Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Comparative Sociological Analysis of the Conventional and Contemporary Educational Approach In the Movie Three Idiots

Year 2024, , 1122 - 1140, 24.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2024..-1350206

Abstract

Three Idiots: is a 2009 Indian feature film directed by Rajkumar Hirani and starring famous names such as Aamir Khan, Kareena Kapoor. This study was conducted to determine the prevalent educational representations in the movie Three Idiots and the educational approaches that could be employed in the analysis of these representations. In the study, on the one hand, the educational dimensions of the film are emphasized, on the other hand, educational understandings are tried to be analyzed comparatively on the basis of characters. The study aimed to demonstrate how the criticism of the conventional educational approach was interspersed throughout the movie and determine the foundations of the contemporary education philosophy based on the movie characters and their lines. The study is considered significant since it aimed to analyze a movie from an educational perspective, focused on educational approaches as well as educational representations, analyzed these approaches with the comparative method, and finally included social science techniques such as discourse and indicator analysis within the context of socio-educational discipline. The study was designed with the "framing analysis" model, a qualitative research method, discourse and indicator analyses were preferred as the data analysis technique. The study concluded that the traditional education was system-oriented and ignored the individual, while the contemporary understanding of education puts the learner in the center and emphasizes individual differences, criticism and creativity.

References

  • Agocuk, P. (2016). A Film Analysis and Interpretation on the Amarcord Film. International Journal of Social Research, 7(31), 8-18.
  • Akdag, B. (2006). Alternative Education Models. Bell and Break Magazine, 1(6), 34-44.
  • Akmese, Z. (2020). The Content and Comprehension Effect of Framing on Television. Esennur Sirer (Eds.). Television 4.0, New Curriculum, New Tracks in the Society 5.0 Period. Literature Publications.
  • Askun, I. C. (1980). Traditional Educational Tools and Methods against Contemporary Educational Technology. Fiction, 3(1), 304-313.
  • Bikic, N. C. (2021). A Critical Analysis of Traditional Education Concept through Three Idiot Films. Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(8), 76-92.
  • Birbicer, B. (2017). Whiteboard Blackboard: A Critical Look at the Modern School System. Maarif Mektepleri Publishing.
  • Coban, B. (2003). Discourse, Ideology, and Action: The Struggle to Resolve the Struggle between Power and Opposition. Baris Coban at al. (Eds.). Discourse and Ideology: Mythology, Religion and Ideology. Water Publications.
  • Coskun, B. (2018). The Structure and Functioning of the Turkish Education System. Mehmet Gultekin (Eds.). (2018). In Introduction to Educational Science. Anadolu University Press.
  • Celik, H. at al. (2008). Discourse Analysis. Atatürk University Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 27(27), 99-117.
  • Dijk, V. (2003). Discourse and Ideology: a Versatile Approach. Baris Coban at al. (Eds.). Discourse and Ideology: Mythology, Religion, Ideology. Water Publications.
  • Erkut, E. (2022).System Desperate: Education is in you. Dogan Book.
  • Fer, S. (2014). Learning Teaching Theory and Approaches. Memoir Publishing.
  • Foucault, M. (2011). Discourse. Basic Ideas in Sociology. (Umit Tatlıcan Tra). Sentez Publishing.
  • Freire, P. (1991). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. (D. Hattatoğlu and E. Özbek Tra). Ayrıntı Publications.
  • Girgin, M. (2017). Education Films. Vize Publishing.
  • Gul, S. S. at al. (2020). Content and Discourse Analysis in Social Sciences. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Science Institute, 42(1), 181-198.
  • Gultekin, M. (2018). Historical Foundations of Education. M. Gultekin (Eds.). In Introduction to Educational Science. Anadolu University Press.
  • Gunes, C. D. (2013). Discourse and Power in Michel Foucault. Anxiety Uludag University Journal of the Faculty of Science, 21(21), 51-69.
  • Gunes, F. (2015). “Basic Concepts and Contemporary Trends in Education”. Firdevs Gunes (Eds.). Introduction to Educational Science. PEGEM Academy.
  • Gokalp, A. at al. (1998). An Evaluation of Poetry in Terms of Semiotics: Book Names in a Dictionary. Prof. Dr. Dursun Yildirim Armağani. Ankara: Prof. Dr. Dursun Yildirim Armağani Publishing.
  • Hussain, S. at al. (2016). The Impact of the Indian Movie, Three Idiots (2009) on Attitudes to Education. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theater and Performance, 21(2), 242-246.
  • Ilich, I. (2022). Schoolless Society. (Mehmet Özay Tra.). Sule Publications.
  • Namaz, Y. (2023). A Bibliography of Educational and Educator-Themed Films and Analysis of Three Education-Themed Films. Erciyes Journal of Communication, 10(1), 369-394.
  • Rousseau J. J. (2014). Emile: A Child is growing up. Selis Books.
  • Sancar, S. (2008).The Adventure of Ideology. Imge Bookstore Publishing.
  • Silman, F. (2019). Films on Education: A Guide for Teachers and Prospective Teachers. PEGEM Academy.
  • Sonmez, V. (2014). Philosophy of Education. Memoir Publications.
  • Sozen, E. (1999). Discourse: Uncertainty, Exchange, Knowledge, Power and Reflexivity. Paradigm Publications.
  • Turkcan, B. (2013). A Semiotic Approach in the Analysis of Children's Paintings. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 13(1), 585-607.
  • Yakar, H. (2013). The Educational Use of Motion Picture Films: A Historical Evaluation. HAYEF Journal of Education, 10(1), 21-36.
  • Yilmaz, K. at al. (2013). The Relationship between Teachers' Beliefs and Their Views on Teacher-Student Relationships. Journal of Education and Training Research, 2(4), 205-219.
  • Yildirim, N. at al. (2016). Educational Analysis of Aamir Khan Films: A Qualitative Evaluation of 3 Idiots (3 Stupid) and Taare Zameen Par (Every Child Is Special). Journal of Atatürk University Fine Arts Institute, (36), 210-244.
  • Yurdigul, A. (2014). An Approach Trial on the Place of the Phenomenon in the Cinematographic Narrative (The Case of the Movie “Honey”). EKEV Academy Journal, (60), 487-502.
  • Yuksel, A. A. (2015). School, Teacher and Student Representations in Cinema Films in Turkey as a Cultural Product. Global Media Journal TR Edition, 6(11), 1-17.

