A Meta-Analysis Study on the Investigation of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Gender

21 - 43

Binnur Ergen , Tugba Yanpar Yelken Sedat Kanadli

https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.641755

Abstract

The purpose of this study is, by using meta-analysis method, to examine whether there is a significant difference in the effect size of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) according to gender. For this purpose, it was examined whether both Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and the knowledge types related to TPACK shows a statistically significant difference by gender. A total of 29 studies conducted both in Turkey and abroad between 2007-2017 and meeting the inclusion criteria were synthesized by the meta-analysis method. Cohen’s d was chosen as the effect size index in order to examine the knowledge types related to TPACK by gender. Since the studies were obtained from the literature, primary studies were combined according to the Random Effects Model. It was concluded as a result of the analysis that there is a significant difference between the knowledge types about TPACK by gender, and in the sub-group analysis, technology knowledge, technological pedagogical knowledge and technological pedagogical content knowledge have a significant effect size in favour of male; on the other hand, content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and technological content knowledge have an insignificant effect size in favour of male and pedagogical knowledge has an insignificant effect size in favour of female.

Keywords

gender, technological pedagogical content knowledge, meta-analysis, sub-group analysis

References

• Acikgul, K., & Aslaner, R. (2015). Investigation of TPACK confidence perception of prospective elementary mathematics teachers. Erzincan University Journal of Educational Faculty, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.17556/jef.04990
• Akgoz, S., Ercan, I., & Kan, I., (2004). Meta-analysis. Uludag University Journal of Medical Faculty, 30(2), 107-112.
• Akkoc, H., Ozmantar, M.F., Bingolbali, E., Demir,S., Basturk, S., & Yavuz, I. (2011). Developing program to enhance technological pedadogical content knowledge of preservice maths teachers (Matematik ogretmen adaylarina teknolojiye yonelik pedagojik alan bilgisi kazandirma amacli program gelistirme). TUBITAK Project No: 107K531, March. Istanbul.
• Aksin, A. (2014). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of social studies teachers (TPACK) qualifications: the case of Amasya province (Sosyal bilgiler ogretmenlerinin Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi (TPAB) yeterlilikleri: Amasya ili ornegi) (Doctoral Dissertation). Ataturk University. Faculty of Education. Erzurum. TURKEY.
• Akyildiz, S., & Altun, T. (2018). Investigation of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of classroom teacher candidates according to some variables. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(2), 318-333. https://doi.org/10.24315/trkefd.322749
• Alazcioglu, H. (2016). Investigation of relationship between teacher candidates’ TPACK competency levels and use of WEB 2.0 tools (Unpublished master thesis). Mevlana University. Science Institute. Konya. TURKEY.
• Alshehri, K. A. (2012). The influence of mathematics teachers’ knowledge in technology, pedagogy and content (TPACK) on their teaching effectiveness in Saudi public schools (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Kansas .USA.
• Altun, T. (2013). Examination of classroom teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge on the basis of their demographic profiles. Croatian Journal of Education, 15(2), 365-397.
• Anderson, B. (2012). Testing the effectiveness of professional development for integrating technology in an Urban Iowa Middle School (Doctoral Dissertation). Northcentral University. USA.
• Avci, T. (2014). Determination of technological pedagogical content knowledge and self-confidence levels of science teachers (Fen bilimleri ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi ve oz-guven duzeylerinin belirlenmesi) (Master Thesis). Celal Bayar University. Science Institute. Manisa.
• Bagriyanik, K. E. (2015). Self-efficacy belief attitudes and perceptions of science teacher candidates on technological pedagogical content knowledge. (Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerine yonelik oz-yeterlik inanislari, tutumlari ve algilari) (Master Thesis). Cumhuriyet University. Institute of Education Sciences. Sivas.
• Bakioglu, A., & Ozcan, S. (2016). Meta-Analysis. Ankara: Nobel Press.
• Balcin, M. D., & Ergun, A. (2016). Technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy of science teacher candidates about material development: development, reliability and validity study. (Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin materyal gelistirme konusundaki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi oz-yeterlik olcegi: gelistirme, guvenirlik ve gecerlik calısmasi). Turkish Journal of Education, 5(3), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.48236
• Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S. (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), depending on the literature review: sample of Turkey. (Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) uzerine alanyazin incelemesi: Turkiye Ornegi. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(1), 15-32.
