<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>erlr</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">2651-494X</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2791-6502</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Erzincan Binali Yildirim University</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id/>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Law in Context</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Hukuk</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>ALMAN CEZA HUKUKUNDA BİR EMNİYET TEDBİRİ TÜRÜ OLARAK GÜVENLİK AMAÇLI MÜŞAHADE ALTINDA TUTMA</article-title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
                                    <trans-title>INCAPACITATION ORDER AS ONE OF THE MEASURES OF CORRECTION AND PREVENTION IN GERMAN CRIMINAL LAW</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Yaşar</surname>
                                    <given-names>Ercan</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>ERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HUKUK FAKÜLTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20181201">
                    <day>12</day>
                    <month>01</month>
                    <year>2018</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>XXII</volume>
                                        <issue>3-4</issue>
                                        <fpage>263</fpage>
                                        <lpage>288</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20181106">
                        <day>11</day>
                        <month>06</month>
                        <year>2018</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20181214">
                        <day>12</day>
                        <month>14</month>
                        <year>2018</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2002, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2002</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>Alman Ceza Kanunu da Türk Ceza Kanunu’nda olduğu gibi yaptırım olarak cezaların yanı sıra güvenlik (emniyet) tedbirlerine de yer vermiştir. Bu güvenlik tedbirlerinden biri de Türk Ceza Kanunu’nda benzeri olmayan güvenlik amaçlı müşahede altında tutma (Sicherungsverwahrung) tedbiridir. Bu çalışma ile söz konusu güvenlik tedbiri kurumunun ortaya çıkma sürecine değinilip şartlarının neler olduğu ortaya konulacaktır. Son olarak mevcut Alman ceza hukuku sisteminde izlenen suç teorileri ve suç politikaları ile bu kurumun ne derece bağdaştığı (meşruiyeti) ve en nihayetinde Türk ceza hukuku sistemi bağlamında böylesi bir güvenlik tedbirinin gerekli olup olmadığı üzerinde durulacaktır.</p></abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
                            <p>As the Turkish criminal law the German criminal law has also measures of correction and prevention (Maßregel der Besserung und Sicherung). But unlike the Turkish criminal law the German criminal law enacted the post-sentence preventive detention (Sicherungsverwahrung) as one of those measures of correction and prevention. The main goal of this article is firstly to illustrate the historical development of this law-institute and to describe the conditions of its applications for lawsuits and also whether the Turkish criminal law system needs such an institution in order to reach its preventive aim and preserve the public against habitual and/or dangerous offenders. Hereinafter the compatibility of a such institution with current German law system is going to be discussed, which is having a prevention policy to preserve but on the other hand the principles of sentencing, which requires adequate sentencing based of the guilt of the offenders.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Güvenlik amaçlı müşahede altında tutma</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Güvenlik tedbirleri</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Sicherungsverwahrung</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Alman ceza hukuku</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                        
                                                                            <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
                                                    <kwd>İncapacitation order</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Measures of correction and
prevention</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  German criminal law</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  İncapacitation order</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Measures of correction and prevention</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  German criminal law</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                            </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Artuk, Mehmet Emin, Güvenlik Tedbirleri, in Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi, C. XII, 2008, s. 461 – 492</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Artuk, Mehmet Emin / Gökçen, Ahmet, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 12. Bası, Adalet Yayınevi Ankara 2018</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Centel, Nur/Zafer, Hamide/Çakmut, Özlem, Türk Ceza Hukukuna Giriş, 5. Bası, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul 2008</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dessecker, Axel, Geschichte und Symbolik der Sicherungsverwahrung, in Sozialwissenschaften und Berufspraxis (SuB), 38/2015, Cilt 1, S. 49-62</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gropp, Walter, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 3. Bası, Springer Yayınları, Berlin 2005</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hanack, Ernst-Walter, in StGB Leipziger Kommentar, 11. Auflage. Hrsg. Von Jähnke/Laufhütte/Odersky: Alman Ceza Kanunu Leipzig Şerhi, 11. Bası. De Gruyter, Berlin 2006</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Heinrich, Bernd, Ceza Hukuku Genel Kısım I, Editör Yener Ünver, 1. Bası, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara 2014</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hoffmann, Miriam, Gefährliche Straftäter zwischen Schuld(un)fähigkeit und psychischer Störung, in 2012 Freilaw, Freiburg Law Sutendts J. 1 (2012), S. 1-2</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Janssen, Bernhard, Probleme der Strafzumessung bei Rückfalltätern, in Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 1991, (Heft) Sayı 2, S. 52 - 54</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kinzig, Jörg, Preventive Measures for Dangerous Recidivists, in European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Vol 5, 1997, S. 27 — 57</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Krahl, Matthias, Zum Verhältnis von Strafrecht und Maßregelrecht am Beispiel der Sicherungsverwahrung, in KritV, Vol 92, No 3(2009), S. 310—322</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">v. Liszt, Franz, Der Zweckgedanke im Strafrecht (1882), in Strafrechtliche Aufsaetze und Vortraege, Erster Band, 1875 – 1891, von Dr. Franz von Liszt, S. 19 – 53</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Maden, Mehmet, Hapis Cezasına Seçenek Yaptırımlar, Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara 2012</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Naucke, Wolfgang Die robuste Tradition des Sicherheitsstrafrechts, KritV, vol 93, no 2 (2010), S. 129—136</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özbek, Veli Özer/Bacaksız, Pınar, TCK İzmir Şerhi, Türk Ceza Kanununun Anlamı, 4. Bası, Cilt 1, Ankara 2010</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özbek, Veli Özer/Doğan, Koray/Bacaksız, Pınar/Tepe, İlker, Türk Ceza Hukuku, Genel Hükümler, 9. Baskı, Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara 2018</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özgenç, İzzet, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 13. Bası, Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara 2017</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rosenau, Henning Jakobs’un Düşman Ceza Hukuku Kavramı, Çev. Temel, Erhan, in AÜHFD 2008, Cilt 57, Sayı 4, S. 391 — 402</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Stratenwerth, Günter, Der Schuldbegriff und das Schuldprinzip / Willensfreiheit – eine staatnotwendige Fiktion? in Beitraege zu Grundfragen eines zietgemaessen Strafrechts, 2017, S. 211 — 238</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Susamcı, Emre, Sicherungsverwahrung aus hegelianischer Perspektive, in Freilaw 2013 / 1, S. 1 – 4</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ullenbruch, Thomas, Verschaerfung der Sicherungsverwahrung auch rückwirkend – populaer aber verfassungswidrig? in NStZ 1998, 326 - 330</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Üzülmez, İlhan, Türk Hukukunda Tekerrür, Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. 10, Sayı 1-2, Yıl 2002, S. 165—186</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yaşar, Ercan, Das Gesetzlichkeitsprinzip, Eine rechtsvergleichende Darstellung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des deutschen und türkischen Rechts, Kovaç Yayınevi, Hamburg 2018</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
