Production Performance and Cost Analysis of 60 Kwp Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System in Ayaş

Year 2024, , 622 - 630, 15.11.2024

Hüseyin Yüksel Özalp , Ramazan Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1533595

Abstract

The Ankara University Ayaş Horticulture Research and Application Station was chosen as the study area for this investigation. It is situated in the Uğurçayırı neighborhood of Ayaş district, in the center of the districts of Ayaş, Güdül, Beypazarı, and Polatlı. Saplings, vegetables, fruits, clover, medicinal, and spice plants are all produced on the 406-hectare land. The analysis employed a variety of solar energy potential sources, including Ayaş, GEPA (2023), MGM HELİOSAT (2021), PVGIS (2021), IRENA (2021), Solar Med Atlas (2021), NASA SSE (2021), SOLARGIS (2019), Global Solar Atlas, and NREL data. In addition, the design cost of a 60 kW photovoltaic system connected to the grid in Ayaş and the daily average/annual total production values according to months were calculated, taking into account the installed solar energy capacity and production values of the Ministry of Energy in the area. Ayaş's annual solar radiation is 1628 kWh/m2. The average daily electricity production is 252 kWh, and the total annual production is 91980 kWh. A 60 kW PV system's installation cost is 50150 USD. The system has a six-year repayment period. Furthermore, the PV system will mitigate 59.7 kilograms of CO2 emissions annually.

Keywords

Photovoltaic, Solar energy, Solar panel, Cost analysis

References

• Arutyunov VS, Lisichkin GV. 2017. Energy resources of the 21st century: problems and forecasts. Can renewable energy sources replace fossil fuels. Russ Chem Rev, 86(8): 777-804. https://doi.org/10.1070/RCR4723
• Energy Market Regulatory Authority (EMRA). 2023. Elektrik piyasası 2022 yılı piyasa gelişim raporu, Ankara, URL: https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-0-0-102/yillik-rapor-elektrik-piyasasi-gelisim-raporlari (accessed date: March 01, 2024).
• Energy Market Regulatory Authority (EMRA). 2024. Elektrik faturalarına esas tarife tabloları. URL: https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-1327/elektrik-faturalarina-esas-tarife-tablolari (accessed date: February 05, 2024).
• Energysage. 2024. Monocrystalline vs. polycrystalline solar panels. URL:https://www.energysage.com/solar/monocrystalline-vs-polycrystalline-solar/ (accessed date: January 02, 2024).
• Gangaraju M. 2022. Classification and analysis of crystalline module cell. In “Solar Power Plant Design". SJBIR, ISSN: 2319 – 1422, Vol. 11, Issue 02, February 2022 Special Issue, 104-111.
• General Directorate of Meteorology (MGM). 2021. Global güneş radyasyonu. URL: https://www.mgm.gov.tr/kurumici/radyasyon_iller.aspx (accessed date: July 21, 2022).
• GEPA. 2023. Güneş Enerjisi Potansiyel Atlası. URL: https://gepa.enerji.gov.tr/MyCalculator/pages/6.aspx (accessed date: March 03, 2024)
• International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). 2021. Global atlas for renewable energy. URL: https://globalatlas.irena.org/workspace (accessed date: July 12, 2022).
• International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). 2022. Statistic data. URL: https://www.irena.org/ (accessed date: March 28, 2024).
• International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). 2023a. Statistic data. URL: https://www.irena.org/ (accessed date: March 28, 2024).
• International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). 2023b. Renewable power generation costs in 2022, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. URL: https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Aug/Renewable-Power-Generation-Costs-in-2022 (accessed date: March 28, 2024).
• Khan J, Arsalan MH. 2016. Solar power technologies for sustainable electricity generation–A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 55(1): 414-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.135
• Koçer A, Şevik S, Güngör A. 2016. Ankara ve ilçeleri için güneş kolektörü optimum eğim açısının belirlenmesi. UUMFD, 21(1): 63-78. https://doi.org/10.17482/uujfe.80088
• Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. 2024. Türkiye ulusal elektrik şebekesi emisyon faktörü. URL:https://enerji.gov.tr/evced-cevre-ve-iklim-turkiye-ulusal-elektrik-sebekesi-emisyon-faktoru (accessed date: February 10, 2024).
• NASA Surface Meteorology and Solar Energy, (NASA SSE). 2021. NASA prediction of worldwide energy resources. URL: https://asdc.larc.nasa.gov/project/SSE (accessed date: July 21, 2022).
• Photovoltaic Geographical Information System (PVGIS). 2021. Photovoltaıc geographıcal informatıon system URL: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/PVGIS/tools/pv-grid. (accessed date: July 21, 2022).
• Pv Europe. 2023. EU solar market reaches record heights. URL: https://www.pveurope.eu/markets/new-report-eu-solar-market-reaches-record-heights (accessed date: July 21, 2022).
• Qazi A, Hussain F, Rahim NA, Hardaker G. Alghazzawi D. Shaban K. Haruna K. 2019. Towards sustainable energy: a systematic review of renewable energy sources, technologies, and public opinions. IEEE access, 7: 63837-63851. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906402
• Smets A. Jäger K. Isabella O. Van Swaaij R., Zeman M. 2016. Solar Energy: The physics and engineering of photovoltaic conversion, technologies and systems. Bloomsbury Publishing, pp 462.
• Solar Med Atlas. 2021. Solar data. URL: http://www.solar-med-atlas.org/solarmed-atlas/map.htm#t=ghi (accessed date: July 21, 2022).
• Solarenerjin. 2022. 2023 Yılı 100 kW güneş enerjisi kurulum maliyeti. URL: https://www.solarenerjin.com/2023-100-kw-gunes-enerjisi-kurulum-maliyeti/ (accessed date: March 19, 2024).
• SOLARGIS. 2019. Solar resource maps of Turkey, URL: https://solargis.com/maps-and-gis-data/download/turkey (accessed date: November 26, 2021).
• Taşçıoğlu A, Taşkın O, Vardar A. 2016. A power case study for monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels in Bursa City, Turkey. Int J Photoenergy, 2016(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7324138
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK). 2016. Tarım istatistikleri. URL: www.tuik.gov.tr (accessed April 01, 2023).