Koroner Anjiyografide Transradial Yaklaşım

Year 2021, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 22 - 28, 24.02.2021

Mehmet Kış , Hamza Duygu

Abstract

Koroner anjiyografi ve perkütan koroner girişimler için yeni bir yöntem olan transradial yaklaşımın ilk kez uygulanmasından sonra zaman içinde popülaritesi artmış olup günümüzde bir çok merkezde standart yaklaşım haline gelmiştir. Transradial girişim transfemoral ile karşılaştırıldığında, daha düşük girişim yeri komplikasyonları, hastane yatış süresinin kısa olması, erken hasta mobilizasyonu, yüksek hasta konforu ve düşük major kanama olayları nedeniyle güvenli bir girişim yöntemidir. Bu yazıda radial arter yoluyla yapılan koroner anjiyografi işleminin avantajları, klavuz önerileri ve işlem ile ilgili kaygılar yapılan çalışmalar ışığında incelendi.

Keywords

Transradial koroner anjiyografi, radial arter ultrasonografi

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

Transradial Approach in Coronary Angiography

Abstract

Transradial approach, which is a new method for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions, has increased in popularity over time after its first application and has become a standard approach in many centers today. Transradial access is a safe intervention method compared to transfemoral, due to lower intervention site complications, short hospital stay, early patient mobilization, high patient comfort and low major bleeding events. In this article, the advantages of the coronary angiography procedure via the radial artery approach, the guideline recommendations and the concerns about the procedure were examined in the light of the studies.

