Review
BibTex RIS Cite

RevMan ile Meta-Analiz

Year 2023, Issue: 56, 436 - 462, 22.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1196512

Abstract

Bu çalışmada öncelikle meta-analiz yöntemi hakkında bilgiler verilmiş, meta-analiz kullanılarak yapılacak çalışmaların adımları sıralanmış, her adımın içeriği hakkında bilgiler sunulmuştur. Ayrıca RevMan programının tanıtılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu doğrultuda RevMan programının edinimi, kurulum için gerekli olan asgari bilgisayar donanım özellikleri, programın ara yüzleri, sonuç ve çıktı dosyaları hakkında bilgiler sunulmuştur. Meta-analiz çalışmasına dâhil edilecek araştırmaların RevMan programına nasıl ekleneceği, bu araştırmalara ait verilerin nasıl girileceği ve gerekli çıktılara nasıl ulaşılacağına dair bilgiler ayrıntılı olarak sunulmuştur. Programda, yazarlar tarafından üretilmiş on adet çalışma içeren standartlaştırılmış ortalama farkına dair (Cohen d) meta-analiz çalışması ve daha önce gerçekleştirilmiş olan ikili veriye dayalı olasılık oranı yöntemini kullanan bir meta-analiz çalışmasının tekrar edilmesiyle iki farklı örnek uygulama gerçekleştirilmiştir. RevMan programı aracılığıyla meta-analiz çalışmasının nasıl yapılacağına dair tüm adımlar sırası ile açıklanmıştır. Ayrıca RevMan programı diğer meta-analiz programları ile karşılaştırılarak aralarındaki farklar belirtilmiştir. Örnek uygulamalara ait sonuçlar (ortalama etki büyüklükleri, heterojenlik testi sonuçları ve yayım yanlılığı sonuçları) verilmiştir. RevMan programının bir kelime işlemci programına ihtiyaç duymadan çalışma yapmaya imkan sağlaması, ücretsiz olması ve analizlerin kolay yapılması bir avantaj olarak değerlendirilmiştir.

