TÜRKİYE’DE HELİKOPTER EBEVEYN SAHİBİ OLAN Y NESLİNİN, AİDİYET, YAŞAM BECERİSİ VE ÖZGÜVEN PROBLEMLERİ

Year 2020, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 450 - 470, 22.10.2020

Çisil Okant Yaşin , Nilüfer Demir

Abstract

Bu araştırma orta ve orta-üst sosyo-ekonomik düzey helikopter ebeveynlerin çocuklarına yönelik davranış ve bu ebeveynlerin davranışlarının yetiştirdikleri çocukların, yetişkinlik yaşamındaki mutluluk hallerini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada ebeveyn davranış ve tutumları, aile, iş, sosyal yaşamdaki aidiyet problemleri bağlamında incelemeler yapılmıştır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemi ve olgu-bilim deseni kullanılmıştır. 12 katılımcı ile derinlemesine mülakat yapılmıştır ve ebeveynlerinin davranış ve tutumları ve kendi yaşamları konusundaki düşüncelerini öğrenmek üzere sorular sorulmuştur. Görüşme analizleri sonucunda helikopter ebeveyn sahibi Y kuşağının kendini başarılı bulmadığı, aidiyet problemleri yaşadığı, sorumluluk alma ve yaşam becerisi geliştirmede sıkıntıları olduğu, kendini gerçekleştirme yönünde hedefler koyamadığı, iş yaşamından ve genel anlamıyla yaşamlarından tatmin olmadığı bulunmuştur.

Keywords

helikopter Ebeveyn, Y Nesli, Kimlik, Aidiyet Hissi

Y GENERATION RAISED BY HELICOPTER PARENTS: SENSE OF BELONGING, LIFE SKILLS, SELF-CONFIDENCE

Abstract

This research aims to uncover the behaviors of helicopter parents from middle and upper-middle class, the difference of these behaviors from other types of parents, and the results of these behaviors in the context of happiness and life satisfaction of their children on their adult life. Analysis has been performed on parenting attitudes and its relations with the identification problems in family life, work life and social life. Qualitative research method and phenomenology design was applied in this research. 12 participants were interviewed in dept. and questions were asked in order to reveal the attitudes of their parents and their own lives. As the result of the analysis it was found that the Y generation individuals with helicopter parents do not consider themselves successful, they experience problems of belonging, they have problems in taking responsibility and developing life skills, they cannot develop goals towards self-actualization and they do not feel satisfied with their work life and life in the general sense.

Keywords

Helicopter Parents, Y Generation, Identification, Sense of Belonging

References

• 1.Bako, M. (2016). The Leadership Style Preferences Of Academics From Different Generations: Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Z. İstanbul, Türkiye.
• 2.Baumrind, D. (2005). Patterns of Parental Authority and Adolescent Autonomy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. no. 108, Summer 2005.61-69
• 3.Berger, P. L. ve Luckmann, T. (2008). Gerçekliğin Sosyal İnşası/ Bir Bilgi Sosyolojisi İncelemesi. İstanbul: Paradigma Yayıncılık.
• 4.Bilgin, N. (2014). Sosyal Bilimlerde İçerik Analizi. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• 5.Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, Volume 7, Issue 1 (Spring, 1989) 14-25.
• 6.Bourdieu, P. ve Passeron, J.-C. (2015). Yeniden Üretim: Eğitim Sistemine ilişkin bir Teorinin İlkeleri. Ankara: Heretik Yayınları.
• 7.Bradley-Geist, J. C. ve Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2014). Helicopter Parents: An examination of the Correlates of Over-Parenting of College Students. Education + Training, 56(4), 314-328.
• 8.Daniels, M. (1982). The Development of the Concept of Self-actualization in the Writings of Abraham Maslow. Current Psychology Review, 61-76.
• 9.Davis, K. (1995). Phenomenology: A New Way of Viewing Organizational Research. JAC, 15(1), 121-129.
• 10.Durkheim, E. (2013). İntihar. İstanbul: Pozitif Yayınlar.
• 11.Fulcher, J. ve Scott, J. (2007). Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
• 12.Gagne, M. ve Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 331-362.
• 13.Giddens, A. (2005). Sosyoloji. Ankara: Ayraç Yayınevi.
• 14.Goffman, E. (2004), Günlük Yaşamda Benliğin Sunumu. (çev. B. Cezar), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• 15.Gursoy, D., Maier, T. A. ve Chi, C. G. (2008). Generational Diffferences: An Examination of Work Values and Generational Gaps in the Hospitality Workforce. Intarnational Journal of Hospitality Management, 448-458.
• 16.Hershatter, A. ve Epstein, M. (2010). Millenials and the World of Work: An Organization and Management Perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 211-223.
• 17.Jill, B.-G. ve Julie, B. O. (2014). Helikopter Parents: An Examination of the Correlates of Over-Parenting of College Students. Education + Training, 314-328.
• 18.Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1993). İnsan Aile Kültür. Ankara: Remzi Kitabevi.
• 19.Keyes, C. L. (1998). Social Well-Being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 121-140.
• 20.Kongar, E. (1979). Toplumsal Değişme Kuramları ve Türkiye Gerçeği. Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi.
• 21.Kwon, K.-A., Yoo, G. ve E.Bingham, G. (2015). Helicopter Parenting in Emerging Adulthood: Support or Barrier for Korean College Students' Psychological Adjustment? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 136-145.
• 22.Lemoyne, T. ve Buchanan, T. (2011 ). Does "Hovering" Matter? Helicopter Parenting and Its Effect on Well-Being. Sociological Spectrum, 399-418.
• 23.Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
• 24.Mills, C. W. (2016). Sosyolojik Tahayyül. (Ö. Küçük, Çev.) İstanbul: Hil Yayın.
• 25., K. G., Booth-Butterfield, M. ve Weber, K. (2014). Investigating Helicopter Parenting, Family Environments, and Relational Outcomes for Millenials. Communication Studies, 407-425.
• 26.Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri. (M. Bütün, & S. B. Demir, Çev.) Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• 27.Reed, K., Duncan, J. M., Lucier-Greer, M. ve Fixelle, C. (2016). Helicopter Parenting and Emerging Adult Self-Efficasy: Implications for Mental and Physical Health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(10), 3136–3149.
• 28.Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness Is Everything, or Is it? Exploration on the Meanings of Psychological, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 57(6), 1069–1081
• 29.Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-Mclean, H., Geary, K. A., Erchull, M. J. ve Tashner, T. (2014). Helping or Hovering? The Effects of Helicopter Parenting on College Students' Well-Being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 548-557.
• 30.Smola, K. W. ve D.Sutton, C. (2002). Generational Differences: Revisiting Generational Work Values for the New Millennium. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 363-382.
• 31Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 1-41.
• 32.Taormina, R. J. ve Gao, J. H. (2013). Maslow and the Motivational Hierarchy: Measuring Satisfaction of the Needs. The American Journal of Psychology, 155-177.
• 33.Trevino, A. J. (2012). The Stratification Trilogy. A. J. Trevino içinde, The Social Thought of C. Wright Mills (s. 61-104). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications .
• 34.Vinson, K. E. (2013). Hovering Too Close: The Ramifications of Helicopter Parenting. Georgia State University Law Review, 29(2), 424.
• 35.Weber, J. (2015). Discoverin Millenials' Personal Value Orientation: A Comparison to Two Managerial Populations. Journal of Business Ethics.
• 36.Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.