Ekonomik Özgürlük Yoksullukla Mücadelede Etkili mi?
Year 2020,
Volume: 9 Issue: 17, 146 - 151, 30.06.2020
Cüneyt Koyuncu
,
Hüseyin Safa Ünal
Abstract
Bu çalışmanın amacı 1995-2015 arasındaki dönemde ekonomik özgürlük ve yoksulluk arasındaki ilişkiyi bulmaktır. Bu amaçla sabit etkiler modeli (FEM) ve tesadüfi etkiler modeli (REM) kullanılmaktadır. Modelin spesifikasyonuna karar vermek için Hausman test sonuçları kullanılmıştır. İş ve ticaret özgürlükleri ekonomik özgürlüğe dahil edilmesine rağmen, her üç ölçüt de modellerde ekonomik özgürlüğün ayrı ayrı göstergesi olarak kullanılmaktadır. Analizler, ekonomik özgürlük ile yoksulluk arasında negatif bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Nüfus artışı yoksulluğu arttırır. Bir refah devleti olarak, hükümetin eğitim harcamalarını artırarak müdahil olması yoksulluğu azaltır. GSYH'nın ise yoksulluk üzerinde zayıf bir negatif etkisi vardır.
References
- Connors, J. (2012). Foreign aid and global poverty. Department of Economics Wake Forest University-Working Paper, No.17.
- Connors, J. (2013). Economic Institutions and Global Poverty. Department of Economics Wake Forest University-Working Paper.
- Dollar, D. (2004). Reform, Growth, and Poverty. In P. Glewwe, N. Agrawal &D. Dollar (Eds.), Economic growth, poverty, and household welfare in Vietnam (pp. 29-51). The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
- Easterly, W. (2006). Reliving the 1950s: the big push, poverty traps, and takeoffs in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 11(4), 289-318.
- Ellis, G. F. R. (1984). The dimensions of poverty. Social Indicators Research, 15(3), 229-253.
- Gewirth, A. (2007). Duties to fulfill the human rights of the poor. In Thomas Pogge (Ed.) Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right, 219-236.
- Graf, G., & Schweiger, G. (2014). Poverty and freedom. Human affairs, 24(2), 258-268.
- Hasan, R., Quibria, M. G., & Kim, Y. (2003). Poverty and economic freedom: Evidence from cross-country data. East-West Center Working Papers, No. 60
- Heritage Foundation (2019). 2019 Index of Economic Freedom. (15.08.2019), Retrieved from: https://www.heritage.org/index/about
- Kaur, S. (2007). Economic freedom, inequality and poverty: re-examining the role of government. The Indian Economic Journal, 55(2), 96-118.
- Moreira, V. (2003). Poverty and psychopathology. In S.C. Carr & T.S. Sloan (Eds.), Poverty and Psychology (pp. 69-86). Springer, Boston, MA.
- Norton, S. W., & Gwartney, J. D. (2008). Economic freedom and world poverty. In Economic Freedom of the World, 2008 Annual Report (pp. 23-40). Economic Freedom Network.
- Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. Harvard University Press.
- Quibria, M. G. (2003). Growth and Poverty Reduction Does Political Regime Matter?. MPRA Paper No. 10302.
- Sachs, J. D. (2005). The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. Penguin.
- Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press.
- Sen, A. (2000). Development as Freedom. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.: New York.
- Sen, A. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring poverty. In Grusky, D. B., Kanbur, S. R. (Eds.). Poverty and inequality (pp. 30-46). Stanford University Press.
- Tupy, M. L. (2005). Trade liberalization and poverty reduction in sub-Saharan Africa. Policy Analysis, No. 557, Cato Institute.