Supporting Institution

Yok

References

  • Akgöz, S., Ercan, İ., & Kan, İ. (2004). Meta-analizi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 107-112.
  • Aksoy Kürü, S. (2021). Meta-analiz. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 42(Özel sayı 1), 215-229.
  • Aslan, Ö. Ş. & Terzi, R. (2023). Örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel sinizm ilişkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 79-98.
  • Bakioğlu, A. & Özcan, Ş. (2016). Meta-analiz. Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Basu, A. (2017). How to conduct meta-analysis: a basic tutorial. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/14582/conductmeta%20analysis(1).pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=2 adresinden 20.12.2021 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  • Bax, L., Yu, L. M., Ikeda, N., & Moons, K. G. (2007). A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(1), 1-9.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H.R. (2005). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2.2.027) [Computer software]. Biostat.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Research synthesis methods, 1(2), 97-111.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysisfor social science research. Guilford Publications.
  • Collaboration, T. C. (2008). Review Manager (RevMan). Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre
  • Conn, V. S., & Rantz, M. J. (2003). Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta‐analyses. Research in Nursing & Health, 26(4), 322-333.
  • Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd edition). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Chalmers, I., Hedges, L. V., & Cooper, H. (2002). A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 25(1), 12-37.
  • Çoğaltay, N., & Karadağ, E. (2015). Introduction to meta-analysis. E. Karadağ (Ed.) Leadership and organizational outcomes (19–28). Springer.
  • Deliktaş, A., Kabukcuoğlu, K., & Kış, A. (2016). Hemşirelikte meta-analiz uygulama süreci: Metodolojiye yönelik bir rehber. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1906-1925.
  • Dinçer, S. (2021). Eğitim bilimlerinde uygulamalı meta analiz (3. Baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89–98.
  • Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634.
  • Egger, M., Ebrahim, S., & Smith, G. D. (2002). Where now for meta-analysis?. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(1), 1-5.
  • Eser, M. T., Yurtçu, M., & Aksu, G. (2022). R programlama dili ve Jamovi ile Meta-analiz uygulamaları(3. Baskı). Pegem A.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16(5), 319–324.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1978). An exercise in megasilliness. American Psychologist, 33, 517–519.
  • Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 665–694
  • Fisher, R. A. (1932). Statistical methods for research workers (4th ed.). Oliver and Boyd.
  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.
  • Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia, 14(1), 29-37.
  • Hedges, L. V. (2008). What are effect sizes and why do we need them?. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 167-171.
  • Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557-560.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta‐analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 275-292.
  • Jenicek, M. (1989). Meta-analysis in medicine where we are and where we want to go. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(1), 35-44.
  • Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L.V. (2009). Statistically analyzing effect sizes: fixed- and random-effects models H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges ve J. C. Valentine (Ed.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation
  • Lee, Y. H. (2018). An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 33(2), 277-283.
  • Lee, C. H., Cook, S., Lee, J. S., & Han, B. (2016). Comparison of two meta-analysis methods: inverse-variance-weighted average and weighted sum of Z-scores. Genomics & Informatics, 14(4), 173-180.
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marin-Martinez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 193.
  • IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 24.0). IBM Corp.
  • Marks‐Anglin, A., & Chen, Y. (2020). A historical review of publication bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(6), 725-742.
  • Morris, S. B. (2023). Meta-analysis in organizational research: A guide to methodological options. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10,225-259.
  • Nestoriuc, Y., Kriston, L., & Rief, W. (2010). Meta-analysis as the core of evidence-based behavioral medicine: tools and pitfalls of a statistical approach. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 23(2), 145-150.
  • Olkin, I. (1999). Diagnostic statistical procedures in medical meta‐analyses. Statistics in Medicine, 18(17‐18), 2331-2341.
  • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobhartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., …, Moher, D. (2021).The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1-11.
  • Petitti D. B. (1994). Meta-analysis, decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis: methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rosenberg, M. S., Adams, D. C., & Gurevitch, J. (1997). MetaWin: Statistical software for metaanalysis with resampling tests. Sinauer Associates.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641.
  • Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 59-82.
  • Shelby, L. B., & Vaske, J. J. (2008). Understanding meta-analysis: A review of the methodological literature. Leisure Sciences, 30(2), 96-110.
  • Schmid, C.H., Stijnen,T. & White, I. R. (2021). General themes in meta-analysis. C.H. Schmid (Ed.), T. Stijnen (Ed.), ve I. R. White(Ed.), Handbook of meta-analysis (19-26). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., & Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, 1-9.
  • Smith, M. L. (1980). Publication bias and meta-analysis. Evaluation in Education, 4, 22-24.
  • Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32(9), 752-760.
  • StataCorp. (2000). Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. Stata Corporation.
  • Strube, M. J., & Hartmann, D. P. (1982). A critical appraisal of meta‐analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(2), 129-139.
  • Şen, S. (2019). SPSS ile meta-analiz nasıl yapılır?. Harran Maarif Dergisi, 4(1), 21-49.
  • Şen, S. & Yıldırım, İ. (2020). CMA ile meta-analiz uygulamaları. Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Şen, S. & Yıldırım, İ. (2022). A Tutorial on How to Conduct Meta-Analysis with IBM SPSS Statistics. Psych, 4(4), 640-667.
  • Tippet, L.H.C. (1931). The methods of statistics. Williamsand Norgate.
  • Tuttle, B. D., Isenburg, M. V., Schardt, C., & Powers, A. (2009). PubMed instruction for medical students: Searching for a better way. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 28(3), 199-210.
  • Üstün, U., & Eryılmaz, A. (2014). Etkili araştırma sentezleri yapabilmek için bir araştırma yöntemi: Meta-analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(174), 1-32.
  • Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1-48.
  • Yiğit, A., & Erdem, R. (2017). Mamografi sağlık teknolojisi ile meme kanseri tarama programının klinik etkililiğinin meta analiz yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 28(3),401-430.