Geleneksel ve Çağdaş Eğitim Anlayışlarının Üç İdiot filmi Üzerinden Karşılaştırmalı Sosyolojik Bir Analizi

Year 2024, , 1122 - 1140, 24.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2024..-1350206

Abstract

Üç İdiot (3 Aptal): Rajkumar Hirani tarafından yönetilen ve başrollerini Aamir Khan, Kareena Kapoor gibi ünlü isimlerin paylaştığı 2009 Hint yapımı bir sinema filmidir. Bu çalışmada, Üç Idiot filminde yer alan eğitimsel temsillerin neler olduğu ve bu temsillerin hangi eğitim anlayışları çerçevesinde değerlendirilebileceği konu edinilmektedir. Çalışmada, bir yandan filmin eğitimsel boyutları üzerinde durulurken öte yandan eğitim anlayışları karakterler bazında karşılaştırmalı bir biçimde analiz edilmeye çalışılmaktadır. Çalışma, farklı eğitim anlayışlarının film örneği üzerinden nasıl işlendiğini ortaya çıkarmayı hedeflemektedir. Daha açıklayıcı bir ifadeyle hedef, geleneksel eğitim anlayışına yöneltilen eleştirelliğin filme nasıl serpiştirildiğini göstermek ve çağdaş eğitim felsefesinin hangi temele dayandığını, filmden kodlanan sahne ve karakterler bağlamında ortaya çıkarmaktır. Çalışma şu açılardan önem arz etmektedir: bir sinema filmini eğitimsel açıdan çözümlemesi, eğitim temsillerinin yanı sıra eğitim anlayışlarına odaklanması, bunları karşılaştırmalı bir biçimde analiz etmesi ile söylem ve gösterge analizi gibi sosyal bilim tekniklerine bir sosyo-eğitim çalışmasında yer veriyor olması. Çalışmada, yöntemsel açıdan nitel bir araştırma deseni olan “çerçeveleme çözümlemesi” modeli esas alınırken veri analiz tekniği olarak da söylem ve gösterge analizleri tercih edilmektedir. Çalışmanın neticesinde filmin, geleneksel eğitim sisteminin eleştirisi üzerine kurgulandığı belirlenmiş, geleneksel eğitimin sistem odaklı kurgulandığı ve bireyi göz ardı ettiği; çağdaş eğitim anlayışının ise öğreneni merkeze alarak bireysel farklılıkları, eleştirelliği ve yaratıcılığı ön plana çıkardığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

