Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Technology-mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course

Year 2016, Volume: 7 Issue: 4, 314 - 330, 16.10.2016

Abstract

In the past fifteen years, Web 2.0 social networking technologies have ushered in a new era of
information production, distribution and consumption with significant implications for
language teaching and learning. An example of such technology is Moodle, which is a learning
management system with several useful features that can transform the learning environment
into a site for interactivity, connectivity and great amounts of extensive learning. With this in
mind, the present case study aims to investigate tertiary education students’ acceptance of and
engagement in a Moodle-hosted writing course. Using case study methodology, qualitative
data were elicited from 24 semester-two students on the basis of focus group interviews
constructed in line with Technology Acceptance Model 2. Another source of data is Moodle log
reports, which offered a detailed account of students’ contributions and activities in the online
writing course. The results showed that almost all the students perceived Moodle as a useful
tool for sharing, collaboration and learning. The results also uncovered three different
categories of students in terms of level of engagement; namely, highly engaged, moderately
engaged and poorly engaged. The implications of these results for an effective implementation
of Moodle are discussed.

References

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Mor, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
  • Ebner, M., & Kickmeier-Rust, M. (2008). Utilizing Wiki-Systems in higher education classes: A chance for universal access? Univ Access Inf Soc(7), 199-207.
  • Erguig, R. (2009). The use of information technologies and audiovisual media in ELT: The department of English in El-jadida, Morocco, as a case study. Porto Linguarum, 11, 115-128.
  • Helen J. Parkin, J. H., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., & Thorpe, L. (2012). A role for technology in enhancing students’ engagement with feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 963-973.
  • Jonas, G. A., & Norman, C. S. (2011). Textbook websites: User technology acceptance behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(2), 147-159.
  • Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 119-132
  • Mason, B. R. (2011). Student Engagement with, and Participation in, an e-Forum. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 258-268.
  • Ministry of National Education in Morocco. (1999). National Charter of Education and Training. Retrieved on 14 February 2014, from http://www.cse.org.ma/ar/admin_files/ressources/ charte-men_ar.pdf
  • Neumann, L. D., & Hood, M. (2009 ). The effects of using a wiki on student engagement and learning of report writing skills in a university statistics course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 382-398.
  • Ouardaoui, A., Legrouri, A., Darhmaoui, H., & Loudiyi, K. (2012). ICT integration into chemistryphysics classes in middle schools through a participatory pilot project approach. Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences, 55, 232-238.
  • Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  • Venter, P., van Rensburg, J. M., & Davis, A. (2012). Drivers of learning management system use in a South African open and distance learning institution. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 183-198.
  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89–100.
  • Zyad, H. (2016a). Integrating computers in the classroom: Barriers and teachers' attitudes. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 67-78.
  • Zyad, H. (2016b). L2 writing development: The case of two high-achieving and two struggling college-level students. International Journal for 21st Century Education, 3(1), 25-36
Year 2016, Volume: 7 Issue: 4, 314 - 330, 16.10.2016

Abstract

References

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Mor, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
  • Ebner, M., & Kickmeier-Rust, M. (2008). Utilizing Wiki-Systems in higher education classes: A chance for universal access? Univ Access Inf Soc(7), 199-207.
  • Erguig, R. (2009). The use of information technologies and audiovisual media in ELT: The department of English in El-jadida, Morocco, as a case study. Porto Linguarum, 11, 115-128.
  • Helen J. Parkin, J. H., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., & Thorpe, L. (2012). A role for technology in enhancing students’ engagement with feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 963-973.
  • Jonas, G. A., & Norman, C. S. (2011). Textbook websites: User technology acceptance behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(2), 147-159.
  • Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 119-132
  • Mason, B. R. (2011). Student Engagement with, and Participation in, an e-Forum. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 258-268.
  • Ministry of National Education in Morocco. (1999). National Charter of Education and Training. Retrieved on 14 February 2014, from http://www.cse.org.ma/ar/admin_files/ressources/ charte-men_ar.pdf
  • Neumann, L. D., & Hood, M. (2009 ). The effects of using a wiki on student engagement and learning of report writing skills in a university statistics course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 382-398.
  • Ouardaoui, A., Legrouri, A., Darhmaoui, H., & Loudiyi, K. (2012). ICT integration into chemistryphysics classes in middle schools through a participatory pilot project approach. Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences, 55, 232-238.
  • Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  • Venter, P., van Rensburg, J. M., & Davis, A. (2012). Drivers of learning management system use in a South African open and distance learning institution. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 183-198.
  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89–100.
  • Zyad, H. (2016a). Integrating computers in the classroom: Barriers and teachers' attitudes. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 67-78.
  • Zyad, H. (2016b). L2 writing development: The case of two high-achieving and two struggling college-level students. International Journal for 21st Century Education, 3(1), 25-36
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hicham Ziyad This is me

Publication Date October 16, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 7 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Ziyad, H. (2016). Technology-mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 314-330.
AMA Ziyad H. Technology-mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course. Contemporary Educational Technology. October 2016;7(4):314-330.
Chicago Ziyad, Hicham. “Technology-Mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course”. Contemporary Educational Technology 7, no. 4 (October 2016): 314-30.
EndNote Ziyad H (October 1, 2016) Technology-mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course. Contemporary Educational Technology 7 4 314–330.
IEEE H. Ziyad, “Technology-mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course”, Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 314–330, 2016.
ISNAD Ziyad, Hicham. “Technology-Mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course”. Contemporary Educational Technology 7/4 (October 2016), 314-330.
JAMA Ziyad H. Technology-mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2016;7:314–330.
MLA Ziyad, Hicham. “Technology-Mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course”. Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, 2016, pp. 314-30.
Vancouver Ziyad H. Technology-mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2016;7(4):314-30.