BibTex RIS Cite

ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YOZLAŞMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİR KESİT VERİ ANALİZİ

Year 2011, Issue: 30, 231 - 240, 20.06.2015

Abstract

The aim of this study, using data for 43 countries, a comparative analysis is the relationship between corruption and environmental sustainability. According to estimations made by the method of OLS, there is negative and significant relationship between corruption and environmental sustainability. The study also tested the Environmental Kuznets Curve is valid or not. Accordingly, the inverted U-shaped relationship between income and environmental sustainability, corruption variable loses its significance when included in the model

References

  • CARTER, T. S. (1997), “The failure of environmental regualiton in New York: the role of co-optation, corruption, and a co-operative enforcement approach”, Crime Law and Social Change, 26 (1): 27-52.
  • DAMANIA, R., P., G., FREDRIKSSON ve A., J., LIST (2003), “ Trade Liberalization , corruption, and environmental polcy formulation: theory and evidenve”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46 (3): 490-512.
  • DALY, H. E. (1993), “The Perils of Free Trade”, Scientific American, 269: 50-57.
  • DILLON, J., E., KARMA, A., FEIGHERY ve R., GARRET (2006), “Corruption & The Environment” http://www.transperancy.org.ru/ doc/Columbia_Universty_Workshop_May2006_0I000_184.pdf (Erişim: 30.04.2011).
  • DOIG, A. ve S., McIVOR (1999) “Corruption and its control in the developmental context: an analysis and selective review of the literature”, Third World Quarterly, 20(3): 657-676.
  • ER, Mevliyar (2008), “Corruption from the Islamic Perspective: Some Recommendations for the MENA Region”, International Journal and Middle Eastern Finance and Mangement, 1(1): 31-51.
  • FABER, D. (1992), “The Ecological Crisis of Latin America: A Theoretical Introduction”, Latin Amerikan Perspectives, 19 (1): 3-16.
  • FINNIE, Bruce W., Linda K., GIBSON, David E., MCNABB (2006), “Economic Development: Corruption, Complexity, Wealth, and aTriad of Strains”, Humanomics, 22(4): 185-204.
  • GENTRY, B. (1998), Private Capital Flows and the Environment: Lessons from Latin America, Edward Elgar Pres, UK.
  • GLOBAL LEADERS (2001), Pilot Environmental Sustainability Index, World Economic Forum 2001, Davos, İsviçre.
  • GROSSMAN, G. M. and A. B. KRUEGER (1995), “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112: 353-377.
  • GROSSMAN, G. M. and A. B. KRUEGER (1993), “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, (Editör: P. M. GARBER), The Mexico-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, MIT Pres, Cambridge, ss: 13-56.
  • GUJARATI, Damodar N. (2006), Temel Ekonometri, Şenesen, Ümit, Gülay Günlük, Şenesen (Çev), Literatür Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • HOFSTEDE, G. H. (1983), “National Cultures in Four Dimensions”, International Studies of Management and Organization, 13: 46-74.
  • KAYRAK, Musa (2008), “Evolving Challenges for Supreme Audit Institutions in Struggling with Corruption”, Journol of Financial Crime, 15(1): 60-70.
  • KOTLOBAY, A. (2002), “Illegal Logging in the Southern Part of the Russian Far East: Problem Analysis and Proposed Solution – A case study on experiences of Log Tracking and Chain of Custody Practices in Forestry and Forest Products in Russia”, WWF, Moscow, Russia. http://archive.panda.org/forests4life/downloads/Case_study_for_Russi a.rtf (Erişim: 02.05.2011).
  • LOPEZ, R. ve S., MITRA (2000), “ Corruption, pollution, and the Kuznets environment curve”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(2): 137-150.
  • MORSE, S. (2006), “Is corruption bad for environmental sustainability? A cross-national analysis”, Ecology and Society, 11(1): 1-22.
  • MUKHERJEE, S. ve D., CHAKRABORTY (2010), “Is Environmental Sustainability Influenced by Socioeconomic and Sociopolitical Factors? Cross-Country Empirical Evidence”, Sustainable Development, 1002: 502- 512.
  • PARK, H., Russell, CLIFFORD ve Junsoo, LEE (2007), “National Culture and Environmental Sustainability: A Cross-National Analysis”, Journal of Economics and Finance, 31(1): 104-121.
  • PELLEGRINI, L. ve R., GERLAGH (2006), “Corruption, Democracy, and Environmental Policy: An Empirical Contribution to the Debate”, The Journal of Environment & Development, 15(3): 332-354.
  • RANJAN, P. ve B., BAKSHI (2006), “Corruption, Environmental Resources, and Intarnational Trade”, Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, 6(1): 1-28.
  • ROBBINS, P. (2000), “The rotten institution: corruption in natural resource management”, Political Geography, 19(4): 423-443.
  • SHAHABUDDIN, Syed (2007), “Corruption and Its Economic and Business Implications”, The Business Review, 8(1): 305-314.
  • SHRIVASTAVA, P. (1995), “Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society”, Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 118-137.
  • STERN, D. I. ve M. S. COMMON (2001), “Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur?”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41: 162-178.
  • TANZI, Vito (1998), “Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures”, IMF Staff Papers, 45(4): 559-594.
  • VINOD, H. D. (1999), “Statistical Analysis of Corruption Data and Using The Internet to Reduce Corruption”, 9. Uluslararası Anti-Yozlaşma Konferansı, 10-15 Ekim, Durhan, Güney Africa, ss. 1-13.
  • WELSCH, H. (2004), “Corruption, Growth, and the Environment: A Cross-Country Analysis”, Environmental and Development Economics, 9(5): 663-693.
  • WINBOURNE, S. (2002), “Corruption and Environment”, Management Systems International (MSI) and USAID: Washington, http://pdf.dec.org/pdf_docs/PNACT876.pdf (Erişim: 02.05.2011)
  • WORLD COMMISSION on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford Universty Pres, Oxfrod.
  • XING, Y. ve C., KOLSTAD (2002), “Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment?”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 21: 1-22.

ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YOZLAŞMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİR KESİT VERİ ANALİZİ

Year 2011, Issue: 30, 231 - 240, 20.06.2015

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 43 ülke verisinin yardımıyla, yozlaşma ile çevresel sürdürülebilirlik arasındaki ilişkiyi karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz etmektir. EKK yöntemiyle yapılan tahminlemeye göre yozlaşma ile çevresel sürdürülebilirlik arasında negatif yönlü ve anlamlı bir ilişki vardır. Araştırmada ayrıca Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisinin geçerli olup olmadığı da sınanmıştır. Buna göre, gelir ile çevresel sürdürülebilirlik arasındaki ters U şeklinde ilişki, yozlaşma değişkeni modele dahil edildiğinde anlamlılığını yitirmektedir

References

  • CARTER, T. S. (1997), “The failure of environmental regualiton in New York: the role of co-optation, corruption, and a co-operative enforcement approach”, Crime Law and Social Change, 26 (1): 27-52.
  • DAMANIA, R., P., G., FREDRIKSSON ve A., J., LIST (2003), “ Trade Liberalization , corruption, and environmental polcy formulation: theory and evidenve”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46 (3): 490-512.
  • DALY, H. E. (1993), “The Perils of Free Trade”, Scientific American, 269: 50-57.
  • DILLON, J., E., KARMA, A., FEIGHERY ve R., GARRET (2006), “Corruption & The Environment” http://www.transperancy.org.ru/ doc/Columbia_Universty_Workshop_May2006_0I000_184.pdf (Erişim: 30.04.2011).
  • DOIG, A. ve S., McIVOR (1999) “Corruption and its control in the developmental context: an analysis and selective review of the literature”, Third World Quarterly, 20(3): 657-676.
  • ER, Mevliyar (2008), “Corruption from the Islamic Perspective: Some Recommendations for the MENA Region”, International Journal and Middle Eastern Finance and Mangement, 1(1): 31-51.
  • FABER, D. (1992), “The Ecological Crisis of Latin America: A Theoretical Introduction”, Latin Amerikan Perspectives, 19 (1): 3-16.
  • FINNIE, Bruce W., Linda K., GIBSON, David E., MCNABB (2006), “Economic Development: Corruption, Complexity, Wealth, and aTriad of Strains”, Humanomics, 22(4): 185-204.
  • GENTRY, B. (1998), Private Capital Flows and the Environment: Lessons from Latin America, Edward Elgar Pres, UK.
  • GLOBAL LEADERS (2001), Pilot Environmental Sustainability Index, World Economic Forum 2001, Davos, İsviçre.
  • GROSSMAN, G. M. and A. B. KRUEGER (1995), “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112: 353-377.
  • GROSSMAN, G. M. and A. B. KRUEGER (1993), “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, (Editör: P. M. GARBER), The Mexico-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, MIT Pres, Cambridge, ss: 13-56.
  • GUJARATI, Damodar N. (2006), Temel Ekonometri, Şenesen, Ümit, Gülay Günlük, Şenesen (Çev), Literatür Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • HOFSTEDE, G. H. (1983), “National Cultures in Four Dimensions”, International Studies of Management and Organization, 13: 46-74.
  • KAYRAK, Musa (2008), “Evolving Challenges for Supreme Audit Institutions in Struggling with Corruption”, Journol of Financial Crime, 15(1): 60-70.
  • KOTLOBAY, A. (2002), “Illegal Logging in the Southern Part of the Russian Far East: Problem Analysis and Proposed Solution – A case study on experiences of Log Tracking and Chain of Custody Practices in Forestry and Forest Products in Russia”, WWF, Moscow, Russia. http://archive.panda.org/forests4life/downloads/Case_study_for_Russi a.rtf (Erişim: 02.05.2011).
  • LOPEZ, R. ve S., MITRA (2000), “ Corruption, pollution, and the Kuznets environment curve”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(2): 137-150.
  • MORSE, S. (2006), “Is corruption bad for environmental sustainability? A cross-national analysis”, Ecology and Society, 11(1): 1-22.
  • MUKHERJEE, S. ve D., CHAKRABORTY (2010), “Is Environmental Sustainability Influenced by Socioeconomic and Sociopolitical Factors? Cross-Country Empirical Evidence”, Sustainable Development, 1002: 502- 512.
  • PARK, H., Russell, CLIFFORD ve Junsoo, LEE (2007), “National Culture and Environmental Sustainability: A Cross-National Analysis”, Journal of Economics and Finance, 31(1): 104-121.
