Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A Review of Ulrich Beck’s Legacy for Sociology and Sociology of Religion

Year 2024, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 32 - 53, 31.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.33931/dergiabant.1453561

Abstract

Ulrich Beck (1944-2015) was one of the most influential sociologists of contemporary social thought. His theories of risk society, reflexive modernization, individualization, and cosmopolitanism stand out among his contributions to contemporary sociology. While Beck's contribution to sociology is extensive, his impact on sociology of religion is not as comprehensive. Despite this, his wide theoretical framework within sociology, particularly highlighted in his later work A God of One’s Own, significantly contributes to understanding the role of religion in contemporary society. The purpose of this article is to assess Beck's academic legacy in two parts: (1) his legacy of sociology and (2) his legacy of sociology of religion. Beck's discussions in the context of concepts such as risk society, reflexive modernity, individualization, class, and cosmopolitanism effectively aid in our comprehension of contemporary social dynamics and the challenges posed by scientific, technological, and political understandings. In contrast to secularization theories that suggest the insignificance of religion in modern societies, Beck defines secularization as a reflexive process where individuals critically question and evaluate their religious beliefs and practices within the context of modernity. His discussions, which deeply scrutinize the perception of religion in modern society and emphasize the relationship between religious cosmopolitanism and individualization, provide a valuable framework for understanding how religion has changed on both societal and individual levels. It is also noteworthy that Beck features individuals like Etty Hillesum, who developed a unique belief in God in contrast to the universal understanding of religion that considers humanity as a whole and the presence of religious belief in the public sphere.

