A study on the determination of damage levels in reinforced concrete structures for different earthquakes

Year 2022, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 14 - 20, 27.06.2022

Ercan Işık , Ali Emre Ulu , Şakir Tunç , Ali Keskiner

https://doi.org/10.17678/beuscitech.1065883

Cited By: 1

Abstract

It is important for spatial planning and urban transformation to determine and manage all the information about the buildings damaged after the earthquake. In this respect, the first damage assessments should be made as quickly and practically as possible, especially immediately after the earthquake. Within the scope of this study, the reinforced concrete structure damage classification given in the European Macro-Seismic Scale (EMS) was used, taking into account five different earthquakes in Turkey. Sample buildings were identified for five different degrees of damage foreseen in the EMS. In addition to the information about these earthquakes, seismic parameters were obtained for the earthquake epicenters. The peak ground acceleration values measured for all earthquakes considered in the study were compared with the currently recommended peak acceleration values.

Keywords

Damage level, RC Structures, EMS-98, Earthquake, Seismic Parameter

References

• Arslan, M.H., and Korkmaz, H.H., 2007. What is to be learned from damage and failure of reinforced concrete structures during recent earthquakes in Turkey?. Engineering Failure Analysis, 14(1), 1-22.
• Aydın, A., 2012. Van Depreminde Hasar Gören Mevcut Betonarme Bir Binadaki Hasarın, DBYBHY 2007’ye Göre Yapılan Performans Analiz Sonuçları İle Karşılaştırılması (Doctoral dissertation, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
• Aydın, A., 2012. Van Depreminde Hasar Gören Mevcut Betonarme Bir Binadaki Hasarın, DBYBHY 2007’ye Göre Yapılan Performans Analiz Sonuçları İle Karşılaştırılması (Doctoral dissertation, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
• Bessason, B., and Bjarnason, J. Ö. 2016. Seismic vulnerability of low-rise residential buildings based on damage data from three earthquakes (Mw6. 5, 6.5 and 6.3). Engineering Structures, 111, 64-79.
• Bilgin, H., Shkodrani, N., Hysenlliu, M., Ozmen, H.B., Isik, E., and Harirchian, E., 2022. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry buildings constructed in 1970s during the 2019 Albania earthquakes. Engineering Failure Analysis, 131, 105824.
• DEMP, 2020. Interactive earthquake map web page for the 08.06.2020 available at https://tdth.afad.gov.tr/
• Dogan, G., Ecemis, A.S., Korkmaz, S.Z., Arslan, M.H., and Korkmaz, H.H., 2021. Buildings Damages after Elazığ, Turkey Earthquake on January 24, 2020. Natural Hazards, 1-40.
• Doǧangün, A., 2004. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingöl Earthquake in Turkey. Engineering Structures, 26(6), 841-856.
• Emre, Ö., Herece, E., Doğan, A., Parlak, O., Özaksoy, V., Çiplak, R., and Özalp, S., 2003 Bingöl depremi değerlendirme raporu. Maden Tetkik Arama Enstitüsü Rapor, (10585).
• Ercan, I., 2017. Hasarlı bir Betonarme Binanın Performans Puanının Hesaplanması. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Sciences Journal, 3(2).
• Erdil, B., 2011. Van Depremlerinin Ardindan: Tasarim ve Uygulama Farklari. 4. Uluslararası Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı 11-13 Ekim 2017 – ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ – ESKİŞEHİR
• Gómez Capera A.A., Albarello, D., Gasperini, P., 2007. Aggiornamento Relazioni fra l’Intensità Macrosismica e PGA, Technical Report. Convenzione INGV-DPC 2004-2006.
• Grünthal, G., 1998. European macroseismic scale 1998. European Seismological Commission (ESC).
• Grünthal, G., and Levret, A., 2001. L'echelle macrosismique européenne= European macroseismic scale 1998:(EMS-98).
• Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Ademovic, N., Pavic, G., and Sipos, T.K., 2018. Strengthening techniques for masonry structures of cultural heritage according to recent Croatian provisions. Earthquakes and Structures, 15(5), 473-485.
