Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Sulama Programlarının Geliştirilmesinde Bitkilerin İçsel Su Durumlarını Belirleyen Yöntemlerden Yararlanma Olanakları

Year 1989, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 17 - 30, 01.06.1989

Abstract

Bu makalede, bitki su durumunu ölçen yöntemlerden sulama programlaması amacıyla tarla koşullarına uygun olabileceklerin açıklanması amaçlanmıştır.
Bitkisel süreçler doğrudan bitki içindeki su koşulları tarafından belirlendiğinden, bitkinin içsel su durumunu esas alan sulama ölçütleri yersel koşullardan daha az etkilenirler ve daha yaygın bir kullanılabilirlikleri vardır.
Bitki su dengesine ilişkin çalışmalardaki yaklaşımlar özetlenmiş ve sulama programlamasındaki yararlılıkları değerlendirilmiştir. Bu yöntemlerden psikrometrik, basınç odacığı, oransal su içeriği, beta ışını ölçümü, infrared termometre ile uzaktan algılama yöntemleri incelenmiştir.

References

  • Baştug, R. ve O.Tekinel, 1988. Pamuk Yaprak Su İçeriği ile Çevresel Etkenler Arasındaki İlişkinin İrdelemesi. 3.Ulusal Kültürteknik Kongresi, 20- 23 Eylül. İzmir (Baskıda).
  • Bielorai, H., and P.A.M.Hopmans, 1975. Recorery of Leaf Water Potential, Transpiration, and Photosynthesis of Cotton During Irrigation Cycles. Agron.J. 67: 629-632.
  • Boyer, J.S., 1969. Measurement of the Water Status of Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 20, 351-364.
  • Denmead, O.T., and R.H.Shaw, 1962. Availability of Soil Water to Plant as Affected by Sail Moisture Content and Meteorological Conditions. Agron.J. 54: 385-390.
  • Ehlig, C.F., and W.R.Gardner, 1964. Relationship Between Transpiration and the Internal Water Relation of Plants. Agron.J. 56: 127-130.
  • Ehrler, W.L., 1973. Cotton Leaf Temperatures as Related to Soil Water Depletion and Meteorological Factors. Agron.J. 65: 404-409.
  • Grimes, D.W., and H.Yamada, 1982 a. Cotton Growth Related to Plant's Water Status. Calif. Agric. Nov.-Dec., 13-14.
  • Grimes, D.W., and. H.Yamada, 1982 b. Relation of Cotton Growth and Yield to Minimum Leaf Water Potential. Crop Sci. 22: 134-139.
  • Hagan, R.M., and J.F.Laborde, 1964. Plants as Indicator of Need for Irrigation. 8 th Intern. Congress of Soil Science, Bucharest, Romania. Transactions Coraptes Rendus Berichte, Vol.II., 399-421.
  • Hillel, D., 1987. The Efficient Use of Water in Irrigation. World Bank Technical Paper Number 64, Washington, D.C.
  • Howell, T.A., J.L.Hatfield, H.Yamada and K.R.Davis, 1984. Evaluation of Cotton Canopy Temperature to Detect Crop Water Stress. Transactions of the ASAE, 27: 84-88. '
  • Hsiao, T.C., and K.J.Bradford, 1983. Physiological Consequences of Cellular Water Deficits. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production (Ed. by Taylor et.al.). USA., 227-265.
  • Jackson, R.D., 1982. Canopy Temperature and Crop Water Stress. Advance in Irrigation. Vol 1. (Ed.by D.Hillel). Academic Press. New York., 43-85.
  • Longenecker, D.E., and P.J.Lyerly, 1969. Moisture Content of Cotton Leaves and Petioles as Related to Environmental Moisture Stress. Agron.J. 61: 687-690.
  • Longenecker, D.E., and P.J.Lyerly, 1971. Diurnal Changes in Cotton Leaf and Pe¬tiole Moisture Content as Related to Environmental Moisture Stress. Agron.J. 63: 885-886.