• Baturay, M. H., Gokcearslan, S., & Sahin, S. (2017). Associations among teachers’ attitudes towards computer-assisted education and TPACK competencies. Informatics in Education, 16(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2017.01
• Bavonese, J. (2014). Determining the impact of a multiliteracies workshop on TPACK knowledge of elementary preservice teachers (Doctoral Dissertation). Alabama University. USA
• Bilici, S. (2015). Investigation of the level of secondary school teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge by using interactive board and other teaching technologies (Ortaogretim ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi duzeylerinin etkilesimli tahta ve diger ogretim teknolojilerinin kullanma durumlarina gore incelenmesi (Master Thesis). Yuzuncu Yil University. Van.
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2013). Introduction to meta-analysis (Meta-analize giris). (Trans. Ed: Dincer, S.). Ankara: Anı Press.
• Bostancioglu, A. (2014). EFL-TPACK: The development of a questionnaire to measure the technology pedagogy and content knowledge of English as foreign language (EFL) teachers. The EUROCALL Teacher Ed SIG. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/ teacheredsignice/programme/abstracts/efl-tpackquestionnaireforteachers
• Cam, E. (2017). An investigation of the levels of technological pedagogical content of the primary teachers (TPACK) in terms of lifelong learning, self-efficacy levels and in-service training requirements: Mus / a case of Bulanik (İlkogretim ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) duzeylerinin yasam boyu ogrenme, oz-yeterlik duzeyleri ve hizmet ici egitim gereksinimleri acisindan incelenmesi: Mus/ Bulanik ornegi) (Master Thesis). Amasya University Institute of Social Sciences. Amasya.
• Can, Ş., Doğru, S., & Bayır, G. (2017). Determination of Pre-service Classroom Teachers Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.2083
• Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Yamak, H., Kavak, N. S., & Guzey, S. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy scale (TPACK-SeS) for pre-service science teachers: construction, validation and reliability. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 52, 37-60.
• Canbolat, N. (2011). Examining the relationship between the technological pedagogical content knowledge and thinking styles of mathematics teacher candidates (Matematik ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri ile dusunme stilleri arasındaki iliskinin incelenmesi) (Master Thesis). Selcuk University Institute of Educational Sciences. Konya.
• Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, London: Guilford Press.
• Cetin, I. (2017). Investigation of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) levels of prospective mathematics teachers (Matematik ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) duzeylerinin incelenmesi) (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Necmettin Erbakan University. Institute of Education Sciences. Konya.
• Cetin-Berber, D., Erdem, A. R. (2015). An investigation of Turkish pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge. Computers, 2015(4), 234-250. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers4030234
• Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31-51.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis (A step by step approach) (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
• Cuhadar, C., Bulbul, T., & Ilgaz, G. (2013). Exploring of the relationship between individual innovativeness and techno-pedagogical education competencies of pre-service teachers. Elementary Education Online, 12(3), 797‐807. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim‐online.org.tr
• Delen, K. (2016). The investigation of technological pedagogical and content knowledge level by Turkish teachers of English (Master Thesis). Cag University. Institute of Social Sciences. Mersin.
• Demir Atalay, T. (2016). Turkce ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi durumlarinin cesitli degiskenlerle iliskisi (The relationship between the various variables of the situations of technological pedagogical content knowledge of the Turkish teacher candidates). Turkish Studies, 11(9), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies. 9465
• Demir, T., & Firat Durdukoca, S. (2018). Pedagojik formasyon egitimi sertifika programina devam eden ogrencilerin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi. (Investigation of technological pedagogical content knowledge of students attending pedagogical formation education certificate program according to various variables). International Journal of Turkish Literature and Culture Education, 7(2), 1253-1275. https://doi.org/10.7884/teke.4173
• Depew, R. (2015). Investigating the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and technology leadership capacities of k-12 public school principals (Doctoral Dissertation). Brandman University. USA.
• Dikkartin Ovez, F. T., & Akyuz, G. (2013). Ilkogretim matematik ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yapilarinin modellenmesi. Education and Science, 38(170), 321-334.
• Dikmen, C. H., & Demirer, V. (2016). Trends in studies on technological pedagogical content knowledge in Turkey between 2009 and 2013 years. Turkish Journal of Education (TURJE), 5(1), 33-46.
• Dincer, S. (2014). Applied meta-analysis in educational sciences (Egitim bilimlerinde uygulamali meta-analiz). Ankara. Pegem Press. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegem.001
• Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761676