References

  • Adam, Barbara - Loon, Joost van. “Introduction: Repositioning Risk; the Challenge for Social Theory”. The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. ed. Barbara Adam vd. London: SAGE Publications, 3rd Ed., 2005.
  • Atkinson, Will. “Beck, Individualization and the Death of Class: A Critique”. The British Journal of Sociology 58/3 (2007), 349-366.
  • Atkinson, Will. “Beyond False Oppositions: A Reply to Beck”. The British Journal of Sociology 58/4 (2007), 707-715.
  • Atkinson, Will. Class, Individualization and Late Modernity: In Search of the Reflexive Worker. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
  • Beck, Ulrich. A God of One’s Own: Religion’s Capacity for Peace and Potential for Violence. Polity Press, 2010.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “Beyond Class and Nation: Reframing Social Inequalities in A Globalizing World”. The British Journal of Sociology 58/4 (2007), 679-705.
  • Beck, Ulrich. Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society. New York: Prometheus Books, 1991.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “Living in the World Risk Society”. Economy and Society 35/3 (2006), 329-345.
  • Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society: Towards A New Modernity. London: SAGE Publications, 1992.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “Risk Society’s ‘Cosmopolitan Moment’”, 2008. http://comciencia.scielo.br/pdf/cci/n104/en_a09n104.pdf
  • Beck, Ulrich. “The Cosmopolitan Condition: Why Methodological Nationalism Fails”. Theory, Culture & Society 24/7-8 (2007), 286-290.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “The Cosmopolitan Society and Its Enemies”. Theory, Culture & Society 19/1-2 (2002), 17-44.
  • Beck, Ulrich. The Metamorphosis of The World: How Climate Change Is Transforming Our Concept of the World. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
  • Beck, Ulrich. The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization”. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. ed. Ulrich Beck vd. 1-55. Stanford University Press, 1994.
  • Beck, Ulrich vd. “The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme”. Theory, Culture & Society 20/2 (2003), 1-33.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “Understanding the Real Europe”. Dissent (Summer), 32-38.
  • Beck, Ulrich. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2nd Ed., 2009.
  • Beck, Ulrich. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999.
  • Beck, Ulrich - Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth. “Global Generations and the Trap of Methodological Nationalism for a Cosmopolitan Turn in the Sociology of Youth and Generation”. European Sociological Review 25/1 (2009), 25-36.
  • Beck, Ulrich - Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London: SAGE Publications, 2002.
  • Beck, Ulrich - Grande, Edgar. “Cosmopolitanism: Europe’s Way Out of Crisis”. European Journal of Social Theory 10/1 (2007), 67-85.
  • Beck, Ulrich - Lau, Christoph. “Second Modernity as A Research Agenda: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations in the ‘Meta‐Change’ of Modern Society”. The British Journal of Sociology 56/4 (2005), 525-557.
  • Beck, Ulrich - Willms, Johannes. Conversations with Ulrich Beck. Polity Press, 2004.
  • Beckford, James A. “Postmodernity, High Modernity and New Modernity: Three Concepts in Search of Religion”. Postmodernity, Sociology and Religion. ed. Kieran Flanagan - Peter C. Jupp. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14989-6_3
  • Camorrino, Antonio. “Gods of" Second Modernity": Religion and Spirituality from Ulrich Beck’s Sociological Perspective”. Italian Sociological Review 12/8S (2022), 931-948.
  • Cipriani, Roberto. “Uncertain Faith: A Multi-method Approach”. Social Compass 70/4 (2024), 619-642.
  • Curran, Dean. “The Organized Irresponsibility Principle and Risk Arbitrage”. Critical criminology 26/4 (2018), 595-610.
  • Dawson, Matt. “Reviewing the Critique of Individualization: The Disembedded and Embedded Theses”. Acta Sociologica 55/4 (2012), 305-319.
  • Dingwall, Robert. “‘Risk Society’: The Cult of Theory and the Millennium?” Social Policy&Administration 33/4 (1999), 474-491.
  • Elliott, Anthony. “Beck’s Sociology of Risk: A Critical Assessment”. Sociology 36/2 (2002), 293-315.
  • Etty, Hillesum. Etty: The Letters and Diaries of Etty Hillesum 1941–1943. Ottowa: Novalis, 1981.
  • Günerigök, Mustafa. Risk Toplumu ve Din: Yeni Bir Sosyolojiye Doğru. Maarif Mektepleri, 2018.
  • Kemple, Thomas. “Mannheim’s Pendulum: Refiguring Legal Cosmopolitanism”. UC Irvine L. Rev. 4 (2014), 273-296.
  • Leahy, Michael. “Ulrich Beck’s Cosmopolitanisation Thesis: A Philosophical Critique”. Australian Journal of Political Science 48/2 (2013), 152-163.
  • Lupton, Deborah. “Sociology and Risk”. Beyond the Risk Society: Critical Reflections on Risk and Human Security. ed. Gabe Mythen - Sandra Walklate. 11-24. Open University Press, 2006.
  • Marshall, Brent K. “Globalisation, Environmental Degradation and Ulrich Beck’s Risk Society”. Environmental Values 8 (1999), 253-275.
  • Mathewes, Charles T. “An Interview with Peter Berger”. The Hedgehog Review 8/1-2 (2006), 152-161.
  • Mythen, Gabe. Ulrich Beck: A Critical Introduction to the Risk Society. London: Pluto Press, 2004.
  • Mythen, Gabe. “Ulrich Beck, Cosmopolitanism and the Individualization of Religion”. Theory, Culture & Society 30/3 (2013), 114-127.
  • Ormrod, James S. “Beyond World Risk Society? A Critique of Ulrich Beck’s World Risk Society Thesis as a Framework for Understanding Risk Associated with Human Activity in Outer Space”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31/4 (2013), 727-744.
  • Quodagno, Jill. “Theories of The Welfare State”. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 13 (1987), 109-128.
  • Ratzinger, Joseph - Pera, Marcello. Without Roots: the West, Relativism, Christianity, Islam. Basic Books, 2006.
  • Rossi, I. “Reflexive Modernization”. Ulrich Beck: Pioneer Cosmopolitan Sociology and Risk Society. ed. Hans Günter Brauch. 59-64. Springer, 2014.
  • Speck, Simon. “Ulrich Beck’s ‘Reflecting Faith’: Individualization, Religion and the Desecularization of Reflexive Modernity”. Sociology 47/1 (2012), 157-172.
  • Thomas, Luckmann. The Invisible Religion. The Transformation of Symbols in Industrial Society. New York: MacMillan Press, 1967.
  • Urry, John. “Introduction: Thinking Society Anew”. Conversations with Ulrich Beck. ed. Ulrich Beck - Johannes Willms. 1-10. Polity Press, 2014.
  • Woodman, Dan vd. “Prophet of A New Modernity: Ulrich Beck’s Legacy for Sociology”. Journal of Sociology 51/4 (2015), 1117-1131.
  • Yates, Joshua. “An Interview with Ulrich Beck on Fear and Risk Society”. The Hedgehog Review Fall/01 (2016), 96-107.

