BibTex RIS Cite

Our experience on developing urinary tract infections after transrectal prostate biopsy

Year 2014, Volume: 41 Issue: 1, 108 - 112, 01.03.2014
https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.01.0382

Abstract

Objective: Prostate cancer is a common disease in men proportionally with age. For the diagnosis of prostate cancer, prostate biopsy be performed routinely in all centers so it has become today. Complications after prostate biopsy is a surgical procedure can be seen. The most important complications are urinary tract infection and sepsis. The use of prophylactic antibiotics before the procedure reduces the risk of infectious complications. In this study, infectious complications after transrectal prostate needle biopsy were evaluated for risk reduction practices are discussed. Methods: We evaluated infective complications after transrectal prostate needle biopsy in 276 patients admitted to our hospital in October 2009- October 2011 with high level of prostate-specific antigen, abnormal signs in transrectal ultrasound, abnormal digital rectal examination due to done transrectal prostate needle biopsy. Results: Transrectal prostate needle biopsy was performed to 276 cases and 59 (21%) cases with hematuria, 21 (7%) cases with hematospermia, 23 (8%) cases with rectal bleeding, 6 (2.1%) cases with asymptomatic bacteriuria, 12 (5.3%) cases with in complicated urinary tract infection was detected. Three patients (1%) had sepsis. 21 (7.3%) patients had positive urine culture. Of them there were 20 positive cultures of E. coli and one Klebsiella spp. respectively. All of the bacteria cultured in twenty-one patients resistant to ciprofloxacin, while 90% to amikacin, 10% to amoxicillin-clavulanate, 35% to cefuroxime sodium and 40% were susceptible to ceftriaxone. Conclusion: Transrectal prostate needle biopsies of 276 patients, 21 (7.3%) patients had positive urine culture. The most frequent complication was hematuria. The most serious complication of sepsis detected in three (1%) patients.

References

  • Rodrigez L and Terris M. Risks and complications of transre- ctal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study and rewiev of litareture. J Urol 1998;160:2115-2120.
  • Aus G, Ahlgren G, Berghdal S, et al. Infection after transrec- tal core biopsies of the prostate- risk factors and antibiotic prophylaxis. Br J Urol 1996;77:851-855.
  • Grabe M. Controversies in antibiotic prophylaxis in urology. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;23:17-23.
  • Taylor HM, Bingham JB, et al. The use of prophylactic an- tibiotics in ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy. Clinical radyology 1997;52:787-790.
  • Berger AP, Gozzi C, Steiner H. et al. Complications rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a com- parison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores. J Urol 2004;171:1478-1480.
  • Enlund AL, Varenhorst E. Morbidity of ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsy of the prostate without prophylactic antibiotic therapy. A prospective study in 415 cases. Br J Urol 1997;79:777-780.
  • Roach MB, Figueroa TE, McBride D, et al. Ciprofloxacin versus gentamicin in prophylaxis against bacteremia in transrectal prostate needle biopsy. Urology 1991;38:84-87.
  • Kapoor DA, Klimberg IW, MalekGH, et al. Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during tran- srectal prostate biopsy. Urology 1998;52:552-558.
  • Aron M, Rajeev TP, Gupta NP. Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate: a randomized con- trolled study. BJU International 2000;85:682-685.
  • Ho HSS, Guat NGL, Tan YH, Yeo M. İntramuscular gen- tamicin ımproves the efficacy of ciprofloxacin as an antibi- otic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2009; 38:212-6.
  • Batura D, Rao GG, Nielsen PB. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in intestinal flora of patients undergoing prostatic biopsy: BJU Int 2010;106:1017-1020.
  • Sieber PR, Rommel FM, Agusta VE, et al. Antibiotic pro- phylaxis in ultrasound guided transrectal prostate biopsy. J Urol. 1997;157:2199-2200.
  • Uddin MM, Ho HSS, Ng LG, Cheng CWS. Transrectal prostate biopsy sepsis: trends in its bacteriology and anti- biotic prophyylaxis in single center over 8 years. Eur Urol Suppl 2010;9:84-89.
  • Simsir A, Kismali E, Mammadov R. Is it possible to predict sepsis, the most serious complication in prostate biopsy? Urol Int 2010;84:395-399.