• Erdogan, A., Sahin, İ. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2010), 2707-2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400
• Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003
• Gomleksiz, M. N., & Fidan, E .K. (2013). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik icerik bilgisi oz-yeterliklerine iliskin algi duzeyleri. Inonu University Journal of Education Faculty, 14(1), 87-113.
• Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0328-0
• Gravel, R. J. (2014). The effects of pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade in-service teachers’ participation in a professional development course aligned with the TPACK framework (Doctoral dissertation). Northern Illinois University. USA.
• Gliner, A. J., Morgan, A. G., & Leech, L. N. (2015). Uygulamada araştirma yontemleri desen ve analizi butunlestiren yaklasim (Trans. Ed: Turan, S.) Translation from 2. Edition. Ankara: Nobel Press.
• Gundogmus, N. (2013). Investigation of the relationship between the technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning strategies of prospective teachers. (Ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri ile ogrenme stratejileri arasındaki iliskinin incelenmesi) (Master Thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University. Institute of Educational Sciences. Konya.
• Gur, H., Karamete, A. (2015). A short review of TPACK for teacher education. Academic Journals, 10(7), 777-789. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.1982
• Haciomeroglu, G., Sahin, C., Arcagok, S. (2014). Turkish adaptation of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge assessment scale. Theory and Practice in Education. Egitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 10(2), 297-315.
• Higgins, J. P. T, Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 6(327), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
• Holland, D. D. (2014). Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) competencies of preservice teachers at a small rural university (Doctoral Dissertation). Arizona Northcentral University. USA.
• Isiguzel, B. (2014). Almanca ogretmen adaylarinin teknopedagojik egitime yonelik yeterlik duzeylerinin incelenmesi. (Examining the proficiency levels of German teacher candidates for technopedagogical education). The Journal of International Social Research, 7(34), 768-778.
• Jang S.-J., & Tsai M. F. (2013). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK Model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 566-580. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.282
• Kabakci Yurdakul I. (2011). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknopedagojik egitim yeterliklerinin bilgi ve iletisim teknolojileri kullanimlari acisindan incelenmesi. (Investigation of pre-service teachers’ technopedagogical education competencies in terms of information and communication technologies usage). Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40(2011), 397-408.
• Kabakci Yurdakul I., Odabasi, F. H., Kılıcer, K., Coklar, A.N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computer and Education, 58(3), 964-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012
• Kabakci Yurdakul, I. (Ed.), Odabasi, F. (2013). Teknopedagojik egitime dayali ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarimi (Instructional technologies and material design based on techno-pedagogical education). 1. Ed. Ankara: Anı Press.
• Kabaran, H. (2016). Examination of the relationship between the instructional elements and the styles of teaching with technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) (Ogretim elemanlarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri (TPAB) İle ogretme stilleri arasındaki iliskinin incelenmesi) (Master Thesis). Mugla Sitki Kocman University Educational Sciences Institute. Mugla.
• Kaleli, Y. G. (2015). Turkiye’deki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi calismalarinin analizi: bir meta-sentez calismasi. (Technological pedagogical content knowledge analysis of studies in Turkey: a meta-synthesis study). Education and Science, 40(178), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4087
• Karaca, F. (2015). An investigation of pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge based on a variety characteristics. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(4), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n4p128
• Karademir, E. (2015). Egitsel internet kullanimi ile teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi ve egitim teknolojilerine yonelik tutum arasındaki iliski: ogretmen adayları ornegi. (The relationship between educational internet use and technological pedagogical content knowledge and attitude towards educational technologies: a sample of prospective teachers). International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 10(15), 519-534. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8746
• Karadeniz, S., & Vatanartiran, S. (2015). Primary school teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Elementary Education Online, 14(3), 1017-1028.
• Karatas, A. (2014). Investigation of high school teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge competency towards FATIH Project: Adiyaman Case (Lise ogretmenlerinin FATIH Projesi’ni Uygulamaya yonelik teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yeterliklerinin incelenmesi: Adıyaman ornegi) (Master Thesis). Sakarya University. University of Educational Sciences. Sakarya.
