KAMU HARCAMALARI, VERGİ GELİRİ, KURUMSAL KALİTE VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: E7 ÜLKELERİ ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2024, , 919 - 937, 20.10.2024

Enes Sarman Sinem Eyüboğlu

https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1482836

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, 2002-2020 dönemi itibariyle E7 ülkelerinde kamu harcamaları, vergi geliri, kurumsal kalite ve gayri safi yurtiçi hasıla arasındaki ilişkileri analiz etmek amaçlanmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki uzun dönem ilişkiyi belirlemek için Westerlund (2008) eşbütünleşme testi kullanılmış ve değişkenlerin uzun dönemde birlikte hareket ettikleri bulunmuştur. Uzun dönem katsayıları Arttırılmış Ortalama Grubu kullanılarak hesaplanmış ve kamu harcamaları ile kurumsal kalitenin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisinin negatif olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ancak vergi gelirinin uzun dönemde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı gözlemlenmiştir. Değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi Dumitrescu ve Hurlin (2012) panel nedensellik testi ile incelenmiş, kurumsal kalite ile ekonomik büyüme, vergi geliri ile ekonomik büyüme ve ekonomik büyüme ile kamu harcamaları arasında tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, kurumsal kaliteden vergi gelirine ve kamu harcamalarından kurumsal kaliteye doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmuştur. Bu bulgular, E7 ülkelerinin uzun dönemli ekonomik büyümelerini artırmak için kurumsal reformlara, kamu harcamalarına, vergi toplama sistemlerine ve ekonomik büyümeyi destekleyici politikalara odaklanmalarının önemini vurgulamaktadır

Keywords

Kamu harcamaları, vergi geliri, kurumsal kalite, ekonomik büyüme, panel eşbütünleşme

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PUBLIC EXPENDITURES, TAX REVENUE, INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: THE CASE OF E7 COUNTRIES

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relationships between public expenditures, tax revenue, institutional quality, and gross domestic product in the E7 countries during the period from 2002 to 2020. To determine the long-term relationship between the variables, the Westerlund (2008) cointegration test was used, and it was found that the variables move together in the long run. Long-term coefficients were calculated using the Augmented Mean Group estimator, and it was found that the impact of public expenditures and institutional quality on economic growth is negative. However, it was observed that tax revenue is not statistically significant in the long term. The causality relationship between the variables was examined using the Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) panel causality test, and it was determined that there is a unidirectional causality relationship between institutional quality and economic growth, tax revenue and economic growth, and economic growth and public expenditures. Additionally, unidirectional causality relationship was found from institutional quality to tax revenue and from public expenditures to institutional quality. These findings highlight the importance for E7 countries to focus on institutional reforms, public expenditures, tax collection systems, and policies that support economic growth to enhance the long-term economic growth.

Keywords

Public expenditure, tax revenue, ınstitutional quality, economic growth, panel cointegration

