Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

YAŞ VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE MAKSİLLER SANTRAL DİŞ RENGİ DAĞILIMININ SPEKTROFOTOMETRE İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ

Year 2018, Volume: 28 Issue: 3, 358 - 364, 11.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473279

Abstract







Amaç: Maksiller santral dişin renk dağılımının belirlenmesi
ve yaş ile cinsiyetin diş rengi dağılımına etkisinin incelenmesi hedeflenmiştir.



Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda
yaşları 15 ile 76 arasında (yaş ortalaması 32) olan 345 gönüllü birey yer
almaktadır. Gönüllülerin 183’ ü erkek (%53), 162’si kadındır (%47). Çalışmada
yer alan hastaların sağ maksiller santral diş rengi ölçümleri Vita EasyShade V
spektrofotometre cihazı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Cihazın ucu sağ maksiller
santral dişlerin labial yüzünün orta üçlüsüne dik tutularak 3 ölçüm
gerçekleştirildi ve ortalaması alındı. Elde edilen veriler Vitapan Classical ve
VITA Toothguide 3D-MASTER skalasına göre kaydedildi. Verilerin istatistiksel
olarak analizi gerçekleştirildi.



Bulgular: Cihaz tarafından
seçilen diş rengi dağılımı incelendiğinde Vitapan Classical renk skalasına göre
en çok A2 (%22,9), VITA Toothguide 3D-MASTER renk skalasına göre en çok 2M2
(%21,2) diş rengi ölçülmüştür. Yapmış olduğumuz diş rengi ölçümü sonuçlarına
göre Vita EasyShade V cihazı tarafından B1, 4L2.5, 4M3 ve 5M3 renkleri
saptanamamıştır.



Sonuç: Çalışmamızda elde
edilen veriler ışığında cinsiyet ile diş rengi dağılımı arasında istatistiksel
olarak anlamlı bir sonuç bulunmazken
(p>0.05), yaş dağılımı ile
diş rengi dağılımı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir sonuç bulundu
(p<0.05).



Anahtar Kelimeler: Diş rengi, spektrofotometre, diş rengi skalaları



EVALUATION OF THE MAXILLARY CENTRAL INCISOR
TOOTH COLOR DISTRIBUTION ACCORDING TO AGE AND GENDER WITH SPECTR
OPHOTOMETER

ABSTRACT



Aim: The purpose of this study was
to investigate the determination of the maxillary central incisor color
distribution and the effect of age and gender on the tooth color distribution.

Material
and Methods:
This study was performed on 345 volunteers varying ages
between 15 and 76 (mean age 32). In the study 183 cases  were male (53%), 162 cases were female (47%).
The color of 345 volunteers’ right maxillary central incisors were measured
with Vita EasyShade V spectrophotometer. The tip of device was held
perpendicular to middle third of the right maxillary central incisors’ labial
surface. Teeth were evaluated by means of three measurement of the
spectrophotometer. The obtained data were recorded according to Vitapan
Classical and VITA Toothguide 3D-MASTER scale. The data were analyzed
statistically.



Results:
The
highest value was A2 (22,9%) for Vitapan
Classical scale and 2M2 (21,2%) for 3D-MASTER scale. B1, 4L2.5, 4M3 and 5M3
colors could not be determined with respect to the Vita Easyshade V device
measurement results.



Conclusion:
In this study, there was a significant difference between age
and tooth color distribution
(p<0.05). On
the other hand, no significant difference was found between gender and tooth
color distribution
(p>0.05).



Keywords: Tooth color,
spectrophotometer, dental shade guides










References

  • 1. Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater 2011;27:97-108.
  • 2. Chen H, Huang J, Dong X, Qian J, He J, Qu X, et al. A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching. Quintessence Int 2012;43:649-59.
  • 3. Hugo B, Witzel T, Klaiber B. Comparison of in vivo visual and computer-aided tooth shade determination. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:244-50.
  • 4. Dozić A, Kleverlaan CJ, El‐Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five commercially available tooth color‐measuring devices. J Prosthodont 2007;16:93-100.
  • 5. Hammad IA. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:50-3.
  • 6. Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, Childressd S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthetic Dent 1998;80(6):642-48.
  • 7. Brewer JD, Wee A, Seghi R. Advances in color matching. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:341-58.
  • 8. Rosentiel S, Land M, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th Ed. 2006;709-39
  • 9. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection, 4th Ed. Quintessence. 2008;25-37
  • 10. Bayındır F, Bayındır YZ. Restoratif diş hekimliğinde dişeti rengi seçimi ve dişeti skalaları. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2010;3:38-43.
  • 11. Al-Saleh S, Tashkandi E. Three-dimensional color Coordinates of Natural Teeth in a Sample of Young Saudis: a pilot study. Saudi Dent J 2007;19:97-100.
  • 12. Hasegawa A, Motonomi A, Ikeda I, Kawaguchi S. Color of natural tooth crown in Japanese people. Col Res Appl 2000;25:43-8.
  • 13. Tuncdemir AR, Polat S, Ozturk C, Tuncdemir MT, Gungor AY. Color differences between maxillar and mandibular incisors. Eur J Gen Dent 2012;1:170.
  • 14. Zhu H, Lei Y, Liao N. [Color measurements of 1,944 anterior teeth of people in southwest of China-discreption]. Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi= Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi= Chinese J Stomatol 2001;36:285-8.
  • 15. Gozalo-Diaz D, Johnston WM, Wee AG. Estimating the color of maxillary central incisors based on age and gender. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:93-8.
  • 16. Odioso L, Gibb R, Gerlach R. Impact of demographic, behavioral, and dental care utilization parameters on tooth color and personal satisfaction. Compen Contin Educ Dent (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995) Supplement 1999:S35-41; quiz S43.
  • 17. Hasegawa A, Ikeda I, Kawaguchi S. Color and translucency of in vivo natural central incisors. The J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:418-23.
  • 18. Pop-Ciutrila I-S, Colosi HA, Dudea D, Badea ME. Spectrophotometric color evaluation of permanent incisors, canines and molars. A cross-sectional clinical study. Clujul Medical 2015; 88: 537.
  • 19. Lasserre J-F, Pop-Ciutrila I-S, Colosi H-A. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods. J Dent 2011;39:29-36.
  • 20. Bahannan SA. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods. J Dent 2014;42:48-52.
  • 21. Kröger E, Matz S, Dekiff M, Tran BL, Figgener L, Dirksen D. In vitro comparison of instrumental and visual tooth shade determination under different illuminants. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:848-55.
  • 22. Pimental W, Tiossi R. Comparison between visual and instrumental methods for natural tooth shade matching. Gen Dent 2014;62:47-9.
  • 23. AlSaleh S, Labban M, AlHariri M, Tashkandi E. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means. J Dent 2012;40:82-87.
  • 24. Ardu S, Feilzer AJ, Devigus A, Krejci I. Quantitative clinical evaluation of esthetic properties of incisors. Dent Mater 2008;24:333-40.
  • 25. Özat P, Tuncel I, Eroğlu E. Repeatability and reliability of human eye in visual shade selection. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40:958-64.
  • 26. Kuzmanovic D, Lyons K. Tooth shade selection using a colorimetric instrument compared with that using a conventional shade guide. New Zealand Dent J 2009;105:131-4.
  • 27. Ma Y, Zhang N, Deng X. Influence of background color on chromatic value of four all-ceramic system core materials. Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi= Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi. Chinese J Stomatol 2010;45:367-9.
  • 28. Ritter DD, Rocha RO, Soares FZ, Lenzi TL. Do adhesive systems influence the color match of resin composites? J App Biomater Func Mater 2016;14:212-6.
  • 29. Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Difference in the colour and colour change of dental resin composites by the background. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:227-33.
  • 30. Turgut S, Bagis B. Effect of resin cement and ceramic thickness on final color of laminate veneers: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:179-86.
  • 31. Meireles SS, Demarco FF, Santos IdSd, Dumith SdC, Bona AD. Validation and reliability of visual assessment with a shade guide for tooth-color classification. Oper Dent 2008;33:121-6.
  • 32. Al-Dosari AAF. Reliability of tooth shade perception by dental professionals and patients. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2010;30:244-9.
  • 33. Shammas M, Alla RK. Color and shade matching in dentistry. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2011;25:172-75.
  • 34. Eroğlu E, Küçükeşmen HC, Uluhan B. SD Ü. Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Protetik Diş Tedavisi Kliniğine Müracaat Eden Hastaların Diş Rengi Dağılımının Saptanması. SDÜ Tıp Fak Derg 2007;14:28-31.
  • 35. Kurtulmuş-Yılmaz S, Şeker E, Ozan O, Meriç G, Ulusoy M. Genç Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk popülasyonunun doğal diş renginin değerlendirilmesi: pilot çalışma. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2011;14:164-74.
  • 36. Öngül D, Çelik B, İlbey D, Şermet B. Türk toplumundaki genç bireylerde diş renk dağılımının incelenmesi. İstanbul Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2013; 47:30-40.
Year 2018, Volume: 28 Issue: 3, 358 - 364, 11.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473279