• Karatas, I., Piskin-Tunc, M., Demiray, E., & Yilmaz, N. (2016). Ogretmen adaylarinin matematik ogretiminde teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin gelistirilmesi. (Development of technological pedagogical content knowledge of pre-service teachers in mathematics teaching). Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 16(2), 512-533. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2016.16.2-5000194940
• Kartal, T., & Afacan, O. (2017). Examining Turkish pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) based on demographic variables. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 1-22.
• Kaya, Z., Ozdemir, T. Y., Emre, I., & Kaya, O. N. (2011). Exploring preservice information technology teachers’ perception of self-efficacy in web-technological pedagogical content knowledge. 6th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’11), Elazig.
• Kaya, S., & Dag, F. (2013). Sinif ogretmenlerine yonelik teknolojik pedagojik icerik bilgisi olcegi’nin Turkce’ye uyarlanmasi. (The adaptation of technological pedagogical content knowledge scale to Turkish for classroom teachers). Educational Sciences: in Theory and Practice, 13(1), 291-306.
• Kaya, Z., Kaya, O. N., & Emre, G. (2013). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) olcegi'nin Turkce'ye uyarlanmasi. (The adaptation of technological pedagogical content knowledge scale to Turkish). Educational Sciences: in Theory and Practice, 13(4). 2355-2377.
• Kaya, Z. (2014). Harmanlanmis ogrenmenin fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin kuresel isinma konusundaki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi ve sinif ici ogretim becerilerinin gelistirilmesi uzerine etkisi (The effect of blended learning on the development of technological pedagogical content knowledge and classroom teaching skills of the prospective science teachers about global warming) (Doctoral Dissertation). Firat University. Institute of Educational Sciences. Elazig.
• Kazu, I. Y., & Erten, P. (2014). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacies. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 126-144. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v2i2.261
• Kiray, A. S. (2016). Development of a TPACK self-efficacy scale for preservice science teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 527-541. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.64750
• Kiylik, D. (2016). Investigation of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) levels of classroom teacher candidates according to various variables (Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) seviyelerinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi) (Master thesis). Institute of Educational Sciences. Van.
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. J. Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing Technological Pedagogical Knowledge. In AACTE (Eds.). The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (p. 14). New York: Routledge.
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
• Koh, J. H. L, & Sing, C.C. (2011). Modeling pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) perceptions: the influence of demographic factors and TPACK constructs. Paper presented at ASCILITE Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference, Australia.
• Kula, A. (2015). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (tpab) yeterliliklerinin incelenmesi: Bartin Universitesi Ornegi. (Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) competiences of teacher candidates: a case of Bartin university). The Journal of Academic Social Science, 3(12), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.615
• Kurt, A. A., & Kabakci Yurdakul, I. (Ed.) (2013). Teknopedagojik egitime dayali ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarimi. (Instructional technologies and material design based on techno-pedagogical education). 1. Ed. Ankara: Anı Press.
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2002). Nonparametric statistics. Annual meeting of the mid-south educational research association, Chattanooga, TN, November 6-8.
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Millen, R. (2015). Closing the gap between technological and best practice innovations: teachers’ perceived technological pedagogical content knowledge and self-efficacy towards differentiated instruction (Doctoral Dissertation). Johnson & Wales University.
• Mutluoglu, A. (2012). Investigation of technological pedagogical content knowledge of primary school mathematics teachers according to teaching style preferences (Ilkogretim matematik ogretmenlerinin ogretim stil tercihlerine gore teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin incelenmesi) (Master Thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University. Institute of Educational Sciences. Konya.
• North, A. S., & Noyes, J. M. (2002). Gender influences on children’s computer attitudes and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00043-7
• Oz, H. (2015). Assessing pre-service English as a foreign language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. International Education Studies, 8(5), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n5p119
• Ozaydinlik, K. (2014). Toplumsal cinsiyet temelinde Turkiye’de kadin ve egitim. (Woman in Turkey on the basis of gender and social education). Sosyal Politika Calismalari Dergisi, 33, 93-112. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.03093