  • PELLEGRINI, L. ve R., GERLAGH (2006), “Corruption, Democracy, and Environmental Policy: An Empirical Contribution to the Debate”, The Journal of Environment & Development, 15(3): 332-354.
  • RANJAN, P. ve B., BAKSHI (2006), “Corruption, Environmental Resources, and Intarnational Trade”, Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, 6(1): 1-28.
  • ROBBINS, P. (2000), “The rotten institution: corruption in natural resource management”, Political Geography, 19(4): 423-443.
  • SHAHABUDDIN, Syed (2007), “Corruption and Its Economic and Business Implications”, The Business Review, 8(1): 305-314.
  • SHRIVASTAVA, P. (1995), “Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society”, Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 118-137.
  • STERN, D. I. ve M. S. COMMON (2001), “Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur?”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41: 162-178.
  • TANZI, Vito (1998), “Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures”, IMF Staff Papers, 45(4): 559-594.
  • VINOD, H. D. (1999), “Statistical Analysis of Corruption Data and Using The Internet to Reduce Corruption”, 9. Uluslararası Anti-Yozlaşma Konferansı, 10-15 Ekim, Durhan, Güney Africa, ss. 1-13.
  • WELSCH, H. (2004), “Corruption, Growth, and the Environment: A Cross-Country Analysis”, Environmental and Development Economics, 9(5): 663-693.
  • WINBOURNE, S. (2002), “Corruption and Environment”, Management Systems International (MSI) and USAID: Washington, http://pdf.dec.org/pdf_docs/PNACT876.pdf (Erişim: 02.05.2011)
  • WORLD COMMISSION on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford Universty Pres, Oxfrod.
  • XING, Y. ve C., KOLSTAD (2002), “Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment?”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 21: 1-22.
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Taner Güney This is me

İbrahim Bakırtaş This is me

Publication Date June 20, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2011 Issue: 30

Cite

APA Güney, T., & Bakırtaş, İ. (2015). ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YOZLAŞMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİR KESİT VERİ ANALİZİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(30), 231-240.
AMA Güney T, Bakırtaş İ. ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YOZLAŞMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİR KESİT VERİ ANALİZİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. June 2015;(30):231-240.
Chicago Güney, Taner, and İbrahim Bakırtaş. “ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YOZLAŞMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİR KESİT VERİ ANALİZİ”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 30 (June 2015): 231-40.
EndNote Güney T, Bakırtaş İ (June 1, 2015) ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YOZLAŞMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİR KESİT VERİ ANALİZİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 30 231–240.
IEEE T. Güney and İ. Bakırtaş, “ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YOZLAŞMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİR KESİT VERİ ANALİZİ”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 30, pp. 231–240, June 2015.
ISNAD Güney, Taner - Bakırtaş, İbrahim. “ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YOZLAŞMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİR KESİT VERİ ANALİZİ”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 30 (June 2015), 231-240.
JAMA Güney T, Bakırtaş İ. ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YOZLAŞMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİR KESİT VERİ ANALİZİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015;:231–240.
MLA Güney, Taner and İbrahim Bakırtaş. “ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YOZLAŞMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİR KESİT VERİ ANALİZİ”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 30, 2015, pp. 231-40.
Vancouver Güney T, Bakırtaş İ. ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE YOZLAŞMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİR KESİT VERİ ANALİZİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015(30):231-40.

Dergimiz EBSCOhost, ULAKBİM/Sosyal Bilimler Veri Tabanında, SOBİAD ve Türk Eğitim İndeksi'nde yer alan uluslararası hakemli bir dergidir.