Transrektal prostat iğne biyopsisi sonrası gelişen üriner sistem infeksiyonları deneyimlerimiz

Year 2014, Volume: 41 Issue: 1, 108 - 112, 01.03.2014
https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.01.0382

Abstract

Amaç: Prostat kanserinin erkeklerde yaş ile orantılı sık görülen bir hastalıktır. Prostat kanseri tanısı için prostat biyopsisi günümüzde tüm merkezlerde rutin yapılan bir işlem haline gelmiştir. Cerrahi bir işlem olan prostat biyopsisi sonrası komplikasyonlar görülebilmektedir. En önemli komplikasyon üriner sistem infeksiyonu ve sepsisdir. İşlem öncesi profilaktik antibiyotik kullanımı infektif komplikasyon riskini azaltmaktadır. Bu çalışmada transrektal prostat iğne biyopsisi sonrasındaki özellikle infektif komplikasyonlar değerlendirilerek, riskin azaltılmasına yönelik uygulamalar tartışılmıştır. Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada Ekim 2009-Ekim 2011 tarihleri arasında hastanemiz üroloji polikliniğine gelen ve prostat kanseri açısından şüpheli yüksek prostat spesifik antijen düzeyi, anormal transrektal ultrason veya rektal tuşe bulguları nedeniyle transrektal ultrason eşliğinde prostat biyopsisi yapılan 276 hastanın işlem sonrası komplikasyonları değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Transrektal prostat iğne biyopsisi yapılan 276 hastanın 59 (%21)\'unda hematüri, 21 (%7)\'inde hematospermi, 23 (%8)\'ünde rektal kanama, 6 (%2.1)\'sında asemptomatik bakteriüri, 12 (%5.3)\'sinde komplike üriner sistem infeksiyonu saptandı. Üç (%1) hastada ise ürosepsis tablosu görüldü. Biyopsi yapılan 276 hastanın 21 (%7,3)\'inde idrar kültüründe üreme tespit edildi. Üremelerin 20 tanesi E.coli, bir tanesi Klebsiella spp. olarak saptandı. Yirmi bir hastanın kültüründe üreyen bakterilerin hepsi siprofloksasine dirençli, amikasine %90, amoksisilin-klavulanata %10, sefuroksim sodyuma %35, seftriaksona %40 duyarlı bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Transrektal prostat iğne biyopsisi yapılan 276 hastanın 21 (%7,3)\'inde idrar kültüründe üreme saptandı. Komplikasyon olarak en sık hematüri görüldü. En ciddi komplikasyon olan ürosepsis tanısı üç (%1) hastada konuldu.

