Searching the effect of anodization process as a surface treatment

Year 2018, Volume: 21 Issue: 4, 298 - 303, 30.12.2018

Mehmet Coşkun Türker Akar Burcu Çırak

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.475207

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of anodization and air-particle abrasion surface treatments on shear bond strength between Ni-Cr and ceramics.

Material and Methods: 30 cylindrical Ni-Cr specimens (7x10 mm) were divided into three groups according to the surface treatments [control group (no-treatment), air-particle abrasion group (110 µm Al₂O₃at 75 psi from 20 cm for 30 seconds), and anodization group]. One sample from each group was evaluated by using SEM. Ceramics with a dimension (5x3 mm) built-up on specimens and shear bond strength tests were performed by using universal testing machine with a 1 mm/min crosshead speed. Stereomicroscope was used to evaluate the failure mode of specimens. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test was used to analyze the differences in shear bond strength values.

Results: The shear bond strength of air-particle abrasion (21,35∓4,64) was higher than anodization group (20,92∓4,85) however, no statistically significant difference was detected. Both groups showed higher bond strength than control group (8,02∓1,47).

Conclusion: Anodization process can be used in order to increase the metal-ceramic bond strength. However, according to the failure mode, air-particle abrasion forms stronger bond strength than anodization.

Keywords

Air-particle abrasion, anodization, Ni-Cr, platinum, shear bond strength

Yüzey işlemi olarak uygulanan anodizasyonun etkilerinin araştırılması

Abstract

Amaç:Bu çalışmanın amacı, anodizasyon ve kumlama yüzey işlemlerinin Ni-Cr ve seramik arasındaki makaslama bağlantı dayanımı üzerine etkilerini karşılaştırmaktır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: 30 adet silindir şeklinde Ni-Cr örnek (7x10 mm) uygulanan yüzey işlemlerine göre üç gruba ayrıldı [kontrol grubu (hiç işlem görmedi), kumlama grubu (110 µm Al₂O₃, 75 psi basınçla, 20 cm uzaklıktan, 30 saniye süresince) ve anodizasyon grubu]. Her gruptan birer örnek alınarak SEM analizleri gerçekleştirildi. Hazırlanan örneklerin üzerine 5x3 mm boyutlarında seramikler pişirildi ve makaslama bağlantı dayanım testleri universal test cihazında kafa hızı 1mm/dk olacak şekilde gerçekleştirildi. Örneklerin kopma şekillerinin tespitinde stereomikroskop kullanıldı. Makaslama bağlantı dayanım değerlerinin analizinde One-way ANOVA ve post-hoc Tukey’s testleri kullanıldı. 

Bulgular:Kumlama grubunun makaslama bağlantı dayanımı (21,35∓4,64)  anodizasyon grubuna (20,92∓4,85) göre yüksek olarak bulunmasına ragmen her iki grup arasındaki farklılık istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunmamıştır. Her iki grupta kontrol grubuna göre (8,02∓1,47) yüksek bağlantı dayanımına sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Sonuç:Anodizasyon uygulaması metal-seramik bağlantısının artırılması için kullanılabilecek bir yöntem olarak kullanılabilir, lakin kırılma şekilleri dikkate alındığında kumlama işleminin anodizasyon uylamasına göre daha güçlü bir bağ oluşturmaktadır. 

