Diş Hekimliğinde İndirekt Kompozit Rezinler

Year 2024, Volume: 34 Issue: 2, 144 - 149, 15.04.2024

Melis Baysal Canyurt Elif Aybala Oktay Serpil Karaoğlanoğlu

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.981559

Abstract

ÖZ
Son yıllarda, adezyon teknolojisindeki gelişmeler, kavite preparasyon tekniklerindeki yeniliklerle beraber hekimlerin estetik ve uzun ömürlü restorasyonlara ilgisi artmış, bu sebeple birçok yeni restoratif materyal üretilmiştir. Bunlardan biri de indirekt kompozit rezinlerdir. İndirekt kompozitler, direk kompozitlere nazaran daha az polimerizasyon büzülmesi gösterir, aşınma direnci daha iyidir, daha ideal kontak oluşturur ve reaksiyona girmemiş artık monomer miktarı daha azdır. Ayrıca indirekt kompozitlerin ilave polimerizasyon teknikleriyle beraber mekanik özellikleri de geliştirilmiştir. Bütün bu avantajlarıyla beraber indirekt kompozit restorasyonlar, seramik restorasyonlara birer alternatif haline gelmiştir. Bu literatür derlemesinde, indirekt kompozitlerin gelişimi, kullanım alanları, mekanik ve fiziksel dezavantajları ele alınacaktır
Anahtar Kelimeler : İndirekt kompozit rezin, İnley-onley , Polimerizasyon
Indirect Composite Resins in Dentistry
ABSTRACT
In recent years, with the advances in adhesion technology and the innovations in cavity preparation techniques, the interest of physicians in aesthetic and long-lasting restorations has increased, so many new restorative materials have been produced. One of these is indirect composite resins. Indirect composites show less polymerization shrinkage, better abrasion resistance, more ideal contact, and less unreacted residual monomer than direct composites. In addition, the mechanical properties of indirect composites have been improved with additional polymerization techniques. With all these advantages, indirect composite restorations have become an alternative to ceramic restorations. In this review of literature, the development, usage areas, mechanical and physical disadvantages of indirect composites will be discussed.