Ulrich Beck'in Sosyoloji ve Din Sosyolojisi Mirası Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Year 2024, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 32 - 53, 31.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.33931/dergiabant.1453561

Abstract

Ulrich Beck (1944-2015), çağdaş toplumsal düşüncenin en etkili sosyologlarından biriydi. Onun risk toplumu, refleksif modernleşme, bireyselleşme ve kozmopolitanizm teorileri; çağdaş sosyolojiye yapmış olduğu katkıların başında gelir. Beck’in din sosyolojisine katkısı ise sosyoloji kadar kapsamlı değildir. Buna rağmen sosyoloji mirasının geniş teorik çerçevesi ve özellikle son dönemlerinde ele aldığı A God of One’s Own adlı kitabı, dinin çağdaş toplumdaki rolünün anlaşılmasında önemli katkılar sağlamaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı, Beck’in bu akademik mirasını iki kısımda değerlendirmektir: (1) Sosyoloji mirası (2) Din sosyolojisi mirası. Beck’in risk toplumu, refleksif modernite, bireyselleşme, sınıf ve kozmopolitanizm gibi kavramlar bağlamında ortaya koyduğu tartışmalar; çağdaş sosyal dinamikleri ve bilimsel, teknolojik ve politik anlayışların oluşturduğu zorlukları kavramamızda etkili olmaktadır. Öte yandan, modern toplumlarda dinin önemsiz olduğunu ileri süren sekülerleşme teorilerinin aksine Beck, sekülerleşmeyi bireylerin modernlik bağlamında dini inançlarını ve uygulamalarını sorguladıkları ve değerlendirdikleri refleksif bir süreç olarak tanımlayarak farklı bir yaklaşım ortaya koymuştur. Onun modern toplumun din algısını derinlemesine sorgulayan ve dinsel kozmopolitanizm ile bireyselleşme arasındaki ilişkiyi vurgulayan tartışmaları, dinin toplumsal ve bireysel düzeyde nasıl değiştiğini anlamak için değerli bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Ayrıca, insanlığı bir bütün olarak ele alan evrensel din anlayışının ve dini inancın kamusal alandaki varlığının karşısına kendine özgü bir Tanrı inancı geliştiren Etty Hillesum gibi bireyleri koyması oldukça dikkat çekicidir.

