Year 2021, Volume , Issue , Pages 0 - 0 2021-04-22

Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling

Sanaz VATANKHAH [1] , Shiva ILKHANIZADEH [2]


This study investigates whether and how key components of organizational attractiveness are interrelating to impose the maximum positive impact on the air transportation job market. An expert panel was shaped to gauge judgments regarding the driving power of each criterion over the other. The results of Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) revealed that organizational and job characteristics are the main criteria with the most driving power in the model fostering perceived fit. In addition, corporate branding and corporate social responsibility (CSR) demonstrated the highest dependence on the other criteria. The results were further validated through Impact Matrix Cross-reference Multiplication to a classification (MICMAC). The hierarchical pattern of study findings offers theoretical contributions to the study of organizational attractiveness. Practical implications of the results and study limitations are also provided.
Airline, Interpretive structural model, MICMAC, Organizational attractiveness, Decision making
  • Albinger, H. S., & Freeman, S. J. (2000). Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 243-253.
  • Ali, S. M., Arafin, A., Moktadir, M. A., Rahman, T., & Zahan, N. (2018). Barriers to reverse logistics in the computer supply chain using interpretive structural model. Global journal of flexible systems management, 19(1), 53-68.
  • Allen, T. D., & O'Brien, K. E. (2006). Formal mentoring programs and organizational attraction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17(1), 43-58.
  • Attri, R., Dev, N., & Sharma, V. (2013). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: an overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2319, 1171.
  • Backhaus, K. B. (2016). Organizational identity, corporate social performance and corporate reputation: Their roles in creating organizational attractiveness. In Corporate Reputation (pp. 127-146). Routledge.
  • Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploringthe relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society, 41(3), 292-318.
  • Bankins, S., & Waterhouse, J. (2019). Organizational identity, image, and reputation: Examining the influence on perceptions of employer attractiveness in public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(3), 218-229.
  • Belinda, C. D., Westerman, J. W., & Bergman, S. M. (2018). Recruiting with ethics in an online era: Integrating corporate social responsibility with social media to predict organizational attractiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 109, 101-117.
  • Bohlmann, C., Krumbholz, L., & Zacher, H. (2018). The triple bottom line and organizational attractiveness ratings: The role of pro‐environmental attitude. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 912-919.
  • Bretz Jr, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). The role of human resource systems in job applicant decision processes. Journal of Management, 20(3), 531-551.
  • Brunner, C. B., & Baum, M. (2020). The impact of brand portfolios on organizational attractiveness. Journal of Business Research, 106, 182-195.
  • Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 67(3), 294-311.
  • Caldwell, D. F., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1990). Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process. Journal of applied psychology, 75(6), 648.
  • Carballo‐Penela, A. (2019). Enhancing social sustainability at a business level: Organizational attractiveness is higher when organizations show responsibility towards employees. Business Strategy & Development, 2(4), 372-383.
  • Carless, S. A. (2005). Person–job fit versus person-organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 411-429.
  • Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, 90(5), 928.
  • Chen, C. F. (2006). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and flight attendants' turnover intentions: A note. Journal of Air Transport Management, 12(5), 274-276.
  • Chen, C. F., & Kao, Y. L. (2011). The antecedents and consequences of job stress of flight attendants–Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(4), 253-255.
  • Chen, F. Y., & Chang, Y. H. (2005). Examining airline service quality from a process perspective. Journal of Air Transport Management, 11(2), 79-87.
  • Cober, R. T., Brown, D. J., Levy, P. E., Cober, A. B., & Keeping, L. M. (2003). Organizational web sites: Web site content and style as determinants of organizational attraction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(2‐3), 158-169.
  • Cowper-Smith, A., & de Grosbois, D. (2011). The adoption of corporate social responsibility practices in the airline industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(1), 59-77.
  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 15(1), 1-13.
  • De Chernatony, L. (2001). A model for strategically building brands. Journal of brand management, 9(1), 32-44.
  • De Chernatony, L. (1999). Brand management through narrowing the gap between brand identity and brand reputation. Journal of marketing management, 15(1-3), 157-179.
  • Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.
  • Denzin, N. K. (2007). Triangulation. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology.
  • Duarte, A. P., Gomes, D. R., & das Neves, J. G. (2014). Tell me your socially responsible practices, I will tell you how attractive for recruitment you are! The impact of perceived CSR on organizational attractiveness. Tékhne, 12, 22-29.
  • Duperrin, J. C., & Godet, M. (1973). Methode de hierarchisation des elements d’un systeme. Rapport Economique du CEA, Paris, 45-51.
  • Erkmen, E., & Hancer, M. (2015). Linking brand commitment and brand citizenship behaviors of airline employees: "The role of trust". Journal of Air Transport Management, 42, 47-54.
  • Etikan, I., Sulaiman, A. M., & Rukayya, S. A. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics 5(1), 1-4.
