Yapı Malzemelerinin Yaşam Döngü Değerlendirmesi: Literatür Taraması

Year 2020, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 210 - 219, 31.01.2020

Nuray Benli Yıldız , Hakan Arslan , Emrah Yılmaz

Abstract

Küresel ısınma ve kaynakların tükenmesi problemlerinin artması sebebiyle sürdürülebilir kalkınma politikaları sıklıkla gündeme gelmektedir. İnşaat sektörü ise ortaya çıkardığı yüksek çevresel yüklerle bu çalışmaların odaklarından biridir. Yapının ortaya çıkması sürecinde pek çok inşaat malzemesi, yöntemi ve aracı bir arada kullanılmaktadır. Bu girdilerin çevresel yüklerinin ortaya çıkartılabilmesi amacıyla Yaşam Döngü Değerlendirmesi (YDD) yöntemi geliştirilmiştir. YDD çalışmalarının sonucunda bileşenlerin veya süreçlerin çevreye verdiği yükler hesaplanabilmekte, kritik noktalar tespit edilebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada inşaat malzemelerinin sürdürülebilirlikleri ve YDD’lerinin Türkiye ve Dünya’daki kitaplar, lisans üstü tezler ve makaleler üzerinden kaynak incelemesi yapılmış ve tablo halinde özetlenmiştir.

Keywords

Yaşam Döngü Değerlendirmesi, Sürdürülebilir Yapı Malzemesi

Supporting Institution

Düzce Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi

Project Number

2014.09.04227

Life Cycle Assessment of Building Materials: Literature Rewiew

Abstract

Sustainable development policies are often on the agenda as global warming and resource depletion problems are increasing. The construction sector is one of the focal points of these studies with high environmental burdens. Many building materials, methods and tools are used together during the construction process. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method has been developed in order to determine the environmental load of these inputs. As a result of LCA studies, the load of components or processes on the environment can be calculated and critical points can be determined. In this study, the sustainability of construction materials have researched by books, post graduate theses and articles in Turkey and around the world and summarised with a table.

Keywords

Life Cycle Assessment, Sustainable Building Material

Project Number

2014.09.04227

References

• [1] H. Yan, Q. Shen, L. C. H. Fan, Y. Wang, and L. Zhang, “Greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: A case study of One Peking in Hong Kong”, Build. Environ., vol. 45, no 4, pp. 949–955, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.09.014
• [2] D. R. Vieira, J. L. Calmon, and F. Z. Coelho, “Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: A review”, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 124, pp. 656–666, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.125
• [3] G. N. Demirer, "Yaşam Döngüsü Analizi", Bölgesel Çevre Merkezi- REC Turkey, Ankara, Turkey, pp. 1-12, 2011. [Online] Available: https://rec.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/yda.pdf
• [4] F. Asdrubali, C. Baldassarri, and V. Fthenakis, “Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings”, Energy Build., vol. 64, no. 73–89, Sept. 2013.
• [5] M. Guo, "Materials and Methods" in Life cycle assessment (LCA) of Light-Weight Eco-composites, 1th ed., London, UK: Splinger, 2012, ch. 2, pp.63-102.
• [6] P. L. Bishop, " Life-Cycle Assessment" in Pollution Prevention: Fundamentals and practice, 1th. ed, Singapore, Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 2000 ch: 6, pp: 251-296.
• [7] Environmental management- Life cycle assessment- Principles and framework, ISO 14040, ,2006
• [8] K. Simonen, "Life Cycle Assessment Fundementals", Pocket Architect: Technic Design Series, Life Cycle Assessment, 1. ed, New York,USA: Routledge, 2014, ch.2, pp:14-34
• [9] S. Iousef et al."Impact of exterior convective heat transfer coefficient models on the energy demand prediction of buildings with different geometry".Build. Simul. vol. 12, pp.797–816, Feb. 2019, doi:10.1007/s12273-019-0531-7
• [10] A. Sandak, J. Sandak, M. Brzezicki, and A. Kutnar, “Portfolio of Bio-Based Façade Materials”, Bio-based Building Skin, Singapore Publishing Co., Singapore, 2019, pp. 155–177.
• [11] K. Kobeticova and R. Cerny, “Ecotoxicology of building materials: A critical review of recent studies”, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 165, pp. 500–508, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.161
• [12] G. Tuna Taygun, “Yapı ürünlerinin yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesine yönelik bir model önerisi”, M.S. thesis, Dept. Architecture, Yıldız Technic Univ., İstanbul, Turkey, 2005.
• [13] A. B. Gültekin, “Yaşam Döngü Değerlendirme Yöntemi kapsamında yapı ürünlerinin çevresel etkilerinin değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir model önerisi”, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Architecture, Gazi Univ., Ankara, Turkey 2006.
• [14] T. Esin, “A study regarding the environmental impact analysis of the building materials production process (in Turkey)”, Build. Environ., vol. 42, no 11, pp. 3860–3871, Nov. 2007.
• [15] T. Özçuhadar, “Sürdürülebilir çevre için enerji etkin tasarım yaşam döngüsü sürecinde incelenmesi”, M.S. thesis, Dept. Architecture, İstanbul Technical Univ., İstanbul, Turkey, 2007.
• [16] A. B. Çakmaklı, “Life cycle assessment of building materials in hotel refurbishment projects: a case study in Ankara”, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Architecture, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara, Turkey, 2007.
• [17] A. Sev," Sürdürülebilir malzeme" in Sürdürülebilir Mimarlık, 1th ed. İstanbul, Turkey: YEM Publishing, 2009, pp.30-45
• [18] F. T. Bayraktar, “Türkiye’de yapı malzemeleri yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesi için bir sistem önerisi”, M.S. thesis, Dept. Architecture, İstanbul Technical Univ., İstanbul, Turkey, 2010.
• [19] C. Bayer et. al., "Life cycle assessment: Introduction and terminology", Guide to Building Life Cycle Assessment in Practice, 1th ed., Washington, (DC), USA,: American Institute of Architects, 2010: ch.1, sec. 4-6, pp:46-56 [20] G. Ölmez, “Comparison of sub-processes and final products of iron and steel production with life cycle assessment”, M.S. thesis, Dept. Environmental Eng., METU, Ankara, Turkey, 2011.
• [21] N. Rajagopalan, “Residential life cycle assessment modeling for green buildings and building products”, M.S. thesis, Dept. Civil Engineering, Univ. Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA, 2011.
• [22] D. Üçer, “Life cycle assessment of masonry wall types using simulation technique”, M.S. thesis, Dept. Architecture, METU, Ankara, Turkey, 2012.
• [23] İ. Kahraman, “A sustainable building assessment model proposal for new residentıal a sustainable building in Turkey”, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Architecture, Dokuz Eylül Univ., İzmir, Turkey, 2013.
• [24] Ç. Yiğit, “Life cycle assessment in ferrous foundry industry”, M.S. thesis, Dept. Environmental Eng., METU, Ankara, Turkey, 2013.
• [25] A. P. Gursel, E. Masanet, A. Horvath, and A. Stadel, “Cement & Concrete Composites Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review”, Cem. Concr. Compos., no. 51, pp. 38–48, Aug. 2014.
• [26] A. Petek Gürsel, “Life-cycle assessment of concrete: decision-support tool and case study application”, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Civil and Environmental Eng., Univ. California, California, USA, 2014.
• [27] S. Karaman Öztaş, “Türk Yapı Malzemesi sektörü için yaşam döngüsü etki değerlendirmesine yönelik bir model önerisi”, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Architecture, İstanbul Technical Univ., İstanbul, Turkey, 2014.
• [28] M. Barecka, I. Zbiciński, and D. Heim, "Life Cycle Assessment of zero- emission façade construction" in Sustainable Built Environment, (Barcelona, Spain) 14, Oct. 28-30, 2014, vol.5, pp. 137-144
• [29] D.M. Souza et. al., “Comparative life cycle assessment of ceramic versus concrete roof tiles in the Brazilian context”, J. Clean. Prod., no 89, pp. 165–173, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.029
• [30] K. E. Seto, “Life cycle assessment and environmental efficiency of concrete materials”, M.S. thesis, Dept. Civil Eng., Univ. Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 2015.
• [31] A. Ferrandez-García, V. Ibanez-Fores, and M.D. Bovea, “Eco-efficiency analysis of the life cycle of interior partition walls : a comparison of alternative solutions”, J. Clean. Prod. J., no. 112, pp. 649–665, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.136
• [32] K. Kobeticova and R. Cerny, " Ecotoxicology of building materials: A critical review of recent studies", J. of Clean. Prod., vol. 165 pp. 500-508, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.161
• [33] N. Benli Yıldız, “Cam elyaf takviyeli beton (GFRC) cephe panelleri için yaşam döngü değerlendirmesi (LCA) yöntemiyle bir sürdürülebilirlik çerçevesi geliştirilmesi”, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Composite Material Technologies, Duzce Univ., Duzce, Turkey, 2017.
• [34] A. Bideci, H. Öztürk, Ö. Sallı Bideci, and M. Emiroğlu, “Fracture energy and mechanical characteristics of self-compacting concretes including waste bladder tyre” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 149, pp.669–678, sept. 2017
• [35] C. Ingrao, A. Messineo, R. Beltramo, T. Yigitcanlar, and G. Ioppolo, “How can life cycle thinking support sustainability of buildings? Investigating life cycle assessment applications for energy efficiency and environmental performance”, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 201, pp. 556–569, Nov. 2018.
• [36] E. Yılmaz, H. Arslan, and A. Bideci, “Environmental performance analysis of insulated composite facade panels using life cycle assessment (LCA)”, Constr. Build. Mater. J., vol. 202, pp. 806–813, Mar. 2019.
• [37] E. Yılmaz, “Kompozit inşaat malzemelerinin çevresel sürdürülebilirliğine yönelik bir çerçeve”, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Composite Material Technologies, Duzce Univ., Duzce, Turkey, 2018.
• [38] D. K. Panesar, D. Kanraj, and Y. Abualrous “Effect of transportation of fly ash: Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of concrete”, Cement and Concrete Composites J., vol: 99 pp.214–224, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.03.019