Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A Case Study of an EFL Teacher’s Personal & Professional Development: Employing Repertory Grid Elicitation Technique

Year 2008, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 25 - 41, 02.09.2015

Abstract

This study presents a knowledge elicitation approach; the Repertory Grid (Repgrid) Elicitation Technique. It describes this technique based on Kelly’s (1955) Personal Construct Psychology. The researcher aims to presents a research investigating an ELT teacher’s development through an in-service program in which repertory grid is used as a research tool. The grid technique reveals not only the change in the content but also in the structure and organization of the participant’s construct system at the end of the study, which lasted a full academic year long. The study emphasizes the high potential of the Repgrid as a tool for reflection and provides useful insights into the personal and professional development of teachers. The findings suggest that the Repgrid promotes reflective process and teachers’ self-awareness, and serves as a trigger for change and development.

References

  • Bailey, M. K.(1992). The process of ınnovation in language teacher development: What, why and how teachers change. In J. Flowerdew, M. Brock, M & S, Hsia (Eds.). Perspectives on second language teacher development, 253-282. Hong Kong:City; Polytechnic of Hong Kong.
  • Ben-Peretz, M. (1984). Kelly's theory of personal constructs as a paradigm for investigating teacher thinking. In R.. Halkes & J. K. Olson (Eds.). Teacher thinking: A new perspective on persisting problems in education. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Carr, M., Barker, M., Bell, B., Biddulph, F., Jones, A., Kirkwood, V., Pearson, J., & Symington, P. (1994). The Constructivist Paradigm and Some Implications for Science Content and Pedagogy. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (Eds.). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
  • Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F. & White, R. T. (Eds.) (1994). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Marland, P. (1998). Teachers’ practical theories:ımplications for preservice teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education & Development, 1 (2), 15-23.
  • Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Children’s science. In R. Osborne & P. Freyberg (Eds.). Learning in science: The implications of children’s science. London: Heinemann.
  • RepGrid2 Manual. (1993). Centre for Person Computer Studies, 3019 Underhill Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4E4.
  • Roberts, J. (1998). Language teacher education. London: Arnold.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
  • Sendan, F. (1995). Patterns of development in EFL student teachers’ personal theories: A constructivist approach: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Reading, UK.
  • Shaw, M. L. G. & Gaines, B. R. (1995). Comparing construction through the web..Retrieved May 5, 2000, from University of Calgary, Knowledge Science Institute Web site: http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/articles/CSCL95WG/.
  • Winkler, G. (2001). Reflection and theory: Conceptualising the gap between teaching experience and teacher expertise. Catholic Institute of Education, Paarl: South Africa.
  • Yaman, Ş. (2004). An action research study on teacher development: A constructivist approach :Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Çukurova, Turkey.
  • Yumru, H. (2000). An ownership approach to teacher development: A constructivist view: Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Çukurova, Turkey.
  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Action research in higher education: Examples and reflection. London: Kogan Page.

A Case Study of an EFL Teacher’s Personal & Professional Development: Employing Repertory Grid Elicitation Technique

Year 2008, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 25 - 41, 02.09.2015

Abstract

This study presents a knowledge elicitation approach; the Repertory Grid (Repgrid) Elicitation Technique. It
describes this technique based on Kelly’s (1955) Personal Construct Psychology. The researcher aims to
presents a research investigating an ELT teacher’s development through an in-service program in which
repertory grid is used as a research tool. The grid technique reveals not only the change in the content but
also in the structure and organization of the participant’s construct system at the end of the study, which
lasted a full academic year long. The study emphasizes the high potential of the Repgrid as a tool for
reflection and provides useful insights into the personal and professional development of teachers. The
findings suggest that the Repgrid promotes reflective process and teachers’ self-awareness, and serves as a
trigger for change and development.

References

  • Bailey, M. K.(1992). The process of ınnovation in language teacher development: What, why and how teachers change. In J. Flowerdew, M. Brock, M & S, Hsia (Eds.). Perspectives on second language teacher development, 253-282. Hong Kong:City; Polytechnic of Hong Kong.
  • Ben-Peretz, M. (1984). Kelly's theory of personal constructs as a paradigm for investigating teacher thinking. In R.. Halkes & J. K. Olson (Eds.). Teacher thinking: A new perspective on persisting problems in education. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Carr, M., Barker, M., Bell, B., Biddulph, F., Jones, A., Kirkwood, V., Pearson, J., & Symington, P. (1994). The Constructivist Paradigm and Some Implications for Science Content and Pedagogy. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (Eds.). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
  • Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F. & White, R. T. (Eds.) (1994). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Marland, P. (1998). Teachers’ practical theories:ımplications for preservice teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education & Development, 1 (2), 15-23.
  • Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Children’s science. In R. Osborne & P. Freyberg (Eds.). Learning in science: The implications of children’s science. London: Heinemann.
  • RepGrid2 Manual. (1993). Centre for Person Computer Studies, 3019 Underhill Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4E4.
  • Roberts, J. (1998). Language teacher education. London: Arnold.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
  • Sendan, F. (1995). Patterns of development in EFL student teachers’ personal theories: A constructivist approach: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Reading, UK.
  • Shaw, M. L. G. & Gaines, B. R. (1995). Comparing construction through the web..Retrieved May 5, 2000, from University of Calgary, Knowledge Science Institute Web site: http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/articles/CSCL95WG/.
  • Winkler, G. (2001). Reflection and theory: Conceptualising the gap between teaching experience and teacher expertise. Catholic Institute of Education, Paarl: South Africa.
  • Yaman, Ş. (2004). An action research study on teacher development: A constructivist approach :Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Çukurova, Turkey.
  • Yumru, H. (2000). An ownership approach to teacher development: A constructivist view: Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Çukurova, Turkey.
  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Action research in higher education: Examples and reflection. London: Kogan Page.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Şaziye Yaman This is me

Publication Date September 2, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 25 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yaman, Ş. (2015). A Case Study of an EFL Teacher’s Personal & Professional Development: Employing Repertory Grid Elicitation Technique. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 25(1), 25-41.