  • Goeters, K. M., Timmermann, B., & Maschke, P. (1993). The construction of personality questionnaires for selection of aviation personnel. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(2), 123-141.
  • Gomes, D., & Neves, J. (2011). Organizational attractiveness and prospective applicants' intentions to apply. Personnel Review, 40(6), 684-699.
  • Hartley, R. I., & Sturm, P. (1997). Triangulation. Computer vision and image understanding, 68(2), 146-157.
  • Held, K., & Bader, B. (2018). The influence of images on organizational attractiveness: comparing Chinese, Russian and US companies in Germany. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(3), 510-548.
  • Helmreich, R. L., & Foushee, H. C. (2010). Why CRM? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training. In Crew resource management (pp. 3-57). Academic Press.
  • Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(6), 986-1001.
  • Hsu, Y. L., & Liu, T. C. (2012). Structuring risk factors related to airline cabin safety. Journal of air transport management, 20, 54-56.
  • Honeycutt, T. L., & Rosen, B. (1997). Family friendly human resource policies, salary levels, and salient identity as predictors of organizational attraction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(2), 271-290.
  • Huang, L., Yang, Y., & Sekiguchi, T. (2020). Attractiveness of Japanese firms to international job applicants: the effects of belongingness, uniqueness, and employment patterns. Asian Business & Management, 19(1), 118-144.
  • IATA annual report (2019). Retrieved June 22, 2020, from https://www.iata.org/contentassets/c81222d96c9a4e0bb4ff6ced0126f0bb/iata-annual-review-2019.pdf.
  • Jain, V., & Ajmera, P. (2018). Modelling the factors affecting Indian medical tourism sector using interpretive structural modeling. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(5), 1461-1479.
  • Jiang, T., & Iles, P. (2011). Employer-brand equity, organizational attractiveness and talent management in the Zhejiang private sector, China. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), 97-110.
  • Joo, Y. R., Moon, H. K., & Choi, B. K. (2016). A moderated mediation model of CSR and organizational attractiveness among job applicants: Roles of perceived overall justice and attributed motives. Management Decision, 54(6), 1269-1293.
  • Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D. (1992). Effects of work values on job choice decisions. Journal of applied psychology, 77(3), 261.
  • Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 359-394.
  • Karatepe, O. M., & Vatankhah, S. (2014a). The effects of high-performance work practices and job embeddedness on flight attendants' performance outcomes. Journal of Air Transport Management, 37, 27-35.
  • Karatepe, O. M., & Vatankhah, S. (2014b). The effects of high-performance work practices on perceived organizational support and turnover intentions: Evidence from the airline industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 13(2), 103-119.
  • Kausel, E. E., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Narrow personality traits and organizational attraction: Evidence for the complementary hypothesis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(1), 3-14.
  • Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: a meta‐analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
  • Koc, E., & Boz, H. (2014). Triangulation in tourism research: A bibliometric study of top three tourism journals. Tourism Management Perspectives, 12, 9-14.
  • Kröll, C., Nüesch, S., & Foege, J. N. (2018). Flexible work practices and organizational attractiveness in Germany: The mediating role of anticipated organizational support. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-30.
  • Kuo, T. C., Ma, H. Y., Huang, S. H., Hu, A. H., & Huang, C. S. (2010). Barrier analysis for product service system using interpretive structural model. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 49(1-4), 407-417.
  • Lambert, J. R., Basuil, D. A., Bell, M. P., & Marquardt, D. J. (2019). Coming to America: work visas, international diversity, and organizational attractiveness among highly skilled Asian immigrants. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(15), 2293-2319.
  • Lee, T. R., Kuo, Y. H., & Muhos, M. (2015). Applying interpretive structural modeling to the planning of a sequence of marketing strategies: a case study of the architectural tourism in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20(10), 1132-1150.
  • Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 395–404.
  • Liang, S. C., & Hsieh, A. T. (2005). Individual's perception of career development and job burnout among flight attendants in Taiwan. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 15(2), 119-134.
  • Lievens, F., Decaesteker, C., Coetsier, P., & Geirnaert, J. (2001). Organizational attractiveness for prospective applicants: A person–organisation fit perspective. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 30-51.
  • Lin, H. F. (2015). The impact of company-dependent and company-independent information sources on organizational attractiveness perceptions. Journal of Management Development, 34(8), 941-959.
  • Lis, B. (2018). Corporate social responsibility's influence on organizational attractiveness: An investigation in the context of employer choice. Journal of General Management, 43(3), 106-114.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). USA: Sage publications.
  • Miles, S. J., & Mangold, W. G. (2005). Positioning Southwest Airlines through employee branding. Business Horizons, 48(6), 535-545.
  • Mollerup, P. (1998). Marks of Excellence: The History and Taxonomy of Trademarks. London: Phaidon Press.
  • Murray, D. W., & Ayoun, B. M. (2010). Hospitality student perceptions on the use of sustainable business practices as a means of signaling attractiveness and attracting future employees. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 10(1), 60-79.
  • Nadler, J., Gann-Bociek, M., & Skaggs, B. (2017). Interview support on perceptions of organizational attractiveness: The effects of applicant gender and socio-economic status. Management Research Review, 40(7), 783-799.