- UNDP (2019). Human Development Reports. (10.08.2019), Retrieved from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
- World Bank (2019a). Understanding Poverty. (20.08.2019), Retrieved from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview
- World Bank (2019b). PovcalNet Database. (13.08.2019), Retrieved from: http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/Docs/dictionary.html
- World Bank (2019c). PovcalNet Database. (10.08.2019), Retrieved from: http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/home.aspx
- World Bank (2019d). World Development Indicators. (10.08.2019), Retrieved from: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
Is Economic Freedom Effective on Poverty Alleviation?
Year 2020,
Volume: 9 Issue: 17, 146 - 151, 30.06.2020
Cüneyt Koyuncu
,
Hüseyin Safa Ünal
Abstract
The aim of this study is to find the relationship between economic freedom and poverty for the period between 1995 and 2015. To this end, fixed effect models (FEM) and random effect models (REM) are put into use. Hausman test results are utilized to decide on the specification of the model. Although business and trade freedoms are included in the economic freedom, all three measures are used as the indicators of economic freedom separately in the models. Analyses revealed that there is a negative association between economic freedom and poverty. Population growth raises poverty. As a welfare state, government’s involvement by increasing expenditures on education lowers poverty. GDP, on the other hand, has a small negative effect on the poverty.
References
- Connors, J. (2012). Foreign aid and global poverty. Department of Economics Wake Forest University-Working Paper, No.17.
- Connors, J. (2013). Economic Institutions and Global Poverty. Department of Economics Wake Forest University-Working Paper.
- Dollar, D. (2004). Reform, Growth, and Poverty. In P. Glewwe, N. Agrawal &D. Dollar (Eds.), Economic growth, poverty, and household welfare in Vietnam (pp. 29-51). The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
- Easterly, W. (2006). Reliving the 1950s: the big push, poverty traps, and takeoffs in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 11(4), 289-318.
- Ellis, G. F. R. (1984). The dimensions of poverty. Social Indicators Research, 15(3), 229-253.
- Gewirth, A. (2007). Duties to fulfill the human rights of the poor. In Thomas Pogge (Ed.) Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right, 219-236.
- Graf, G., & Schweiger, G. (2014). Poverty and freedom. Human affairs, 24(2), 258-268.
- Hasan, R., Quibria, M. G., & Kim, Y. (2003). Poverty and economic freedom: Evidence from cross-country data. East-West Center Working Papers, No. 60
- Heritage Foundation (2019). 2019 Index of Economic Freedom. (15.08.2019), Retrieved from: https://www.heritage.org/index/about
- Kaur, S. (2007). Economic freedom, inequality and poverty: re-examining the role of government. The Indian Economic Journal, 55(2), 96-118.
- Moreira, V. (2003). Poverty and psychopathology. In S.C. Carr & T.S. Sloan (Eds.), Poverty and Psychology (pp. 69-86). Springer, Boston, MA.
- Norton, S. W., & Gwartney, J. D. (2008). Economic freedom and world poverty. In Economic Freedom of the World, 2008 Annual Report (pp. 23-40). Economic Freedom Network.
- Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. Harvard University Press.
- Quibria, M. G. (2003). Growth and Poverty Reduction Does Political Regime Matter?. MPRA Paper No. 10302.
- Sachs, J. D. (2005). The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. Penguin.
- Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press.
- Sen, A. (2000). Development as Freedom. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.: New York.
- Sen, A. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring poverty. In Grusky, D. B., Kanbur, S. R. (Eds.). Poverty and inequality (pp. 30-46). Stanford University Press.
- Tupy, M. L. (2005). Trade liberalization and poverty reduction in sub-Saharan Africa. Policy Analysis, No. 557, Cato Institute.
- UNDP (2019). Human Development Reports. (10.08.2019), Retrieved from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
- World Bank (2019a). Understanding Poverty. (20.08.2019), Retrieved from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview
- World Bank (2019b). PovcalNet Database. (13.08.2019), Retrieved from: http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/Docs/dictionary.html
- World Bank (2019c). PovcalNet Database. (10.08.2019), Retrieved from: http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/home.aspx
- World Bank (2019d). World Development Indicators. (10.08.2019), Retrieved from: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators