Yaygın Barınak Türlerine Alternatif Olabilecek Prefabrik Barınakların Tasarımı ve Karşılaştırmalı Maliyet Analizi

Year 2021, Volume: 52 Issue: 2, 167 - 175, 29.05.2021

Hasan Er , Yasemin Kuşlu

https://doi.org/10.17097/ataunizfd.802543

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, prefabrik barınak yapı elemanlarının planlaması ve tasarımı yapılmış, geleneksel yöntemle üretilen barınak türü ile karşılaştırmalı maliyet analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapının temelinde çelik hasır kullanılmıştır. Taşıyıcı ve örtü malzemesi olarak galvaniz sac malzeme kullanılmıştır. Sac metalin dayanımını artırmak için malzeme trapez verilmiştir. Tünel kesitli ve bağlı duraklı tipte planlanan barınaklar, özellikle aile işletmeleri için uygun olacak şekilde 10, 20 ve 30 başlık tasarlanmıştır. Galvaniz sac malzemede ısı ve ses yalıtımı sağlamak için poliüretan (PU) köpük ve ekstrüdepolistiren sandviç panel (XSP) kullanılmıştır. Tasarlanan galvanizli sac barınakların maliyeti, geleneksel yolla üretilenlerle karşılaştırılmıştır. Analizler sonucunda hayvan sayısı arttıkça hayvan başına barınak maliyetinin düştüğünü görülmüştür. PU köpük ve XSP izoleli galvaniz sac malzemeden yapılan barınaklarının geleneksel yöntemle üretilenlere göre daha ekonomik olduğu görülmüştür. Poliüretan köpük yalıtımlı galvanizli sac barınakta maliyet düşme oranları 10, 20 ve 30 başlıklar için sırasıyla % 30.1, % 32.7 ve % 30.6 olmuştur. Bu değerler sandviç panel yalıtımlı barınak için % 24.9, % 27.8 ve % 25.5 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. En ekonomik barınak türü galvanizli sac ve poliüretan köpük yalıtım birleşimi olmuştur. Galvanizli saclardan yapılan prefabrik barınaklar teknik olarak yeterli ve geleneksel olanlara göre ekonomik olarak avantajlı olduğundan hem yeni kurulan işletmelere hem de eski barınaklarını iyileştirmek isteyen işletmelere tavsiye edilebilir.

Keywords

Prefabrik barınak, Bağlı-duraklı tip, Maliyet analizi, Galvanizli çelik, Poliüretan köpük

Supporting Institution

Atatürk Üniversitesi

Project Number

FYL-2018-6565

Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types

Abstract

In this study, planning, design and cost analysis of prefabricated beef cattle barns carried out. Steel mesh was used to strengthen the foundation of the structure. Galvanized-sheet material was used as the carrier and cover material, and shaped like a trapezoid cross-section. The barns, which are planned in the form of tunnel cross-section and tie-stalls type, are designed for 10, 20 and 30-cattle to be particularly suitable for family enterprises. Polyurethane (PU) foam and extruded polystyrene sandwich panel (XSP) were used to provide heat and sound insulation. Cost analysis of the galvanized-sheet barns was compared with the barns constructed by the traditional production method. After analyses, we found that as the number of animals increased, barn cost per animal decreased. The cost reduction rates in the PU foam insulated galvanized-sheet barn were 30.1%, 32.7% and 30.6% for the 10, 20 and 30-cattle respectively. These values were 24.9%, 27.8% and 25.5% for the sandwich panel insulated galvanized-sheet barn. The most economical combination was the polyurethane foam insulation of galvanized sheets. Galvanized-sheet barns are technically sufficient, and economically advantageous than the conventional ones, so it can be recommended to both newly established enterprises and enterprises that want to improve their old barns.

Keywords

Prefabricated barns, Tie-stalls type, Cost analysis, Galvanized sheet, Polyurethane foam

