YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE NEOLİBERAL DEĞİŞİM: MİKROKURUMSALCILIK TEORİK PERSPEKTİFİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ANALİZE YANSIMALARI

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 40, 72 - 102, 29.04.2022

Oğuzhan Bozoğlu , Şöheyda Göktürk

https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.931213

Cited By: 1

Öz

Yükseköğretim, neoliberalizm ekseninde bir yeniden yapılanma sürecinden geçmekte; bu süreçte daha önceden kendisine yabancı olan değerler ile yeni bir forma bürünmektedir. Bir yandan genişleme, özelleşme, ticarileşme ve uluslararasılaşma gibi küresel eğilimler, diğer taraftan üniversite sıralamaları ve kalite güvencesi sistemleri gibi yeni kalite göstergeleri yükseköğretim kurumsal çevresinin bir parçası haline gelmektedir. Makro düzeyde yükseköğretim kurumsal çevresindeki gelişmeleri Türkiye’deki gelişmeleri de kapsayacak şekilde değerlendiren bu teorik çalışma, alanyazında ‘Mikrokurumsalcılık’ olarak ifade edilen teorik perspektifi incelemektedir. Makro düzeyde kurumsal çevrenin örgütler üzerindeki eşbiçimci etkilerini kabul etmesinin yanı sıra, mikro düzeyde örgütsel bileşenleri kapsayan bu teorik perspektif daha bütüncül örgütsel analizlere olanak tanıyabilecek niteliktedir. Özellikle, örgütsel kimliğin makro düzeyde kurumsal çevreden örgüte nüfus eden baskı ve talepleri anlamlandırmadaki rolü nedeniyle tarihsel olarak farklı yönlerde ilerleyen Yeni Kurumsalcılık ve örgütsel kimlik perspektiflerinin bütünleştirilmesinin gerekliliği alanyazında öne çıkmaktadır. Bu iki teoriyi bütünleştirmeyi amaçlayan Mikrokurumsalcılık teorik perspektifi, yükseköğretim örgütlerinin kurumsal çevre ile ilişkileri sonucunda oluşabilecek benzeşme ve ayrıklaşma süreçlerine yönelik daha kapsamlı bilgiler sunarak örgütsel davranış ve değişimi açıklayabilir. Bu çalışma kapsamında Mikrokurumsalcılık teorik perspektifi yükseköğretimde giderek baskın hale gelen neoliberalist dönüşüm ekseninde irdelenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yeni Kurumsalcılık, mikrokurumsalcılık, eşbiçimlilik, neoliberalizm, örgütsel kimlik

NEOLIBERAL CHANGE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: IMPLICATIONS OF MICROINSTITUTIONALISM THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE FOR ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS

Öz

The ascendency of neoliberalism and its discourse has brought about fundamental shifts in higher education, Today, higher education institutions are being infused with values that were once regarded unorthodox. Not only such global trends as massification, privatization, commodification and internationalization but also new quality indicators -in the form of quality assurance systems and university rankings- have become an integral part of higher education institutional field both globally and in Turkish higher education context. Upon briefly examining the macro level higher education institutional field with special reference to that of Turkey’s, the current theoretical paper outlines a more holistic theoretical approach to organizational analysis. Coined as Microinstitutionalism, this theoretical framework can contribute to organizational analysis in that it can combine elements of organizational identity and actorhood with conventional new institutionalist perspective, thus allowing for a more thorough understanding of diffusion and convergence of organizational behavior and practices.

Anahtar Kelimeler

New Institutionalism, microinstitutionalism, isomorphism, neoliberalism, organizational identity