• Harirchian, E., Hosseini, S.E.A., Jadhav, K., Kumari, V., Rasulzade, S., Işık, E., ... and Lahmer, T. 2021. A review on application of soft computing techniques for the rapid visual safety evaluation and damage classification of existing buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 102536.
• Isik, E., Aydin, M.C., and Buyuksarac, A., 2020. 24 January 2020 Sivrice (Elazığ) earthquake damages and determination of earthquake parameters in the region. Earthquakes and Structures, 19(2), 145-156.
• Işık, E., Işık, M.F., and Bülbül, M.A., 2017. Web based evaluation of earthquake damages for reinforced-concrete buildings. Earthquakes and Structures, 13(4), 423-432.
• Işık, E., Özdemir, M., and Karaşin, İ.B., 2018. Performance analysis of steel structures with A3 irregularities. International Journal of Steel Structures, 18(3), 1083-1094.
• Işık, M., Işık, E., and Haricihian, E., 2021. Application of IOS/Android Rapid Evaluation of Post-Earthquake Damages in Masonry Buildings. Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi (GMBD), 7(1), 36-50.
• İnşaat Müh. Odası, İzmir Depremi Raporu.
• Kramer, S.L., 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Education India.18TC005365.
• Kutanis, M., Ulutaş, H., and Işik, E., 2018. PSHA of Van province for performance assessment using spectrally matched strong ground motion records. Journal of Earth System Science, 127(7), 1-14.
• Mehmet, İ., Özmen, H.B., and Çaycı, B.T. Simav and Van depremleri (2011). Yapı hasar nedenlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(6), 256-265.
• Mercalli G. 1902. Intensity scales. Bollettino della Societa Sismologica Italiana 8:184–91.
• Moehle, J., and Deierlein, G.G., 2004. A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering. In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (Vol. 679).
• Morell, K.D., Styron, R., Stirling, M., Griffin, J., Archuleta, R., and Onur, T., 2020. Seismic hazard analyses from geologic and geomorphic data: Current and future challenges. Tectonics, 39(10), e20
• Özden, Ş., Akpinar, E., and Atalay, H.M., 2011. Tarihli Van Depreminde Gözlenen Yapi Hasarlari. Reconnaissance Report-Van Earthquake of October.
• Özmen, B., and Hüsnü, C., 2016. Ankara için deterministik deprem tehlike analizi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1).
• Şahin H., Alyamaç K.E., Durucan A.R., Demirel B., Ulaş Açikgenç M., Bildik A.T., Durucan C., Demir T., Ulucan M., and Demirbaş N., 2020. 24 Ocak 2020 Mw 6.8 Sivrice/Elazığ Depremi Elazığ Bölgesi Yapısal Hasarlar İnceleme ve Analiz Raporu, Yapı ve Beton Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Rapor No:2020/D001, Elazığ, Türkiye.
• Sharma, R.C., Tateishi, R., Hara, K., Nguyen, H. T., Gharechelou, S., and Nguyen, L. V. 2017. Earthquake Damage Visualization (EDV) technique for the rapid detection of earthquake-induced damages using SAR data. Sensors, 17(2), 235.
• Tabrizikahou, A., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Kuczma, M., and Lozančić, S., 2021. Application of shape memory alloys in retrofitting of masonry and heritage structures based on their vulnerability revealed in the Bam 2003 earthquake. Materials, 14(16), 4480.
• TBEC-2018, 2018. Turkish Building Earthquake Code, T.C. Resmi Gazete; 30364 Ankara Turkey. Xian, L., He, Z., and Ou, X., 2016. Incorporation of collapse safety margin into direct earthquake loss estimate. Earthquakes and Structures, 10(2), 429-450.
• Yakut, A., Sucuoğlu, H., Binici, B., Canbay, E., Donmez, C., İlki, A., and Ay, B.Ö., 2021. Performance of structures in İzmir after the Samos island earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 1-26.
• Zanini, M.A., Hofer, L., and Faleschini, F., 2019. Reversible ground motion-to-intensity conversion equations based on the EMS-98 scale. Engineering Structures, 180, 310-320.
• Zhai, W., and Zeng, W., 2017. Building damage assessment using a single post-earthquake PolSAR image: a case of the 2010 Yushu earthquake. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 57, No. 1, p. 012018). IOP Publishing.