Meta-Analysis with RevMan

Year 2023, Issue: 56, 436 - 462, 22.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1196512

Abstract

In this study, information about the meta-analysis method was given, the steps of the meta-analysis were listed, and information about the content of each step was presented. It is also aimed to introduce the RevMan software package. In this direction, information about the acquisition of the RevMan program, the minimum computer hardware features required for installation, the interfaces of the program, the results and output files are presented. Information on how to add the studies to be included in the meta-analysis study to the RevMan program, how to enter the data of these studies, and how to reach the necessary outputs are presented in detail. Two different sample applications, consisting of a meta-analysis study of the standardized mean difference (Cohen’s d) of ten studies simulated by the authors, and a replication of a previously performed meta-analysis study using the binary data-based odds ratio effect size, were performed in the program. All the steps on how to do the meta-analysis study through the RevMan program are explained in order. In addition, the RevMan software package was compared with other meta-analysis software packages, and the differences between them were stated. The results of the sample applications (mean effect sizes, heterogeneity test results, and publication bias results) are given. It is determined as an advantage that the RevMan program allows working without the need for a word processing program, is free, and is easy to analyze.

References

  • Akgöz, S., Ercan, İ., & Kan, İ. (2004). Meta-analizi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 107-112.
  • Aksoy Kürü, S. (2021). Meta-analiz. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 42(Özel sayı 1), 215-229.
  • Aslan, Ö. Ş. & Terzi, R. (2023). Örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel sinizm ilişkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 79-98.
  • Bakioğlu, A. & Özcan, Ş. (2016). Meta-analiz. Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Basu, A. (2017). How to conduct meta-analysis: a basic tutorial. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/14582/conductmeta%20analysis(1).pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=2 adresinden 20.12.2021 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  • Bax, L., Yu, L. M., Ikeda, N., & Moons, K. G. (2007). A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(1), 1-9.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H.R. (2005). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2.2.027) [Computer software]. Biostat.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Research synthesis methods, 1(2), 97-111.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysisfor social science research. Guilford Publications.
  • Collaboration, T. C. (2008). Review Manager (RevMan). Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre
  • Conn, V. S., & Rantz, M. J. (2003). Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta‐analyses. Research in Nursing & Health, 26(4), 322-333.
  • Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd edition). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Chalmers, I., Hedges, L. V., & Cooper, H. (2002). A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 25(1), 12-37.
  • Çoğaltay, N., & Karadağ, E. (2015). Introduction to meta-analysis. E. Karadağ (Ed.) Leadership and organizational outcomes (19–28). Springer.
  • Deliktaş, A., Kabukcuoğlu, K., & Kış, A. (2016). Hemşirelikte meta-analiz uygulama süreci: Metodolojiye yönelik bir rehber. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1906-1925.
  • Dinçer, S. (2021). Eğitim bilimlerinde uygulamalı meta analiz (3. Baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89–98.
  • Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634.
  • Egger, M., Ebrahim, S., & Smith, G. D. (2002). Where now for meta-analysis?. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(1), 1-5.
  • Eser, M. T., Yurtçu, M., & Aksu, G. (2022). R programlama dili ve Jamovi ile Meta-analiz uygulamaları(3. Baskı). Pegem A.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16(5), 319–324.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1978). An exercise in megasilliness. American Psychologist, 33, 517–519.
  • Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 665–694
  • Fisher, R. A. (1932). Statistical methods for research workers (4th ed.). Oliver and Boyd.
  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.
  • Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia, 14(1), 29-37.
  • Hedges, L. V. (2008). What are effect sizes and why do we need them?. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 167-171.
  • Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557-560.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta‐analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 275-292.
  • Jenicek, M. (1989). Meta-analysis in medicine where we are and where we want to go. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(1), 35-44.
  • Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L.V. (2009). Statistically analyzing effect sizes: fixed- and random-effects models H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges ve J. C. Valentine (Ed.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation
  • Lee, Y. H. (2018). An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 33(2), 277-283.
  • Lee, C. H., Cook, S., Lee, J. S., & Han, B. (2016). Comparison of two meta-analysis methods: inverse-variance-weighted average and weighted sum of Z-scores. Genomics & Informatics, 14(4), 173-180.
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marin-Martinez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 193.
  • IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 24.0). IBM Corp.
  • Marks‐Anglin, A., & Chen, Y. (2020). A historical review of publication bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(6), 725-742.
  • Morris, S. B. (2023). Meta-analysis in organizational research: A guide to methodological options. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10,225-259.
  • Nestoriuc, Y., Kriston, L., & Rief, W. (2010). Meta-analysis as the core of evidence-based behavioral medicine: tools and pitfalls of a statistical approach. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 23(2), 145-150.
  • Olkin, I. (1999). Diagnostic statistical procedures in medical meta‐analyses. Statistics in Medicine, 18(17‐18), 2331-2341.
  • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobhartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., …, Moher, D. (2021).The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1-11.
  • Petitti D. B. (1994). Meta-analysis, decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis: methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rosenberg, M. S., Adams, D. C., & Gurevitch, J. (1997). MetaWin: Statistical software for metaanalysis with resampling tests. Sinauer Associates.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641.
  • Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 59-82.
  • Shelby, L. B., & Vaske, J. J. (2008). Understanding meta-analysis: A review of the methodological literature. Leisure Sciences, 30(2), 96-110.
  • Schmid, C.H., Stijnen,T. & White, I. R. (2021). General themes in meta-analysis. C.H. Schmid (Ed.), T. Stijnen (Ed.), ve I. R. White(Ed.), Handbook of meta-analysis (19-26). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., & Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, 1-9.
  • Smith, M. L. (1980). Publication bias and meta-analysis. Evaluation in Education, 4, 22-24.
  • Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32(9), 752-760.
  • StataCorp. (2000). Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. Stata Corporation.
  • Strube, M. J., & Hartmann, D. P. (1982). A critical appraisal of meta‐analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(2), 129-139.
  • Şen, S. (2019). SPSS ile meta-analiz nasıl yapılır?. Harran Maarif Dergisi, 4(1), 21-49.
  • Şen, S. & Yıldırım, İ. (2020). CMA ile meta-analiz uygulamaları. Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Şen, S. & Yıldırım, İ. (2022). A Tutorial on How to Conduct Meta-Analysis with IBM SPSS Statistics. Psych, 4(4), 640-667.
  • Tippet, L.H.C. (1931). The methods of statistics. Williamsand Norgate.
  • Tuttle, B. D., Isenburg, M. V., Schardt, C., & Powers, A. (2009). PubMed instruction for medical students: Searching for a better way. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 28(3), 199-210.
  • Üstün, U., & Eryılmaz, A. (2014). Etkili araştırma sentezleri yapabilmek için bir araştırma yöntemi: Meta-analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(174), 1-32.
  • Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1-48.
  • Yiğit, A., & Erdem, R. (2017). Mamografi sağlık teknolojisi ile meme kanseri tarama programının klinik etkililiğinin meta analiz yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 28(3),401-430.
There are 62 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ömer Şahin Aslan 0000-0003-1330-1251

Sedat Şen 0000-0001-6962-4960

Ragıp Terzi 0000-0003-3976-5054

Publication Date June 22, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Issue: 56

Cite

APA Aslan, Ö. Ş., Şen, S., & Terzi, R. (2023). RevMan ile Meta-Analiz. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi(56), 436-462. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1196512