Kuramsal Bir Gelenek Olarak Tarihsel Kurumsalcılık ve Uluslararası İlişkiler

Year 2018, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 179 - 199, 01.06.2018

Fatih Demircioğlu

https://doi.org/10.33905/bseusbed.383985

Abstract

Bu çalışmada
tarihsel kurumsalcılığın sosyal bilimler ve uluslararası ilişkiler içerisindeki
seyri açıklanmış ve ilgili literatürden örneklere başvurmak suretiyle
uluslararası sistemin evrimi tarihsel kurumsalcı yöntemin kavramlar seti
aracılığıyla anlamlandırılmaya çalışılmıştır. Uluslararası sistemin kurumsal
değişim ve dönüşümü üzerinde etkili olan tarihsel kurumsalcı gündemlerden ve
kademeli değişim modellerinden bahsedilmiştir. Tarihsel kurumsalcılığın,
kurumsalcı geleneğin diğer yaklaşımlarıyla olan farkları vurgulanarak bu
yöntemin Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplini’nin olgunlaşmasına katkı yapabilecek
potansiyele sahip olduğu gösterilmiştir.

Keywords

Tarihsel Kurumsalcılık, Uluslararası İlişkiler

References

• Abdelal, Rawi (2007). Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Alter, K. J. ve Sophie Meunier (2009). “Symposium: The Politics of International Regime Complexity”, Perspectives on Politics, Cilt 7 (1), ss. 13–24.
• Barnett, Michael ve Martha Finnemore (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
• Barton, John H., Judith L. Goldstein, Timothy E. Josling ve Richard H. Steinberg (2006). The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Blyth, Mark (2001). Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century, New York: Cambridge University Press. Bourantonis, Dimitris (2005). The History and Politics of UN Security Council Reform, London: Routledge Press.
• Callaghan, Helen ve Martin Höpner (2005). “European Integration and the Clash of Capitalisms: Political Cleavages over Takeover Liberalization”, Comparative European Politics, Cilt 3 (3), ss. 30-32.
• Capoccia, Giovanni ve R. Daniel Kelemen (2007). “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism” World Politics, Cilt 59 (3), ss. 341-369.
• Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse ve Beth A. Simmons (2002). Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage Press.
• Crouch, Colin ve Henry Farrell (2004). “Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism in Political Economy”, Rationality and Society, Cilt 16 (1), ss. 5-43.
• Drezner, Daniel (2009). “The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity” Perspectives on Politics, Cilt 7 (1), ss. 65-70.
• Elman, Colin ve Elman, Miriam Fendius (2001). Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists, and the Study of International Relations, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Falleti, Tulia G. ve Julia F. Lynch (2009). “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis”, Comparative Political Studies, Cilt 42 (9), ss. 1143-1166.
• Farrell, Henry ve Abraham Newman (2010). “Making International Markets: Domestic Institutions in International Political Economy”, Review of International Political Economy, Cilt 17 (4), ss. 609-638.
• Finnemore, Martha ve Kathryn Sikkink (2001). “Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics”, Annual Review of Political Science, Cilt 4, ss. 391-416.
• Frieden, Jeffry A. (1999). “Actors and Preferences in International Relations”, (Strategic Choice and International Relations içinde), ed. David A. Lake ve Robert Powell, ss. 39-76, Princeton, New York: Princeton University Press.
• Frieden, Jeffry A. ve Lisa Martin (2001). “International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions”, (Political Science: State of the Discipline içinde), ed. Ira Katznelson ve Helen V. Milner, ss.118-146, New York: Norton Press.
• Garrett, Laurie (2007). “The Challenge of Global Health”, Foreign Affairs, Cilt 86 (1), ss. 14-38.
• Gilpin, Robert (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Goldstein, Judith (1993). Ideas, Interests and American Trade Policy, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
• Goldstein, Judith, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane ve Anne-Marie Slaughter (2000). “Introduction: Legalization and World Politics”, International Organization, Cilt 54 (3), ss. 1-15.
• Hall, Peter A. (1993). “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain”, Comparative Politics, Cilt 25 (3), ss. 275-296.
• Hobden, Stephen ve John M. Hobson (2002). Historical Sociology in International Relations, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Ikenberry, G. John (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Ikenberry, G. John (2009). “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order”, Perspectives on Politics, Cilt 70 (1), ss. 71-87.
• Jervis, Robert (1997). System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Kahler, Miles ve David A. Lake (2003). Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Kahler, Miles ve David A. Lake (2009). “Economic Integration and Global Governance: Why So Little Supranationalism?” (The Politics of Global Regulations içinde), ed. Walter Mattli ve Ngaire Woods, ss. 242-276. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Katzenstein, Peter J., Robert O. Keohane ve Stephen D. Krasner (1998). “International Organization and the Study of World Politics”, International Organization, Cilt 52 (4), ss. 645-685.
• Katznelson, Ira ve Barry R. Weingast (2005). “Intersections between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism”, (Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism içinde), ed. Ira Katznelson ve Barry R. Weingast, ss. 1-26. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
• Keohane, Robert O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Keohane, Robert O. (2008). “Big Questions in the Study of World Politics” (The Oxford Handbook of International Relations içinde), ed. Christian Reus-Smit ve Duncan Snidal, ss. 708-715, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Keohane, Robert O. ve Lisa L. Martin (2001). “Institutional Theory as a Research Program”, (Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field içinde), ed. Colin Elman ve Elman Miriam Fendius, ss. 71-108, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Lake, David (2002). “Progress in International Relations: Beyond Paradigms in the Study of Institutions”, (Realism and Institutionalism in International Studies içinde), ed. Michael Brecher ve Frank P. Harvey, ss. 135-152. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Lawson, George (2006). “The Promise of Historical Sociology in International Relations”, International Studies Review, Cilt 8 (3), ss. 397-423.