Abstract

References

  • 1. Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater 2011;27:97-108.
  • 2. Chen H, Huang J, Dong X, Qian J, He J, Qu X, et al. A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching. Quintessence Int 2012;43:649-59.
  • 3. Hugo B, Witzel T, Klaiber B. Comparison of in vivo visual and computer-aided tooth shade determination. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:244-50.
  • 4. Dozić A, Kleverlaan CJ, El‐Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five commercially available tooth color‐measuring devices. J Prosthodont 2007;16:93-100.
  • 5. Hammad IA. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:50-3.
  • 6. Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, Childressd S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthetic Dent 1998;80(6):642-48.
  • 7. Brewer JD, Wee A, Seghi R. Advances in color matching. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:341-58.
  • 8. Rosentiel S, Land M, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th Ed. 2006;709-39
  • 9. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection, 4th Ed. Quintessence. 2008;25-37
  • 10. Bayındır F, Bayındır YZ. Restoratif diş hekimliğinde dişeti rengi seçimi ve dişeti skalaları. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2010;3:38-43.
  • 11. Al-Saleh S, Tashkandi E. Three-dimensional color Coordinates of Natural Teeth in a Sample of Young Saudis: a pilot study. Saudi Dent J 2007;19:97-100.
  • 12. Hasegawa A, Motonomi A, Ikeda I, Kawaguchi S. Color of natural tooth crown in Japanese people. Col Res Appl 2000;25:43-8.
  • 13. Tuncdemir AR, Polat S, Ozturk C, Tuncdemir MT, Gungor AY. Color differences between maxillar and mandibular incisors. Eur J Gen Dent 2012;1:170.
  • 14. Zhu H, Lei Y, Liao N. [Color measurements of 1,944 anterior teeth of people in southwest of China-discreption]. Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi= Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi= Chinese J Stomatol 2001;36:285-8.
  • 15. Gozalo-Diaz D, Johnston WM, Wee AG. Estimating the color of maxillary central incisors based on age and gender. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:93-8.
  • 16. Odioso L, Gibb R, Gerlach R. Impact of demographic, behavioral, and dental care utilization parameters on tooth color and personal satisfaction. Compen Contin Educ Dent (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995) Supplement 1999:S35-41; quiz S43.
  • 17. Hasegawa A, Ikeda I, Kawaguchi S. Color and translucency of in vivo natural central incisors. The J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:418-23.
  • 18. Pop-Ciutrila I-S, Colosi HA, Dudea D, Badea ME. Spectrophotometric color evaluation of permanent incisors, canines and molars. A cross-sectional clinical study. Clujul Medical 2015; 88: 537.
  • 19. Lasserre J-F, Pop-Ciutrila I-S, Colosi H-A. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods. J Dent 2011;39:29-36.
  • 20. Bahannan SA. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods. J Dent 2014;42:48-52.
  • 21. Kröger E, Matz S, Dekiff M, Tran BL, Figgener L, Dirksen D. In vitro comparison of instrumental and visual tooth shade determination under different illuminants. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:848-55.
  • 22. Pimental W, Tiossi R. Comparison between visual and instrumental methods for natural tooth shade matching. Gen Dent 2014;62:47-9.
  • 23. AlSaleh S, Labban M, AlHariri M, Tashkandi E. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means. J Dent 2012;40:82-87.
  • 24. Ardu S, Feilzer AJ, Devigus A, Krejci I. Quantitative clinical evaluation of esthetic properties of incisors. Dent Mater 2008;24:333-40.
  • 25. Özat P, Tuncel I, Eroğlu E. Repeatability and reliability of human eye in visual shade selection. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40:958-64.
  • 26. Kuzmanovic D, Lyons K. Tooth shade selection using a colorimetric instrument compared with that using a conventional shade guide. New Zealand Dent J 2009;105:131-4.
  • 27. Ma Y, Zhang N, Deng X. Influence of background color on chromatic value of four all-ceramic system core materials. Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi= Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi. Chinese J Stomatol 2010;45:367-9.
  • 28. Ritter DD, Rocha RO, Soares FZ, Lenzi TL. Do adhesive systems influence the color match of resin composites? J App Biomater Func Mater 2016;14:212-6.
  • 29. Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Difference in the colour and colour change of dental resin composites by the background. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:227-33.
  • 30. Turgut S, Bagis B. Effect of resin cement and ceramic thickness on final color of laminate veneers: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:179-86.
  • 31. Meireles SS, Demarco FF, Santos IdSd, Dumith SdC, Bona AD. Validation and reliability of visual assessment with a shade guide for tooth-color classification. Oper Dent 2008;33:121-6.
  • 32. Al-Dosari AAF. Reliability of tooth shade perception by dental professionals and patients. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2010;30:244-9.
  • 33. Shammas M, Alla RK. Color and shade matching in dentistry. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2011;25:172-75.
  • 34. Eroğlu E, Küçükeşmen HC, Uluhan B. SD Ü. Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Protetik Diş Tedavisi Kliniğine Müracaat Eden Hastaların Diş Rengi Dağılımının Saptanması. SDÜ Tıp Fak Derg 2007;14:28-31.
  • 35. Kurtulmuş-Yılmaz S, Şeker E, Ozan O, Meriç G, Ulusoy M. Genç Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk popülasyonunun doğal diş renginin değerlendirilmesi: pilot çalışma. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2011;14:164-74.
  • 36. Öngül D, Çelik B, İlbey D, Şermet B. Türk toplumundaki genç bireylerde diş renk dağılımının incelenmesi. İstanbul Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2013; 47:30-40.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Araştırma Makalesi
Authors