References

  • Agocuk, P. (2016). A Film Analysis and Interpretation on the Amarcord Film. International Journal of Social Research, 7(31), 8-18.
  • Akdag, B. (2006). Alternative Education Models. Bell and Break Magazine, 1(6), 34-44.
  • Akmese, Z. (2020). The Content and Comprehension Effect of Framing on Television. Esennur Sirer (Eds.). Television 4.0, New Curriculum, New Tracks in the Society 5.0 Period. Literature Publications.
  • Askun, I. C. (1980). Traditional Educational Tools and Methods against Contemporary Educational Technology. Fiction, 3(1), 304-313.
  • Bikic, N. C. (2021). A Critical Analysis of Traditional Education Concept through Three Idiot Films. Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(8), 76-92.
  • Birbicer, B. (2017). Whiteboard Blackboard: A Critical Look at the Modern School System. Maarif Mektepleri Publishing.
  • Coban, B. (2003). Discourse, Ideology, and Action: The Struggle to Resolve the Struggle between Power and Opposition. Baris Coban at al. (Eds.). Discourse and Ideology: Mythology, Religion and Ideology. Water Publications.
  • Coskun, B. (2018). The Structure and Functioning of the Turkish Education System. Mehmet Gultekin (Eds.). (2018). In Introduction to Educational Science. Anadolu University Press.
  • Celik, H. at al. (2008). Discourse Analysis. Atatürk University Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 27(27), 99-117.
  • Dijk, V. (2003). Discourse and Ideology: a Versatile Approach. Baris Coban at al. (Eds.). Discourse and Ideology: Mythology, Religion, Ideology. Water Publications.
  • Erkut, E. (2022).System Desperate: Education is in you. Dogan Book.
  • Fer, S. (2014). Learning Teaching Theory and Approaches. Memoir Publishing.
  • Foucault, M. (2011). Discourse. Basic Ideas in Sociology. (Umit Tatlıcan Tra). Sentez Publishing.
  • Freire, P. (1991). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. (D. Hattatoğlu and E. Özbek Tra). Ayrıntı Publications.
  • Girgin, M. (2017). Education Films. Vize Publishing.
  • Gul, S. S. at al. (2020). Content and Discourse Analysis in Social Sciences. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Science Institute, 42(1), 181-198.
  • Gultekin, M. (2018). Historical Foundations of Education. M. Gultekin (Eds.). In Introduction to Educational Science. Anadolu University Press.
  • Gunes, C. D. (2013). Discourse and Power in Michel Foucault. Anxiety Uludag University Journal of the Faculty of Science, 21(21), 51-69.
  • Gunes, F. (2015). “Basic Concepts and Contemporary Trends in Education”. Firdevs Gunes (Eds.). Introduction to Educational Science. PEGEM Academy.
  • Gokalp, A. at al. (1998). An Evaluation of Poetry in Terms of Semiotics: Book Names in a Dictionary. Prof. Dr. Dursun Yildirim Armağani. Ankara: Prof. Dr. Dursun Yildirim Armağani Publishing.
  • Hussain, S. at al. (2016). The Impact of the Indian Movie, Three Idiots (2009) on Attitudes to Education. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theater and Performance, 21(2), 242-246.
  • Ilich, I. (2022). Schoolless Society. (Mehmet Özay Tra.). Sule Publications.
  • Namaz, Y. (2023). A Bibliography of Educational and Educator-Themed Films and Analysis of Three Education-Themed Films. Erciyes Journal of Communication, 10(1), 369-394.
  • Rousseau J. J. (2014). Emile: A Child is growing up. Selis Books.
  • Sancar, S. (2008).The Adventure of Ideology. Imge Bookstore Publishing.
  • Silman, F. (2019). Films on Education: A Guide for Teachers and Prospective Teachers. PEGEM Academy.
  • Sonmez, V. (2014). Philosophy of Education. Memoir Publications.
  • Sozen, E. (1999). Discourse: Uncertainty, Exchange, Knowledge, Power and Reflexivity. Paradigm Publications.
  • Turkcan, B. (2013). A Semiotic Approach in the Analysis of Children's Paintings. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 13(1), 585-607.
  • Yakar, H. (2013). The Educational Use of Motion Picture Films: A Historical Evaluation. HAYEF Journal of Education, 10(1), 21-36.
  • Yilmaz, K. at al. (2013). The Relationship between Teachers' Beliefs and Their Views on Teacher-Student Relationships. Journal of Education and Training Research, 2(4), 205-219.
  • Yildirim, N. at al. (2016). Educational Analysis of Aamir Khan Films: A Qualitative Evaluation of 3 Idiots (3 Stupid) and Taare Zameen Par (Every Child Is Special). Journal of Atatürk University Fine Arts Institute, (36), 210-244.
  • Yurdigul, A. (2014). An Approach Trial on the Place of the Phenomenon in the Cinematographic Narrative (The Case of the Movie “Honey”). EKEV Academy Journal, (60), 487-502.
  • Yuksel, A. A. (2015). School, Teacher and Student Representations in Cinema Films in Turkey as a Cultural Product. Global Media Journal TR Edition, 6(11), 1-17.
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education (Other)
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Abdülbaki Kınsün 0000-0003-2476-2985

Early Pub Date June 12, 2024
Publication Date June 24, 2024
Submission Date August 25, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

APA Kınsün, A. (2024). Comparative Sociological Analysis of the Conventional and Contemporary Educational Approach In the Movie Three Idiots. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 1122-1140. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2024..-1350206