Functional and Physicochemical Properties of Milled and Microfluidized Bulgur and Chickpea Brans

Year 2023, Volume: 29 Issue: 1, 200 - 208, 31.01.2023

Burcu Baumgartner Berrin Özkaya İrem Saka Hazım Özkaya

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1001981

Abstract

Dietary fiber plays a crucial role in human diet due to their healthpromoting effects. Cereal brans are widely used for fiber enrichment of bakery products; however, their high phytic acid content, mostly localized in the aleurone layer, lowers the nutritional value of the endproduct. Therefore, the functional and physicochemical properties of two aleurone-free brans, bulgur and chickpea brans, were investigated as alternative fiber sources. Furthermore, effect of particle size reduction by means of milling and the microfluidization process on these properties were determined. The microfluidization reduced the particle sizes of bulgur and chickpea brans to 13.12 and 14.25 μm, respectively. The results indicated that the microfluidization significantly increased the soluble dietary fiber content of brans. Thus, the insoluble/ soluble dietary fiber ratios of bulgur and chickpea brans decreased to 8.42 and 6.13 from 19.20 and 15.33, respectively. The phytic acid contents
ranged from 230.8 to 247.9 mg/100g for bulgur bran, and 112.1 to 113.1 mg/100g for chickpea bran. After the microfluidization, these contents decreased to 107.1 and 47.9 mg/100g for bulgur and chickpea brans, respectively. The milled samples did not show any differences in terms of phenolic contents and antioxidant activity, but the microfluidization increased the phenolic content of bulgur and chickpea brans as 73.80% and 59.62%, respectively. In addition, the antioxidant activity values increased 73.08% for bulgur bran, and 76.70% for chickpea bran with this process. Chickpea bran had higher swelling and water holding capacity than that of bulgur bran, but the oil holding capacities of both types of brans were close to each other. Conventional milling had no
significant effect on these properties, whereas the microfluidization improved them. Therefore, it can be said that the applied microfluidization process enhanced physicochemical properties along with their functional properties, and it is possible to degrade phytic acid with microfluidization process. 

Keywords

Bulgur bran, Leblebi, Antioxidant activity, microfluidization, dietary fiber, phytic acid

References

• AACCI Approved Methods (2010) Approved Methods of American Association of Cereal Chemists, 11th ed. The Association, St. Paul, MN, USA.
• AOAC (2012) Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
• Adom KK & Liu RH (2002) Antioxidant Activity of Grains. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50: 6182-6187.
• Brewer LR, Kubola J, Siriamornpun S, Herald TJ & Shi Y-C (2014) Wheat bran particle size influence on phytochemical extractability and antioxidant properties. Food Chemistry 152: 483-490.
• Chau CF & Huang Y-L (2003) Comparison of the chemical composition and physicochemical properties of different fibers prepared from the peel of Citrus sinensis L. Cv. Liucheng. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 2615-2618.
• Chau CF, Wen YL & Wang YT (2006). Effects of micronisation on the characteristics and physicochemical properties of insoluble fibres. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86: 2380-2386.
• Chau CF, Wu S-C & Lee M-H (2007) Physicochemical changes upon micronization process positively improve the intestinal health-enhancement ability of carrot insoluble fibre. Food Chemistry 104: 1569-1574.
• Chen J, Gao D, Yang L & Gao Y (2013) Effect of microfluidization process on the functional properties of insoluble dietary fiber. Food Research International 54: 1821-1827. Cheryan M & Rackis JJ (1980) Phytic acid interactions in food systems. Critical Reviews in Food Science & Nutrition 13: 297-335.
• Deshpande SS & Damodaran S (1990) Food legumes: chemistry and technology. In: Pomeranz, Y. (Ed.), Advances in Cereal Science and Technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN, pp 147–241.
• Eastwood MA (1992) The physiological effect of dietary fiber: an update. Annual Review of Nutrition 12: 19-35.
• Esposito F, Arlotti G, Maria Bonifati A, Napolitano A, Vitale D & Fogliano V (2005) Antioxidant activity and dietary fibre in durum wheat bran by-products. Food Research International 38: 1167-1173.
• Galisteo M, Duarte J & Zarzuelo A (2008) Effects of dietary fibers on disturbances clustered in the metabolic syndrome. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 19: 71-84.
• Haug W & Lantzsch HJ (1983) Sensitive method for the rapid determination of phytate in cereals and cereal products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 34: 1423–1426. https://doi. org/10.1002/jsfa.2740341217.
• Hemery Y, Chaurand M, Holopainen U, Lampi A-M, Lehtinen P, Piironen V, Sadoudi A & Rouau X (2011) Potential of dry fractionation of wheat bran for the development of food ingredients, part I: Influence of ultra-fine grinding. Journal of Cereal Science 53: 1-8.
• Hussain B, Khan S, Ismail M & Sattar A (1989) Effect of roasting and autoclaving on phytic acid content of chickpea. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 33: 345-348.
• Özkaya B, Turksoy S, Özkaya H & Duman B (2017) Dephytinization of wheat and rice brans by hydrothermal autoclaving process and the evaluation of consequences for dietary fiber content, antioxidant activity and phenolics. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 39: 209-215.
• Özkaya H, Özkaya B, Duman B & Turksoy S (2017) Effect of Dephytinization by Fermentation and Hydrothermal Autoclaving Treatments on the Antioxidant Activity, Dietary Fiber and Phenolic Content of Oat Bran. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65: 5713-5719.
• Rincón F, Martínez B & Ibáñez M (1998) Proximate composition and antinutritive substances in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) as affected by the biotype factor. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 78: 382-388.
• Rosa NN, Barron C, Gaiani C, Dufour C & Micard V (2013) Ultra-fine grinding increases the antioxidant capacity of wheat bran. Journal of Cereal Science 57: 84-90.
• Saka İ, Özkaya H & Özkaya B. (2020). Potential utilization of bulgur bran as a source of dietary fiber in cookies. Cereal Chemistry 97: 930-939.
• Stevenson L, Phillips F, O'sullivan K & Walton J (2012) Wheat bran: its composition and benefits to health, a European perspective. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 63: 1001-1013.
• Wang T, Raddatz J & Chen G (2013) Effects of microfluidization on antioxidant properties of wheat bran. Journal of Cereal Science 58: 380-386.
• Wang T, Sun X, Zhou Z & Chen G (2012) Effects of microfluidization process on physicochemical properties of wheat bran. Food Research International 48: 742-747.
• Wang T, Zhu Y, Sun X, Raddatz J, Zhou Z & Chen G (2014) Effect of microfluidisation on antioxidant properties of corn bran. Food Chemistry 152, 37-45.
• Xu B & Chang SK (2007) A comparative study on phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of legumes as affected by extraction solvents. Journal of Food Science 72(2): 159-166.
• Xu B & Chang SK (2008) Effect of soaking, boiling, and steaming on total phenolic contentand antioxidant activities of cool season food legumes. Food Chemistry 110: 1-13.
• Yu L, Haley S, Perret J, Harris M, Wilson J & Qian M (2002) Free radical scavenging properties of wheat extracts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50: 1619-1624.
• Zhu K, Huang S, Peng W, Qian H & Zhou H (2010) Effect of ultrafine grinding on hydration and antioxidant properties of wheat bran dietary fiber. Food Research International 43: 943-948.
• Zia-Ul-Haq M, Iqbal S, Ahmad S, Imran M, Niaz A & Bhanger M (2007) Nutritional and compositional study of desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars grown in Punjab, Pakistan. Food Chemistry 105: 1357-1363.