References

  • Rodrigez L and Terris M. Risks and complications of transre- ctal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study and rewiev of litareture. J Urol 1998;160:2115-2120.
  • Aus G, Ahlgren G, Berghdal S, et al. Infection after transrec- tal core biopsies of the prostate- risk factors and antibiotic prophylaxis. Br J Urol 1996;77:851-855.
  • Grabe M. Controversies in antibiotic prophylaxis in urology. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;23:17-23.
  • Taylor HM, Bingham JB, et al. The use of prophylactic an- tibiotics in ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy. Clinical radyology 1997;52:787-790.
  • Berger AP, Gozzi C, Steiner H. et al. Complications rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a com- parison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores. J Urol 2004;171:1478-1480.
  • Enlund AL, Varenhorst E. Morbidity of ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsy of the prostate without prophylactic antibiotic therapy. A prospective study in 415 cases. Br J Urol 1997;79:777-780.
  • Roach MB, Figueroa TE, McBride D, et al. Ciprofloxacin versus gentamicin in prophylaxis against bacteremia in transrectal prostate needle biopsy. Urology 1991;38:84-87.
  • Kapoor DA, Klimberg IW, MalekGH, et al. Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during tran- srectal prostate biopsy. Urology 1998;52:552-558.
  • Aron M, Rajeev TP, Gupta NP. Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate: a randomized con- trolled study. BJU International 2000;85:682-685.
  • Ho HSS, Guat NGL, Tan YH, Yeo M. İntramuscular gen- tamicin ımproves the efficacy of ciprofloxacin as an antibi- otic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2009; 38:212-6.
  • Batura D, Rao GG, Nielsen PB. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in intestinal flora of patients undergoing prostatic biopsy: BJU Int 2010;106:1017-1020.
  • Sieber PR, Rommel FM, Agusta VE, et al. Antibiotic pro- phylaxis in ultrasound guided transrectal prostate biopsy. J Urol. 1997;157:2199-2200.
  • Uddin MM, Ho HSS, Ng LG, Cheng CWS. Transrectal prostate biopsy sepsis: trends in its bacteriology and anti- biotic prophyylaxis in single center over 8 years. Eur Urol Suppl 2010;9:84-89.
  • Simsir A, Kismali E, Mammadov R. Is it possible to predict sepsis, the most serious complication in prostate biopsy? Urol Int 2010;84:395-399.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Gülay Dede This is me

İrfan Şencan This is me

Onur Dede This is me

Gönül Şentürk This is me

Aslı Haykır This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2014
Submission Date March 2, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 41 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Dede, G., Şencan, İ., Dede, O., Şentürk, G., et al. (2014). Transrektal prostat iğne biyopsisi sonrası gelişen üriner sistem infeksiyonları deneyimlerimiz. Dicle Medical Journal, 41(1), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.01.0382
AMA Dede G, Şencan İ, Dede O, Şentürk G, Haykır A. Transrektal prostat iğne biyopsisi sonrası gelişen üriner sistem infeksiyonları deneyimlerimiz. diclemedj. March 2014;41(1):108-112. doi:10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.01.0382
Chicago Dede, Gülay, İrfan Şencan, Onur Dede, Gönül Şentürk, and Aslı Haykır. “Transrektal Prostat iğne Biyopsisi Sonrası gelişen üriner Sistem Infeksiyonları Deneyimlerimiz”. Dicle Medical Journal 41, no. 1 (March 2014): 108-12. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.01.0382.
EndNote Dede G, Şencan İ, Dede O, Şentürk G, Haykır A (March 1, 2014) Transrektal prostat iğne biyopsisi sonrası gelişen üriner sistem infeksiyonları deneyimlerimiz. Dicle Medical Journal 41 1 108–112.
IEEE G. Dede, İ. Şencan, O. Dede, G. Şentürk, and A. Haykır, “Transrektal prostat iğne biyopsisi sonrası gelişen üriner sistem infeksiyonları deneyimlerimiz”, diclemedj, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 108–112, 2014, doi: 10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.01.0382.
ISNAD Dede, Gülay et al. “Transrektal Prostat iğne Biyopsisi Sonrası gelişen üriner Sistem Infeksiyonları Deneyimlerimiz”. Dicle Medical Journal 41/1 (March 2014), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.01.0382.
JAMA Dede G, Şencan İ, Dede O, Şentürk G, Haykır A. Transrektal prostat iğne biyopsisi sonrası gelişen üriner sistem infeksiyonları deneyimlerimiz. diclemedj. 2014;41:108–112.
MLA Dede, Gülay et al. “Transrektal Prostat iğne Biyopsisi Sonrası gelişen üriner Sistem Infeksiyonları Deneyimlerimiz”. Dicle Medical Journal, vol. 41, no. 1, 2014, pp. 108-12, doi:10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.01.0382.
Vancouver Dede G, Şencan İ, Dede O, Şentürk G, Haykır A. Transrektal prostat iğne biyopsisi sonrası gelişen üriner sistem infeksiyonları deneyimlerimiz. diclemedj. 2014;41(1):108-12.