Abstract
Bu makalede modern bilimsel yaklaşımın, bilinç konusuna eğildiğinde kullandığı dilin mantıksal analizini yapmayı hedefliyorum. Bu analizden çıkan sonuca göre, bilinç hakkında konuşurken modern bilimsel paradigmanın yanılsamalara başvurmaktan başka seçeneği yoktur. Oysa yanılsamacı söylem, yedeğinde bir çoklu-dünyalar ontolojisi getirmektedir. Sonuç olarak, modern bilimsel paradigma hem bilinci ikna edici şekilde açıklamayı başaramamakta hem de bilinç hakkında tutarlı bir şekilde konuşmamıza engel olmaktadır
Keywords
References
- Alıcı, Tevfik. (2014), Gerçek Bir Yanılsama: Bilinç, Metis, İstanbul.
- Dennett, Daniel C. (1991), Consciousness Explained, Black Bay Books, NewYork.
- Dennett, Daniel C. (2017), Bilinç Açıklanıyor, Alfa, İstanbul. Dennett, https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_dennett_on_our_consciousness C.
- (2003), “The Illusion of Consciousness”, TED 2003
- Frankish, Keith (ed.). (2017), Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness, 2017 digital verison converted and published by Andrews UK Lİmited.
- Locke, John. (2000), İnsanın Anlama Yetisi Üzerine Bir Deneme, Çev. Meral Delikara Topçu
- Öteki Yayınevi, Ankara. Nagel, Thomas. (2017), “Is Consciousness an Illusion?”, The Newyork Review of Books, March , 2017 Issue. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/03/09/is-consciousness-an-illusion-dennett- evolution/
- Seth, Anil. (2017), “Your brain hallucinates your conscious reality”, TED 2017, https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_how_your_brain_hallucinates_your_conscious_reality/transcri pt
- Tura, Saffet Murat. (2016), Histerik Bilinç, Metis, İstanbul.
- Tura, Saffet Murat. (2018), Zor Problem: Bilinç, Metis, İstanbul.
Abstract
In this article my aim is to make a logical analysis of modern scientific approach when it deals with the topic of consciousness. According to the result of this analysis, while talking about consciousness, the modern scientific paradigm has no choice but to resort to illusions. This illusionist discourse, however, is accompanied by a multi-world ontology. As a result, the modern scientific paradigm both cannot explain consciousness convincingly, and also prevents us from talking consistently about consciousness
References
- Alıcı, Tevfik. (2014), Gerçek Bir Yanılsama: Bilinç, Metis, İstanbul.
- Dennett, Daniel C. (1991), Consciousness Explained, Black Bay Books, NewYork.
- Dennett, Daniel C. (2017), Bilinç Açıklanıyor, Alfa, İstanbul. Dennett, https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_dennett_on_our_consciousness C.
- (2003), “The Illusion of Consciousness”, TED 2003
- Frankish, Keith (ed.). (2017), Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness, 2017 digital verison converted and published by Andrews UK Lİmited.
- Locke, John. (2000), İnsanın Anlama Yetisi Üzerine Bir Deneme, Çev. Meral Delikara Topçu
- Öteki Yayınevi, Ankara. Nagel, Thomas. (2017), “Is Consciousness an Illusion?”, The Newyork Review of Books, March , 2017 Issue. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/03/09/is-consciousness-an-illusion-dennett- evolution/
- Seth, Anil. (2017), “Your brain hallucinates your conscious reality”, TED 2017, https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_how_your_brain_hallucinates_your_conscious_reality/transcri pt
- Tura, Saffet Murat. (2016), Histerik Bilinç, Metis, İstanbul.
- Tura, Saffet Murat. (2018), Zor Problem: Bilinç, Metis, İstanbul.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 1, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Issue: 21 |
Dicle University
Journal of Social Sciences Institute (DUSBED)