Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2018, Volume: 14 Issue: 14, 363 - 390, 30.12.2018

Abstract

References

  • Aboulafia, Mitchell. Philosophy, Social Theory and the Thought of George Herbert Mead, New York: The State University of New York Press, 2004.
  • Aboulafia, Mitchell. Transcendence on Self-Determination and Cosmopolitanism, California: Stanford University Press, 2010.
  • Blumer, Herbert. Symbolic Interactionism Perspective and Method, Berkeley&Los Angeles&London: University of California Press, 1986, 1-18.
  • De Waal, Cornelis. On Mead, Australia, Canada, Mexico vd.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning, 2002.
  • Gillespie, Alex. “G.H. Mead: Theorist of the Social Act” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Wiley Blackwell Publishing, 35/1, 2005. 19-39.
  • Hirst, R. John. “Realism”, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Ed. Paul Edwards. Vol. 7, New York-London: Collier-MacMillan Publishing, 1967. 77-83.
  • Honderich, Ted. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • Lee, Harold N. “Mead’s Doctrine of the Past”, Tulane Studies in Philosophy, XII, 1963, 52-75.
  • Lüscher, Kurt. “The Social Reality of Perspectives: On G. H. Mead’s Potential Relevance For The Analysis of Contemporary Societies”, Symbolic Interactionism, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1-18.
  • McCarthy, E. Doyle. “Toward a Sociology of the Physical World: George Herbert Mead on Physical Objects”, Critical Assessments, Ed. Peter Hamilton, Vol. III, London&New York, Taylor&Francis Publishers, 1992, 215-229.
  • Mead, George Herbert. “The Objective Reality of Perspectives”, Selected Writings, Ed. Andrew J. Reck, Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press, 1964. 306-319.
  • Mead, George Herbert. The Individual and the Social Self: Unpublished Work of George Herbert Mead, Ed. David L. Miller, Chicago&London: The University of Chicago Press, 1982.
  • Mead, George Herbert. The Philosophy of the Present. Ed. Arthur E. Murphy, London: The Open Court Company Publishers, 1932.
  • Mead, George Herbert. Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, Ed. Charles W. Morris, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.
  • Mead, George Herbert. The Philosophy of the Act. Ed. Charles W. Morris, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1938.
  • Miller, David L. George Herbert Mead Self, Language and the World, Austin&London: The University of Texas Press, 1973.
  • Morris, Charles W. “Introduction: The Task of The Philosophy of the Act”, The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1938. vii-lxxiii.
  • Natanson, Maurice. The Social Dynamics of George Herbert Mead, Netherlands: The Hague Nijhoff Publishers, 1973.
  • Posner, Roland. “Charles Morris and the Behavioral Foundations of Semiotics”, Classics of Semiotics, United States: Springer, 1987. 23-57.
  • Türer, Celal. Ahlaktan Felsefeye Felsefeden Ahlaka, İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları, 2017.
  • VandenBos, Gary R. APA Dictionary of Psychology, Washington DC: American Psychological Association Press, 2007.
  • Von Mises, Ludwig. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, San Francisco: Fox&Wilkes Company, 1996.

George Herbert Mead'ın Eylem Kuramı

Year 2018, Volume: 14 Issue: 14, 363 - 390, 30.12.2018

Abstract

Bir ya da birkaç canlı
organizma tarafından belirli amaçlara yönelik olarak gerçekleştirilen
davranışlar olarak tanımlanabilen eylem kavramı, sosyoloji, psikoloji, felsefe
vs. disiplinlerde farklı boyutlarının ele alınarak açıklanan bir konudur.
Eylemin kaynağının ne olduğu, nasıl meydana geldiği, bir organizmanın meydana
getirdiği bir eylemin etki alanının o organizma ile sınırlı olup olmadığı,
eylem bağlamında oganizma-çevre, zihin-beden, birey-toplum ilişkisinin nasıl
açıklanabileceği sorularına bu çerçevede cevap aranır. Klasik Amerikan
pragmatistlerinden George Herbert Mead, zihin-beden, birey-toplum,
organizma-doğa ayrımı gibi düalist yaklaşımların oluşturduğu problemlere çözüm
bulmak için bütüncül bakış açısının kaçınılmaz olduğunu savunur. O, hem eylemde
bulunan bireyin bütünlüğünü hem de bireyin toplumla ve doğa ile olan
bütünlüğünü ortaya koyacak bir eylem kuramı önerir. Bu çerçevede Mead, eylemi
insan altı canlı varlıklar söz konusu olduğunda dürtü ve tamamlanma olmak üzere
iki; insani varlıklar söz konusu olduğunda ise dürtü, algı, düzenleme ve
tamamlanma olmak üzere dört aşamayı içerecek şekilde ortaya koyar.