Tahir Karaman

Eyyüp Altıntaş This is me

Bekir Eşer This is me

Tuba Talo Yıldırım This is me

Alihan Bozoğlan This is me

Publication Date July 11, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 28 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Karaman, T., Altıntaş, E., Eşer, B., Talo Yıldırım, T., et al. (2018). YAŞ VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE MAKSİLLER SANTRAL DİŞ RENGİ DAĞILIMININ SPEKTROFOTOMETRE İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3), 358-364. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473279
AMA Karaman T, Altıntaş E, Eşer B, Talo Yıldırım T, Bozoğlan A. YAŞ VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE MAKSİLLER SANTRAL DİŞ RENGİ DAĞILIMININ SPEKTROFOTOMETRE İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. July 2018;28(3):358-364. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.473279
Chicago Karaman, Tahir, Eyyüp Altıntaş, Bekir Eşer, Tuba Talo Yıldırım, and Alihan Bozoğlan. “YAŞ VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE MAKSİLLER SANTRAL DİŞ RENGİ DAĞILIMININ SPEKTROFOTOMETRE İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28, no. 3 (July 2018): 358-64. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473279.
EndNote Karaman T, Altıntaş E, Eşer B, Talo Yıldırım T, Bozoğlan A (July 1, 2018) YAŞ VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE MAKSİLLER SANTRAL DİŞ RENGİ DAĞILIMININ SPEKTROFOTOMETRE İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28 3 358–364.
IEEE T. Karaman, E. Altıntaş, B. Eşer, T. Talo Yıldırım, and A. Bozoğlan, “YAŞ VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE MAKSİLLER SANTRAL DİŞ RENGİ DAĞILIMININ SPEKTROFOTOMETRE İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 358–364, 2018, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.473279.
ISNAD Karaman, Tahir et al. “YAŞ VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE MAKSİLLER SANTRAL DİŞ RENGİ DAĞILIMININ SPEKTROFOTOMETRE İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28/3 (July 2018), 358-364. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473279.
JAMA Karaman T, Altıntaş E, Eşer B, Talo Yıldırım T, Bozoğlan A. YAŞ VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE MAKSİLLER SANTRAL DİŞ RENGİ DAĞILIMININ SPEKTROFOTOMETRE İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2018;28:358–364.
MLA Karaman, Tahir et al. “YAŞ VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE MAKSİLLER SANTRAL DİŞ RENGİ DAĞILIMININ SPEKTROFOTOMETRE İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 28, no. 3, 2018, pp. 358-64, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.473279.
Vancouver Karaman T, Altıntaş E, Eşer B, Talo Yıldırım T, Bozoğlan A. YAŞ VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE MAKSİLLER SANTRAL DİŞ RENGİ DAĞILIMININ SPEKTROFOTOMETRE İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2018;28(3):358-64.

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.