References

  • Adam, Barbara - Loon, Joost van. “Introduction: Repositioning Risk; the Challenge for Social Theory”. The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. ed. Barbara Adam vd. London: SAGE Publications, 3rd Ed., 2005.
  • Atkinson, Will. “Beck, Individualization and the Death of Class: A Critique”. The British Journal of Sociology 58/3 (2007), 349-366.
  • Atkinson, Will. “Beyond False Oppositions: A Reply to Beck”. The British Journal of Sociology 58/4 (2007), 707-715.
  • Atkinson, Will. Class, Individualization and Late Modernity: In Search of the Reflexive Worker. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
  • Beck, Ulrich. A God of One’s Own: Religion’s Capacity for Peace and Potential for Violence. Polity Press, 2010.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “Beyond Class and Nation: Reframing Social Inequalities in A Globalizing World”. The British Journal of Sociology 58/4 (2007), 679-705.
  • Beck, Ulrich. Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society. New York: Prometheus Books, 1991.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “Living in the World Risk Society”. Economy and Society 35/3 (2006), 329-345.
  • Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society: Towards A New Modernity. London: SAGE Publications, 1992.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “Risk Society’s ‘Cosmopolitan Moment’”, 2008. http://comciencia.scielo.br/pdf/cci/n104/en_a09n104.pdf
  • Beck, Ulrich. “The Cosmopolitan Condition: Why Methodological Nationalism Fails”. Theory, Culture & Society 24/7-8 (2007), 286-290.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “The Cosmopolitan Society and Its Enemies”. Theory, Culture & Society 19/1-2 (2002), 17-44.
  • Beck, Ulrich. The Metamorphosis of The World: How Climate Change Is Transforming Our Concept of the World. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
  • Beck, Ulrich. The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization”. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. ed. Ulrich Beck vd. 1-55. Stanford University Press, 1994.
  • Beck, Ulrich vd. “The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme”. Theory, Culture & Society 20/2 (2003), 1-33.
  • Beck, Ulrich. “Understanding the Real Europe”. Dissent (Summer), 32-38.
  • Beck, Ulrich. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2nd Ed., 2009.
  • Beck, Ulrich. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999.
  • Beck, Ulrich - Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth. “Global Generations and the Trap of Methodological Nationalism for a Cosmopolitan Turn in the Sociology of Youth and Generation”. European Sociological Review 25/1 (2009), 25-36.
  • Beck, Ulrich - Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London: SAGE Publications, 2002.
  • Beck, Ulrich - Grande, Edgar. “Cosmopolitanism: Europe’s Way Out of Crisis”. European Journal of Social Theory 10/1 (2007), 67-85.
  • Beck, Ulrich - Lau, Christoph. “Second Modernity as A Research Agenda: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations in the ‘Meta‐Change’ of Modern Society”. The British Journal of Sociology 56/4 (2005), 525-557.
  • Beck, Ulrich - Willms, Johannes. Conversations with Ulrich Beck. Polity Press, 2004.
  • Beckford, James A. “Postmodernity, High Modernity and New Modernity: Three Concepts in Search of Religion”. Postmodernity, Sociology and Religion. ed. Kieran Flanagan - Peter C. Jupp. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14989-6_3
  • Camorrino, Antonio. “Gods of" Second Modernity": Religion and Spirituality from Ulrich Beck’s Sociological Perspective”. Italian Sociological Review 12/8S (2022), 931-948.
  • Cipriani, Roberto. “Uncertain Faith: A Multi-method Approach”. Social Compass 70/4 (2024), 619-642.
  • Curran, Dean. “The Organized Irresponsibility Principle and Risk Arbitrage”. Critical criminology 26/4 (2018), 595-610.
  • Dawson, Matt. “Reviewing the Critique of Individualization: The Disembedded and Embedded Theses”. Acta Sociologica 55/4 (2012), 305-319.
  • Dingwall, Robert. “‘Risk Society’: The Cult of Theory and the Millennium?” Social Policy&Administration 33/4 (1999), 474-491.
  • Elliott, Anthony. “Beck’s Sociology of Risk: A Critical Assessment”. Sociology 36/2 (2002), 293-315.
  • Etty, Hillesum. Etty: The Letters and Diaries of Etty Hillesum 1941–1943. Ottowa: Novalis, 1981.
  • Günerigök, Mustafa. Risk Toplumu ve Din: Yeni Bir Sosyolojiye Doğru. Maarif Mektepleri, 2018.
  • Kemple, Thomas. “Mannheim’s Pendulum: Refiguring Legal Cosmopolitanism”. UC Irvine L. Rev. 4 (2014), 273-296.
  • Leahy, Michael. “Ulrich Beck’s Cosmopolitanisation Thesis: A Philosophical Critique”. Australian Journal of Political Science 48/2 (2013), 152-163.
  • Lupton, Deborah. “Sociology and Risk”. Beyond the Risk Society: Critical Reflections on Risk and Human Security. ed. Gabe Mythen - Sandra Walklate. 11-24. Open University Press, 2006.
  • Marshall, Brent K. “Globalisation, Environmental Degradation and Ulrich Beck’s Risk Society”. Environmental Values 8 (1999), 253-275.
  • Mathewes, Charles T. “An Interview with Peter Berger”. The Hedgehog Review 8/1-2 (2006), 152-161.
  • Mythen, Gabe. Ulrich Beck: A Critical Introduction to the Risk Society. London: Pluto Press, 2004.
  • Mythen, Gabe. “Ulrich Beck, Cosmopolitanism and the Individualization of Religion”. Theory, Culture & Society 30/3 (2013), 114-127.
  • Ormrod, James S. “Beyond World Risk Society? A Critique of Ulrich Beck’s World Risk Society Thesis as a Framework for Understanding Risk Associated with Human Activity in Outer Space”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31/4 (2013), 727-744.
  • Quodagno, Jill. “Theories of The Welfare State”. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 13 (1987), 109-128.
  • Ratzinger, Joseph - Pera, Marcello. Without Roots: the West, Relativism, Christianity, Islam. Basic Books, 2006.
  • Rossi, I. “Reflexive Modernization”. Ulrich Beck: Pioneer Cosmopolitan Sociology and Risk Society. ed. Hans Günter Brauch. 59-64. Springer, 2014.
  • Speck, Simon. “Ulrich Beck’s ‘Reflecting Faith’: Individualization, Religion and the Desecularization of Reflexive Modernity”. Sociology 47/1 (2012), 157-172.
  • Thomas, Luckmann. The Invisible Religion. The Transformation of Symbols in Industrial Society. New York: MacMillan Press, 1967.
  • Urry, John. “Introduction: Thinking Society Anew”. Conversations with Ulrich Beck. ed. Ulrich Beck - Johannes Willms. 1-10. Polity Press, 2014.
  • Woodman, Dan vd. “Prophet of A New Modernity: Ulrich Beck’s Legacy for Sociology”. Journal of Sociology 51/4 (2015), 1117-1131.
  • Yates, Joshua. “An Interview with Ulrich Beck on Fear and Risk Society”. The Hedgehog Review Fall/01 (2016), 96-107.
There are 49 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Sociology of Religion
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Muhammed Babacan 0000-0002-8845-4677

Publication Date May 31, 2024
Submission Date March 15, 2024
Acceptance Date May 22, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Cite

ISNAD Babacan, Muhammed. “Ulrich Beck’in Sosyoloji Ve Din Sosyolojisi Mirası Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”. Dergiabant 12/1 (May 2024), 32-53. https://doi.org/10.33931/dergiabant.1453561.