MANUSCRIPT EVALUATION FORM


Registration (ID) number : /
'


Title of the manuscript:


Please Specify YES or NO


1. TITLE


1. Does the Turkish title reflect the content of the study?  

2. Does the English title reflect the content of the study?  


2. ABSTRACT


1. Does the Turkish summary cover the content and results of the study in general terms?  

2. Does the English summary cover the content and results of the study in general terms?  

3. INTRODUCTION

1. Is the purpose of the article clearly stated in the introduction?  


4. MATERIAL AND METHOD


1. Is the number of cases, observations and experiments sufficient and appropriate for the purpose?  

2. Is the method adequately explained and referenced?  


5. RESULTS

1. Is the measurement and statistical evaluation of the results sufficient and reliable?  


6. DISCUSSION


1. Have the literature data been synthesized and presented among themselves?  

2. Is the literature data presented by synthesizing it with the author's own experiences?  

3. Is there sufficient explanation for the different findings?  

4. Is the discussion sufficient?  


7. REFERENCES


1. Have national references been adequately utilized?  

2. Have international  references been used sufficiently?  

3. Are the references up to date?  

4. Are the references relevant?  

5. Are the references sufficient?  

6. Are the references used in the text appropriately?  


8. TABLES AND FIGURES


1. Are the tables and/or figures necessary?  

2. Are the tables and/or figures sufficient?  

3. Are the explanation about the tables and /or figures sufficient?  


9. SECTIONS OF THE ARTICLE


1. Are the sections of the manuscript made in accordance with the type of article?  

2. Is it necessary to shorten the article?  


10. LINGUISTIC


1. Is the manuscript  clear and understandable?  

2. Are there any spelling and spelling mistakes?  

3. Is the medical terminology used appropriately?  


11. TYPE OF THE MANUSCRIPT


1. Research  

2. Compilation  

3. Case presentation  

4. Letter to the editor  

5. Preliminary notice  


12. DECISION


This work

1. Can be published as is. 

2. Can be published after being corrected in line with the criticisms. 

3. After it has been corrected in line with the criticism, it should been re-edited by me.

4. Can not be published. 





13. Please indicate your evaluations about the study below























































Name and Surname of the Reviewer:

Date:

Signature: