Effect of different crown removing procedures on the implant stability quotient and removal torque values of dental implants

Year 2021, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 314 - 319, 30.06.2021

Hakan Akın Yasemen Ünal Kaan Yilmazer

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.789728

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of different crown-removal methods on the osseointegration of dental implants in implant-retained single crowns.

Methods: Two implants were inserted in each tibia of each New Zealand rabbit’s rear legs. After 28 days, resonance frequency analysis was performed on the implants to detect the degree of osseointegration; 24 hours later, the sacrificed tibias were divided into 3 groups according to different crown-removal methods: crown removal with a diamond bur, the use of a spring-loaded crown remover, and the use of a pneumatic crown remover. Following the crown-removal procedures, the implants’ resonance frequency analysis values and removal torque values were measured.

Results: No significant difference in implant stability quotient was measured after crown removal for either group of diamond bur or group of pneumatic crown remover (p=0.677 and p=0.918, respectively). However, there was a statistically significant difference in implant stability quotient after crown removal for group of spring-loaded crown remover (p=0.008). Moreover, no significant difference was detected between the groups’ removal torque values (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The crown-removal procedure has significantly unfavorable effect on the implant stability quotient values of the implants, whereas removal torque values of the implants was not affected crown-removal procedures.

Keywords

dental implant, crown removal, RFA, reverse torque

References

• 1. Ma S, Fenton A. Screw- versus cement-retained implant prostheses: a systematic review of prosthodontic maintenance and complications. Int J Prosthodont 2015; 28:127-145.
• 2. Mehl C, Harder S, Schwarz D, et al. In vitro influence of ultrasonic stress, removal force preload and thermocycling on the retrievability of implant-retained crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:930-937.
• 3. Lemos CA, de Souza Batista VE, Almeida DA, et al. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 115:419-427.
• 4. Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, et al. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23(Suppl 6):163-201.
• 5. Garg P, Pujari M, Prithviraj DR, et al. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study. J Oral Implantol 2014; 40:649-654. 6. Akin H, Guney U. Effect of various surface treatments on the retention properties of titanium to implant restorative cement. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27:1183-1187.
• 7. Worni A, Gholami H, Marchand L, et al. Retrievability of implant-supported crowns when using three different cements: a controlled clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 2015; 28:22-29.
• 8. Mehl C, Harder S, Wolfart M, et al. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation. Clin Oral Impl Res 2008; 19:1304–1311.
• 9. Ormianer Z, Schiroli G. Maxillary single-tooth replacement utilizing a novel ceramic restorative system: results to 30 months. J Oral Implantol 2006; 32:190–199. 10. Freitas AC Jr, Bonfante EA, Martins LM, et al. Reliability and failure modes of anterior single-unit implant-supported restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:1005–1011.
• 11. Mangano C, Mangano F, Piattelli A, et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of 307 singletooth morse taper-connection implants: amulticenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25:394–400.
• 12. Pjetursson BE, Bragger U, Lang NP, et al. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18(Suppl 3):97–113.
• 13. Janardanan K, Varkey VK, Lovely M, et al. Coronal disassembly systems and techniques: An overview. J Interdiscip Dentistry 2014; 4:33-40.
• 14. Polat Sağsöz N, Yanıkoğlu N, Aladağ Lİ, et al. The investigation of reasons for removal of fixed prosthetic restorations and comparison of traditional removal method with KaVo CORONAflex restoration remover. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014; 24:378-385.
• 15. Sennerby L, Persson LG, Berglundh T, et al. Implant stability during initiation and resolution of experimental periimplantitis: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7:136-140.
• 16. Ito Y, Sato D, Yoneda S, et al. Relevance of resonance frequency analysis to evaluate dental implant stability: simulation and histomorphometrical animal experiments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19:9-14.
• 17. Al-Nawas B, Groetz KA, Goetz H, et al. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19:1-8.
• 18. Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lang N. Implant stability in relation to osseointegration: an experimental study in the Labrador dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 3:313-318. 19. Abdel-HaQ J, Karabuda ZC, Arısan V, et al. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of a hydrophilic blasted and acid-etched implant: an experimental study in sheep tibia. İstanbul Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2010; 44:141-152.
• 20. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekohm U. Influence of mono and bicortical anchorage on the titanium implants. A study in rabbit tibia. Int J OralMaxillofac Surg 1996; 25:229-235.
• 21. Bischof M, Nedir R, Moncler SS, et al. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing- A clinical resonance frequency analysis study with SLA ITI implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 2004; 15:529-539.
• 22. Gehrke SA, Marin GW. Biolechanical evaluation of dental implants with three different designs: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbits. Ann Anat 2015; 199:30-35.
• 23. Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Akca K, et al. Meta-analysis of methods used to assess implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:1015-1032.
• 24. Rasmusson L, Merdith N, Cho IH, et al. The influence of simultaneous versus delayed placement on the stability of titanium implants in onlay bone grafts- A histologic and biomechanic study in the rabbit. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28:224-231.