<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                    <journal-id></journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">0365-8104</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">1307-5608</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Ankara University</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4274/atfm.galenos.2022.28199</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Obstetrics and Gynocology Nursing</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Doğum ve Kadın Hastalıkları Hemşireliği</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>Birinci ve İkinci Trimester Tarama Testlerinde Kullanılan Biyokimyasal Belirteçlerin Kötü Obstetrik Sonuçlarla İlişkisi</article-title>
                                                                                                                                        </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-5363</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Cellek</surname>
                                    <given-names>Merve</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>Kırıkkale Yüksek İhtisas Hastanesi</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Çağlar</surname>
                                    <given-names>Ali Turhan</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, ANKARA ETLİK ZÜBEYDE HANIM HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER FOR GYNECOLOGICAL DISEASES</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20220630">
                    <day>06</day>
                    <month>30</month>
                    <year>2022</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>75</volume>
                                        <issue>2</issue>
                                        <fpage>286</fpage>
                                        <lpage>294</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20210615">
                        <day>06</day>
                        <month>15</month>
                        <year>2021</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20220602">
                        <day>06</day>
                        <month>02</month>
                        <year>2022</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 1947, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>1947</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>Objectives: This study aims to determine the relationship between poor obstetric and perinatal outcomes and maternal serum aneuploidy markersof first and second trimesters.Materials and Methods: Five hundred three singleton pregnancies who underwent prenatal screening for aneuploidy were examined. Theassociation between serum aneuploidy markers and poor obstetric and perinatal outcomes was investigated. In the regression analysis, adjustedodds ratio, 95% confidence interval and p-values were found for each marker.Results: The median Multiple of the Median (MoM) of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A was significantly lower in pregnancies with pregnancyinduced hypertension (0.63 vs 0.89, p=0.014). Women with elevated free β human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) MoM levels were more likely toexperience intrauterine growth retardation (p=0.029). By examining low (≤10th percentile) alpha fetoprotein (AFP) MoM levels, we found a 9 foldincrease in risk of fetal death at or after 24 weeks of gestation (p=0.036). In case of high AFP levels, 5 fold increase in risk of IUGR was observed(p=0.023). While decreased levels of second-trimester hCG were associated with IUGR (p=0.011), increased risk of pregnancy induced hypertensionwas significantly associated with elevated hCG levels (p=0.001). Increased risk of abruptio placentae was associated with elevated hCG levels(p=0.023). Low levels of unconjugated estriol (uE3) appeared to be associated with pregnancy induced hypertension and low birth weight, the risksof which increased as depressed levels of uE3 became more extreme. Elevated hCG (31% vs 6%, p&amp;lt;0.001) and low uE3 (16.3% vs 6.2%, p=0.025)levels were associated with more need for neonatal intensive care in newborns. Reduced uE3 levels (at or below 10th percentile) were correlatedwith lower gestational age at birth (38.4 vs 39, p=0.038).Conclusion: A relationship was found between abnormal values of markers used in first and second trimester screening tests and poor obstetricresults. Triple screening hCG has been determined to be the best marker for predicting pregnancy induced hypertensive diseases.</p></abstract>
                                                                                    
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Prenatal Screening Test</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Aneuploidy Markers</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Perinatal Outcomes</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                        
                                                                                                                                                    </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">1. Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2001-2011.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">2. Alldred SK, Takwoingi Y, Guo B, et al. First and second trimester serum tests with and without first trimester ultrasound tests for Down’s syndrome screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3:CD012599.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">3. Alamillo CM, Krantz D, Evans M, et al. Nearly a third of abnormalities found after first-trimester screening are different than expected: 10-year experience from a single center. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:251-256.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">4. Kazerouni NN, Currier RJ, Hodgkinson C, et al. Ancillary benefits of prenatal maternal serum screening achieved in the California program. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30:981-987.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">5. Dugoff L, Hobbins JC, Malone FD, et al. First-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free-beta subunit human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and nuchal translucency are associated with obstetric complications: a population-based screening study (The FASTER Trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1446-1451.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">6. Krantz D, Goetzl L, Simpson JL, et al. Association of extreme first-trimester free human chorionic gonadotropin-beta, pregnancy-associated plasma protein
A, and nuchal translucency with intrauterine growth restriction and other ad verse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1452-1458.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the Society forMaternal-FetalMedicin. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:97-109.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">8. No authors listed. Practice Bulletin No. 145: Antepartum Fetal Surveillance. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:182-192.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">9. No authors listed. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:1.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">10. American Diabetes Association. Erratum. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Sec. 2. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2016. Diabetes Care 2016;39(Suppl.1):S13-S22.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">11. Dugoff L, Hobbins JC, Malone FD, et al. Quad screen as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:260-267.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">12. Dugoff L; Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. First- and second-trimester maternal serum markers for aneuploidy and adverse obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:1052-1061.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">13. O’Gorman N, Wright D, Syngelaki A, et al. Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:103.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">14. Goetzinger KR, Singla A, Gerkowicz S, et al. The efficiency of first-trimester serum analytes and maternal characteristics in predicting fetal growth disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:412.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">15. Hung TH, Shau WY, Hsieh CC, et al. Risk factors for placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:545-550.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">16. Oztas E, Ozler S, Caglar AT, et al. Analysis of first and second trimester maternal serum analytes for the prediction of morbidly adherent placenta requiring hysterectomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016;32:579-585.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">17. Krause TG, Christens P, Wohlfahrt J, et al. Second-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome(1). Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:277-282</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">18. Milunsky A, Jick SS, Bruell CL, et al. Predictive values, relative risks, and overall benefits of high and low maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening in singleton pregnancies: new epidemiologic data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:291-297.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">19. Kırlangıç MM, Açmaz G, Şahin E, et al. The assessment of the perinatal outcomes of the patients who underwent quad screening test. Perinatal Journal. 2020;28:28-35.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">20. Yaron Y, Cherry M, Kramer RL, et al. Second-trimester maternal serum marker screening: maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, estriol, and their various combinations as predictors of pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:968-974.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">21. Gagnon A, Wilson RD; Society Of Obstetricians And Gynaecologists Of Canada Genetics Committee. Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:918-932.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">22. Huerta-Enochian G, Katz V, Erfurth S. The association of abnormal alpha-fetoprotein and adverse pregnancy outcome: does increased
fetal surveillance affect pregnancy outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1549-1555.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">23. van Rijn M, van der Schouw YT, Hagenaars AM, et al. Adverse obstetric outcome in low- and high- risk pregnancies: predictive value of maternal serum screening. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:929-934.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">24. Chandra S, Scott H, Dodds L, et al. Unexplained elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and/or human chorionic gonadotropin and the risk of
adverse outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:775-781.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">25. No authors listed. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 743. Low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:44-52.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">26. Wenstrom KD, Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, et al. The effect of low-dose aspirin on pregnancies complicated by elevated human chorionic gonadotropin levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1292-1296.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
