Theoretical Article

Professional Identity in Freefall: What It Means to Be a Filmmaker When Everyone Can "Make Films"

Volume: 1 Number: 1 June 30, 2026
EN TR

Professional Identity in Freefall: What It Means to Be a Filmmaker When Everyone Can "Make Films"

Abstract

The spread of AI powered visual production tools has provoked a crisis of professional identity among filmmakers, educators, and media practitioners. Drawing on years of experimentation with AI storytelling tools, a career spanning independent through to international productions, and my research as a master’s student, I argue that what is underway is not the flattening of expertise but its forced redefinition. AI has levelled a playing field that was never level, dissolving class barriers that historically determined who tells stories on screen. Yet this democratization introduces dangers of its own: the tyranny of infinite choice, the erosion of productive constraints and happy accidents central to creative discovery, and the narrowing of whose stories get told to those who can afford the technology. The filmmaker who survives this transition will not be the one who resists AI but the one who understands what it cannot do: decide what is worth saying, navigate the ethics of representation, and sustain the human connections from which meaningful stories emerge. This piece is both a theoretical argument and a practitioner's testimony from someone who has watched the industry move from scepticism to quiet acceptance of tools reshaping what it means to make a film.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Ulster University, Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Project Number

1

Ethical Statement

This study does not require ethics committee approval. The article is an opinion piece based on the author's professional experience as a filmmaker and lecturer, and on practice-based research conducted as part of a masters programme. No human participants, personal data, or experimental procedures were involved in the preparation of this manuscript. The work complies with the ethical principles and publication policies of CLAIMS: Journal of Critical AI and Media Studies.

Thanks

The author would like to thank Ulster University for supporting this research as part of the masters programme within the Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. Thanks are also due to colleagues and students whose conversations and creative practice have shaped the ideas presented in this article.

References

  1. Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 217–251). Schocken Books.
  2. Comunian, R., Faggian, A., & Jewell, S. (2011). Winning and losing in the creative industries: An analysis of creative graduates' career opportunities across creative disciplines. Cultural Trends, 20(3–4), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2011.589710
  3. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2019). The cultural industries (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  4. Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2011). Creative labour: Media work in three cultural industries. Routledge.
  5. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
  6. Lobato, R. (2019). Netflix nations: The geography of digital distribution. New York University Press.
  7. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.
  8. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Ecco.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Communication Technology and Digital Media Studies

Journal Section

Theoretical Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2026

Submission Date

April 6, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 13, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 1 Number: 1

APA
Kotey, C. (2026). Professional Identity in Freefall: What It Means to Be a Filmmaker When Everyone Can "Make Films". CLAIMS: Eleştirel Yapay Zeka Ve Medya Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 94-103. https://izlik.org/JA82BE76MT
AMA
1.Kotey C. Professional Identity in Freefall: What It Means to Be a Filmmaker When Everyone Can "Make Films". CLAIMS. 2026;1(1):94-103. https://izlik.org/JA82BE76MT
Chicago
Kotey, Christian. 2026. “Professional Identity in Freefall: What It Means to Be a Filmmaker When Everyone Can ‘Make Films’”. CLAIMS: Eleştirel Yapay Zeka Ve Medya Çalışmaları Dergisi 1 (1): 94-103. https://izlik.org/JA82BE76MT.
EndNote
Kotey C (June 1, 2026) Professional Identity in Freefall: What It Means to Be a Filmmaker When Everyone Can "Make Films". CLAIMS: Eleştirel Yapay Zeka ve Medya Çalışmaları Dergisi 1 1 94–103.
IEEE
[1]C. Kotey, “Professional Identity in Freefall: What It Means to Be a Filmmaker When Everyone Can ‘Make Films’”, CLAIMS, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 94–103, June 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA82BE76MT
ISNAD
Kotey, Christian. “Professional Identity in Freefall: What It Means to Be a Filmmaker When Everyone Can ‘Make Films’”. CLAIMS: Eleştirel Yapay Zeka ve Medya Çalışmaları Dergisi 1/1 (June 1, 2026): 94-103. https://izlik.org/JA82BE76MT.
JAMA
1.Kotey C. Professional Identity in Freefall: What It Means to Be a Filmmaker When Everyone Can "Make Films". CLAIMS. 2026;1:94–103.
MLA
Kotey, Christian. “Professional Identity in Freefall: What It Means to Be a Filmmaker When Everyone Can ‘Make Films’”. CLAIMS: Eleştirel Yapay Zeka Ve Medya Çalışmaları Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 1, June 2026, pp. 94-103, https://izlik.org/JA82BE76MT.
Vancouver
1.Christian Kotey. Professional Identity in Freefall: What It Means to Be a Filmmaker When Everyone Can "Make Films". CLAIMS [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 1;1(1):94-103. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA82BE76MT