Project Number

FYL-2018-6565

References

• Arslan, M.H., Korkmaz, H.H., Gülay, F.G., 2006. Damage and failure pattern of prefabricated structures after major earthquakes in Turkey and short falls of the Turkish earthquake code. Engineering Failure Analysis, 13: 537-557.
• Aslan, H., Seyfi, S. U., 2015. Alternative barn design applicable in different environmental condition for goat breeding. J. Int. Environmental Application & Science, Vol. 10 (4): 421-428.
• Bracke, M.B.M., Hopster, H., 2006. Assessing the importance of natural behaviour for animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 19: 77-89.
• Broom, D.M., 1991. Animal welfare–concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Sci., 69: 4167-4175.
• CAE, 2018. The Livestock Report, The UNION of the Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects (UCETA) the Chamber of Agricultural Engineers (CAE) Available online with updates at http://www.zmo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=29946&tipi=17&sube=0 (Accessed Date: 15 March 2019)
• Dawkins, M.S., 2016. Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict inevitable? Animal Production Sci., 57 (2) 201-208.
• Dong, S. L., Yuan, X.F., 2006. Development of lattice shells in China. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 47 (2): 111-123.
• Dong, S., Zhao, Y., Xing, D., 2012. Application and development of modern long-span space structures in China. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 6 (3): 224-239.
• Ekmekyapar, T., 2001. Regulation of Environmental Conditions in Animal Shelters. Atatürk University Agricultural Faculty Pub. No: 306 (In Turkish: Hayvan Barınaklarında Çevre Koşullarının Düzenlenmesi), Erzurum, 164 p.
• Er, H., Kuslu, Y., 2019. Investigation the use of different material on the barns construction. 1st International Congress on Biosystems Engineering (ICOBEN2019), 24-27 September 2019, Hatay, pp: 212-218.
• Er, H., Kuslu, Y., 2020. Planning and design of prefabricated beef cattle barns constructed by lightweight concrete for cold climate regions. YYU J of Agr. Sci., 30 (1): 90-99.
• Erbatur, I., 2010. The Construction Properties of Beef Cattle Barns in Kulu-Konya. Master diss., Selçuk Univ. Agricultural Structures and Irrigation Dept. Konya, Turkey.
• FAO, 2011. Livestock Housing in Rural Structures in the Tropics: Design and Development Available online with updates at http://www.fao.org/3/i2433e/i2433e.pdf (Accessed Date: 15 March 2019)
• Ferrer, F., Ferran, J.J., Torregrosa, J.B., Ferrer, C.M., Sanchez, F.J., Redon, M., Valles, J.J., 2007. Light structure examples for industrial architecture. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 48 (2): 119-129.
• Gürer, C., 2008. Prefabricated Structures Lecture Notes. Kocatepe Univ. Technical Education Faculty Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (In Turkish: Prefabrik Yapılar Ders Notları).
• Hegger, M., Auch-Schwelk, V. Fuchs, M., Rosenkranz, T., 2006. Construction Materials Manual, Birkhauser, Munich, Germany, 280 pp.
• İçöz, Y., 1998. Ahırlarda sağlıklı ortam nasıl olmalıdır? Türk Holstein Friesion Yetiştiricileri Dergisi, 12: 4-10.
• İnci, H., Yiğit, B., Karakaya, E., 2019. A research on technical and structural properties of broiler farms in Bingol province. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi 8 (2): 265-274.
• Karakaş, Ö., 2013. Investigetion of the effects of Cr3+, Cr6+ type passivation agents and rust preventive oils on corrosion resistance of hot dip galvanised DX51D+Z grade steel sheet. Master diss., Mustafa Kemal Univ. Mechanical Engineering Dept., Hatay, Turkey.
• Kocaman, I., Konukcu, F., İstanbulluoğlu, A., 2007. Heat and moisture balance in animal barns. KSU Journal of Science and Engineering, 10 (1): 134-140.
• Kuslu, Y., 2008. Effects of an irrigation project in prevention of migration from rural areas. Water Resour Manage, 22: 611-619. Lateef, M., K.Z. Gondal, Younas, M., Mustafa M.I., Bashir, M.K., 2008. Reproductive performance of Holstein Friesian and Jersey cattle in Punjab, Pakistan. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 45 (2): 245-249.
• Noton, N.H., 1982. Farm Buildings. College of Estate Management Reading, England, 359 p.
• Şahin, E., Uğurlu, N., 2017. Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1 (1): 37-43.
• Şirin, Ü., Kocaman, B., 2016. Optimum design of dairy cattle barns in Erzurum province Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa Univ., 33: 28-38.
• Trampler, W., 1989. Rindermastverfahren.BauBriefe Landwirtschft31, Kaelberufzucht. Jungvrehhaltung Rindermast Land wirtsehaftsverlang, Münster, 36 p.
• TS 498 (Turkish Standard), 1997. Design Loads for Buildings. Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara.
• TS 822 (Turkish Standard), 2019. Hot-dip Galvanized Plain and Corrugated Sheets, Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara.
• TS EN 10346 (Turkish Standard), 2015. Continuously hot-dip coated steel flat products for cold forming - Technical delivery conditions, Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara.
• TSI (Turkish Statistical Institute), 2017. Animal Production Statistics (Annual), Available online with updates at http://www.turkstat.gov.tr /PreTablo.do?alt_id=1002 (Accessed Date: 15 March 2019)
• TSMS, 2018. Meteorological Bulletin, Turkish State Meteorological Service Available online with updates at https://mgm.gov.tr/eng/forecast-cities.aspx?m=ERZURUM (Accessed Date: 15 March 2019)
• Turhan, H., 2016. The Structural Properties of Dairy Cattle Houses in Karatay-Konya. Master diss., Selçuk Univ. Agricultural Structures and Irrigation Dept. Konya, Turkey.
• Türker, K., 1998. Analysis of the Moment Transfer Connections in Precast Reinforced Concrete Structures. Master diss., Balıkesir Univ. Civil Engineering Dept. Balıkesir, Turkey.
• Usta, S., 2011. Free stall dairy cattle farms architectural layout plan principles and suggestions for the nature of manufacturer type residential development plans. SDU The Journal of Technical Sciences, 1 (2): 29-42.
• Uzal, S., 2004. The Constructural Analyse o Beef Cattle House in Konya. Master diss., Selçuk Univ. Agricultural Structures and Irrigation Dept. Konya, Turkey.
• Wathes, C.M., Jones, C.D.R., Webster, A.J.F., 1983. Ventilation, air hygiene and animal healty, farm housing. Veterinary Record, 113: 554-559.
• Yanık, R., Okuroğlu, M., 2017. A Research on structural properties of some animal barns in agricultural managing and revolving fund application farm of Atatürk University Agriculture Faculty. Alinteri J Agr. Sci., 32 (2): 11-15.