  • Namken, L.N., 1965. Relative Turgidity Technique for Scheduling Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Irrigation. Agron.J. 57: 38-41.
  • Namken, L.N., J.F.Bartholic, J.R.Runkles, 1969. Monitoring Cotton Plant Stem Radius as an Indication of Water Stress. Agron.J. 61: 891-893.
  • Namken, L.N., J.F.Bartholic, J.R.Runkles, 1971. Water Stress and Stem Radial Contraction of Cotton Plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Under Field Conditions. Agron.J. 63: 623-627.
  • Pinter, P.J.Jr., R.J.Reginato, 1982. A Thermal Infrared Technique for Monitoring Cotton Water Stress and Scheduling Irrigations. Transactions of the ASAE. 25: 1651-1655.
  • Radin, J.W., 1984. Stomatal Responses to Water Stress and to Abscisic Acid in Phosphorus-Deficient Cotton Plants. Plant Physiol. 76: 392-394.
  • Radulovich, R.A., C.J.Phene, K.R.Davis, and J.R.Brownell, 1982. Comparison of Water Stress of Cotton from Measurements with the Hydraulic Press and the Pressure Chamber. Agron.J. 74: 383-385.
  • Reginato, R.J., and J.Howe, 1985. Irrigation Scheduling Using Crop Indicators. J.Irrig. Drain. Eng. 111(2): 125-133.
  • Shimshi, D., 1973. Water Status in Plants-Methods of Measuring. Arid Zone Irrigation (Ed. by B.Yaron et.al.) Springer-Verlag New York. Heidelberg. Berlin, 249-259.
  • Slatyer, R., 1967. Water as a Plant Component. Plant-Water Relationships. Academic Press-London and New York, 127-160.
  • Stegman, E.C., L.H.Schiele, A.Bauer, 1976. Plant Water Stress Criteria for Irrigation Scheduling. Transactions of the ASAE. 19: 850-855.
  • Tekinel, 0., R.Kanber, 1978. Çukurova Koşullarında Pamuk Bitkisinin Fenolojik Görüntüsüne Göre Sulama Zamanının Saptanması üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Ç.Ü.Ziraat Fakültesi Yıllığı (9): 32-44.
  • Thomas, J.R., L.N.Namken, G.F.Oerther, and R.G.Brown, 1971. Estimating Leaf Water Content by Reflectance Measurements. Agron.J. 63: 845-847.
  • Thomas, J.R., K.W.Brown, and W.R.Jordan, 1976. Stomatal Response to Leaf Water Potential as Affected by Preconditioning Water Stress in the Field. Agron.J. 68: 706-708.
  • Turner, N.C., and G.J.Burch. 1983. The Role of Uater in Plants. Crop-Water Relations (Ed. by I.D.Teare and M.M.Peet). John Wiley and Sons. USA, 73-126.

Evaluation of the Methods Based on Measurements of Internal Water Status for the Development of Irrigation Programs

Year 1989, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 17 - 30, 01.06.1989

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to describe some of the techniques for measuring plant water status which are suitable for using at field conditions for irrigation programming.
Since plant processes are determinated directly by internal water status within the plant, irrigation criteria based on plant water should be less influenced by local conditions and should have nearly common application.
Approaches to studying plant water balance were summarized and their usefulness were evaluated for irrigation programing. These include psychrometric, pressure chaoter, beta-ray gauging, relative water content methods and remote sensing with an infrared thermometer.

