Case Report
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2024, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 97 - 99, 31.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1469773

Abstract

References

  • Van den Dop LM, Sneiders D, Yurtkap Y, Werba A, van Klaveren D, Pierik REGJM et al; PRIMA Trialist Group. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement vs. primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): long-term outcomes of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023; 36:100787.
  • Sanders DL, Pawlak MM, Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Balla A, Berger C et al. Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society. Br J Surg. 2023; 110(12):1732-1768.
  • Deerenberg EB, Henriksen NA, Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Bramer WM, Fischer Jp et al. Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies. Br J Surg. 2022; 109(12):1239-1250.
  • Dumanian GA. Suturable mesh demonstrates improved outcomes over standard suture in a porcine laparotomy closure model. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9(10):e3879.
  • Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 386(10000):1254-1260.
  • Hackenberger PN, Mittal M, Fronza J, Shapiro M. Duramesh registry study: short-term outcomes using mesh suture for abdominal wall closure. Front Surg. 2024; 10:1321146.
  • Bharadwaj SN, Raikar CH, Dumanian GA, Malaisrie SC. Novel mesh suture may resist bone cutting seen with wire-based sternal closures. JTCVS Tech. 2023; 20:130-137.
  • Janes LE, Mioton LM, Fracol ME, Ko JH. An In vivo comparison: Novel mesh suture versus traditional suture-based repair in a rabbit tendon model. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2021;4(1):32-39.
  • Yurtkap Y, den Hartog FPJ, van Weteringen W, Jeekel J, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF. Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model. Hernia. 2020; 24(6):1317-1324.

Repair of recurrent umbilical hernia with Duramesh™, a suturable mesh: Our first application experience

Year 2024, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 97 - 99, 31.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1469773

Abstract

Suture tension due to the structure of the sutures used during closure of laparotomies and the technique applied, or the cutting of the tissue while the stitches are being pulled, predisposes to incisional hernia. It is known that repairs made with the use of mesh provide more successful results in incisional hernia surgery compared to primary closure of the defect with sutures. For this reason, a multifilament suturable mesh was developed to prevent the suture from cutting the tissue due to tension at the stitch and tissue interface. In this case, the approach and early results of a recurrent umbilical hernia case operated on with suture-shaped mesh (Duramesh™), a new product developed for use in incisional hernias and abdominal closure, are presented.

References

  • Van den Dop LM, Sneiders D, Yurtkap Y, Werba A, van Klaveren D, Pierik REGJM et al; PRIMA Trialist Group. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement vs. primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): long-term outcomes of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023; 36:100787.
  • Sanders DL, Pawlak MM, Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Balla A, Berger C et al. Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society. Br J Surg. 2023; 110(12):1732-1768.
  • Deerenberg EB, Henriksen NA, Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Bramer WM, Fischer Jp et al. Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies. Br J Surg. 2022; 109(12):1239-1250.
  • Dumanian GA. Suturable mesh demonstrates improved outcomes over standard suture in a porcine laparotomy closure model. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9(10):e3879.
  • Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 386(10000):1254-1260.
  • Hackenberger PN, Mittal M, Fronza J, Shapiro M. Duramesh registry study: short-term outcomes using mesh suture for abdominal wall closure. Front Surg. 2024; 10:1321146.
  • Bharadwaj SN, Raikar CH, Dumanian GA, Malaisrie SC. Novel mesh suture may resist bone cutting seen with wire-based sternal closures. JTCVS Tech. 2023; 20:130-137.
  • Janes LE, Mioton LM, Fracol ME, Ko JH. An In vivo comparison: Novel mesh suture versus traditional suture-based repair in a rabbit tendon model. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2021;4(1):32-39.
  • Yurtkap Y, den Hartog FPJ, van Weteringen W, Jeekel J, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF. Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model. Hernia. 2020; 24(6):1317-1324.
There are 9 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects General Surgery
Journal Section CASE REPORTS
Authors

Hüseyin Kılavuz 0000-0001-8860-0630

Feyyaz Güngör 0000-0002-4066-6072

Murat Demir 0000-0003-3097-1441

İdris Kurtuluş 0000-0001-9101-6363

Publication Date May 31, 2024
Submission Date April 17, 2024
Acceptance Date May 14, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kılavuz, H., Güngör, F., Demir, M., Kurtuluş, İ. (2024). Repair of recurrent umbilical hernia with Duramesh™, a suturable mesh: Our first application experience. Archives of Current Medical Research, 5(2), 97-99. https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1469773

Archives of Current Medical Research (ACMR) provides instant open access to all content, bearing in mind the fact that presenting research

free to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

http://www.acmronline.org/