Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2018, Volume: 1 Issue: 4, 134 - 139, 01.10.2018

Abstract

References

  • Anderson, J. C., Gerbing, D.W., 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach”, Psychological Bulletin, 411-423.
  • Bentler, P.M., ve Chou, C.P., 1987. Practical Issues in Structural Modeling Sociological Methods & Research,16: 78-117.
  • Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables, John Wiley, New York.
  • Cerrah, İ. ve Semiz, E., 2000. “Yirmi Birinci Yüzyılda Polis Temel Sorunlar-Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar”, Sibel Matbaası, Haziran, Ankara.
  • Hamamcı, Z., Oskargil, E., İnanç, N.,2004. Okullarda Çalışan Psikolojik Danışmanların Mesleki Yönden Kendilerini Geliştirmeleri ve Mesleki Doyumları İle İlişkisinin İncelenmesi, XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
  • İncir, G., 1990. Çalışanların Motivasyonuna Genel Bir Bakış, Milli Protaktivite Merkezi Yayınları, No: 313, Ankara.
  • Joreskog, K. Sörbom, D., 2001. LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide, Scientific Software International Inc.
  • Kelloway E.K., 1998. Using Lisrel for Stuctural Equation Modelling: A Researcher’s Guide, Sage Publications.
  • Kline, R. B., 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, (Second Edition), NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., 2003. “Evaluating The Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures”, Methods of Psychological Research Online,8(2), 23-74.
  • Schultz, D. P., Schultz, S. E., 1986. “Psychology and Industry Today; An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational, Psyhology”, (4th Edition), NewYork McMillian Publishing Com.
  • Sümer, N., 2000. “Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar”, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-73.
  • Yılmaz, V., 2004. LISREL ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Tüketici Şikayetlerine Uygulanması, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , cilt 4,no.1,s.77-90

Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police with Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun

Year 2018, Volume: 1 Issue: 4, 134 - 139, 01.10.2018

Abstract

Job
satisfaction is a spiritual pleasure which employees feel in exchange of their
job. Based on this, it can be said that job satisfaction of employees increases
when expectations comply with the properties of the work. Spiritual pleasure is
very important in terms of providing more efficient and qualified service in
sectors that provide services. For this purpose, a study was conducted on
police working in law enforcement agency which is thought to have the greatest
responsibility on the society’s order and trust and which provides the most
important services to society. The sample of the study consists of 396 police
in the city center and towns of Samsun. In the study, the sub-dimensions that
influence general job satisfaction and the associations between these were
tested with structural equation modeling.

References

  • Anderson, J. C., Gerbing, D.W., 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach”, Psychological Bulletin, 411-423.
  • Bentler, P.M., ve Chou, C.P., 1987. Practical Issues in Structural Modeling Sociological Methods & Research,16: 78-117.
  • Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables, John Wiley, New York.
  • Cerrah, İ. ve Semiz, E., 2000. “Yirmi Birinci Yüzyılda Polis Temel Sorunlar-Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar”, Sibel Matbaası, Haziran, Ankara.
  • Hamamcı, Z., Oskargil, E., İnanç, N.,2004. Okullarda Çalışan Psikolojik Danışmanların Mesleki Yönden Kendilerini Geliştirmeleri ve Mesleki Doyumları İle İlişkisinin İncelenmesi, XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
  • İncir, G., 1990. Çalışanların Motivasyonuna Genel Bir Bakış, Milli Protaktivite Merkezi Yayınları, No: 313, Ankara.
  • Joreskog, K. Sörbom, D., 2001. LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide, Scientific Software International Inc.
  • Kelloway E.K., 1998. Using Lisrel for Stuctural Equation Modelling: A Researcher’s Guide, Sage Publications.
  • Kline, R. B., 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, (Second Edition), NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., 2003. “Evaluating The Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures”, Methods of Psychological Research Online,8(2), 23-74.
  • Schultz, D. P., Schultz, S. E., 1986. “Psychology and Industry Today; An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational, Psyhology”, (4th Edition), NewYork McMillian Publishing Com.
  • Sümer, N., 2000. “Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar”, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-73.
  • Yılmaz, V., 2004. LISREL ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Tüketici Şikayetlerine Uygulanması, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , cilt 4,no.1,s.77-90
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Taner Tunç 0000-0002-5548-8475

Seval Enöz This is me

Publication Date October 1, 2018
Submission Date August 6, 2018
Acceptance Date September 13, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 1 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Tunç, T., & Enöz, S. (2018). Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police with Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 1(4), 134-139.
AMA Tunç T, Enöz S. Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police with Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun. BSJ Eng. Sci. October 2018;1(4):134-139.
Chicago Tunç, Taner, and Seval Enöz. “Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police With Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 1, no. 4 (October 2018): 134-39.
EndNote Tunç T, Enöz S (October 1, 2018) Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police with Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 1 4 134–139.
IEEE T. Tunç and S. Enöz, “Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police with Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun”, BSJ Eng. Sci., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 134–139, 2018.
ISNAD Tunç, Taner - Enöz, Seval. “Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police With Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 1/4 (October 2018), 134-139.
JAMA Tunç T, Enöz S. Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police with Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2018;1:134–139.
MLA Tunç, Taner and Seval Enöz. “Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police With Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 1, no. 4, 2018, pp. 134-9.
Vancouver Tunç T, Enöz S. Analysis of Job Satisfaction Levels of Police with Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Samsun. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2018;1(4):134-9.

                                                24890