References

  • Baştug, R. ve O.Tekinel, 1988. Pamuk Yaprak Su İçeriği ile Çevresel Etkenler Arasındaki İlişkinin İrdelemesi. 3.Ulusal Kültürteknik Kongresi, 20- 23 Eylül. İzmir (Baskıda).
  • Bielorai, H., and P.A.M.Hopmans, 1975. Recorery of Leaf Water Potential, Transpiration, and Photosynthesis of Cotton During Irrigation Cycles. Agron.J. 67: 629-632.
  • Boyer, J.S., 1969. Measurement of the Water Status of Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 20, 351-364.
  • Denmead, O.T., and R.H.Shaw, 1962. Availability of Soil Water to Plant as Affected by Sail Moisture Content and Meteorological Conditions. Agron.J. 54: 385-390.
  • Ehlig, C.F., and W.R.Gardner, 1964. Relationship Between Transpiration and the Internal Water Relation of Plants. Agron.J. 56: 127-130.
  • Ehrler, W.L., 1973. Cotton Leaf Temperatures as Related to Soil Water Depletion and Meteorological Factors. Agron.J. 65: 404-409.
  • Grimes, D.W., and H.Yamada, 1982 a. Cotton Growth Related to Plant's Water Status. Calif. Agric. Nov.-Dec., 13-14.
  • Grimes, D.W., and. H.Yamada, 1982 b. Relation of Cotton Growth and Yield to Minimum Leaf Water Potential. Crop Sci. 22: 134-139.
  • Hagan, R.M., and J.F.Laborde, 1964. Plants as Indicator of Need for Irrigation. 8 th Intern. Congress of Soil Science, Bucharest, Romania. Transactions Coraptes Rendus Berichte, Vol.II., 399-421.
  • Hillel, D., 1987. The Efficient Use of Water in Irrigation. World Bank Technical Paper Number 64, Washington, D.C.
  • Howell, T.A., J.L.Hatfield, H.Yamada and K.R.Davis, 1984. Evaluation of Cotton Canopy Temperature to Detect Crop Water Stress. Transactions of the ASAE, 27: 84-88. '
  • Hsiao, T.C., and K.J.Bradford, 1983. Physiological Consequences of Cellular Water Deficits. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production (Ed. by Taylor et.al.). USA., 227-265.
  • Jackson, R.D., 1982. Canopy Temperature and Crop Water Stress. Advance in Irrigation. Vol 1. (Ed.by D.Hillel). Academic Press. New York., 43-85.
  • Longenecker, D.E., and P.J.Lyerly, 1969. Moisture Content of Cotton Leaves and Petioles as Related to Environmental Moisture Stress. Agron.J. 61: 687-690.
  • Longenecker, D.E., and P.J.Lyerly, 1971. Diurnal Changes in Cotton Leaf and Pe¬tiole Moisture Content as Related to Environmental Moisture Stress. Agron.J. 63: 885-886.
  • Namken, L.N., 1965. Relative Turgidity Technique for Scheduling Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Irrigation. Agron.J. 57: 38-41.
  • Namken, L.N., J.F.Bartholic, J.R.Runkles, 1969. Monitoring Cotton Plant Stem Radius as an Indication of Water Stress. Agron.J. 61: 891-893.
  • Namken, L.N., J.F.Bartholic, J.R.Runkles, 1971. Water Stress and Stem Radial Contraction of Cotton Plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Under Field Conditions. Agron.J. 63: 623-627.
  • Pinter, P.J.Jr., R.J.Reginato, 1982. A Thermal Infrared Technique for Monitoring Cotton Water Stress and Scheduling Irrigations. Transactions of the ASAE. 25: 1651-1655.
  • Radin, J.W., 1984. Stomatal Responses to Water Stress and to Abscisic Acid in Phosphorus-Deficient Cotton Plants. Plant Physiol. 76: 392-394.
  • Radulovich, R.A., C.J.Phene, K.R.Davis, and J.R.Brownell, 1982. Comparison of Water Stress of Cotton from Measurements with the Hydraulic Press and the Pressure Chamber. Agron.J. 74: 383-385.
  • Reginato, R.J., and J.Howe, 1985. Irrigation Scheduling Using Crop Indicators. J.Irrig. Drain. Eng. 111(2): 125-133.
  • Shimshi, D., 1973. Water Status in Plants-Methods of Measuring. Arid Zone Irrigation (Ed. by B.Yaron et.al.) Springer-Verlag New York. Heidelberg. Berlin, 249-259.
  • Slatyer, R., 1967. Water as a Plant Component. Plant-Water Relationships. Academic Press-London and New York, 127-160.
  • Stegman, E.C., L.H.Schiele, A.Bauer, 1976. Plant Water Stress Criteria for Irrigation Scheduling. Transactions of the ASAE. 19: 850-855.
  • Tekinel, 0., R.Kanber, 1978. Çukurova Koşullarında Pamuk Bitkisinin Fenolojik Görüntüsüne Göre Sulama Zamanının Saptanması üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Ç.Ü.Ziraat Fakültesi Yıllığı (9): 32-44.
  • Thomas, J.R., L.N.Namken, G.F.Oerther, and R.G.Brown, 1971. Estimating Leaf Water Content by Reflectance Measurements. Agron.J. 63: 845-847.
  • Thomas, J.R., K.W.Brown, and W.R.Jordan, 1976. Stomatal Response to Leaf Water Potential as Affected by Preconditioning Water Stress in the Field. Agron.J. 68: 706-708.
  • Turner, N.C., and G.J.Burch. 1983. The Role of Uater in Plants. Crop-Water Relations (Ed. by I.D.Teare and M.M.Peet). John Wiley and Sons. USA, 73-126.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Agricultural Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ruhi Baştuğ This is me

Rıza Kanber This is me

Publication Date June 1, 1989
Published in Issue Year 1989 Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Baştuğ, R., & Kanber, R. (1989). Sulama Programlarının Geliştirilmesinde Bitkilerin İçsel Su Durumlarını Belirleyen Yöntemlerden Yararlanma Olanakları. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 2(1), 17-30.
AMA Baştuğ R, Kanber R. Sulama Programlarının Geliştirilmesinde Bitkilerin İçsel Su Durumlarını Belirleyen Yöntemlerden Yararlanma Olanakları. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. June 1989;2(1):17-30.
Chicago Baştuğ, Ruhi, and Rıza Kanber. “Sulama Programlarının Geliştirilmesinde Bitkilerin İçsel Su Durumlarını Belirleyen Yöntemlerden Yararlanma Olanakları”. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 2, no. 1 (June 1989): 17-30.
EndNote Baştuğ R, Kanber R (June 1, 1989) Sulama Programlarının Geliştirilmesinde Bitkilerin İçsel Su Durumlarını Belirleyen Yöntemlerden Yararlanma Olanakları. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 2 1 17–30.
IEEE R. Baştuğ and R. Kanber, “Sulama Programlarının Geliştirilmesinde Bitkilerin İçsel Su Durumlarını Belirleyen Yöntemlerden Yararlanma Olanakları”, Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 1989.
ISNAD Baştuğ, Ruhi - Kanber, Rıza. “Sulama Programlarının Geliştirilmesinde Bitkilerin İçsel Su Durumlarını Belirleyen Yöntemlerden Yararlanma Olanakları”. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 2/1 (June 1989), 17-30.
JAMA Baştuğ R, Kanber R. Sulama Programlarının Geliştirilmesinde Bitkilerin İçsel Su Durumlarını Belirleyen Yöntemlerden Yararlanma Olanakları. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. 1989;2:17–30.
MLA Baştuğ, Ruhi and Rıza Kanber. “Sulama Programlarının Geliştirilmesinde Bitkilerin İçsel Su Durumlarını Belirleyen Yöntemlerden Yararlanma Olanakları”. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, vol. 2, no. 1, 1989, pp. 17-30.
Vancouver Baştuğ R, Kanber R. Sulama Programlarının Geliştirilmesinde Bitkilerin İçsel Su Durumlarını Belirleyen Yöntemlerden Yararlanma Olanakları. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. 1989;2(1):17-30.