Keywords

kumlama, anodizasyon, Ni-Cr, platin, makaslama bağlantı dayanımı

References

• Referans1 Choi JE, Waddell JN, Torr B, Swain MV. Pressed ceramics onto zirconia. Part 1: Comparison of crystalline phases present, adhesion to a zirconia system and flexural strength. Dent Mater 2011;27:1204-1212.
• Referans2 Abreu A, Loza MA, Elias A, Mukhopadhyay S, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of metal type and surface treatment on in vitro tensile strength of copings cemented to minimally retentive preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:199-207.
• Referans3 Külünk T, Kurt M, Ural Ç, Külünk Ş, Baba S. Effect of different air-abrasion particles on metal-ceramic bond strength. J Dent Sci 2011;6:140-146.
• Referans4 Sipahi C, Özcan M. Interfacial shear bond strength between different base metal alloys and five low fusing feldspathic ceramic systems. Dent Mater J 2012;31:333-337.
• Referans5 Inan Ö, Acar A, Halkaci S. Effects of sandblasting and electrical discharge machining on porcelain adherence to cast and machined commercially pure titanium. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater 2006;78:393-400.
• Referans6 Al Hussaini, Khalid A. Al Wazzan. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength of low-fusing porcelain to commercially pure titanium. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:350-356. Referans7 Kim JT, Cho SA. The effects of laser etching on shear bond strength at the titanium ceramic interface. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:101-106.
• Refereans7 Kim JT, Cho SA. The effects of laser etching on shear bond strength at the titanium ceramic interface. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:101-106.
• Referans8 McLean JW. The Science and Art of Dental Ceramics Volume 1: The Nature of Dental Ceramics and their Clinical Use. London: Quintessence 2011:79-82.
• Referans9 Emre M, Akar T, Tugut F. Airborne-particle abrasion ; searching the right parameter. J Dent Sci. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2018.02.002.
• Referans10 Gilbert JL, Covey DA, Lautenschlager EP. Bond characteristics of porcelain fused to milled titanium. Dent Mater 1994;10:134-140.
• Referans11 Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: Special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials 2003;24:3893-3907.
• Referans12 Subramani K, Ahmed W. Titanium Nanotubes as Carriers of Osteogenic Growth Factors and Antibacterial Drugs for Applications in Dental Implantology. In: Emerging Nanotechnologies in Dentistry 2012:103-111.
• Referans13 Dent R, Preston, JD D, Moffa J, Al. E. Effect of oxidation on ceramometal bond strength. J prosthet Dent. 1982;47:59-62.
• Referans14 Shillingburg H, Hobo S, Whitsett L, Jacobi R, Brackett S. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. London: Quintessence; 2007:456.
• Referans15 Akova T, Ucar Y, Tukay A, Balkaya MC, Brantley WA. Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain. Dent Mater 2008;24:1400-1404.
• Referans16 Korkmaz T, Asar V. Comparative evaluation of bond strength of various metal-ceramic restorations. Mater Des 2009;30:445-451.
• Referans17 De Melo RM, Travassos AC, Neisser MP. Shear bond strengths of a ceramic system to alternative metal alloys. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:64-69.
• Referans18 Fonseca RG, Martins SB, De Oliveira Abi-Rached F, Dos Santos Cruz CA. Effect of different airborne-particle abrasion/bonding agent combinations on the bond strength of a resin cement to a base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:316-323.
• Referans19 Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, Özcan M. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003;123:540-546.
• Referans20 Fernandes Neto AJ, Panzeri H, Neves FD, Do Prado RA, Mendonça G. Bond strength of three dental porcelains to Ni-Cr and Co-Cr-Ti alloys. Braz Dent J 2006;17:24-28.
• Referans21 Lombardo GHL, Nishioka RS, Souza ROA, et al. Influence of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of ceramics fused to cobalt-chromium. J Prosthodont 2010;19:103-111.
• Referans22 Lubovich RP, Goodkind RJ. Bond strength studies of precious, semiprecious, and nonprecious ceramic-metal alloys with two porcelains. J Prosthet Dent 1977;37:288-299. Referans23 Golebiowski M, Wolowiec E, Klimek L. Airborne-particle abrasion parameters on the quality of titanium-ceramic bonds. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:453-459.
• Referans23 Golebiowski M, Wolowiec E, Klimek L. Airborne-particle abrasion parameters on the quality of titanium-ceramic bonds. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:453-459.
• Referans24 Akay C, Çakırbay Tanış M, Şen M. Effects of Hot Chemical Etching and 10-Metacryloxydecyl Dihydrogen Phosphate (MDP) Monomer on the Bond Strength of Zirconia Ceramics to Resin-Based Cements. J Prosthodont 2017;26:419-423.
• Referans25 Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu F, Ertürk E. Shear Bond Strength of Brackets Bonded To Porcelain Surface: in Vitro Study. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent 2016;50:9-18.
• Referans26 Ucar Y, Aksahin Z, Kurtoglu C. Metal Ceramic Bond After Multiple Castings of Base Metal Alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:165-171.