Kaynakça

• Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (2004). “Organizational identity.” Organizational identity: A reader, 89-118.
• Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). “The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities.” Journal of studies in international education, 11(3-4): 290-305.
• Amaral, A., & Rosa, M. J. (2010). “Recent trends in quality assurance.” Quality in higher education, 16(1): 59-61.
• Angelis, L., Bassiliades, N., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2019). “On the necessity of multiple university rankings.” COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 13(1): 11-36.
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). “How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship.” Academy of Management, 3(1): 65-107.
• Beddewela, E., & Fairbrass, J. (2016). “Seeking legitimacy through CSR: Institutional pressures and corporate responses of multinationals in Sri Lanka.” Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3): 503-522.
• Blackmur, D. (2004). “Issues in higher education quality assurance.” Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(2): 105-116.
• Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Chan, K. (2006). Higher education and economic development in Africa (Vol. 102): World Bank Washington, DC.
• Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2008). Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage Publications.
• Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage Publications.
• Brewer, M. B. (2003). Optimal distinctiveness, social identity, and the self.
• Brewer, M. B. (2011). Optimal distinctiveness theory: Its history and development. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 2, 81-98.
• Brinton, M. C., & Nee, V. (1998). The New Institutionalism in Sociology: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Cai, Y. (2010). “Global Isomorphism and Governance Reform in Chinese Higher Education.” Tertiary Education and Management, 16(3): 229-241. doi:10.1080/13583883.2010.497391
• Canaan, J. E., & Shumar, W. (2008). “Higher education in the era of globalization and neoliberalism.” Structure and agency in the neoliberal university, 15(1).
• Cannella, G. S., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2017). “Neoliberalism in higher education: Can we understand? Can we resist and survive? Can we become without neoliberalism? “Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 17(3): 155-162.
• Carlon, D., Downs, A., Pitsakis, K., Biniari, M. G., & Kuin, T. (2012). “Resisting change: organizational decoupling through an identity construction perspective.” Journal of Organizational Change Management.
• Christiansen, L. H., & Lounsbury, M. (2013). “Strange brew: Bridging logics via institutional bricolage and the reconstitution of organizational identity.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39(A): 199-232.
• Degn, L. (2015). “Sensemaking, sensegiving and strategic management in Danish higher education.” Higher Education, 69(6): 901-913.
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.” American Sociological Review, 147-160.
• Dodds, A., Obradovic-Wochnik, J., & Badran, A. (2014). “The new institutionalism in the context of Kosovo's transition: regulatory institutions in contested states.” East European Politics, 30(4): 436-457.
• Erkkilä, T., & Piironen, O. (2019). “Trapped in university rankings: bridging global competitiveness and local innovation.” International Studies in Sociology of Education, 1-23.
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations.” Research policy, 29(2): 109-123.
• Ewan, K. M. S. P. O. (2002). New public management: Current trends and future prospects: Psychology Press.
• Federkeil, G. (2008). “Rankings and quality assurance in higher education.” Higher Education in Europe, 33(2-3): 219-231.
• Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The new public management in action: OUP Oxford.
• Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). “Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation.” Strategic Management Journal, 12(6): 433-448.
• Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L., & Corley, K. G. (2013). “Organizational identity formation and change.” Academy of Management annals, 7(1): 123-193.
• Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). “Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability.” Academy of management Review, 25(1): 63-81.
• Giroux, H. (2002). “Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere.” Harvard Educational Review, 72(4): 425-464.
• Glynn, M. A. (2008). Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism: Sage.
• Goglio, V. (2016). “One size fits all? A different perspective on university rankings.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(2): 212-226.
• Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E. (2017). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: Sage.
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). “Institutional complexity and organizational responses.” Academy of Management annals, 5(1): 317-371.
• Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). “30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship.” Research Policy, 40(8): 1045-1057.
• Gulbrandsen, M., & Slipersaeter, S. (2007). “The third mission and the entrepreneurial university model.” Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation, 112-143.
• Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage
• Harman, G. (2011). Competitors of rankings: New directions in quality assurance and accountability. University Rankings. Springer.
• Hız, G. (2010). “1980 sonrasında Türkiye'de yükseköğretimde piyasalaştırma ve özelleştirmedeki gelişmeler.” Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (25): 55-80.
• Hornsby, D. J., & Osman, R. (2014). “Massification in higher education: large classes and student learning.” Higher education, 67(6): 711-719.
• Ingram, P., & Clay, K. (2000). “The choice-within-constraints new institutionalism and implications for sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1): 525-546.
• Kandiko, C. B. (2010). “Neoliberalism in higher education: A comparative approach.” International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(14): 153-175.
• Kezar, A. (2013). “Understanding sensemaking/sensegiving in transformational change processes from the bottom up.” Higher education, 65(6): 761-780.
• Lawson, S., Sanders, K., & Smith, L. (2015). “Commodification of the information profession: A critique of higher education under neoliberalism.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly communication, 3(1): 2-26.
