Dişsel Kamuflaj Amaçlı Mandibuler Keser Dişi Çekimi

Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 32 - 35, 15.03.2017

Kadir Beycan , Mustafa Burhan Ateş

Abstract

Bu vaka raporunda iskeletsel Sınıf II maloklüzyonu ve alt diş kavsinde çapraşıklığı olan bir hastada, dental oklüzyonun mandibuler keser dişi çekimi yapılarak tedavi edilme süreci anlatılmaktadır. Alt küçük azı dişlerinin çapraşıklığından şikayetçi olan 18 yaşındaki erkek hasta artmış üst dudak ve azalmış alt dudak projeksiyonu ile birlikte konveks bir profile sahipti. Üst dişsel orta hat, yüz orta hattı üzerinde, alt dişsel orta hat ise yüz orta hattının 3 mm sağında konumlanmıştı. Ağız içi muayenesinde sol tarafta dişsel Sınıf I kanin ve Sınıf II molar ilişkisi olduğu, sağ tarafta ise Sınıf II kanin ve molar ilişkisinin mevcut olduğu tespit edildi. Hastada mandibuler retrognatiye bağlı isketsel Sınıf II ilişki, normal dikey boyut, normal üst ve prokline alt dişlerin bulunduğu belirlendi. Tedavi planı alt sağ lateral keser diş çekiminden oluşan kamuflaj tedavisi olarak belirlenmiştir. 20 aylık aktif tedavi sonunda koordine dental arklarla beraber dişsel Sınıf I kanin ve molar ilişkisi elde edildi, çapraşıklık giderildi. Dikkatle planlanan olgularda mandibuler keser diş çekimi minimal ortodontik müdahale ile fonksiyonel ve estetik sonuçlar sağlayan etkin bir tedavi seçeneğidir.

Keywords

Kamuflaj tedavisi, sınıf II maloklüzyon, mandibuler keser dişi çekimi

Single Lower Incisor Extraction for Dental Camouflage

Abstract

This is a report of the camouflage treatment of a patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion and lower crowding for whom one mandibular incisor extraction was selected as the treatment of choice to improve the dental occlusion. The chief complaint of the 18-year-old male patient was crooked lower premolars. He had a convex profile with protrusive upper and retrusive lower lips. The upper dental midline was coincident with the facial midline, and lower dental midline was 3 mm to the right. The patient had Class I molar and Class II canine relationships on the left and Class II molar and canine relationships on the right. He had a Class II skeletal relationship because of mandibular retrognathy with normal upper and proclined lower incisors. The treatment plan included the extraction of the lower right lateral incisor for camouflage treatment. Class I molar and canine relationships as well as aligned and coordinated dental arches were achieved at the end of 20 months of active fixed treatment. Lower dental crowding was resolved. If carefully planned, mandibular incisor extraction can be an effective treatment option for camouflage treatment that produces functional and esthetic results with minimal orthodontic involvement.

Keywords

Camouflage treatment, class II malocclusion, mandibular incisor extraction

References

• 1. Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. 1996 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part I: Results and trends. J Clin Orthod 1996; 30: 615-29. 2. Dacre JT. The long term effects of one lower incisor extraction. Eur J Orthod 1985; 53: 706-13. [CrossRef] 3. Canut JA. Mandibular incisor extraction: indications and long-term evaluation. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18: 485-9. [CrossRef] 4. Faerovig E, Zachrisson BU. Effects of mandibular incisor extraction on anterior occlusion in adults with Class III malocclusion and reduced overbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115: 113-24. [CrossRef] 5. Kokich VG, Shapiro PA. Lower incisor extraction in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1984; 54: 139-53. 6. Miller RJ, Duong TT, Derakhshan M. Lower incisor extraction treatment with the Invisalign system. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36: 95-102. 7. Riedel RA, Little RM, Bui TD. Mandibular incisor extraction: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1992; 62: 103-16. 8. Valinoti JR. Mandibular incisor extraction therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 105: 107-16. [CrossRef] 9. Uribe F, Holliday B, Nanda R. Incidence of open gingival embrasures after mandibular incisor extractions: a clinical photographic evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 49-54. [CrossRef] 10. Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958; 28: 113-30.