The Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives with Different Acidities to Calcium Silicate-Based Materials

Year 2021, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 170 - 174, 31.03.2021

Elif Kalyoncuoğlu Cangül Keskin Duygu Acar Nihan Gonulol

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.740487

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Objective: To compare the micro-shear bond strengths of 3 different universal adhesives to 2 different calcium silicate-based materials.

Methods: A hole was prepared in the center of the top surfaces of 60 cylindrical acrylic blocks, and the blocks were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=30) according to biomaterial filling; NeoMTA Plus (Avalon Biomed Inc. Bradenton, FL, USA) and ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA). Biomaterials were prepared according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The sample surfaces were flattened after the initial setting, and the samples were incubated for 24h at 37°C. After placing the biomaterials in the prepared holes, the specimens were randomly divided into 3 subgroups (n=10) according to adhesive; G-Premio Bond (GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan), All-Bond Universal (Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA) and Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). Adhesives were applied to the specimens and polymerized. A micro-hybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE, MN, USA) was then placed on the specimen surfaces and polymerized. Micro-shear bond strengths were tested using a universal testing device (LRX, Lloyd Instruments, Farnham, UK). A Shapiro-Wilk test confirmed normal distribution, and 2-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis.

Result: No significant differences were found in the shear bond strengths of any of the tested adhesives to either of the calcium silicate-based materials (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The results indicate that the acidity of a universal adhesive does not affect the bond strength of composite resin to calcium silicate-based materials.

Keywords

calcium silicate, shear strength, universal adhesives, NeoMTA, ProRoot MTA

References

• Gandolfi MG, Spagnuolo G, Siboni F, Procino A, Rivieccio V, Pelliccioni GA, et al. Calcium silicate/calcium phosphate biphasic cements for vital pulp therapy: chemical- physical properties and human pulp cells response. Clin Oral Invest 2015; 19: 2075-2089.
• Bjorndal L, Demant S, Dabelsteen S. Depth and activity of carious lesions as indicators for the regenerative potential of dental pulp after intervention. J Endod 2014; 40: 76-81.
• Cohen BD, Combe EC. Development of new adhesive pulp capping materials. Dent Update 1994; 21: 57-62.
• Brizuela C, Ormeño A, Cabrera C, Cabezas R, Silva CI, Ramirez V, et al. Direct Pulp Capping with Calcium Hydroxide, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Biodentine in Permanent Young Teeth with Caries: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod 2017; 43: 1776-1780.
• Santos PSD, Pedrotti D, Braga MM, Rocha RDO, Lenzi TL. Materials used for indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth: a mixed treatment comparisons meta-analysis. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31. e101. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107/2017.vol31.0101
• Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999; 25: 197-205.
• Ford TR, Torabinejad M, Abedi HR, Bakland LK, Kariyawasam SP. Using mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulp capping material. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1491-1494.
• Altunsoy M, Tanrıver M, Ok E, Kucukyilmaz E. Shear bond strength of a self-adhering flowable composite and a flowable base composite to mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture cement, and Biodentine. J Endod 2015; 41: 1691-1695.
• Tunc ES, Sonmez IS, Bayrak S, Eğilmez T. The evaluation of bond strength of a composite and a compomer to white mineral trioxide aggregate with two different bonding systems. J Endod 2008; 34: 603–605.
• Tyagi N, Chaman C, Tyagi SP, Singh UP, Sharma A. The shear bond strength of MTA with three different types of adhesive systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19: 130-133.
• Kayahan MB, Nekoofar MH, Kazandağ M, Canpolat C, Malkondu O, Kaptan F, et al. Effect of acid-etching procedure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 1004-1014.
• Shafiei F, Mohammadparast P, Jowkar Z. Adhesion performance of a universal adhesive in the root canal: Effect of etch-and-rinse vs. self-etch mode. PloS one 2018; 13: 4. e0195367 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195367
• Moura SK, Reis A, Pelizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Loguercio AD, Arana-Chavez VE, et al. Bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17: 315-325.
• Camilleri J. Characterization of hydration products of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 408-417.
• Torabinejad M, Smith PW, Kettering JD, Ford TRP. Comparative investigation of marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate and other commonly used root-end filling materials. J Endod 1995; 21: 295-299.
• Camilleri J. Staining potential of Neo MTA Plus, MTA Plus and Biodentine used for pulpotomy procedures. J Endod 2015; 41: 1139–1145.
• Siboni F, Taddei P, Prati C, Gandolfi MG. Properties of NeoMTA Plus and MTA Plus cements for endodontics. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 83-94.
• Lee SJ, Monsef M, Torabinejad M. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod 1993; 19: 541-544.
• Walker MP, Diliberto A, Lee C. Effect of setting conditions on mineral trioxide aggregate flexural strength. J Endod 2006; 32: 334-336.
• Fujita-Nakajima K, Aoki-Tabei N, Arita A, Nishiyama N. NMR study on the demineralization mechanism of the enamel and dentin surfaces in MDP-based all-in-one adhesive. Dent Mater 2018; 2017-2292.
• Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: currents status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235.
• De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-132.
• De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, et al. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 39-49.
• Ginebra MP, Fernandez E, Driessens FC, Planell JA. Modeling of the hydrolysis of α-tricalcium phosphate. J Amer Ceram Soc 1999; 82: 2808–2812.
• Spagnuolo G, D’Antò V, Valletta R, Strisciuglio C, Schmalz G, Schweikl H, et al. Effect of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate on human pulp cell survival pathways ERK and AKT. J Endod 2008; 34: 684–688.
• Yelamali S, Patil AC. Evaluation of shear bond strength of a composite resin to white mineral trioxide aggregate with three different bonding systems-An An in vitro analysis. J Clin Exp Dent 2016; 8: 273- 277.
• Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 376-381.
• Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1396–1399.
• Al-Sarheed MA. Evaluation of shear bond strength and SEM observation of all-in-one self-etching primer used for bonding of fissure sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7: 9–16.
• Tate WH, Friedl KH, Powers JM. Bond strength of composites to hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 147-152.