• Lea, D. R. (2011). “The managerial university and the decline of modern thought. “ Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(8): 816-837.
• Levy, D. (2014). “Evolving privatization in Eastern and Central European higher education.” European Education, 46(3): 7-30.
• Lowndes, V., & Roberts, M. (2013). Why institutions matter: The new institutionalism in political science: Macmillan International Higher Education.
• Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). “Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward.” Academy of Management Annals, 8(1): 57-125.
• Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. (2010). “Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988).” Journal of Management Studies, 47(3): 551-580.
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006). “Elaborating the “new institutionalism”.” The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, 5: 3-20.
• McNeely, C. L. (2012). World polity theory. The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization.
• Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, B. (2006). Institutional analysis and the study of education. The New Institutionalism in Education. New York: State University of New York Place.
• Meyer, J., Rowan, B., & Scott, W. (1983). Organizational Environments: Beverly Hills. In: Sage.
• Meyer, J. W. (2010). “World society, institutional theories, and the actor.” Annual review of sociology, 36: 1-20.
• Miller, B. (2010). “Skills for sale: what is being commodified in higher education?” Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(2): 199-206.
• Mizruchi, M. S., & Fein, L. C. (1999). “The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4): 653-683.
• Mok, K. H. (2016). "Massification of higher education, graduate employment and social mobility in the Greater China region." British Journal of Sociology of Education 37.1 (2016): 51-71.
• Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). “Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism.” Journal of education policy, 20(3): 313-345.
• Pedersen, J. S., & Dobbin, F. (2006). “In search of identity and legitimation: Bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism.” American behavioral scientist, 49(7): 897-907.
• Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O'Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). “The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions.” Technovation, 31(4): 161-170.
• Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: University of Chicago Press.
• Proulx, R. (2009). World university rankings. The need for a new paradigm. University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education. Brill Sense.
• Prudence, C. C., & Li-Tien, W. (2012). “Who benefits from the massification of higher education in Taiwan?” Chinese Education & Society, 45(5-6): 8-20.
• Qiang, Z. (2003). “Internationalization of higher education: Towards a conceptual framework. “Policy futures in education, 1(2): 248-270.
• Rice, D. (2013). “Street-level bureaucrats and the welfare state: Toward a micro-institutionalist theory of policy implementation.” Administration & Society, 45(9): 1038-1062.
• Rowan, B., Meyer, H., & Rowan, B. (2006). The new institutionalism and the study of educational organizations: Changing ideas for changing times. The new institutionalism in education. New York: State University of New York Place.
• Santiago, P., Tremblay, K., Basri, E., & Arnal, E. (2008). Tertiary education for the knowledge society (Vol. 1): OECD Paris.
• Schilke, O. (2018). “A micro-institutional inquiry into resistance to environmental pressures.” Academy of Management journal, 61(4): 1431-1466.
• Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). “The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century.” American Sociological Review, 70(6): 898-920.
• Schwarz, S., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2004). Accreditation in the framework of evaluation activities: A comparative study in the European higher education area. Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area: Springer.
• Shin, J. C., & Harman, G. (2009). “New challenges for higher education: Global and Asia-Pacific perspectives.” Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(1): 1-13.
• Shin, J. C., Toutkoushian, R. K., & Teichler, U. (2011). University rankings: Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (Vol. 3): Springer Science & Business Media.
• Shumar, W. (1997). College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education: Psychology Press.
• Slaughter, S., Slaughter, S. A., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education: JHU Press.
• Smidt, H. (2015). European quality assurance—A European higher education area success story [overview paper]. The European Higher Education Area (625). Cham: Springer.
• Snihur, Y. (2016). “Developing optimal distinctiveness: organizational identity processes in new ventures engaged in business model innovation.” Entrepreneurship & Regional development, 28(3-4): 259-285.
• Steele, C. W., Toubiana, M., & Greenwood, R. (2019). Why worry? Celebrating and reformulating “integrative institutionalism”. Microfoundations of Institutions. Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional Approaches.” Academy of management Review, 20(3): 571-610.
• Şenses, F. (2007). “Uluslararası Gelişmeler Işığında Türkiye Yükseköğretim Sistemi: Temel Eğilimler, Sorunlar, Çelişkiler ve Öneriler.” Economic Research Center Working Papers in Economics, 7(5): 1-32.
• Taylor, A. (2017). “Perspectives on the university as a business: The corporate management structure, neoliberalism and higher education.” Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 15(1): 108-135.
• Tilak, J. B. (2008). “Transition from higher education as a public good to higher education as a private good: The saga of Indian experience.” Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1(2): 220-234.
• van Eeten, M. J., Loucks, D. P., & Roe, E. (2002). “Bringing actors together around large-scale water systems: Participatory modeling and other innovations. “ Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 14(4): 94-108.
• Wang, L. (2011). “Exploring the potential rationale for the privatization of higher education in China.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31(4): 421-438.
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3): Sage.
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). “Organizing and the process of sensemaking.” Organization Science, 16(4): 409-421.
• Zuckerman, E. W. (2016). Optimal distinctiveness revisited. The Oxford Handbook on Organizational Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.