<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                    <journal-id></journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">1301-1308</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">3108-4311</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Ankara University</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33629/auhfd.1388896</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Criminal Law</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Ceza Hukuku</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
                                    <trans-title>PROPORTIONALITY OF APPLICATION IN REHABILITATION AND SECURITY MEASURES IN GERMAN CRIMINAL LAW</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <article-title>Alman Ceza Hukukunda İyileştirme ve Güvenlik Tedbirlerinin Tatbikinde Ölçülülük</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-0888</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Eryıldız</surname>
                                    <given-names>Hüsnü Sefa</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20240807">
                    <day>08</day>
                    <month>07</month>
                    <year>2024</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>73</volume>
                                        <issue>2</issue>
                                        <fpage>791</fpage>
                                        <lpage>835</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20231110">
                        <day>11</day>
                        <month>10</month>
                        <year>2023</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20240719">
                        <day>07</day>
                        <month>19</month>
                        <year>2024</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 1943, </copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>1943</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder></copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
                            <p>In German law, the principle of proportionality recognized at the constitutional level is based on the protective quality of fundamental rights in terms of defense function and the principle of the rule of law. The grounding of legality in the field of rehabilitation and security measures on the paramount public interest shifts the perspective to the principle of proportionality applied in the event of conflicts between public and individual benefits. Indeed, the principle of proportionality in this field is explicitly mentioned in Article 62 of the German Criminal Code. The regulation aims to provide an additional guarantee concerning the special obligations imposed on the dangerous offender that exceed his fault, - primarily, taking into account the impression of its widespread use during the fascist era. It is acknowledged that the principle of proportionality is valid not only in deciding on or forming the content of rehabilitation and security measures but also in their grading, enforcement, shaping, continuation, application period, postponement, withdrawal of the postponement, and aggregation.In this study, the conditions for the application of the principle of proportionality in the field of rehabilitation and security measures in German Criminal Law have been examined within the scope of Article 62 of the German Criminal Code. In this context, the historical development, establishment reasons, scope of application, conditions of application and the consequences of violations of the proportionality principle, have been examined in line with doctrinal opinions and supreme court decisions.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <abstract><p>Alman Hukuku’nda anayasal düzeyde tanınan ölçülülük ilkesi, savunma işlevi açısından temel hakların özgürlüğü koruyucu niteliğine ve hukuk devleti ilkesine dayandırılmaktadır. İyileştirme ve güvenlik tedbirleri alanında da hukuka uygunluğun üstün kamu yararına dayandırılması, bakış açısını kamusal ve bireysel yararlar arasında ortaya çıkan çatışma halinde tatbik edilen ölçülülük ilkesine yöneltmektedir. Nitekim bu alanda ölçülülük ilkesine Alman Ceza Kanunu’nun 62. maddesinde açıkça yer verilmiştir. Düzenleme ile tehlike arz eden faile yüklenen ve kusuru aşan özel yükümlülükler bakımından – her şeyden önce faşizm dönemindeki yaygın kullanım izlenimi de dikkate alınarak – ek bir güvence sağlanması amaçlanmıştır. Ölçülülük ilkesinin yalnızca iyileştirme ve güvenlik tedbirlerine karar verme veya bu kararların içeriğini oluşturmada değil, aynı zamanda tedbirlerin derecelendirilmesi, infazı, biçimlendirilmesi, devamı, tatbik süresi, ertelenmesi, ertelemenin kaldırılması ve içtimaı bakımından da geçerli olduğu kabul edilmektedir.Bu çalışmada, Alman Ceza Hukuku’nda ölçülülük ilkesinin iyileştirme ve güvenlik tedbirleri alanında tatbikine ilişkin koşullar Alman Ceza Kanunu’nun 62. maddesi kapsamında ele alınmıştır. Bu bağlamda maddenin tarihsel gelişimi, ihdas nedenleri, uygulama alanı ve uygulanma koşulları ile ölçülülük ilkesine aykırılığın sonuçları öğreti görüşleri ve yüksek mahkeme kararları doğrultusunda incelenmiştir.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Güvenlik Tedbirleri</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  İyileştirme Tedbirleri</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Ölçülülük</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Aşırılık Yasağı</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Ölçülülüğün Somutlaştırılması</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
                                                    <kwd>Security Measures</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Rehabilitative Measures</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Proportionality</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Prohibition of Excessiveness</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Concretization of Proportionality</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Eschelbach, Ralf. “Strafgesetzbuch”, Kommentar, Herausgegeben von: Holger Matt. Joachim Renzikowski. München: Verlag Franz Vahlen, 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fischer, Thomas. Strafgesetzbuch und Nebengesetze. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2008.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gödekli, Mehmet. Ceza Hukukunda Güvenlik Tedbirleri ve Muhakeme Usulü. Ankara: Adalet, 2020.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Heger, Martin. “Strafgesetzbuch”, Kommentar, Herausgegeben von: Karl Lackner, Kristian Kühl, Martin Heger. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2023.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jescheck, Hans-Heinrich ve Weigend, Thomas. Lehrbuch des Strafrechts, Allgemeiner Teil. Berlin: Duncker &amp; Humbolt, 1996.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kaspar, Johannes. “Strafgesetzbuch”, Kommentar, Herausgegeben von: Helmut Satzger, Wilhelm 
Schluckebier, Gunter Widmaier, §§ 61–64. Hürth: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2014.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kinzig, Jörg. “Strafgesetzbuch”, Kommentar, Herausgegeben von: Adolf Schönke, Horst Schröder, §§ 56–72. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lothar, Michael. “Grundfälle zur Verhältnismäßigkeit”. JuS, (2001), 654-659.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Maurach, Reinhart, Gössel, Karl ve Heinz, Zipf. Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, Teilband 2, Erscheinungsformen des Verbrechens und Rechtsfolgen der Tat. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 1989.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Meier, Bernd-Dieter. Strafrechtliche Sanktionen. Berlin: Springer, 2014.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pollähne, Helmut. “Strafgesetzbuch”, Nomoskommentar, Herausgegeben von: Urs Kindhäuser, Ulfrid Neumann, Hans-Ullrich Paeffgen, Frank Saliger, §§ 61–64. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2023.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schöch, Heinz. “Strafgesetzbuch”, Leipziger Kommentar, Dritter Band, Herausgegeben von: Heinrich Wilhelm Laufhütte, Ruth Rissing-Van Saan, Klaus Tiedemann, §§ 61-64, 67. Berlin: De Gruyter Recht, 2008.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sinn, Arndt. “Systematischer Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch”, Band 2, Herausgegeben von: Hans-Joachim Rudolphi, Jürgen Wolter, §§ 61-72. Köln: Wolters Kluwer, 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Van Gemmeren, Gerhard. “Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch”, Band 2, Bandredakteur: Bernd von Heintschel-Heinegg, §§ 61–65. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2020.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ziegler, Theo. BeckOK StGB. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2023.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zippelius, Reinhold. Juristische Methodenlehre. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2021.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zippelius, Reinhold. Rechtsphilosophie. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2011.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