Keywords

Transradial coronary angiography, radial artery ultrasonography

Project Number

-

References

• 1.Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J. 1999;138(3):430-436. doi:10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70143-2
• 2.Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, et al. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32(3):572-576. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00288-5
• 3.Kiemeneij F, Hofland J, Laarman GJ, Van Der Elst DH, Van Der Lubbe H. Cost comparison between two modes of Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation: transradial bare stent technique vs. transfemoral sheath-protected stent technique. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995;35(4):301-308. doi:10.1002/ccd.1810350405
• 4.Choussat R, Black A, Bossi I, Fajadet J, Marco J. Vascular complications and clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty with platelet IIb/IIIa receptor blockade: comparison of transradial vs. transfemoral arterial access. Eur Heart J. 2000;21(8):662-667. doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1945
• 5.Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2020;ehaa575. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575
• 6.Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2187-2195. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.039
• 7.Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(2):349-356. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.034
• 8.Yonetsu T, Kakuta T, Lee T, et al. Assessment of acute injuries and chronic intimal thickening of the radial artery after transradial coronary intervention by optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart. 2010;31(13):1608-1615. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq102
• 9.Burstein JM, Gidrewicz D, Hutchison SJ, Holmes K, Jolly S, Cantor WJ. Impact of radial artery cannulation for coronary angiography and angioplasty on radial artery function. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(4):457-459. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.055
• 10.Wakeyama T, Ogawa H, Iida H, et al. Intima-media thickening of the radial artery after transradial intervention. An intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1109-1114. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00089-5
• 11.Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;16(1):3-7. doi:10.1002/ccd.1810160103
• 12.Kiemeneij F. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;30(2):173-183.
• 13.Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of precutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(6):1269-1275. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00064-8
• 14.Louvard Y, Lefe`vre T, Allain A, Morice M. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: the CARAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;52(2):181-187. doi:10.1002/1522726x(200102) 52:2<181::aid-ccd1044>3.0.co;2-g
• 15.Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119-177. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
• 16.Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(3):213-260. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419
• 17.Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink MEL, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(9):763-816. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095
• 18.Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87-165. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
• 19.Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407-477. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425
• 20.Anjum I, Khan M, Aadil M, et al. Transradial vs. Transfemoral approach in cardiac catheterization: a literature review. Cureus. 2017;9(6):e1309. doi:10.7759/cureus.1309
• 21.Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am CollCardiol Intv. 2016;9:1419-1434. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.014
• 22.Kanei Y, Kwan T, Nakra NC, et al. Transradial cardiac catheterization: a review of access site complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interven. 2011;78:840-846. doi:10.1002/ccd.22978
• 23.Karrowni W, Vyas A, Giacomino B, et al. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:814-823. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010
• 24.Rao SV, Turi ZG, Wong SC, Brener SJ, Stone GW. Radial versus femoral access. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(suppl 17):11-20. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.700
• 25.Yang YJ, Kandzari DE, Gao Z, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral method of percutaneous coronary revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: comparison of procedural and late-termoutcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(10):1035-1042. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.003
• 26.Rathore S, Hakeem A, Pauriah M, Roberts E, Beaumont A, Morris JL. A comparison of the transradial and the transfemoral approach in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73(7):883-887. doi:10.1002/ccd.21922
• 27.Salgado Fernández J, Calviño Santos R, Vázquez Rodríguez JM, et al. Transradial Approach to coronary angiography and angioplasty: initial experience and learning curve. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2003;56(2):152-159.
• 28.Hess C, Peterson E, Neely M, et al. The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States. Circulation. 2014;129(22):2277-2286. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA .113.006356
• 29.Kolkailah AA, Alreshq RS, Muhammed AM, ZahranME, Anas El-Wegoud M, Nabhan AF. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;4:CD012318. doi:10.1002/14651858 .CD012318.pub2
• 30.Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Trani C, Burzotta F, Pendenza G, Tommasino A, et al. Evaluation of the “learning curve” for left and right radial approach during percutaneous coronary procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:185-188. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.022
• 31.Looi JL, Cave A, El-Jack S. Learning curve in transradial coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:1092-1095. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.009
• 32.Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome) study. J AmColl Cardiol. 2012;60:2481-2489. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06 .017
• 33.Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, et al. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2490-2499. doi:10.1016/j.jacc .2012.07.050
• 34.Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, et al. Radial versus femoral access inpatients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2465-2476. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6
• 35.Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am CollCardiol Intv. 2016;9:1419-1434. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.014
• 36.Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Carr M, et al. Baseline bleeding risk andarterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1554-1564. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.075
• 37.Singh S, Singh M, Grewal N, Khosla S. The fluoroscopy time, door to balloon time, contrast volume use and prevalence of vascular access site failure with transradial versus transfemoral approach in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review & meta analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16(8):491-497. doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2015.08.013
• 38.Osman M, Saleem M, Osman K, et al. Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Trial sequential analysis. Am Heart J. 2020;224:98-104. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2020.03.014
• 39.May ML, Wells G, So D, et al. Safety and efficacy of femoral access vs radial access in ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction: The SAFARI-STEMI randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(2):126-134. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4852
• 40.Gaudino M, Leone A, Lupascu A, et al. Morphological and functional consequences of transradial coronary angiography on the radial artery: implications for its use as a bypass conduit. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;48:370-374. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu456
• 41.Yan Z, Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Zhou Z, Yang S, Wang Z. Impact of transradial coronary procedures on radial artery function. Angiology. 2014;65:104-107. doi:10.1177/0003319713 479650
• 42.Soydan E, Kış M, Akın M. Evaluation of radial artery endothelial functions in transradial coronary angiography according to different radial access sites. Anatol J Cardiol. 2021;25(1):42-48. doi:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.59085
• 43.Üreyen ÇM, Coşansu K, Vural MG, Şahin SE, Kocayigit I, Pabuccu MT. Is trans-radial approach related to an increased risk of radiation exposure in patients who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention? (The SAKARYA study). Anatol J Cardiol. 2019;22(1):5-12. doi:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.06013
• 44.Valgimigli M, Campo G, Penzo C, et al. Trans-radial coronary catheterization and ıntervention across the whole spectrum of Allen's test results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(18):1833-1841. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.043
• 45.Abdelaal E, Brousseau-Provencher C, Montminy S, et al. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:1129-1137. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.019
• 46.Chugh SK, Chugh S, Chugh Y, Rao SV. Feasibility and utility of pre-procedure ultrasound imaging of the arm to facilitate transradial coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures (PRIMAFACIE-TRI). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:64-73. doi:10.1002/ccd.24585
• 47.Seto AH, Roberts JS, Abu-Fadel MS, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (radial artery access with ultrasound trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:283-291. doi:10.1016/ j.jcin.2014.05.036.
• 48.Moussa Pacha H, Alahdab F, Al-Khadra Y, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided radial artery catheterization in adult population: a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2018;204:1-8. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2018.06.007
• 49.Kiemeneij F. Prevention and management of radial artery spasm. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006(4):159-160.
• 50.Bhat T, Bhat H, Teli S, et al. Pseudoaneurysm a rare complication of transradial cardiac catheterization: a case report. Vascular. 2013;21(5):331-334. doi:10.1177/17085 38113478745.
• 51.D’Achille A, Sebben RA, Davies RP. Percutaneous ultrasound guided thrombin injection for coagulation of posttraumatic pseudoaneurysms. Australas Radiol. 2001;45:218-221.
• 52.Kış M, Soydan E. A case of radial artery pseudoaneurysm which is a rare complication of transradial coronary angiography. Anatolian Clinic the Journal of Medical Sciences. ID: 722102. In press.
• 53.Palaparti R, Koduru GK, Palaparthi S, et al. Radial artery pseudoaneurysms treated by ultrasound-guided differential compression: an effective and simple method. Heart Views. 2019;20:60-64. doi:10.4103/heartviews .heartviews_67_18
• 54.Vranckx P, Frigoli E, Rothenbühler M, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(14):1069-1080. doi:10.1093/ eurheartj/ehx048
• 55.Fan Y, Wei Q, Cai J, Wang Y, Fu X. Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion following trans-radial coronary intervention using 6-french versus 7-french sheaths. Cardiol J. doi:10.5603/CJ.a2019.0085
• 56.Moran SV, Baeza R, Gurda E, et al. Predictors of radial artery patency for coronary bypass operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(5):1552-1556. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03090-9
• 57.Koutouzis M, Kontopodis E, Tassopoulos A, et al. Distal versus traditional radial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019;20(8):678-680. doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2018.09.018
• 58.Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(22):2069-2077. doi:10.1056 /NEJMoa1716026
• 59.Deb S, Cohen EA, Singh SK, et al. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial artery patency study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(1):28-35. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.037