• Ozturk, E. (2013). Evaluation of the technological pedagogical content knowledge of classroom teachers in terms of some variables. Usak University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 223-228.
• Pamuk, S., Ulken, A., & Dilek, N. S. (2012). Ogretmen adaylarinin ogretimde teknoloji kullanim yeterliliklerinin teknolojik pedagojik içerik bilgisi kuramsal perspektifinden incelenmesi. (Investigation of pre-service teachers’ technology use competencies from the theoretical perspective of technological pedagogical content knowledge). Mustafa Kemal University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, 9(17), 415-438.
• Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H. B., & Ayas C. (2015). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument. Educ Inf Technol, 20(2015), 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9278-4
• Price, G. F., Wright, V. H., & Rice, M. L. (2014). Determining the impact of an integrated triadic model on TPACK development in preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(4), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2014.927250
• Roig-Vila, R., Mengual-Andrés, S., & Quinto-Medrano, P. (2015). Primary teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge. Media Education Research Journal, 45(23), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.3916/C45-2015-16
• Sad, S. N., Acikgul, K., & Delican, K. (2015). Senior pre-service teachers’ senses of efficacy on their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 8(2), 204-235. https://doi.org/10.5578/keg.9480
• Sahin, İ. (2011). Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 97-105.
• Sainz, M., & Saez, M. L. (2010). Gender differences in computer attitude and the choice of technology related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain. Computers & Education, 54(2), 578-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.007
• Saka Ozturk, H. (2017). Teachers ‘techno-pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) levels, students’ self-efficacy and the relationship between their academic achievement (Ogretmenlerin tekno-pedagojik alan bilgisi (tpab) duzeyleri, ogrencilerin oz-yeterlikleri ve akademik basarilari arasindaki iliskilerin incelenmesi) (Master Thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University. Institute of Educational Sciences. Konya.
• Sancar Tokmak, H., Yavuz Konokman, G., & Yanpar Yelken, T. (2013). Mersin Universitesi okul oncesi ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (tpab) ozguven algilarinin incelenmesi. (Investigation of pre-school teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) self-confidence perceptions in Mersin University). Ahi Evran University Journal of Educational Faculty of Kirsehir (KEFAD), 14(1), 35-51.
• Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. (2009a). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
• Tuncer, M., & Dikmen, M. (2018). Cinsiyetin tekno-pedagojik alan bilgisi uzerindeki etkisinin meta-analiz yontemiyle arastirilmasi. (Investigation of the effect of gender on techno-pedagogical content knowledge by meta-analysis method). Firat University The Journal of International Social Sciences, 28(1), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.387808
• Turgut, T. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yeterlilikleri: Karabuk ili ornegi (Technological pedagogical content knowledge qualifications of social studies teachers: the case of Karabuk City) (Master Thesis). Karabuk University. Social Sciences Institute. Karabuk.
• Unlu, I., Kaskaya, A., & Coskun, M. K. (2017). Investigation of social studies teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical content knowledge according to various variables. Journal of Erzincan University Faculty of Education, 19(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.295611
• Viechtbauer, W. (2017). Metafor: Meta-analysis package for R. R package version 2.0-0 [Data files]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metafor/index
• Wright, B., & Akgunduz, D. (2018). The relationship between technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) self-efficacy belief levels and the usage of Web 2.0 applications of pre-service science teachers. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 10(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v10i1.3187
• Yanpar Yelken, T. (2012). Ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarimi. (Teaching technologies and material design) (11. Ed.). Ankara: Anı Press.
• Yanpar Yelken, T., Sancar Tokmak, H., Ozgelen, S., & Incikapi, L. (2013). Teknolojik- pedagojik- alan bilgisi (tpab) cercevesi ve bu cercevenin Milli Egitim Bakanligi fen ve matematik egitimi programindaki yeri. (Technological- pedagogical- content knowledge (tpack) frame and its place in the science and mathematics education program of the Ministry of National Education). In: T. Y.Yelken, H. S. Tokmak, S. Ozgelen and L. Incikapi (Ed.) Fen ve matematik egitiminde teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi temelli ogretim tasarimlari. (Educational designs based on technological pedagogical content knowledge in science and mathematics education). (pp. 2-10). Ankara: Anı Press.
• Yavuz Konokman, G., Yanpar Yelken, T., & Sancar Tokmak, H. (2013). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin TPAB’lerine iliskin algilarinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi: Mersin Universitesi ornegi. (Examining the pre-service teachers’ perceptions about TPACK according to various variables: Mersin University case). Kastamonu University Journal of Education, 21(2), 666-684.