Bilgi Yapılandırma Sürecine ve Yol Göstericilere Yönelik Öğrenci Yansımaları

Year 2022, Volume: 51 Issue: 3, 1487 - 1517, 30.12.2022

Ümmühan Avcı

https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.855455

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Yeni teknolojilerin eğitim öğretim sürecine dâhil olmasıyla eğitimde “bilgi yapılandırma topluluğu” ve “çevrim içi öğrenme topluluğu” gibi iş birlikli öğrenme ortamları önem kazanmaya başlamıştır. Bu öğrenme ortamlarında beklenen aktif katılımın sağlanması için öğrencilerin bilgi yapılandırma süreçlerini desteklemek, yön vermek ve zenginleştirmek amacıyla cümle başlatıcı ve rol atama gibi bazı yol göstericilere başvurulmaktadır. Bu çalışmada öğretmen adayı öğrencilerin çevrim içi iş birlikli bilgi yapılandırma sürecine ve bu süreçte kullanılan yol göstericilere ilişkin görüşlerini incelemek amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmaya katılan 77 öğretmen adayı, farklı yol göstericileri kullanarak ve hiçbir yol göstericiyi kullanmayarak dört farklı grup hâlinde bilgi yapılandırma sürecine katılmışlardır. Öğrencilerden bu süreçte kendi deneyimlerini yansıtan beşli likert tipi 12 sorudan oluşan bilgi yapılandırma anketini ve 10 sorudan oluşan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formunu doldurmaları istenmiştir. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmış ve veriler içerik analizi ile analiz edilmiştir. Ayrıca yüzde ve frekans gibi bazı betimsel istatistiklere yer verilmiştir. Öğrencilerin iş birlikli bilgi yapılandırma sürecindeki deneyimlerine yönelik görüşlerinin büyük oranda olumlu olduğu görülmüştür. Öğrenciler en çok “Hedeflerimizi belirlemek ve ilerlememizi planlamak önemlidir” görüşünde bulunmuşlardır. Öğrenciler bilgi yapılandırma sürecindeki katkılarını en fazla “görüş çeşitliliği sağlayan” olarak tanımlamışlardır. Ayrıca öğretmen adaylarının çevrim içi iş birlikli bilgi yapılandırma sürecinde kullandıkları yol göstericilere ve daha kaliteli bilgi yapılandırma sürecine yönelik yansımalarına yer verilmiş ve teknoloji destekli eğitim bağlamında yorumlanmıştır.

Keywords

Çevrim Içi Iş Birlikli Öğrenme, Dijital Teknolojiler, Bilgi Yapılandırma, Yol Göstericiler, Öğretmen Adayları

Students’ Reflections on Knowledge Building Process and Scaffolding

Abstract

Collaborative learning environments such as “knowledge building community” and “online learning community” have gained importance with the inclusion of new technologies in the education process. In order to provide active participation expected in these learning environments, scaffolds such as sentence openers and role assignments are used in order to support, guide and enrich students' knowledge building processes. In this study, it is aimed to examine the pre-service teachers' opinions about online collaborative knowledge building process and the scaffolds used in this process. Seventy-seven pre-service teachers participating in the study participated in the knowledge building process in four different groups, using different scaffolds and no scaffolds. In this process, students were asked to complete the knowledge building questionnaire consisting of 12 questions of five likert types and a semi-structured interview form consisting of 10 questions reflecting their own experiences. Qualitative research method was used in the research and the data were analyzed by content analysis. In addition, some descriptive statistics such as percentage frequency are included. It was observed that the opinions of the students about their experiences in the collaborative knowledge building process were mostly positive. The students mostly stated that “it is important to determine our goals and to plan our progress”. The students defined their contributions in the knowledge building process as the most “providing diversity of opinions”. In addition, the scaffolds used by pre-service teachers in the online collaborative knowledge building process and their reflections on the better quality knowledge building process were included and interpreted in the context of technology-supported education.

Keywords

Online Collaborative Learning, Digital Technologies, Knowledge Building, Scaffolds, Pre-Service Teachers

References

• Ak, Ş. (2016). The role of technology‐based scaffolding in problem‐based online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12254
• Avcı, Ü. (2020). Examining the role of sentence openers, role assignment scaffolds and self-determination in collaborative knowledge building. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09672-5
• Avcı Yücel, Ü., & Usluel, Y. K. (2016). Knowledge building and the quantity, content and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 97, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.015
• Belland, B. R. (2010). Portraits of middle school students constructing evidence-based arguments during problem-based learning: The impact of computer-based scaffolds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9139-4
• Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Cesareni, D., Cacciamani, S., & Fujita, N. (2016). Role taking and knowledge building in a blended university course. Intern. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learning, 11, 9–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9224-0
• Chan, C. K., & Chan, Y. Y. (2011). Students' views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.003
• Dillenbourg, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Computer-supported collaborative learning: The basics. Zeitschrift für Berufs-und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 21, 111–130.
• Feagin, J., Orum, A., & Sjoberg, G. (1991). A case for case study. University of North Carolina Press.
• Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. 2000. Effective discussion through a computer‐mediated anchored forum. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437–469. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_3
• Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open-ended learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. II) (pp. 115–140). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Hong, H. Y., Chen, F. C., Chai, C. S., & Chan, W. C. (2011). Teacher-education students’ views about knowledge building theory and practice. Instructional Science, 39(4), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9143-4
• Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654
• Law, N., Yuen, J., Wong, W. O., & Leng, J. (2011). Understanding learners’ knowledge building trajectory through visualizations of multiple automated analyses. In S. Puntambekar, G. Erkens, & C. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Analyzing interactions in CSCL: Methods, approaches and issues, computer-supported collaborative learning series (pp. 47–82). Springer.
• Lazonder, A. W., Wilhelm, P., & Ootes, S. A. W. (2003). Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer‐mediated learning environments. Computers & Education, 41(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00050-2
• Li, Q. (2008). Knowledge building in an online environment: A design-based research study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 37(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.37.2.f
• Lin, C. Y., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2016). Scaffolding wiki-supported collaborative learningfor small-group projects and whole-class collaborative knowledge building. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12140
• Merriam, S. B. (2001). Case studies as qualitative research. Qualitative research in higher education: Expanding perspectives, 2, 191–201.
• Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., Tempelaar, D., Lygo-Baker, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2012). The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL. Computers & Education, 59(3), 893–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.010
• Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Open Court.
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education, (2nd ed.). Macmillan Reference.
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press.
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2010). A brief history of knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1), 1–16.
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In L. Sawyer (Ed.). Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 397–417). Cambridge University Press.
• Wang, Q., Rose, C. P., Ma, N., Jiang, S., Bao, H., & Li, Y. (2022). Design and application of automatic feedback scaffolding in forums to promote learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3156914
• Wise, A. F., Saghafian, M., & Padmanabhan, P. (2012). Towards more precise design guidance: Specifying and testing the functions of assigned student roles in online discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9212-7
• Yiong‐Hwee, T., & Churchill, D. (2007). Using sentence openers to support students’ argumentation in an online learning environment. Educational Media International, 44(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980701491658
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. Yoon, S. A., Anderson, E., Park, M., Elinich, K., & Lin, J. (2018). How augmented reality, textual, and collaborative scaffolds work synergistically to improve learning in a science museum. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1386645
• Zheng, L. (2021). Design and optimization of scaffolding in computer-supported collaborative learning. In Data-driven design for computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 45–57). Springer.
• Zheng, L., Li, X., Zhang, X., & Sun, W. (2019). The effects of group metacognitive scaffolding on group metacognitive behaviors, group performance, and cognitive load in computer-supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.03.002