Keywords

İndirekt kompozit rezin, İnley-onley, Polimerizasyo

References

• 1. Küçükeşmen HC. Porselen inley-onleyler. Turkiye Klinikleri. J Dent Sci. 2011;2:22-28.
• 2. el-Mowafy O. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetalic bonded restorations-case report. J Can Dent Assoc. 2000; 66:302-307.
• 3. Baratieri LN, Monteiro S, Correa M, Ritter AV. Posterior resin composite restorations: a new technique. Quint Int. 1996; 27:733-738.
• 4. Aykor A., Tınaztepe N. Preference for Indirect Composite Resin Restorations. Turkiye Klinikleri J Restor Dent-Special Topics 2015;13:87-94.
• 5. Goldstein RE, Garber DA, Schwartz CG, Goldstein CE. Patient Maintenance of Esthetic Restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992; 123:61-67.
• 6. Arıkan S. Posterior kompozit restorasyonlar. Cumhuriyet Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2005; 8:63- 70.
• 7. Karaarslan Şirin E., Ertaş E, Indirect Posterior Composite Resin Restorations: A Review. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ Dis Hekim Fak Derg. 2010; 103:116-124.
• 8. Bowen RL. Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1963; 66:57-64 in Garcia AH, Lozano MAM, Vila JC, Escribano BA, Galve PF. Composite resins. A review of the materials and clinical indications. Med Oral Patol Oral CirBucal. 2006; 11:215-220.
• 9. Buonocore MG. A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955; 34:849-853.
• 10. Tuncer D, Çelik Ç, Çehreli SB, Arhun N. Comparison of microleakage of a multi-mode adhesive system with contemporary adhesives in class II resin restorations. J Adh Sci Tech. 2014; 28:1288-1297.
• 11. Bicalho AA, Pereira RD, Zanatta RF, Franco SD, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, et al. Incremental filling technique and composite material--part I: cuspal deformation, bond strength, and physical properties. Oper Dent. 2014;3 9:71-82.
• 12. Tantbirojn D, Pfeifer CS, Braga RR, Versluis A. Do low-shrink composites reduce polymerization shrinkage effects? J Dent Res. 2011; 90:596-601.
• 13. Hickel R, Dasch R, Janda M, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New Direct Restorative Materials. Int Dent J. 1998; 48:3-16.
• 14. Limly Bal T, Chakravarthy D, Padmaraj SN, et al. Indirect Resin Composite Restorations- A Narrative Review. J Dent Res. 2019; 5(1): 41.
• 15. Mahalaxmi S. Material Used in Dentistry. Wolters kluwer india Pvt Ltd, 2013; 53.
• 16. Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, et al. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int. 2017; 26(2): 127–138.
• 17. Malmström H, Schlueter M, Roach T, Moss M.E. Effect of Thickness of Flowable Resins on Marginal Leakage in Class II Composite Restorations. Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 373-380.
• 18. Roulet JF. Spreafıco R. Esthetic posterior indirect restorations, Roulet JF, Wilson NHF, Fuzzi M., Advances in Operative Dentistry,Contemporary Clinical Practice. Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Illinois, s. 2001. p.165-190.
• 19. Swift EJ, Sturdevant JR, Ritter AV. Class I and II indirect tooth-colored restorations, Roberson TM,Heymann HO, Swift EJ, editors. Sturdevant's Artand Science of Operative Dentistry. 5st ed., St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book.Inc, 2006. p.603-622.
• 20. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations:5-year follw-up. J Dent. 2000; 28:375-382.
• 21 . Touati B, Pissis P. Bonded inlays of composite resins. Cah Prothese. 1984; 12 (48): 29-59.
• 22. Nandini S. Indirect resin composites . J Conserv Dent. 2010; 13 4 : 184–94.
• 23. Peutzfeldt A. Indirect Resin and Ceramic Systems. Oper Dent. 2001;200:1153-1176.
• 24. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. The effect of secondary curing of resin composites on the adherence of resin cement. J Adhesive Dent. 2000; 2:315-318.
• 25. Mazumdar P, Das UK and Majumdar N. Degree of conversion of indirect composite resin under Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy . An in vitro study. Int J Adv Case Reports. 2015; 2(23): 1410–1417.
• 26. Bagis YH, Rueggeberg FA. The effect of post-cure heating on residual, unreacted monomer in a commercial resin composite. Dent Mater. 2000; 16:244-247.
• 27. Wendt SL. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. 2. Wear, hardness, color stability. Quintessence Int. 1987; 18:351-356.
• 28. Miara P. Aesthetic guidelines for second-generation inlays and onlay composite restorations. Prac Periodont Aesthet Dent. 1998; 10:423-431.
• 29. Asmussen E. Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. Scandinavian J Dent Res. 1982; 90:490-496.
• 30. Burke FJ, Watts DC, Wilson NH, Wlson MA. Current status ans rationale for composite inlays and onlays. Br Dent J. 1991; 70:s269-273.
• 31. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: Properties and fractography. Dent Mater. 1992; 8:290-295.
• 32. Eldiwany M, Powers JM, George LA. Mechanical properties of direct and post-cured composites. Am J Dent. 1993; 6:222-224.
• 33. Viljanen EK, Skrifvars M, Vallittu PK. Dendritic copolymers and particulate filler composites for dental applications: Degree of conversion and thermal properties. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:1420-1427.
• 34. Santana IL, Lodovici E, Matos JR, Medeiros IS, Miyazaki CL, Rodrigues-Filho LE. Effect of Experimental Heat Treatment on Mechanical Properties of Resin Composites. Braz Dent J. 2009; 20:205-210.
• 35. Mehl A, Hickel R and Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without softstart-polymerization. J Dent. 2017; 25(3–4): 321–330.
• 36. Soares LES, Liporoni PCS, Martin AA. The Effect of Soft-start Polymerization by Second Generation LEDs on the Degree of Conversion of Resin Composite. Oper Dent. 2007; 32: 160–165.
• 37. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Faltermeier A, Handel G. Electron beam irradiation of dental composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21:804-810. 38. Greer RW, Wilkes GL. Apparent reversal of physical aging by electron beam irradiation-furthur investigations. Polymer. 1998; 39:4205-4210. 39. Ladizesky NH, Ho CF, Chow TW. Reinforcement of complete denture bases with continuous high performance polyethylene fibers. J Prosthet Dent Cited. 2017; 68(6): 934–939.