  • Ng, S. I., Sambasivan, M., & Zubaidah, S. (2011). Antecedents and outcomes of flight attendants' job satisfaction. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(5), 309-313.
  • Nur Iplik, F., Can Kilic, K., & Yalcin, A. (2011). The simultaneous effects of person-organization and person-job fit on Turkish hotel managers. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23(5), 644-661.
  • Park, H. I., Monnot, M. J., Jacob, A. C., & Wagner, S. H. (2011). Moderators of the relationship between person-job fit and subjective well-being among Asian employees. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(1), 67.
  • Petter, S. C., & Gallivan, M. J. (2004). Toward a framework for classifying and guiding mixed method research in information systems. In 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the (pp. 10-pp). IEEE.
  • Ranjan Debata, B., Sree, K., Patnaik, B., & Sankar Mahapatra, S. (2013). Evaluating medical tourism enablers with interpretive structural modeling. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20(6), 716-743.
  • Rode, V., & Vallaster, C. (2005). Corporate branding for start-ups: the crucial role of entrepreneurs. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(2), 121-135.
  • Rynes, S. L., & Barber, A. E. (1990). Applicant attraction strategies: An organizational perspective. Academy of management review, 15(2), 286-310.
  • Rynes, S. L., & Miller, H. E. (1983). Recruiter and job influences on candidates for employment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(1), 147-154.
  • Schiffinger, M., & Braun, S. M. (2020). The impact of social and temporal job demands and resources on emotional exhaustion and turnover intention among flight attendants. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 19(2), 196-219.
  • Schreurs, B., Druart, C., Proost, K., & De Witte, K. (2009). Symbolic attributes and organizational attractiveness: The moderating effects of applicant personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(1), 35-46.
  • Sivertzen, A.M., Nilsen, E.R. & Olafsen, A.H. (2013). Employer branding: Employer attractiveness and the use of social media. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 22(7), 473-483.
  • Sohn, M., Sohn, W., Klaas-Wissing, T., & Hirsch, B. (2015). The influence of corporate social performance on employer attractiveness in the transport and logistics industry: Insights from German junior talent. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(5), 486-505.
  • Sommer, L. P., Heidenreich, S., & Handrich, M. (2017). War for talents—How perceived organizational innovativeness affects employer attractiveness. R&D Management, 47(2), 299-310.
  • Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Sage.
  • Spitzmüller, C., Neumann, E., Spitzmüller, M., Rubino, C., Keeton, K. E., Sutton, M. T., & Manzey, D. (2008). Assessing the influence of psychosocial and career mentoring on organizational attractiveness. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(4), 403-415.
  • Story, J., Castanheira, F., & Hartig, S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and organizational attractiveness: implications for talent management. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(3), 484-505.
  • Sushil, S. (2012). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87-106.
  • Thurlow, C., & Aiello, G. (2007). National pride, global capital: A social semiotic analysis of transnational visual branding in the airline industry. Visual communication, 6(3), 305-344.
  • Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
  • Turban, D. B., & Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 184.
  • Umphress, E. E., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P., Dietz, J., & Watkins, M. B. (2007). When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 396.
  • Van Hoye, G., & Lievens, F. (2005). Recruitment‐related information sources and organizational attractiveness: Can something be done about negative publicity?. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(3), 179-187.
  • van Prooijen, A. M., & Ellemers, N. (2015). Does it pay to be moral? How indicators of morality and competence enhance organizational and work team attractiveness. British Journal of Management, 26(2), 225-236.
  • Vatankhah, S., Javid, E., & Raoofi, A. (2017). Perceived organizational support as the mediator of the relationships between high-performance work practices and counter-productive work behavior: Evidence from airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 59, 107-115.
  • Vatankhah, S., Zarra-Nezhad, M., & Amirnejad, G. (2019). Tackling the fuzziness of business model concept: A study in the airline industry. Tourism Management, 74, 134-143.
  • Waples, C. J., & Brachle, B. J. (2020). Recruiting millennials: Exploring the impact of CSR involvement and pay signaling on organizational attractiveness. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 870-880.
  • Warfield, J. N. (1974). Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, (1), 81-87.
  • Warfield, J. N. (1994). Science of generic design: managing complexity through systems design. Iowa State Press.
  • Yeh, Y. P. (2014). Exploring the impacts of employee advocacy on job satisfaction and organizational commitment: Case of Taiwanese airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 36, 94-100.
  • Younis, R. A. A., & Hammad, R. (2020). Employer image, corporate image and organizational attractiveness: the moderating role of social identity consciousness. Personnel Review, 50(1), 244-263.
  • Yu, K. Y. T. (2014). Person–organization fit effects on organizational attraction: A test of an expectations-based model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(1), 75-94.
  • Zhang, Q., Cao, M., Zhang, F., Liu, J., & Li, X. (2020). Effects of corporate social responsibility on customer satisfaction and organizational attractiveness: A signaling perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(1), 20-34.
Primary Language en
Subjects Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Orcid: 0000-0001-9604-8356
Author: Sanaz VATANKHAH (Primary Author)
Institution: University of Bedfordshire
Country: United Kingdom


