177-192.
  • Börzel, Tanja A. et. al. “European Union Enlargement and Integration Capacity: Concepts, Findings, and Policy Implications.” Journal of European Public Policy 24, no 2 (2017): 157-176.
  • Braghiroli, Stefano ve Maili Vilson. “FEUTURE EU 28 Country Report: Estonia.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 25, 2018. http://www.feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/pdf/Estonia_28_Country_Report.pdf.
  • Bruģe, Ilvija. “FEUTURE EU 28 Country Report: Latvia.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 25, 2018. http://www.feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/pdf/Latvia_28_Country_Report.pdf.
  • Damian, Alexandru ve Raluca Dinu. “FEUTURE EU 28 Country Report: Romania.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 25, 2018. http://www.feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/pdf/Romania_28_Country_Report.pdf.
  • Dimitrova, Antoaneta et. al. “Comparing Discourses about Past and Future EU Enlargements–Core Arguments and Cleavages.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 26, 2018. http://www.sps.unimi.it/extfiles/unimidire/28401/attachment/comparing-discourses-about-eu-enlargement-30-april-final.pdf.
  • Dimitrova, Antoaneta ve Aron Buzogány. “Post‐Accession Policy‐Making in Bulgaria and Romania: Can Non‐state Actors Use EU Rules to Promote Better Governance?” Journal of Common Market Studies 52, no 1 (2014): 139-156.
  • Dimitrova, Antoaneta ve Elitsa Kortenska. “What Do Citizens Want? And Why Does It Matter? Discourses among Citizens as Opportunities and Constraints for EU Enlargement.” Journal of European Public Policy 24, no 2 (2017): 259-277.
  • Epstein, Rachel A. ve Wade Jacoby. “Eastern Enlargement Ten Years On: Transcending the East–West Divide?” Journal of Common Market Studies 52, no 1 (2014): 1-16.
  • Hobolt, Sara. B. “Ever Closer or Ever Wider? Public Attitudes towards Further Enlargement and Integration in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 21, no 5 (2014): 664-680.
  • Hürsoy, Siret. “On the Edge of the EU: Turkey’s Choice between ‘Privileged Partnership’and Non-Accession.” Asia Europe Journal (2017): 1-21.
  • İçener, Erhan ve David Phinnemore. “Enlargement and the European Union's Absorption Capacity: 'Oft-forgotten' Condition or Additional Obstacle to Membership?” Insight Turkey 8, no 3 (2006): 37-43.
  • Jahn, Egbert. “Limits on the Future Expansion of the European Union. On the Disputed Membership of Turkey, Ukraine and Other States.” International Politics (2015): 27-42.
  • Karakaş, Cemal. “EU–Turkey: Integration without Full Membership or Membership without Full Integration? A Conceptual Framework for Accession Alternatives.” Journal of Common Market Studies 51, no 6 (2013): 1057-1073.
  • Mandacı, Nazif. “Avrupa’daki Radikal Sağ Partiler ve Balkanlı Kuzenleri: Çanlar Türkiye İçin Çalıyor.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 33, no 9 (2012): 41-71.
  • Müftüler-Baç, Meltem. “Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: The Impact of the EU’s Internal Dynamics.” International Studies Perspectives 9, no 2 (2008): 201-219.
  • Müftüler-Baç, Meltem ve Aylin Ece Çiçek. “A Comparison of the European Union’s Accession Negotiations with Bulgaria and Turkey: The Role of Bilateral Issues.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 25, no 2 (2017): 180-196.
  • Sedelmeier, Ulrich. “Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania after Accession.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52, no 1 (2014): 105-121.
  • Şatır, Bilgesu. “FEUTURE EU 28 Country Report: Slovakia.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 25, 2018. http://www.feuture.uni-koeln.de/eu-28-country-reports/slovakia/.
  • Taydaş, Zeynep ve Cigdem Kentmen-Cin. “Who Is Afraid of EU Enlargement? A Multilevel Comparative Analysis.” Political Research Quarterly (2017).
  • Turhan, Ebru. “Turkey’s EU Accession Process: Do Member States Matter?” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 24, no 4 (2016): 463-477.
  • Uğur, Mehmet. “Open‐Ended Membership Prospect and Commitment Credibility: Explaining the Deadlock in EU–Turkey Accession Negotiations." Journal of Common Market Studies 48, no 4 (2010): 972.
  • Usul, Ali Resul. “Is There Any Hope on the Revival of EU–Turkey Relations in the ‘New Era’?” Turkish Studies 15, no 2 (2014): 283-302.
  • Verveckiene, Liucija, ve Justinas Lingevicius. “FEUTURE EU 28 Country Report: Lithuania.” Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 25, 2018. http://www.feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/pdf/Lithuania_28_Country_Report.pdf.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Eda Kuşku Sönmez

Publication Date September 6, 2018
Submission Date April 3, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 17 Issue: 1

Cite

Chicago Kuşku Sönmez, Eda. “TÜRKİYE’NİN ORTA VE DOĞU AVRUPA’DAKİ KARARSIZ MÜTTEFİKLERİ: TÜRKİYE’NİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ SÜRECİNE YÖNELİK DESTEĞİN DİNAMİKLERİ”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 17, no. 1 (September 2018): 153-79. https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.457841.

320px-Cc_by-nc-nd_icon.svg.png

Ankara Review of European Studies (ARES) is licenced under the Creative Commons License of CC BY-NC-ND license.