bilgesci Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research 2651-401X 2651-4028 Kutbilge Akademisyenler Derneği 10.30516/bilgesci.1425413 Ecology (Other) Ekoloji (Diğer) Comprehensive examination of diverse assessment methodologies applicable to Sport Science departments at Higher Education institutions https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-4668 Breukelman Gerrit University of Zululand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-8983 Millard Lourens University of Zululand 09 30 2024 8 2 134 140 02 27 2024 09 11 2024 Copyright © 2017, Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research 2017 Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research

Educators and educational leaders have engaged in ongoing discussions and debates concerning student assessment in higher education. Concerns have been raised by academics about the disconnect between assessment methods and actual student learning outcomes. The aim of this review was to conduct a comprehensive examination of diverse assessment methodologies applicable to higher education. Furthermore, a critical analysis was performed to evaluate the alignment of current assessment practices within the author's specific academic field with the various assessment methods under scrutiny, as well as to assess their efficacy. The literature review pertaining to the evaluation techniques employed in higher education underwent an electronic search across several databases: EBM Reviews, Current Contents, Science Direct, Google Scholar, CISTI Source (from 2000 to June 2021), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and international e-catalogues. A total of (n=38) studies were found that met the necessary criteria to be included in the study. It is important to acknowledge that this examination should be regarded as a foundational framework, with ample room for future research to incorporate additional assessment approaches, given the multitude of options available. Assessment for learning, tasks of learning, and peer and self-assessment emerge as invaluable tools applicable across various disciplines within higher education.

 Assessment Sport Science Assessment Methods Learning Outcomes Assessment Practices University of Zululand Bonwell, C. C. (1997). Using active learning as assessment in the postsecondary classroom. The Clearing House, 71(2), 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098659709599328 Boud, D., Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. New York, NY: Routledge. Burton, K. (2011). A framework for determining the authenticity of assessment tasks: applied to an example in law. Journal of Learning Design, 4(2), 20-28. Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Abington: Routledge. Carless, D., G. Joughin., G., Lui, N. F. (2006). How assessment supports learning: Learning oriented assessment in action. Hong Kong University Press. Carter, F. L., Hogan, P. T. (2013). Integrating active learning and assessment in the accounting classroom. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies. 11, 1-10. Chetcuti, D., C. Cutajar, C. (2014). Implementing peer assessment in a post-secondary (16-18) physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3101-3124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.953621 Demirci, C. (2017). The effect of active learning approach on attitudes of 7th grade students. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1048a Douglas, M., Wilson, J., Ennis, S. (2012). Multiple-choice question tests: A convenient, flexible and effective learning tool? A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.677596 Duncan, T., Buskirk-Cohen, A. A. (2011). Exploring learner-centered assessment: A cross-disciplinary approach. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 246-259. Ertmer, P. A., Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143 Gibson, K. Shaw, C. M. (2011). Assessment of Active Learning. The International Studies Encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://webs.wichita.edu/depttools/depttoolsmemberfiles/carolynshaw/Gibson%20Sha w%20compendium.pdf Gilles, J. P., Detroz, P., Blais, J. (2011). An international online survey of the practices and perceptions of higher education professors with respect to the assessment of learning in the classroom. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(6), 19-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.484880 Gronlund, N, E. (2005). Assessment of Student Achievement. Third Custom Edition for the University of Alberta. Boston, Pearson Custom Pub. Hernández, R. (2012). Does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning? Higher Education, 64, 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9506-7 Hui, F., Koplin, M. (2011). Instructional note: The implementation of authentic activities for learning: A case study in finance education. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 5(1), 59-72. Jacoby, J. C., Heugh, S., Bax, C., Branford-White, C. (2014). Enhancing learning through formative assessment. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 51(1), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.771970 Libman, Z. (2010). Alternative assessment in higher education: An experience in descriptive statistics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(1-2), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.01.002 McCoy, B. (2013). Active and reflective learning to engage all students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 146-153. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2013.010302 McDowell, L., Wakelin, D., Montgomery, C., King, S. (2011). Does assessment for learning make a difference? The development of a questionnaire to explore the student response. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(7), 749-765. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.488792 Mcginnis, P., Roberts, K. L., Sedor, K. L., Towler, L., Palliser, J., Jonas, L., Thomas, W., Butera, J., Bichali, H., Lorrain, C., Parker, J., Beacom, D., Evans, D. L., Sheldrake, J. (2018). From the Editor’s Desk: Engaging Students in Learning Through Assessment. Science Scope, 41(5), 1. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/ss18_041_05_1 Nielsen, K. (2014). Self-assessment methods in writing instruction: A conceptual framework, successful practices and essential strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01533.x Norton, L., Norton, B., Shannon, L. (2013). Revitalising assessment design: What is holding new lecturers back? Higher Education, 66(2), 233-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9601-9 Oladele, I. O. (2011). Knowledge and utilization of authentic assessment techniques by lecturers in Botswana College of Agriculture. NACTA Journal, 55(1), 63-67. Paily, M. U. (2013). Creating constructivist learning environment: Role of "web 2.0" technology. International Forum of Teaching & Studies, 9(1), 39-50. Pantiwati, Y., Husamah. (2017). Self and peer assessments in active learning model to increase metacognitive awareness and cognitive abilities. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 185-202.