References

• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 385-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3
• Akıncı, A. (2019). Vergi gelirlerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1), 100-106. 10.29106/fesa.539026
• Al-Sharea, I., Al-Azzawi, R., & Khhudhair, A. (2020). Tax culture and its impact on tax activity (applied research regarding the general authority for taxation). International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(11), 531-551.
• Alkasasbeha, O. M. A., Haron, N. F., & Abueid, A. I. S. (2018). The impact of government expenditures, taxes on economic growth in Jordan. American based research journal, 7(12).
• Altinok, H., & Arslan, M. (2020). The relationship between public expenditures and economic growth in Southeastern European Countries: An analysis of bootstrap panel Granger causality. Economıc Computatıon And Economıc Cybernetıcs Studıes And Research, 54(3). 10.24818/18423264/54.3.20.15
• Altunç, Ö. F. (2011). Kamu harcamaları ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye’ye ilişkin ampirik kanıtlar. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 18(2), 145-157.
• Aluthge, C., Jibir, A., & Abdu, M. (2021). Impact of government expenditure on economic growth in Nigeria, 1970-2019. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics, 12(1), 139-174. 10.33429/Cjas.12121.6/6
• Arvin, M. B., Pradhan, R. P., & Nair, M. S. (2021). Are there links between institutional quality, government expenditure, tax revenue and economic growth? Evidence from low-income and lower middle-income countries. Economic analysis and policy, 70, 468-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.03.011
• Atabey, A. Ö., & şimşek, M. H. (2022). Vergi gelirleri ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: G-7 ülkelerinden ampirik kanıtlar (1970-2020). Econder International Academic Journal, 6(2), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.35342/econder.1211114
• Aytun, C., & Akın, C. S. (2014). Kurumsal kalite ve ekonomik büyüme: Panel nedensellik analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 89-100.
• Azam, M. (2022). Governance and economic growth: Evidence from 14 Latin America and Caribbean countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2), 1470-1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00781-2
• Barro, R. J. (1996). Institutions and growth, an introductory essay. Journal of Economic Growth, 145-148.
• Bond, S. ve Eberhardt, M., (2009). “Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator”, Nordic Econometrics Conference, Lund.
• Boţa-Avram, C., Groşanu, A., Răchişan, P. R., & Gavriletea, M. D. (2018). The bidirectional causality between country-level governance, economic growth and sustainable development: A cross-country data analysis. Sustainability, 10(2), 502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020502
• Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The review of economic studies, 47(1), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
• Butkiewicz, J. L., & Yanikkaya, H. (2011). Institutions and the impact of government spending on growth. Journal of Applied Economics, 14(2), 319-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1514-0326(11)60017-2 Chimezie, P. O., Omankhanlen, A. E., & Eriabie, S. (2020). Nexus between public finance and economic growth in Nigeria. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 7, 184-194. 10.37394/23207.2020.17.20
• Demircan, E. S. (2003). Vergilendirmenin ekonomik büyüme ve kalkınmaya etkisi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 97-136.
• Devarajan, S., Swaroop, V., & Zou, H. F. (1996). The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. Journal of monetary economics, 37(2), 313-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(96)90039-2
• Diler, H. (2016). Kamu harcamaları–Ekonomik büyüme: Türkiye üzerine bir uygulama. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 3(1), 21-36.
• Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
• Economics, P. (2013). World in 2050. The BRICs and beyond: prospects, challenges and opportunitie. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
• Eneche, E. O., & Stephen, I. A. (2023). Tax revenue and Nigeria economic growth. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies, Volume 7, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2115282
• Ghosh, S., & Gregoriou, A. (2008). The composition of government spending and growth: is current or capital spending better?. Oxford Economic Papers, 60(3), 484-516. d doi:10.1093/oep/gpn005
• Gökmenoğlu, M., & Yavuz, İ. S. (2022). Kamu harcamaları ve ekonomik büyüme İlişkisi: Kırılgan beşli örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 1094-1118.
• Gövdeli, T. (2019). Life expectancy, direct foreign investments, trade openness and economic growth in E7 countries: Heterogeneous panel analysis. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 54(2), 731-743. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.19.05.1130
• Gurdal, T., Aydin, M., & Inal, V. (2021). The relationship between tax revenue, government expenditure, and economic growth in G7 countries: new evidence from time and frequency domain approaches. Economic Change and Restructuring, 54, 305-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09280-x
• Gül, E., & Yavuz, H. (2011). Türkiye’de kamu harcamaları ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi: 1963-2008 dönemi. Maliye Dergisi, 160, 72-85. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2014.10.23.510
• Ho, T. T., Tran, X. H., & Nguyen, Q. K. (2023). Tax revenue-economic growth relationship and the role of trade openness in developing countries. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2213959. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2213959
• Huidrom, R., Ayhan Kose, M., Matsuoka, H., & Ohnsorge, F. L. (2020). How important are spillovers from major emerging markets?. International Finance, 23(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.12350
• Idenyi, O. S., Igberi, C. O., Udude, C. C., & Chibuzor, C. B. (2016). Public expenditure and economic growth in South Africa: Long run and causality approach. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 1(2), 1-17. 10.9734/AJEBA/2016/29677
• İmamoğlu, İ. K. (2022). Yönetişim, girişimcilik ve ekonomik büyüme: Bir panel nedensellik analizi. Ekonomi Maliye İşletme Dergisi, 5(2), 304-317. https://doi.org/10.46737/emid.1205240
• Karagianni, S., Pempetzoglou, M., & Saraidaris, A. (2012). Tax burden distribution and GDP growth: Non-linear causality considerations in the USA. International Review of Economics & Finance, 21(1), 186-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2011.06.002 Keynes, JM (1936). The general theory of interest, employment and money.
• Knack, SF (Ed.) (2003). Democracy, governance, and growth. University of Michigan Press.
• Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: cross‐country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics & Politics, 7(3), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x
• Koçbulut, Ö. (2023). Vergi gelirleri, kamu harcamaları ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: AB ülkeleri üzerine ampirik bir inceleme. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 142(142), 138-154.
• Kouassi, K. B. (2018). Public spending and economic growth in developing countries: A synthesis. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 2(2), 22-30.
• Lau, L. S., Choong, C. K., & Eng, Y. K. (2014). Carbon dioxide emission, institutional quality, and economic growth: empirical evidence in Malaysia. Renewable energy, 68, 276-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.013
• Maku, O. E. (2009). Does government spending spur economic growth in Nigeria? Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Paper No:17941: 1-20.
• Mucuk, M., & Alptekin, V. (2008). Türkiye’de vergi ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: VAR analizi (1975-2006). Maliye Dergisi, 155(2), 159-174.
• Narayan, P. K., Nielsen, I., & Smyth, R. (2008). Panel data, cointegration, causality and Wagner's law: Empirical evidence from Chinese provinces. China economic review, 19(2), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2006.11.004
• North, DC (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press.
• North, D. C. (1991). Institutions, ideology, and economic performance. Cato Journal, 11, 477.
• Odhiambo, N. M. (2015). Government expenditure and economic growth in South Africa: An empirical investigation. Atlantic Economic Journal, 43(3), 393-406. DOI 10.1007/s11293-015-9466-2
• Olayungbo, D. O., & Adediran, K. A. (2017). Effects of oil revenue and institutional quality on economic growth with an ARDL approach. Energy and Policy Research, 4(1), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/23815639.2017.1307146
• Olufemi, A. S., & Oladipo, O. N. (2021). The viability of public expenditure in stimulating economic growth in Nigeria (Mediating on the Role of Public Sector). Acta Universitatis Danubius: Oeconomica, 17(1), 70-86.
• Ökde, B. & Bülbül, D. (2019). Kamu harcamaları ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki̇ ilişki̇: G7 ülkeleri̇ için panel veri̇ analizi̇. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(69), 308-317. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.441015
• Özpençe, A. İ. (2017). Türkiye’de 1980 sonrası kamu harcamaları, vergi gelirleri ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkinin analizi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (28), 31-41. DOİ: 10.5505/pausbed.2017.13549
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Available at SSRN 572504.
• Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of econometrics, 142(1), 50-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
• Pradhan, R. P., & Bagchi, T. P. (2012). The expenditure-GDP nexus: Evidence from a panel of SAARC 7-countries. International Journal of Public Policy, 8(4-6), 295-307. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2012.048710
• Radulović, M. (2020). The impact of institutional quality on economic growth: A comparative analysis of the EU and non-EU countries of Southeast Europe. Economic Annals, 65(225), 163-181.
• Salman, M., Long, X., Dauda, L., & Mensah, C. N. (2019). The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and carbon emissions: Evidence from Indonesia, South Korea and Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118331
• Samadder, S., Ghosh, K., & Basu, T. (2012). Scaling analysis of prime stock exchange indices of the emerging seven (E7) countries. International Journal of Applied Computational Science and Mathematics, 2(1), 11-22.
• Sandalcı, U., & Sandalcı, İ. (2017). OECD ülkelerinde ekonomik büyüme ve vergi gelirleri arasındaki ilişkinin ampirik analizi: 1990–2014. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 9 (1) 51-62.
• Saputri, R. D. A., & Nugraha, F. K. (2024). Analysis of the effect of tax rates and understanding of taxation on MSME taxpayer compliance in Lamongan Regency. Review: Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 1(03), 56-65. DOI:10.59422/rjmss.v1i03.260
• Tiftikçigil, B. Y., Güriş, B., & Yaşgül, Y. S. (2018). Does middle income trap exist?: Evidence from emerging economies: E7 countries for 1969-2015. Revista galega de economía: Publicación Interdisciplinar da Facultade de Ciencias Económicas e Empresariais, 27(1), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.27.1.5234
• Tong, T., Ortiz, J., Xu, C., & Li, F. (2020). Economic growth, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions in the E7 countries: a bootstrap ARDL bound test. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00253-6
• Tutgun, S., & Savaş, Y. (2023). Kurumsal kalite ve finansal gelişmenin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Sahra Altı Afrika Ülkeleri örneği. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 879-904. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.1280373
• Udonwa, U. E., & Effiong, U. E. (2023). Public spending and economic growth in Nigeria: Assessing recurrent expenditure’s neutrality and monetary policy interaction. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 20(4), 35-52. 10.9734/sajsse/2023/v20i4741
• Utıle, T. I., Ijırshar, V. U., & Adoo, S. E. M. (2021). Impact of institutional quality on economic growth in Nigeria. Gusau International Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 4(3), 21-21.
• Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of applied econometrics, 23(2), 193-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
• Wu, S. Y., Tang, J. H., & Lin, E. S. (2010). The impact of government expenditure on economic growth: How sensitive to the level of development? Journal of Policy Modeling, 32(6), 804-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.05.011
• Yamak, T. (2017). Kurumsal kalite faktörlerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Körfez ülkeleri örneği. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(4), 65- 79. https://doi.org/10.25272/j.2147-7035.2017.5.4.04
• Yapraklı, S. (2008). Kurumsal yapının ekonomik büyümeye etkisi: üst orta gelir düzeyindeki ülkeler üzerine bir uygulama. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 8(1).
• Zkaria, B., & Fatiha, B. (2023). The role of institutions on accelerating economic growth evidence from MENA countries. Management & Economics Research Journal. ISSN-2710-8856.