Orcid: 0000-0002-9362-663X
Author: Shiva ILKHANIZADEH
Institution: ULUSLARARASI KIBRIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Country: Turkey


Dates

Application Date : November 30, 2020
Acceptance Date : April 30, 2021
Publication Date : April 22, 2021

Bibtex @research article { ahtr833629, journal = {Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR)}, issn = {2147-9100}, eissn = {2148-7316}, address = {Akdeniz University, Tourism Faculty Dumlupınar Boulevard Post Code: 07058 Campus ANTALYA, TURKEY}, publisher = {Akdeniz University}, year = {2021}, volume = {}, pages = {0 - 0}, doi = {10.30519/ahtr.833629}, title = {Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling}, key = {cite}, author = {Vatankhah, Sanaz and Ilkhanızadeh, Shiva} }
APA Vatankhah, S , Ilkhanızadeh, S . (2021). Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling . Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) , , 0-0 . DOI: 10.30519/ahtr.833629
MLA Vatankhah, S , Ilkhanızadeh, S . "Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling" . Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) (2021 ): 0-0 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ahtr/issue/59492/833629>
Chicago Vatankhah, S , Ilkhanızadeh, S . "Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling". Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) (2021 ): 0-0
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling AU - Sanaz Vatankhah , Shiva Ilkhanızadeh Y1 - 2021 PY - 2021 N1 - doi: 10.30519/ahtr.833629 DO - 10.30519/ahtr.833629 T2 - Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 0 EP - 0 VL - IS - SN - 2147-9100-2148-7316 M3 - doi: 10.30519/ahtr.833629 UR - https://doi.org/10.30519/ahtr.833629 Y2 - 2021 ER -
EndNote %0 Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling %A Sanaz Vatankhah , Shiva Ilkhanızadeh %T Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling %D 2021 %J Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) %P 2147-9100-2148-7316 %V %N %R doi: 10.30519/ahtr.833629 %U 10.30519/ahtr.833629
ISNAD Vatankhah, Sanaz , Ilkhanızadeh, Shiva . "Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling". Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) / (April 2021): 0-0 . https://doi.org/10.30519/ahtr.833629
AMA Vatankhah S , Ilkhanızadeh S . Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR). 2021; 0-0.
Vancouver Vatankhah S , Ilkhanızadeh S . Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR). 2021; 0-0.
IEEE S. Vatankhah and S. Ilkhanızadeh , "Understanding Airline Organizational Attractiveness Using Interpretive Structural Modelling", Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), pp. 0-0, Apr. 2021, doi:10.30519/ahtr.833629