References

  • Aboulafia, Mitchell. Philosophy, Social Theory and the Thought of George Herbert Mead, New York: The State University of New York Press, 2004.
  • Aboulafia, Mitchell. Transcendence on Self-Determination and Cosmopolitanism, California: Stanford University Press, 2010.
  • Blumer, Herbert. Symbolic Interactionism Perspective and Method, Berkeley&Los Angeles&London: University of California Press, 1986, 1-18.
  • De Waal, Cornelis. On Mead, Australia, Canada, Mexico vd.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning, 2002.
  • Gillespie, Alex. “G.H. Mead: Theorist of the Social Act” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Wiley Blackwell Publishing, 35/1, 2005. 19-39.
  • Hirst, R. John. “Realism”, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Ed. Paul Edwards. Vol. 7, New York-London: Collier-MacMillan Publishing, 1967. 77-83.
  • Honderich, Ted. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • Lee, Harold N. “Mead’s Doctrine of the Past”, Tulane Studies in Philosophy, XII, 1963, 52-75.
  • Lüscher, Kurt. “The Social Reality of Perspectives: On G. H. Mead’s Potential Relevance For The Analysis of Contemporary Societies”, Symbolic Interactionism, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1-18.
  • McCarthy, E. Doyle. “Toward a Sociology of the Physical World: George Herbert Mead on Physical Objects”, Critical Assessments, Ed. Peter Hamilton, Vol. III, London&New York, Taylor&Francis Publishers, 1992, 215-229.
  • Mead, George Herbert. “The Objective Reality of Perspectives”, Selected Writings, Ed. Andrew J. Reck, Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press, 1964. 306-319.
  • Mead, George Herbert. The Individual and the Social Self: Unpublished Work of George Herbert Mead, Ed. David L. Miller, Chicago&London: The University of Chicago Press, 1982.
  • Mead, George Herbert. The Philosophy of the Present. Ed. Arthur E. Murphy, London: The Open Court Company Publishers, 1932.
  • Mead, George Herbert. Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, Ed. Charles W. Morris, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.
  • Mead, George Herbert. The Philosophy of the Act. Ed. Charles W. Morris, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1938.
  • Miller, David L. George Herbert Mead Self, Language and the World, Austin&London: The University of Texas Press, 1973.
  • Morris, Charles W. “Introduction: The Task of The Philosophy of the Act”, The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1938. vii-lxxiii.
  • Natanson, Maurice. The Social Dynamics of George Herbert Mead, Netherlands: The Hague Nijhoff Publishers, 1973.
  • Posner, Roland. “Charles Morris and the Behavioral Foundations of Semiotics”, Classics of Semiotics, United States: Springer, 1987. 23-57.
  • Türer, Celal. Ahlaktan Felsefeye Felsefeden Ahlaka, İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları, 2017.
  • VandenBos, Gary R. APA Dictionary of Psychology, Washington DC: American Psychological Association Press, 2007.
  • Von Mises, Ludwig. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, San Francisco: Fox&Wilkes Company, 1996.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mustafa Kınağ 0000-0003-3333-9425

Publication Date December 30, 2018
Submission Date October 1, 2018
Acceptance Date October 30, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 14 Issue: 14

Cite

ISNAD Kınağ, Mustafa. “George Herbert Mead’ın Eylem Kuramı”. Bozok Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 14/14 (December 2018), 363-390.

download

   Bozok Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi (BOZİFDER) Creative Commons Atıf-Gayriticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC ND) ile lisanslanmıştır.