• 40.Meiers JC and Freilich MA. Conservative anterior tooth replacement using fiber-reinforced composite. Oper Dent. 2017; 25(3): 239–243.
• 41. Imai T, Yamagata S, Watari F, et al. Temperature-dependence of the mechanical properties of FRP orthodontic wire. Dent Mater J. 2017; 18(2): 167–165.
• 42. Vallittu PK. A review of fiber-reinforced denture base resins. J Prosthodont. 2017; 5(4): 270–276.
• 43. Butterworth C, Ellawaka AE, Shortall A. Fibre reinforced composites in restorative dentistry. Dent Update 2003; 30:300-6.
• 44. Van Heumen, C. C. M., Kreulen, C. M., Bronkhorst, E. M., Lesaffre, E., & Creugers, N. H. J. Fiber-reinforced dental composites in beam testing. Dental Materials. 2008; 24:1435–1443.
• 45. Turkaslan S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Bagis B, Pekka K, Vallittu PK, Lassila VJ. Effect of fiber-reinforced composites on the failure load and failure mode of composite veneers. Dent Mater. 2009; 28:530-6. 2008; 24:1435-1443.
• 46. Leinfelder KF. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997; 128:573-581.
• 47. Terry DA, Touati B. Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory fabricated inlays/ onlay restoration a review. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001; 13:51-58.
• 48. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, Al-Dhamadi YA, Silikas N, Watts DC. In vitro characterization of two labprocessed resin composites. Dent Mater. 2003; 19:93-98.
• 49. Gohring TN, Gallo Luthy H. Effect of water storage, thermocycling, the incorporation and site of placement of glass fibres on the flexural strength of veneering composites. Dent Mater. 2005; 21:761-772.
• 50. Matsumura H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Kitasawa S. A metal halide light source for laboratory curing of prosthetic composite materials. J Dent Res. 1997; 76:688-693.
• 51. Satsukawa H, Koizumi H, Tanoue N, Nemoto M, Ogino T, Matsumura H. Properties of an IRC material polymerized with two different laboratory polymerizing systems. Dent Mater. 2005; 24:377-381.
• 52. Klymus ME, Shinkai RS, Mota EG, Oshima HM, Spohr AM, Burnett Jr LH. Influence of the mechanical properties of composites for indirect dental restorations on pattern failure. Stomatologija 2007; 9:56-60.
• 53. Suh BI. New concepts and technology for processing of IRCs. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003; 24:40-42.
• 54. Terry DA, Leinfelder K. Preservation, conservation, and restoration of posterior tooth structure with advanced biomaterials. Contemp Esthet Restor Pract. 2004; 46-61.
• 55. Douglas RD. Color stability of new-generation indirect resins for prosthodontic application. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83:166-70.
• 56. Da Fonte Porto Carreiro A, Dos Santos Cruz CA, Vergani CE. Hardness and compressive strength of IRC resins: Effects of immersion in distilled water. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31:1085-1089.
• 57. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000; 53:353-361.
• 58. Chung KH. The Relationship between Composition and Properties of Posterior Resin Composites. J Dent Res. 2017; 69(3): 852–856.
• 59. Neves AD, Discacciati JAC, Orêfice RL, et al. Correlation between degree of conversion, microhardness and inorganic content in composites. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2017;16(4): 349–354.
• 60. Borba M, Bon AD, Cecchetti D. Flexural strength and hardness of direct and IRC. Braz Oral Res. 2009; 23:5-10.
• 61. Condon JD, Ferracane JL. Invirto wear of composite with varied filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res. 1997; 76:1095-1411.
• 62. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Heymann HO. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater. 1992; 8:305-309.
• 63. O'Brien Wj. Color and apperence. Dental Materials and Their Selection. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Pub:1997 p:25-9.
• 64. Papadopoulosa T, Sarafianoub A, Hatzikyriakos A. Colour Stability of Veneering Composites after Accelerated Aging. Eur J Dent 2010; 4:137-42.
• 65. Douglas RD. Color stability of indirect resins for prostodontic application. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83 :166-170.
• 66. Çulhaoğlu K, Zaimoğlu A. Yeni Jenerasyon İndirekt Kompozitlerin Renk Stabilitelerinin IPS Empress Seramik Sistemi ile Karşılaştırılarak İncelenmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri Dental Sci. 2011; 17: 133-139.
• 67. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Kramers L, Benz C, Hickel R. Two-year clinical evaluation of composite fillings and inlays in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82:391-397.
• 68. Van Dijken JWV. Direct composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent. 2000; 28:299-306.
• 69. Karaarslan E. Arka grup dişlerde yapılan direkt ve indirekt kompozit dolguların bir yıllık klinik takibi. Samsun: Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi. 2008.
• 70. Puy MCL, Navarro LF, Llacer VCF, Ferrandez A. Composite resin inlays: A study of marginal adaptation. Quint Int. 1993; 24:429-33.
• 71. Robinson PB, Moore BK, Swartz ML. Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro. Oper Dent. 1987; 12:113-116.
• 72. Fruits TJ, Knapp JA, Khajotia SS. Microleakage in the proximal walls of direct and indirect posterior resin slot restorations. Oper Dent. 2006; 31:719-727.
• 73. İlday, A, Urvasızoğlu, A, Seven, P. İndirekt Kompozit İnley Restorasyonlar İle Direkt Kompozit Restorasyonların Mikrosızıntı Yönünden Karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2009; 2: 76-84.
• 74. Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. Mutans Biofilms to IRC. Dent Mater. 2007; 26:915-923.
• 75. Lucena-Martín C, González-López S and Navajas-Rodríguez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 86(5): 481–488.
• 76. Soares CJ, Soares P V, Pereirea JC, Fonseca RB. Surface Treatment Protocols in the Cementation Process of Ceramic and Laboratory-Processed Composite Restorations: A Literature Review. J Esth Restorat Dent. 2005; 17(4): 224–235.
• 77. Soares CJ, Giannini M, Oliveira MT, Martins LR, Paulillo LA. Effect of surface treatments of laboratory fabricated composites on the microtensile bondstrength to a luting resin cement. J Appl Oal Sci. 2004; 12:45-50.