The Effect of Aging and Different Surface Treatments on Temporary Cement Bonding of Temporaray Crown Materials

Year 2023, Volume: 26 Issue: 2, 144 - 149, 23.06.2023

Sebahat Fındık Aydıner Nuran Yanıkoğlu Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1228177

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of different surface treatments and aging on the bond strength of different temporary restorative materials with temporary cements.
Methods: 252 temporary crown materials 2 mm thick with a 10 mm diameter were prepared. No surface treatment was administered to the control group. 4% hydrofluoric acid gel was administered to one of the other groups and sandblasted to the other. Two types of temporary cement were used. After a 5000-cycle thermal cycle was administered to half of the materials, cement bond strengths were measured.
Results:It was found that the material used, the type of cement, the aging treatment, the material*aging treatment, and the material-cement interaction (p<0.001) were statistically very significant, the material*cement*aging treatment interaction (p<0.05) were significant, and the other interactions were insignificant (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was found that the tested cements and surface treatments could not be implemented for all materials tested. It was found that the cement bond strength increased significantly in the temporary crowns administered by sandblasting. In the case of long-term use of the temporary restoration tested by evaluating the simulation of the oral environment, the use of a sandblasting surface treatment may be appropriate. It may be said that polymethylmethacrylate temporary crowns obtained by the conventional method have better bonding with eugenol-containing cements.

Keywords

Temporary dental restoration, Dental Bonding, Luting agents, Surface properties, Thermocycling

Supporting Institution

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

• 1. Burns, D.R., D.A. Beck, and S.K. Nelson, A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent, 2003. 90(5): p. 474-97.
• 2. Rayyan MM, Aboushelib M, Sayed NM, Ibrahim A, Jimbo R. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually. J Prosthet Dent, 2015. 114(3): p. 414-9.
• 3. Astudillo-Rubio D, Delgado-Gaete A, Bellot-Arcís C, Montiel-Company JM, Pascual-Moscardó A, Almerich-Silla JM. Mechanical properties of provisional dental materials: A systematic review and meta- analysis. PLoS One, 2018. 13(2): p. e0193162.
• 4. Gegauff A, H.J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 5th ed. ed. Interim fixed restorations. Vol. Chapter 15. 2016, St. Louis: Elsevier.
• 5. Lodding, D.W. Long-term esthetic provisional restorations in dentistry. Curr Opin Cosmet Dent, 1997. 4: p. 16-21.
• 6. Elagra MI, Rayyan MR, Alhomaidhi MM, Alanaziy AA, Alnefaie MO. Color stability and marginal integrity of interim crowns: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent, 2017. 11(3): p. 330-334.
• 7. Alabdulkader, M.A. and S.R. Habib, Effect of cement application techniques on the adaptation and retention of provisional crowns. Technol Health Care, 2018. 26(6): p. 945-955.
• 8. Regish, K.M., D. Sharma, and D.R. Prithviraj, Techniques of fabrication of provisional restoration: an overview. Int J Dent, 2011. 2011: p. 134659.
• 9. Jeong, K.-W. and S.-H. Kim, Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM provisional restorations. The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2019. 11(2): p. 95.
• 10. Song, M.Y., H. An, and E.J. Park, The effect of temporary cement cleaning methods on the retention of crowns. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2019. 28(1): p. e210-e215.
• 11. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1997. 77(2): p. 122- 126.
• 12. Ha SR., Kim SH., Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS. Improving shear bond strength of temporary crown and fixed dental prosthesis resins by surface treatments. Journal of materials science, 2016. 51(3): p. 1463-1475.
• 13. Lee, Y.-G., S.-R. Moon, and Y.-G. Cho, Effect of cutting instruments on the dentin bond strength of a self-etch adhesive. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry, 2010. 35(1): p. 13-19.
• 14. Özcan M, Corazza PH, Marocho SM, Barbosa SH, Bottino MA. Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing. Clinical oral investigations, 2013. 17(7): p. 1751-1758.
• 15. da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. Journal of Dentistry, 2012. 40(6): p. 513-521.
• 16. Kimyai S, Oskoee SS, Mohammadi N, Rikhtegaran S, Bahari M, Oskoee PA, et al., Effect of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments on the repaired bond strength of an indirect composite resin. Lasers in medical science, 2015. 30(2): p. 653-659.
• 17. Ozcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2005. 16(1): p. 21-27.
• 18. Özcan, M. Evaluation of alternative intra‐oral repair techniques for fractured ceramic‐fused‐to‐metal restorations. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2003. 30(2): p. 194-203.
• 19. Swift EJ Jr, LeValley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dental Materials, 1992. 8(6): p. 362-365.
• 20. Retief D. Standardizing laboratory adhesion tests. American journal of dentistry, 1991. 4(5): p. 231-236.
• 21. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dental Materials, 1995. 11(2): p. 117-125.
• 22. Hatice Ö. Lityum Disilikat Seramiklerde Rezin Siman Bağlantısı ve Baskı Dayaniminin İn Vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. 2013.
• 23. Rosenstiel SF, L.M., Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 2nd ed. ed. 1995., St Louis: Mosby-Year Book.
• 24. Gilson TD, Myers GE. Clinical studies of dental cements. 3. Seven zinc oxide-eugenol cements used for temporarily cementing completed restorations. J Dent Res, 1970. 49(1): p. 14-20.
• 25. Millstein PL, Hazan E, Nathanson D. Effect of aging on temporary cement retention in vitro. J Prosthet Dent, 1991. 65(6): p. 768-771.
• 26. Bowley JF, Kieser J. Axial-wall inclination angle and vertical height interactions in molar full crown preparations. J Dent, 2007. 35(2): p. 117-123.
• 27. Lepe, X., D.J. Bales, and G.H. Johnson, Retention of provisional crowns fabricated from two materials with the use of four temporary cements. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1999. 81(4): p. 469-475.
• 28. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. Journal of dentistry, 1999. 27(2): p. 89-99.
• 29. Yao J, Li J, Wang Y, Huang H. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2014. 112(3): p. 649-657.
• 30. Phillips RW. Skinner's Science of Dental Materials. 1982.
• 31. Grajower R, Hirschfeld Z, Zalkind M. Compatibility of a composite resin with pulp insulating materials. A scanning electron microscope study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1974. 32(1): p. 70-77.