• Lindner, Johannes ve Berthold Rittberger (2003). “The Creation, Interpretation and Contestation of Institutions: Revisiting Historical Institutionalism”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Cilt 41 (3), ss. 445-473.
• Mahoney James, Erin Kimball ve Kendra L. Koivu (2009). “The Logic of Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences”, Comparative Political Studies, Cilt 42 (1), ss.114-146.
• Mahoney, James ve Dietrich Rueschemeyer (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Mahoney, James ve Kathleen Thelen (2009). Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Mansfield, Edward D. ve Jack Snyder (2005). Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• March, James G. ve Johan P. Olsen (1984). “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life”, American Political Science Review, Cilt 78 (3), ss. 734-749.
• Martin, Lisa L. ve Beth A. Simmons (1998). “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions”, International Organization, Cilt 52 (4), ss. 729-757.
• McNamara, Kathleen R. (1998). The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
• Mearsheimer, John (1990). “Back to the Future: Instability of Europe After the Cold War”, International Security, Cilt 15 (1), ss. 5-56.
• Meunier, Sophie ve Kathleen R. McNamara (2007). Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Milner, Helen V. (1998). “Rationalizing Politics: The Emerging Synthesis of International, American and Comparative Politics”, International Organization, Cilt 52 (4), ss. 759-786.
• Moravcsik, Andrew (1997). “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics”, International Organization, Cilt 51 (4), ss. 513-553.
• Munuera, Gabriel (1994). Preventing armed conflict in Europe: lessons from recent experience, Institute for Security Studies Western European Union Press, Paris.
• Newman, Abraham L. (2008). Protectors of Privacy: Regulating Personal Data in the Global Economy, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
• Page, Scott (2006). “Path Dependence”, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, Cilt 1 (1), ss. 87–115.
• Philpott, Daniel (2001). Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Pierson, Paul (1993). “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change”, World Politics, Cilt 45 (4), ss. 595-628.
• Pierson, Paul (1996). “The Path to European Integration: A Historical-Institutionalist Analysis”, Comparative Political Studies, Cilt 29 (2), ss. 123-163.
• Pierson, Paul (2000). “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics”, American Political Science Review, Cilt 94 (2), ss. 251-267.
• Pierson, Paul (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Pierson, Paul ve Theda Skocpol (2001). “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science”, (Political Science: State of the Discipline içinde), ed. Ira Katznelson ve Helen V. Milner, ss. 693-721, New York: Norton Press.
• Pollack, Mark A. (2006). “Rational Choice and EU Politics”, (Handbook of European Union Politics içinde), ed. Knud Erik Jørgensen, Mark A. Pollack ve Ben Rosamond, ss. 31-56, London: Sage Press.
• Raustiala, Kal (2009). Does the Constitution Follow the Flag? The Evolution of Territoriality in American Law, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Raustiala, Kal ve David G. Victor (2004). “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources”, International Organization, Cilt 58 (2), ss. 277-309.
• Reus-Smit, Christian ve Duncan Snidal (2008). The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Ruggie, John Gerard (2004). “Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues, Actors, and Practices”, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt 10 (4), ss. 499–531.
• Sanders, Elizabeth (2006). “Historical Institutionalism”, (The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions içinde) ed. R. A. W. Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder ve Bert A. Rockman, ss. 39-55. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Schickler, Eric (2001). Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Shaffer, Gregory (2006). “The Challenges of WTO Law: Strategies for Developing Country Adaptation”, World Trade Review, Cilt 5 (2), ss. 177-198.
• Shanks, Cheryl, Harold K. Jacobson ve Jeffrey H. Kaplan (1996). “Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981–1992”, International Organization, Cilt 50 (4), ss. 593-627.
• Singer, David Andrew (2007). Regulating Capital: Setting Standards for the International Financial System, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
• Snidal, Duncan (2002). “Rational Choice and International Relations”, (Handbook of International Relations içinde, ed. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, ve Beth A. Simmons, ss. 73-94. London: Sage Press.
• Solingen, Etel (2007). Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Spruyt, Hendrik (1994). The Sovereign State and Its Competitors, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Stein, Arthur (2008). “Neoliberal Institutionalism”. (Oxford Handbook of International Relations içinde), ed. Christian Reus-Smit ve Duncan Snidal, ss. 201-221, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Streeck, Wolfgang ve Kathleen Thelen (2005). “Introduction”. (Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Capitalist Economies içinde), ed. Wolfgang Streeck ve Kathleen Thelen, ss. 1-39. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Thelen, Kathleen (1999). “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics”, Annual Review of Political Scienc, Cilt 2, ss. 369-404.
• Thelen, Kathleen (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Tilly, Charles (1990). Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Press.
• Victor, David (2001). The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Wallander, Celeste A. (2000). “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War”, International Organization, Cilt 54 (4), 705-735.
• Wendt, Alexander (1999). Social Theory of International Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Woods, Ngaire, vd. (1996). Explaining International Relations Since 1945, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.